mercedes-benz eqe-class Full OverviewThe 2023 Mercedes-AMG EQE isn't the first all-electric car from AMG. That honor goes to the wild gullwing SLS AMG Electric Drive coupe unveiled at the 2012 Paris Show. Now a largely forgotten curio, the SLS AMG Electric Drive was at the time the most powerful AMG production car ever built, boasting 740 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque, courtesy of four e-motors powered by a 60 kWh lithium-ion battery. Only nine were said to have been produced.The AMG EQE also follows in the wheel tracks of the larger, plusher AMG EQS sedan we drove late in 2021. But it's perhaps the most important AMG electric car so far, not the least of which because it will be the most affordable AMG electric car so far. Though U.S. pricing has yet to be finalized, back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest the AMG EQE should retail for about the same money as a Tesla Model S Dual Motor.Though two versions of the AMG EQE are offered in Europe—the 470-hp EQE 43 4Matic and the 617-hp EQE 53 4Matic+—the U.S. will only get the latter, and it will simply be badged Mercedes-AMG EQE.And in case you're wondering, there isn't an EQE 63 waiting in the wings. Well, not yet anyway: AMG engineers confirm the AMG EQE we're getting is the most powerful variant they will build on the Mercedes-Benz EVA2 electric vehicle platform that underpins the regular EQE and EQS sedans. Truly tarmac-melting AMG electric cars will be built on a new, dedicated performance EV platform currently under development in Affalterbach.That's not to say the AMG EQE is slow. Far from it. But first, the tech highlights.AMG EQE Power and TorqueThe dual-motor AMG EQE has a 221-hp e-motor driving the front wheels and a 396-hp e-motor powering the rears, the pair delivering a total system output of 617 hp and 701 lb-ft of torque. That's almost twice the power—and nearly twice the torque—of the entry-level, rear-drive EQE 350+. And in cars fitted with the optional AMG Dynamic Plus package the boost mode function unleashes 677 hp and 738 lb-ft.The AMG-specific permanently excited synchronous e-motors feature improved cooling to allow repeated acceleration without performance degradation, and unique windings with thicker wires that carry higher currents with greater stability, enabling higher motor rpm and increased power. The rear e-motor is a six phase design rather than the normal three phase, to further increase its power output.The five drive modes—Slippery, Comfort, Sport, Sport+, and Individual—not only change the AMG EQE's chassis settings, but also significantly vary the powertrain output. Slippery mode restricts the powertrain to 308hp, Comfort to 493 hp, and Sport to 555 hp. Only in Sport+ are you able to access the full 617hp or more.The e-motors are fed by a 90.6-kWh battery pack that AMG says will deliver from 275 miles to 321 miles of range on the WLTP test cycle. That suggests a range of somewhere between 210 miles and 240 miles on the tougher EPA test.Chassis upgrades include AMG-specific wheel carriers, suspension links and stiffer stabilizer bars. The bushes between the body shell and rear axle subframe are 50 percent stiffer than those of the regular EQE, and the AMG Ride Control+ air suspension has unique mapping for the spring and shock rates. The system will instantly lower the ride height by six-tenths of an inch in Sport and Sport+ modes and keep it there; in Comfort mode that only happens when you hit 78 mph. Drop down to 50 mph, and the car will raise itself back to its standard ride height.Rear-wheel steering is standard, the wheels turning up to 3.6 degrees in the opposite direction to the fronts at speeds up to 37 mph to improve low speed maneuverability and agility, and in the same direction as the fronts at higher speeds to increase stability.Though the AMG EQE will recoup up to 260 kilowatts with the regen system set in its most aggressive mode, AMG's high performance steel brake setup is standard, with 16.3-inch rotors and six piston calipers on the front axle, and 14.9-inch units with single piston calipers at the rear. Carbon ceramic brakes are available as an option, but only with the optional 21-inch wheels. Standard wheels are 20-inch. Despite their aggressive styling, all the wheels have been carefully designed to reduce aerodynamic drag.The EQE Has Digital Sound Effects—If You Want ThemAMG engineers claim the EQE is only marginally less slippery than the regular model, despite its wider tires and more aggressively styled front and rear fascias. That contributes to one of the car's standout characteristics—its quietude, especially at freeway cruising speeds. But for a brand that's long been celebrated for powertrains that when you mash the gas pedal assault your ears like you're in the mosh pit at an AC/DC concert, that's potentially an existential problem.AMG's solution has been to create special electronic soundscapes that play through the audio speakers when you select either Sport or Sport+ drive modes. It may be a generational thing— gamers who've spent years listening to digital effects might think they're cool—but to our ears in Sport mode at full acceleration it sounded like an Airbus A380 on takeoff, while the Sport+ mode soundscape sounded as if Captain Kirk had just ordered the Enterprise to warp speed.Fortunately, you can switch the fancy effects off, either by accessing the menu on the center touch screen or using the shortcut on the steering wheel. Embrace the relative silence, and you'll start noticing subtle aural cues that are usually drowned by the raucous mayhem of combustion and mechanics; things like changes in tire noise as you approach the limits of adhesion through corners or under brakes, for example.Our test car was fitted with the optional Dynamic Plus package, which meant it had the full-strength, high-caffeine 677-hp, 738-lb-ft powertrain. Worth the extra money? Let's just say the way it delivers is right on brand.This EQE Is Definitely An AMGThe acceleration in Sport+ mode is neck-snapping, more instantly ferocious, more gut-punchingly violent, than in any internal combustion engine AMG car. Mat the accelerator and the AMG EQE launches like a fighter jet catapulted off an aircraft carrier. The traction is astonishing, and while the AMG EQE is limited to a mere—by AMG standards—137 mph (149 mph in Dynamic Plus-equipped cars) it gets there riding an endless torrent of weapons grade thrust. Like Porsche's Taycan, it has top end response few other EVs can match.AMG claims a 0-60 mph acceleration time of 3.2 seconds for Dynamic Plus-equipped cars, and 3.4 seconds for standard AMG EQEs. That's impressive, especially for a car that's claimed to weigh about 5,500 pounds. For context, Tesla claims its 670-hp Model S Dual Motor, which it says weighs about 1,000-pounds less than the Mercedes, is only 0.1 to 0.3 seconds quicker to 60 mph.Even more impressive, perhaps, is the chassis. While the regular EQE can feel a little floaty and detached when pushed, the AMG EQE remains resolutely planted, even when hammered over bumpy, tight, and twisting roads. The body control is excellent, and even in Sport+ mode there's a syrupy coating to the ride you rarely feel in an AMG car.Our test car was on the optional 21-inch wheels, with 265/35 Michelin Pilot Sport EV tires up front and 295/30 items at the rear, but in Comfort mode at slow speeds, the AMG EQE still rode more like a modern luxury sport sedan on low profile tires than a hair-on-fire muscle car, the impacts from potholes and random road acne well suppressed.Astounding Power and One-Pedal DrivingIt doesn't exactly shrink around you, the AMG EQE, though. It's still a big, very heavy sedan, and the high cowl and cab-forward stance means you can't see its front corners from the driver's seat, which makes it difficult to place on tight, narrow roads. But once you get a sense of its physicality, you can push it as hard and fast along any canyon road as any AMG sedan, exploiting the confidence of the chassis to make the most of its astounding instant-on power and torque.There's not much nuance to the weighty steering, though the front axle responds as soon as you pull the wheel off center, and the rear steer system helps snap the Mercedes into the tighter, slower corners.The asymmetric powertrain means that there's a bias to the rear axle when you go to power. Under full acceleration, 64 percent of the torque goes to the rear wheels and 36 percent to the front, and you can feel the front wheels helping pull the car out of a corner as the rears punch it hard past the apex.You can switch between three levels of lift-off regen using the paddles either side of the steering wheel. High regen allows almost one-pedal driving around town, while normal gives a similar lift-off effect to an internal combustion engine car with an automatic transmission. You can also switch regen off completely and allow the AMG EQE to coast.The coast setting is great for freeway driving, as it allows the car to make the most of its available kinetic energy, especially on long downhill stretches or with a tail wind. Normal is the best all-round setting for when you're hustling along a fun road, as it induces the gentle lift-off weight transfer to the front axle that's often so useful when setting up a car for a corner.AMG engineers say the regenerative braking system will recoup up to 260 kilowatts in the highest setting. We saw a peak of 171 kilowatts recouped in the normal mode while pushing the AMG EQE down a quiet mountain road, on a run that gave the brakes a real workout.The brake-by-wire system felt more natural than in the regular EQE, the transition between regenerative and mechanical braking almost seamless. As the steel rotors got hot, however, the pedal became longer in travel and a little less linear in feel. Not that the braking performance seemed affected; we could still get right to the point of ABS intervention on the inside front wheel on the entry to some of the tighter, dropaway turns.The AMG EQE's mass means you can't toss it around like a sports car, but if you're smooth and tidy with your inputs, it will cover ground with imperious, ground-crushing pace. And when you're not chasing ultimate pace, the AMG EQE is an oasis of grace.High Style and HyperscreenThe low noise levels, good rolling ride, and comfortable seats make it a superb highway cruiser. With the silly fake powertrain noises switched off, you can enjoy your favorite sounds on the excellent Burmester audio system, have a quiet conversation with your passengers, or just admire the scenery and enjoy the sunshine through the standard panorama roof.Like all modern Mercedes, you'll need to spend time hunting and pecking around the vast MBUX interface to find the settings and shortcuts you want, but at least you can turn off the annoying stuff like lane keep assist and tweak the powertrain and suspension settings independently, even within the main drive modes. Our cars were all fitted with the optional Hyperscreen that hides three smaller screens behind a dramatic sweep of glass across the dash.It's a fingerprint magnet, the Hyperscreen, but the third screen allows the front seat passenger to access all manner of menus, including the cool AMG-specific ones that show how hard the driver is working the car.The AMG EQE might be a new sort of AMG performance car, but the interior ambience—the sports seats and contrast stitching, the steering wheel with the control pods under the horizontal spokes and aluminum paddles behind it—as well as the exterior detailing—the more aggressive front and rear fascias, the big wheels, the wing on the trunk lid—is all familiar fare from the folks at Affalterbach.The chrome bars on the AMG EQE's 'grille' might seem a pointless affectation, but in truth they give the front end a distinctive visual signature that can be hard to achieve in an EV. But you'll just have to accept that this is an AMG car that won't have four bazooka-caliber exhausts peeking out from under the rear bumper.Which E AMG?AMG EQE versus AMG E 63 S? The E 63 S has the better power-to-weight ratio, packing 603 hp in a car that's 1,000-pounds lighter than the AMG EQE, and sizzling top end bite. But the electric AMG car punches harder out of corners, and accelerates in an irresistible rush that's uninterrupted by the need to change gears.The E 63 S's lighter weight, which makes it easier on brakes and tires, wieldier on the change of direction, and delivers higher steady-state grip, would ultimately give it the edge. But in terms of ultimate on-road pace on anything but an unlimited autobahn, there's probably not much between the two.Yes, the smooth and quiet AMG EQE is that quick, an electric car that delivers performance and handling that—like the most iconic AMG cars—simply bludgeons any road into submission. But it's not a hammer. It's a whispering assassin.Looks good! More details?2023 Mercedes-AMG EQE Specifications PRICE $100,000 (MT est) LAYOUT Front- and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 2 permanent-magnet-type electric, 617-677-hp/701-738-l-ft (comb) TRANSMISSION 1-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 5,500lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 126.4i n L x W x H 196.6 x 64.3 x 59.5 in 0-60 MPH 3.2 - 3.4 sec (mfr) EPA FUEL ECON, CITY/HWY/COMB N/A ENERGY CONSUMPTION, CITY/HWY N/A CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB N/A ON SALE Late 2022 Show All
acura nsx Full OverviewProsThe most satisfying modern NSX, Engine pulls hard, Strong lateral grip. ConsIt's dying just as it gets good, Needs a price-appropriate interior, Lacks ultimate steering feel. For decades, General Motors was notorious among its own loyalists for underfunding and underdeveloping a promising new car, expressing shock when initial sales excitement evaporated, reluctantly spending the money it should have in the first place to make the car as good as it should have been from the start, wondering why sales didn't rebound despite the tarnished reputation, then canceling the car once that it was finally good (see: Pontiac Fiero). Acura's parent company, Honda, has collaborated with GM in the past and continues to collaborate with GM today, and this is one tradition it shouldn't adopt. Case in point: the 2022 Acura NSX Type S. Not to put too fine a point on it, but the Type S is what the NSX should've been from day one. The reborn NSX held such promise, and Acura engineers benchmarked the right cars. Their insistence in thinking like Honda engineers, though, and worrying about how practical their mid-engine supercar was and how it drove in Ohio winters, compromised its final form. They studied the Ferrari 458 Italia but built a car that didn't drive anywhere near as well or as viscerally.The limited-edition Type S makes great strides toward righting that wrong. It's far more engaging to drive than any NSX before it. Much of the feel and feedback missing from the standard car has finally broken through in the Type S.Test Numbers Trail Regular NSX'sUnfortunately, it seems to have come at the cost of some performance. Despite driving better than any other NSX we've tested, the Type S is also the slowest NSX we've ever tested. At 3.4 seconds to 60 mph, it's 0.4 second behind the quickest we've evaluated, and it doesn't get any better by the quarter-mile mark. To get there, the Type S needs 11.6 seconds, and it's traveling at 120.7 mph by the finish line, 0.4 second and 3.3 mph slower than the quickest one. It's not down to a bad launch, either, because the Type S is 0.2 second slower accelerating from 45 mph to 65 mph than the quickest NSX we've tested. This despite the Type S being the most powerful NSX ever at 600 hp and 492 lb-ft, 27 hp and 16 lb-ft more than any other.It's worth saying, though, that the NSX Type S experience is delightful. The engine revs very quickly and has a broad powerband thanks to the pancake electric motor mounted between the engine and transmission. It pulls hard all the way to redline, and the transmission, in Track mode, won't upshift until you've actually reached the redline, so you get every last pony. It's also happy to not upshift and let the engine wind back down if you lift off the throttle, helpful on a twisty road with short straights between tight corners. And despite all the electrification, the powertrain even manages to sound pretty good for a V-6. The engine noise is surprisingly melodious, and the turbo flutter is icing on the cake.Back to the instrumented testing results, it wasn't any better going the other way. Stopping the Type S from 60 mph required 103 feet, a massive 8 feet longer than the best one we've tested. On a mountain road, that translated to several instances of standing on the brakes and not getting the stopping power a 600-hp car ought to have. Making the experience somehow worse, the squishy, spongy brake pedal response provides no feedback. Better brakes would let this car go down the road considerably faster.There is a bright spot in the Type S' numbers, and it's shining on the handling results. Pulling 1.03 average lateral g on the skidpad ties it with the stickiest NSX, as does its 23.2-second figure-eight lap time, though the 0.89 average g it pulled on in the figure eight was 0.03 g off the leader.And you know what? We're OK with all of that. We're willing to give up a tenth here and two tenths there for a car that drives better. Still, this should've been the starting point six years ago, not the swan song.You do still have to drive it like an NSX, though. To get the most out of this powertrain, you need to treat it the way your high-performance driving instructor told you not to. Brake early, point it at the apex, and then get back on the power as soon as possible. Before the apex if you can. Normally, this delivers guaranteed understeer, but in the NSX, the front motors go to work, the nose bites, and it pulls you through the corner while accelerating hard. You can actually correct understeer by going to the power. Once you figure this out, the car becomes far more impressive than it is when driving it like a typical all-wheel-drive car.Tips For the Next One (Which Isn't Coming)Were this car to get the next generation it deserves, there are a few other components that could be further improved, as well. Body control, for one. The Type S is stiff, which is fine, but it lacks compliance. It's bouncing around way too much on bumpy pavement, making you constantly chase it with the steering or back out of throttle. It's especially bad in big brake zones where the car starts shimmying around in its lane. It's all manageable, but it shouldn't have to be managed. Tie it down, and, again, the car could go down the road noticeably faster.The steering is better than before, but it could be even better still. In this case, it's not so much holding the car back as it isn't making it better. It's very precise, but it lacks feel. Other companies have figured out how to get steering feel out of a car with electric motors powering the front axle, and Acura could, too.Then, of course, there's the interior. It was never up to snuff, and it still isn't because it hasn't changed. It looks like an Acura interior, and Acura doesn't make $200,000 interiors. A next-generation car would need a complete interior redo with much less plastic, a much more expressive design, and for the love of all that's holy, a modern infotainment system with a volume knob. You can't put Civic parts or even TLX parts in a car priced nearly on par with an entry-level Ferrari.Hopefully, Acura will get all those details right when the NSX returns as an EV in the future—as it's promised to, after a hiatus—but this still feels like a missed opportunity for the high-performance hybrid iteration of the car. The Type S proves the current NSX formula wasn't fundamentally flawed—it was just unfinished. It's a shame this car missed the mark so widely that its sales can't support a second generation of this model to finish the job. If the NSX Type S is any indication, it could've been great. Instead, Acura is pulling a GM and canceling it just as it started to get right. Everyone loses.Looks good! More details?2022 Acura NSX Type S Specifications BASE PRICE $171,495 PRICE AS TESTED $185,995 VEHICLE LAYOUT Mid-engine, 2 front and 1 rear motors, AWD, 2-pass, 2-door hatchback ENGINE, MOTOR Twin-turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 24-valve 60-degree V-6, plus 3 permanent-magnet electric motors POWER (SAE NET) 520 hp @ 6,500 rpm (gas), 72 hp (comb front elec), 47 hp (rear elec); 600 hp (comb) TORQUE (SAE NET) 443 lb-ft @ 2,300 rpm (gas), 108 lb-ft (comb front elec), 109 lb-ft (rear elec); 492 lb-ft (comb) TRANSMISSIONS 1-speed auto (fr), 9-speed twin-clutch auto (rr) CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,903 lb (42/58%) WHEELBASE 103.5 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 178.5 x 76.3 x 47.8 in 0-60 MPH 3.4 sec QUARTER MILE 11.6 sec @ 120.7 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 103 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.03 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.2 sec @ 0.89 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 21/22/21 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 328 miles ON SALE Now Show All
toyota corolla-hybrid Full OverviewWith gas prices taking a bigger bite than ever out of everyone's wallets, suddenly an ultra-efficient car like the Toyota Corolla Hybrid is having a moment. Yearning for an SUV or anything "cooler?" Just think about all you could do with the cash you save at the pump. We figured the time is ripe for our first check-in with the fuel-sipping sedan since its debut, even before the revised 2023 version arrives later this year with a new touchscreen, upgraded safety features, a new hybrid battery, and optional all-wheel drive.Why It's ImportantThe 2022 Toyota Corolla Hybrid is a rolling shrine to affordability in a time of grotesque price inflation. How does 52 mpg and a $25,075 price tag sound? In 2022, that's practically talking dirty to any weary car shopper who's facing $5/gallon gas and average new-car transaction prices pushing $50,000.To recap, the Toyota Corolla Hybrid is cheaper than a Prius and the more stylish Hyundai Elantra hybrid, though not quite as efficient. It trades the regular the Corolla's 1.8-liter gasoline engine for a hybridized version assisted by dual electric motors. This 121-hp, 105-lb-ft powertrain (including its continuously variable automatic transmission) is pulled directly out of and nails the same 52-mpg combined rating as the base Prius. You might notice the hubcapped lightweight aluminum wheels and hybrid badges, though the smaller 11.4-gallon fuel tank (regular Corollas get 13.4-gallon tanks) and 600-volt lithium-ion battery stuffed under the rear seat are well hidden.Pros: What We LikeWe mentioned the 52 mpg, right? During the course of 200 miles of tooling around Dallas for a week, we easily achieved that figure, which theoretically delivers nearly 600 miles of range per fill-up. We drove the 2022 Toyota Corolla Hybrid normally, too, squirting in and out of traffic like we needed to get someplace; oh, and there was a heatwave, so we blasted the A/C to combat average daytime temps hovering past 100 degrees. In other words, we didn't "hypermile" the Corolla Hybrid by treating its gas pedal like an eggshell, coasting more than a mile to a stop, or sweating without A/C. Nor does the Toyota make pained noises when you demand everyday acceleration from it. Credit the hybrid's seemingly substantial ability to drive around under electric power alone. Even at higher speeds, the engine will wink off and you can even (gently) accelerate on electrons alone. There's an electric-drive mode, too, though it only delivers about a mile of EV-only travel at a time, and at slower speeds.The powertrain is smooth and mostly quiet, with the engine note picking up only when you mat the throttle. While objectively slow—our most recent test data says it needs more than 10 seconds to reach 60 mph—the Toyota feels adequately powered. Select the "PWR" mode, and engine revs stay higher, and it almost feels punchy up to about 40 mph. Avoid the Eco mode, as it dulls most inputs and reminds you of just how leisurely this sedan's performance really is.This is no penalty box, either. With its relatively small-diameter wheels (15-inchers!) and soft suspension tuning, the 2022 Toyota Corolla Hybrid rolls quietly and smoothly over even the worst city streets. An 8.0-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, automatic single-zone climate control, a mostly digital gauge cluster, LED headlights, adaptive cruise control, and lane-keep assist are standard. An optional package adds blind-spot monitoring for $500, and a Premium package throws some leather on the steering-wheel rim, replaces the cloth seat upholstery with eco-friendly faux leather, and adds front-seat heaters. The trunk is big and has a nicely shaped opening, and even offers a pass-through to the cabin.Cons: What We Don't LikeThree years into its lifespan, the Toyota Corolla is neither as nicely appointed nor well-packaged as the Honda Civic. Interior materials are just OK, the rear seat is tighter, and storage throughout the interior is lacking. The center console has only a single cubby buried under the dash that can't fit a regular-sized iPhone, and the armrest cubby is tiny. Rear passengers do without air vents, USB ports, or door pockets that can hold anything of note. There is at least a fold-down center rear armrest with two cupholders.Other complaints include the fuzzy graphics on the touchscreen—soon to be addressed with the sharp new Toyota Multimedia Audio system on the 2023 model—and the doughy handling. Between the soft suspension and hard, fuel-economy-biased tires, the Corolla rolls more than is typical for a compact sedan and can require corrections at the wheel when it meets bumps while turning or sailing up an off-ramp. Also, yes, if you're the sort of driver that shoots for gaps in traffic or regularly drag races others from stoplights, the Hybrid is not quick, something also being addressed on the newer model next year.The Bottom LineThe 2022 Toyota Corolla Hybrid is the right car for the times, and it's better-looking than a Prius. But wait for the 2023 model if you want some of its flaws ironed out.Looks good! More details?2022 Toyota Corolla Hybrid 2022 Toyota Corolla Hybrid BASE PRICE $25,075 LAYOUT Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 1.8L/121-hp/105-lb-ft Atkinson-cycle DOHC 16-valve I-4, plus 71-hp/105-lb-ft electric motor; 121 hp/105 lb-ft comb TRANSMISSION CVT CURB WEIGHT 2,900 lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 106.3 in L x W x H 182.3 x 70.1 x 56.5 in 0-60 MPH 10.3 sec (MT est) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 53/52/53 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 600 miles ON SALE Now Show All
Whereas there's plenty of hubbub around the V-8-equipped $80,000 Jeep Wrangler 392 and how Jeep finally has stiff competition in the Ford Bronco, there's much less chatter surrounding the other Wranglers. The bulk of the auto market may gravitate toward decked-out variants, but there's still a place for base trims. You know, the ones that cost $30,000 and form the foundation upon which the upper-echelon trims are built. There are still stubborn Jeep guys who just want a Wrangler—just not a Wrangler weighed down with every option. Luckily, Jeep provideth.Consider this: You can theoretically buy—good luck finding one in real life, though—a brand-new two-door 2022 Jeep Wrangler Sport for $29,995 that comes standard with Uconnect 3 with an itty-bitty 5.0-inch touchscreen display and no air conditioning. Even the next trim, Willys Sport, can be had with no air conditioning. (We actually know a guy who opted for a brand-new Wrangler devoid of A/C. Absolute hero! Or just young and broke.) Luckily, you can choose to be frosty. There is the option to upgrade to Uconnect 4 with a respectable 7.0-inch touchscreen. This $1,395 option on the configurator also gets you air conditioning.Fast-forward to model year 2023, and Jeep has implemented some changes to its bare-bones, base-trim, two-door 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport—while only raising the MSRP by $300 to $30,295. For better or worse, it's still base, but a little less base. Uconnect 4 with the 7.0-inch touchscreen is standard, and Uconnect 3 with the 5.0-inch touchscreen officially dies. That means standard air conditioning; all Wranglers great and small have standard air conditioning for 2023. For those who hate the idea of A/C, crank down that manual window and leave the A/C off. Don't panic—2023 Wrangler Sports retain standard manual door locks, manual windows, and a manual transmission behind the 3.6-liter V-6. Luckily, even the 2023 Wrangler Sport still gets the Smoker's Group option, complete with a removable ash tray and a cigar lighter.Although the two-door 2022 Wrangler Sport still comes standard with the smaller screen and no A/C, that's not the case with the four-door Unlimited configuration of the same year; it made the switch to the better Uconnect, screen, and A/C for 2022. Bottom line: Doors matter.More broadly, the 2023 Jeep Wrangler drops three trims (Sport Altitude, Sahara Altitude, and High Tide) and a few colors (Snazberry and Gobi)—but there's plenty of time for Jeep to garnish its 2023 fleet with more new trims and colors. Pricing remains pretty stable, with the four-door Sahara seeing the biggest jump at $2,170, and some trims (four-door examples: Willys Sport, Sport S, and Rubicon) actually becoming less expensive.These changes in standard equipment for the 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport two-door help it fall more in line with the Base Ford Bronco, which has air conditioning and Sync 4 with an 8.0-inch touchscreen. But still, RIP Wranglers without A/C. You'll always be hot.
We go into every comparison test with an open mind, but in this electric SUV matchup between Hyundai's Ioniq 5 and Toyota's newer bZ4X, the Hyundai was the heavy favorite. After all, it already won a comparison test against its corporate cousin, the slick Kia EV6, and is currently our top pick among electric SUVs in our Ultimate Car Rankings. Turns out we were both right and wrong: Right about which EV would win but wrong about the reasons why. What we found were two exceptionally useful electric cars with their own distinct strengths.Meet the Players: Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Toyota BZ4XThe Ioniq 5 is a talented and stylish EV, and it's the first vehicle from Hyundai's all-electric Ioniq subbrand. Although the bZ4X is Toyota's first modern-day battery electric vehicle, Toyota introduced an electric RAV4 back in 1997 and has been selling the Mirai FCEV (an electric car powered by a hydrogen fuel cell instead of a battery) since 2016. Given that experience, we thought it was fair to match the bZ4X against the best in the field.For this comparison, we went with top-of-the-line all-wheel-drive models. Our Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited AWD came with a set of accessory floormats that raised its price to $55,920. The bZ4X's top trim level is also called Limited, and our test AWD EV came with a cold-weather package, premium stereo, spoiler, and extra-cost paint that raised the sticker price to $52,050.Are These Electric SUVs or Electric Hatchbacks?Although both vehicles are pitched as compact sport-utilities, they blur the line between SUV and hatchback car. Both are just an inch or two shorter in length than Toyota's ubiquitous RAV4 and about the same width as it. But the BZ4X's roofline is some 2 inches closer to the ground than the RAV4's, and the Hyundai checks in 2 inches lower still. Consider that both carry their batteries under their bellies, which raises their floor height, and you can understand why they feel more like cars than SUVs from behind the wheel.The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is the head-turner of this duo. Its nifty '80s-hatchback styling was inspired by Hyundai's first mass-produced vehicle, a dreadfully unreliable rustbucket called the Pony; despite those questionable roots, it drew universal acclaim: Throughout our test drive we could see the points and smiles directed at the Ioniq 5, and thanks to the Toyota's inferior sound insulation, we could sometimes hear the compliments, as well. The bZ4X is pretty enough in its own way, with its bold, grilleless styling and rakish roofline reminiscent of Toyota's own Venza. The black fender surrounds are questionable but do set the bZ4X apart—or at least they would if the Toyota didn't look so much like its fraternal twin, the Subaru Solterra.Inside the Ioniq 5 and the bZ4XInside, the Hyundai has the edge: We love the EV rethink of the cabin. With no need for a center tunnel to house driveshafts or exhaust pipes, Hyundai has given the Ioniq 5 a completely flat floor, so there's no center pedestal where front passengers can smack their knees. It's a smart layout that reminds us of minivans and bench-seat sedans of yore. The control layout is fairly straightforward, and the cabin has plenty of storage space, but the instrument panel takes time to interpret, and there's a definite learning curve to the infotainment system. The Ioniq 5 is not a car for those who never RTFM.The Toyota, in contrast, is refreshingly simple. Despite an all-digital dash, the controls and displays look like they could have been pulled from any Toyota model, and that simplicity is the bZ4X's hallmark, or at least it is once you get used to the driving position. The bZ4X's instrument panel is placed close to the windshield and meant to be viewed over the steering wheel rim rather than through it, blurring the line between a traditional gauge panel and a head-up display. It takes some getting used to, but once we adapted, we rather liked it.Both cars have adequate room in the back seat, but the Toyota has a short cushion that sits too close to the floor. The Hyundai's back seat is positioned higher and is more comfortable by an order of magnitude, with no shortage of headroom despite its lower roofline, and the full-length sunroof lets in more daylight than the twin-pane job on the BZ4X.The two cars run neck and neck on cargo space, with about 27 cubic feet behind the rear seats; only the Ioniq 5 has a sliding rear seat to adjust between passenger and luggage space, however. Neither car has a proper frunk, as both cars concentrate their electrical control gear under the hood. Hyundai does have a vestigial storage locker up front, but it's too small to be of much use.Driving: Surprises and DisappointmentsOut on the open road, the Toyota took us by surprise: Although it's not as quick as the Hyundai (we timed the bZ4X to 60 in 5.8 seconds versus 4.4 for the Ioniq 5), it feels very zippy and responsive, with a strong midrange punch that always made us smile. The Hyundai's accelerator is set up so that, outside of Sport mode, one must dip more deeply into its travel to access its best acceleration. Nothing wrong with that, but we preferred the Toyota's always-eager feel.The Toyota had the better ride, too; it's comfortable and steady, whereas the Hyundai is busier and more jittery, even while being appreciably quieter. On the curviest section of our test route, the Hyundai exhibited better grip, but the suspension felt underdamped. The Ioniq 5 leans more in the turns than the bZ4X, and midcorner bumps set it bounding, often to the detriment of traction. Speaking of which, if you turn off traction control and punch the throttle coming out of the turns, the Ioniq 5 is happy to get a little sideways. (Stability control will keep it from going too far out of line.) It's good fun if a bit ragged. The Toyota wasn't as up for this sort of silly fun, but it showed more serious skills: Its better damping kept all four wheels in good contact with the pavement, allowing it to rocket out of turns that left the Hyundai scrabbling for grip.Both of our cars had cruise control and lane centering, and both systems worked well. We like that the Hyundai's lane centering can be switched on independent of cruise control. The Hyundai has automated lane changing, but we couldn't figure out how to get it to work—that's our fault and not the car's, as we never did, um, RTFM. But it underscores a point we made earlier: The Ioniq 5 has a steeper learning curve, while the Toyota is simplicity defined.At this point in our test, the cars were running relatively neck and neck: The Hyundai Ioniq 5 led on style and interior comfort, but we appreciated the Toyota bZ4X's ease of use and—much to our surprise—judged its road manners superior. But once we factored in range and charging speed, the Hyundai pulled ahead by several EV lengths.Range and Charging: Hyundai Pulls Ahead of ToyotaThe AWD version of the Ioniq 5 has an EPA-rated range of 256 miles, while the BZ4X Limited AWD is rated at 222 miles (which you can increase to 228 by opting for the cheaper XLE model). A 34-mile delta isn't much, but the difference in charge times is significant, particularly at DC fast chargers of the type you'd most likely use on a road trip. The Hyundai has an 800-volt charging system that can take advantage of high-speed 350-kW chargers. Hyundai says the Ioniq 5 can charge from 10 to 80 percent capacity in 18 minutes, and our experience bears that out. The all-wheel-drive bZ4X can't charge at more than 100 kW, which means that same charge can take the better part of an hour. During our test, we stopped for lunch at a supermarket with the batteries similarly depleted, plugged both cars into 150 kW chargers, and went upstairs to wait in line at the busy deli counter. The Hyundai hit 80 percent as we were paying for our sandwiches; the Toyota didn't get there until well after we had finished eating.Does charging speed really matter? Maybe not, if you install a 240-volt home charger—and you'll want to, as the convenience of having one beats the stuffing out of relying on the public charging network—and mainly use the EV for commuting while also owning another car for long-distance trips. Remember, home charging means leaving every morning with a full "tank," and few Americans routinely drive more than 200 miles in a day. (That said, even on the slower Level 2 household plugs, the Hyundai's 10.9-kW charging gear takes power faster than the Toyota's 6.6-kW unit.) But if you're an inveterate road-tripper and/or a single-car household, the Hyundai's high-speed charging abilities will make a significant difference.Let's Consider the CoinWe were ready to name Hyundai as the winner, but we hadn't yet considered the price difference: The Hyundai we were driving cost $4,390 more than the Toyota. The higher charge speeds might justify that extra cost, but what if we were homebodies to whom charging speed wasn't important? Is the Toyota the better value?We debated this point and decided it wasn't. The Ioniq 5 has better accommodations and looks, and opting for the midrange SEL version will run $50,995. That means living without the big sunroof, the nifty head-up display, and a few other goodies, but we think that's a worthwhile sacrifice for the better overall car and experience.Hyundai Ioniq 5 Wins—But Don't Count Out the Toyota bZ4XAlthough the Toyota emerged as our second-place finisher, we can make a good use case for it. The bZ4X's simplicity and approachability should not be undervalued: For someone who isn't a tech geek, who doesn't want to have to read the manual or watch a bunch of YouTube videos, who just wants to get in the damn car and drive it, the Toyota bZ4X is the way to go. With every automaker seeming to want to emulate Tesla and turn their EVs into high-tech showcases, the Toyota is refreshingly easy to use. It's the flip phone of electric cars, and we mean that as a compliment. We also can't ignore that the Toyota is the better-riding and better-driving of these two EVs.Still, after extensive back-to-back evaluation, the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 emerged as the winner. It's a marvelous electric SUV that is both practical and futuristic, and its employment of better electrical hardware makes it a long-legged, fast-charging adventurer. Nonetheless, the margin of victory over the Toyota was narrower than we expected. The 2022 bZ4X is a competent electric car with many of the attributes that have made Toyota one of the world's most popular car brands. It exits this competition with its head held high—or at least it will once it finishes charging.2nd Place: 2022 Toyota bZ4XPros: Zippy acceleration, sure-footed handling, easy to operate.Cons: Low back seat, moderate range, slow charging performance.Verdict: An easy-to-approach EV for the layperson but not a great traveling companion.1st Place: 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5Pros: Handsome and stylish looks, roomy interior, superfast charging.Cons: Underdamped suspension, steeper learning curve, a little pricier.Verdict: One of the best overall electric SUVs on the market right now.POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 HTRAC Specifications 2023 Toyota bZ4x Limited AWD Specifications DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front- and rear-motor, AWD Front- and rear-motor, AWD MOTOR TYPE Permanent-magnet electric Permanent-magnet electric POWER (SAE NET) 99 hp (fr), 221 hp (rr), 320 hp (comb) 107 hp (fr), 107 hp (rr), 214 hp (comb) TORQUE (SAE NET) 105 lb-ft (fr), 321 lb-ft (rr), 446 lb-ft (comb) 124 lb-ft (fr), 124 lb-ft (rr), 248 lb-ft (comb) WEIGHT TO POWER 14.6 lb/hp 20.6 lb/hp TRANSMISSIONS 1-speed automatic 1-speed automatic AXLE RATIO 4.71:1/10.65:1 13.80:1/13.80:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 14.3:1 14.1:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.7 2.8 BRAKES, F; R 12.8-in vented disc; 12.8-in disc 12.9-in vented disc; 12.5-in vented disc WHEELS 8.0 x 20-in cast aluminum 8.0 x 20-in cast aluminum TIRES 255/45R20 105V Michelin Primacy Tour A/S (M+S) 235/50R20 100V Bridgestone Turanza EL450 (M+S) DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 118.1 in 112.2 in TRACK, F/R 64.2/64.6 in 63.0/63.4 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 182.5 x 74.4 x 63.0 in 184.6 x 73.2 x 65.0 in TURNING CIRCLE 39.3 ft 40.0 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 4,684 lb (51/49%) 4,402 lb (54/46%) SEATING CAPACITY 5 5 HEADROOM, F/R 39.1/37.5 in 38.6/37.1 in LEGROOM, F/R 41.7/39.4 in 42.1/35.3 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 57.7/57.7 in 57.8/56.0 in CARGO VOLUME, BEH F/R 59.3/27.2 cu ft 50.7/25.8 cu ft TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.6 sec 2.1 sec 0-40 2.3 3.1 0-50 3.3 4.3 0-60 4.4 5.8 0-70 5.8 7.7 0-80 7.6 10.0 0-90 9.7 12.7 0-100 12.3 16.0 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 2.3 3.1 QUARTER MILE 13.2 sec @ 102.7 mph 14.5 sec @ 95.9 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 123 ft 125 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.88 g (avg) 0.77 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.7 sec @ 0.71 g (avg) 27.4 sec @ 0.62 g (avg) CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $48,745 $49,995 PRICE AS TESTED $56,440 $52,050 AIRBAGS 6: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee BASIC WARRANTY 5 years/60,000 miles 3 years/36,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 10 years/100,000 miles (including battery) 5 years/60,000 miles (8 years/100,000 miles battery) ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 5 years/Unlimited miles 2 years/25,000 miles BATTERY CAPACITY 77.4 kWh Li-Ion 72.8 kWh Li-Ion EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 110/87/98 mpg-e 112/92/102 mpg-e (mfr est) EPA RANGE, COMB 256 miles 222 miles (mfr est) RECOMMENDED FUEL 240-volt electricity, 480-volt electricity 240-volt electricity, 480-volt electricity ON SALE Now Now Show All
With Acura's NSX supercar being sunsetted this year after the final run of Type S variants is built, the Performance Manufacturing Center (PMC) where it is assembled by hand is going to need purpose. Well, a different purpose, at least—and Acura's been trying to give it some over the past few years with its normal-looking-on-the-outside, secretly hand-built batches of PMC Editions of its mainstream models. These mostly ordinary Acura models are usually gifted some special paint—a lustrous red on the 2020 TLX PMC Edition, a blazing orange on the 2021 RDX PMC Edition, etc.—and carry the distinction of being hand-built in the same factory as the NSX supercar, by the same technicians, even. The newest addition to this PMC family? The latest-generation TLX sedan.As mentioned, there has been a TLX PMC Edition previously, but that was based on the previous-generation TLX. This 2023 Acura TLX PMC Edition blends not only the newest TLX with the PMC treatment, but also the TLX in its spicier 355-hp Type S form, which also gets Acura's torque-vectoring Super Handling All-Wheel Drive. This sport sedan with a name of many characters will, ironically, be limited in number, though Acura hasn't outlined yet what that number will be. (Past PMCs were built in numbered runs, with each model wearing a plaque inside with its unique figure; there is a similar plaque pictured on the new '23 TLX, but it only shows "001," not how many that number is out of.) It is, of course, built by hand at Acura's PMC in Ohio, and for an added dash of fancy, each car will be delivered in a covered, single-car transporter to its delivery dealership in order to keep the paint free from blemishes.In no small part because this TLX PMC Edition is based on the already saucy looking Type S version of Acura's midsize sedan, it is an altogether more serious-looking machine than the old one. Acura steps up the visuals with copper-colored 21-inch wheels, carbon-fiber rear spoiler and diffuser pieces, and Berlina Black (a classic Honda color) roof and door mirrors. Three colors will be available, and (go, America!), they're Curva Red (with a black interior), 130R White (red interior), and Long Beach Blue (with a white interior)—perfectly timed for a certain celebratory weekend in the U.S.A. All three colors are borrowed from the NSX, too.Other enhancements on the PMC include Pirelli P-Zero summer tires, carbon fiber interior trim, backlit "Type S" door sill plates, and blacked-out badges. The result is a TLX Type S that is subtly different, but in a hard-to-place way if you just saw one on the street.Of course, the delicious, even subtler aspect of these PMC cars has long been their hand assembly, which is just plain unusual for cars not priced in the stratosphere. Like with past PMC Editions, we anticipate the TLX Type S version won't break the bank, costing a few thousand bucks more than a regular one. Again, imagine someone paying just a little more for, say, a hand-built Ford F-150 or Honda Civic. It's both weird and kind of, secretly, maybe cool. We'll know final pricing and, likely, how limited production will be when the order books open for the TLX Type S PMC Edition later this year.
The automotive industry is in a tight squeeze right now, wedged within the transition from internal-combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) amid a global pandemic, a war in Europe, and supply constraints and rising material costs. Several BEV automakers including Tesla, Hummer, Lucid, and Rivian have raised their prices in recent weeks, and other automakers have delayed orders, limited buyer options, and in some cases, shipped vehicles without supply-limited components, with a promise to fulfill missing parts when supplies are available. And here is why it's not likely to change very soon.That's the outlook through 2024, according to a report from industry analyst AlixPartners. In particular, the report says semiconductor shortages will continue to negatively impact new vehicle production through the next couple of years, caused in part by the rising market share of BEVs planned to go on sale as the majority of the industry shifts away from internal combustion.BEVs will increase chip demand at a growth rate of 55 percent per year, according to the study, which will remain a key bottleneck in new vehicle production. That means that, as automakers introduce a lineup of new BEVs, the technical requirements of these new vehicles will increase the strain of supply because BEVs typically require more chips than ICE vehicles.That will likely force automakers to continue to hold back on production levels, meaning the number of cars on sale will probably remain limited for a few more years. This gives automakers more pricing power if demand for new cars remains high, so cars likely won't get any cheaper anytime soon.That doesn't necessarily mean automakers are making too much profit from higher pricing. As an example, via CNBC, Ford recently said the Mustang Mach-E has lost most of its profitability due to rising commodity costs.Pricing will continue to be negatively impacted by rising material costs, for both new BEVs and ICE vehicles. AlixPartners puts the raw material costs for ICE vehicles at $3,662 per vehicle, and BEVs materials cost more than twice that at $8,255 per vehicle since the battery and motor requirements require more raw materials.Those costs per vehicle are more than double what they were just two years ago, according to CNBC, reflecting the impact of the market constraints mentioned above.AlixPartners predicts that BEVs will only overtake ICE vehicles in the majority of market share way out in 2035, as suppliers and automakers likely scale back or slow down the recently rapid introduction of the resource-heavy, higher priced BEV models planned to be introduced, and customer interest and EV infrastructure need time to grow.AlixPartners says $48 billion in infrastructure investment is needed by 2030, but so far only $11 billion has been committed, so infrastructure support for BEVs will be catching up for years to come.
With Acura's NSX supercar being sunsetted this year after the final run of Type S variants is built, the Performance Manufacturing Center (PMC) where it is assembled by hand is going to need purpose. Well, a different purpose, at least—and Acura's been trying to give it some over the past few years with its normal-looking-on-the-outside, secretly hand-built batches of PMC Editions of its mainstream models. These mostly ordinary Acura models are usually gifted some special paint—a lustrous red on the 2020 TLX PMC Edition, a blazing orange on the 2021 RDX PMC Edition, etc.—and carry the distinction of being hand-built in the same factory as the NSX supercar, by the same technicians, even. The newest addition to this PMC family? The latest-generation TLX sedan.As mentioned, there has been a TLX PMC Edition previously, but that was based on the previous-generation TLX. This 2023 Acura TLX PMC Edition blends not only the newest TLX with the PMC treatment, but also the TLX in its spicier 355-hp Type S form, which also gets Acura's torque-vectoring Super Handling All-Wheel Drive. This sport sedan with a name of many characters will, ironically, be limited in number, though Acura hasn't outlined yet what that number will be. (Past PMCs were built in numbered runs, with each model wearing a plaque inside with its unique figure; there is a similar plaque pictured on the new '23 TLX, but it only shows "001," not how many that number is out of.) It is, of course, built by hand at Acura's PMC in Ohio, and for an added dash of fancy, each car will be delivered in a covered, single-car transporter to its delivery dealership in order to keep the paint free from blemishes.In no small part because this TLX PMC Edition is based on the already saucy looking Type S version of Acura's midsize sedan, it is an altogether more serious-looking machine than the old one. Acura steps up the visuals with copper-colored 21-inch wheels, carbon-fiber rear spoiler and diffuser pieces, and Berlina Black (a classic Honda color) roof and door mirrors. Three colors will be available, and (go, America!), they're Curva Red (with a black interior), 130R White (red interior), and Long Beach Blue (with a white interior)—perfectly timed for a certain celebratory weekend in the U.S.A. All three colors are borrowed from the NSX, too.Other enhancements on the PMC include Pirelli P-Zero summer tires, carbon fiber interior trim, backlit "Type S" door sill plates, and blacked-out badges. The result is a TLX Type S that is subtly different, but in a hard-to-place way if you just saw one on the street.Of course, the delicious, even subtler aspect of these PMC cars has long been their hand assembly, which is just plain unusual for cars not priced in the stratosphere. Like with past PMC Editions, we anticipate the TLX Type S version won't break the bank, costing a few thousand bucks more than a regular one. Again, imagine someone paying just a little more for, say, a hand-built Ford F-150 or Honda Civic. It's both weird and kind of, secretly, maybe cool. We'll know final pricing and, likely, how limited production will be when the order books open for the TLX Type S PMC Edition later this year.
The Drako GTE electric supercar first whizzed upon the car scene during the 2019 Monterey Car Week. It wooed onlookers with its Fisker Karma platform, carbon-fiber body designed by ex-Pininfarina design director Lowie Vermeersch, and exclusive Drako Motors Drive OS vehicle-management system technology. The performance-oriented electric car was more about the love of driving and a passion for awesome sports cars than it was about economy, value, and saving the planet—the standard talking points of mass-produced EVs. It was a lovable car developed by Dean Drako and Shiv Sikand, successful Silicon Valley software entrepreneurs and avid car fans—who just wanted a better-driving car than what they were finding.It's likely you won't find any of these $1.25-million Drako GTEs on the road, if not for the astronomical price, but for the fact that Drako intends on building only 25 units. Some of our MotorTrend staffers were fortunate enough, though, to experience the GTE's four-motor drive system pushing 1,200 horsepower. It was described as "the first electric car we've driven that really feels entirely like a new kind of vehicle. " Its responsiveness, agility, and stability were remarkable. Basically, the thing was dialed. Drako hinted at another model, way back at the end of 2019, pending the success of the company's GTE. "Our next car, which we can do in about a year, will be targeted at around 4,500 pounds," Sikand said. "We'll build 99 of them, at half the price of the GTE. That puts me squarely in Lamborghini Aventador and Ferrari 812 Superfast territory. And I can eat those cars." Sikand smiled at the thought. "That's what we're going to do: provide cars that are just amazing to drive, totally guilt-free, and fast as hell. "'Fast-forward about two years, and it seems Drako Motors' aspiration for another model has come to fruition. It's called the Drako Dragon, and while we don't have all the specifics quite yet on this five-seater, one thing's for sure: it's the GTE on steroids. Everything Drako learned from the GTE, it applied to the Dragon. Drako, when speaking of (some iteration of) the Dragon openly on its website, considered the Dragon an upgrade of the GTE, significantly redesigned and upgraded with essentially no system untouched, "the new pinnacle of electric vehicle performance."Like the GTE, the Drako Dragon was designed by Drako Chief Designer Lowie Vermeersch and his Italian GranStudio team. The Dragon's silhouette shows that it has generous ground clearance with broad, aerodynamic hips. It's a curvy gullwing SUV. Drako touts "world-class" passenger comfort within its five-seat cabin, abundant luggage capacity, and "world-beating" luxury and performance.Like the GTE, the Dragon will use Drako's DriveOS Quad Motor powertrain (allowing for individual control of each wheel's positive and negative torque) and Drako's in-house battery system. The the 2,000-hp Dragon should reach a top speed of over 200 mph, sprint to 60 mph in 1.9 seconds, and achieve a 9.0-second quarter-time. Those figures would be surprising—if there was no GTE paving its way. A three-stage suspension system helps smooth roads and trails alike. Yes, Drako mentioned trails and off-road ability.As for the price of the Drako Dragon? We don't have a figure, but it's apparently competitive with the existing super-SUV segment—albeit with double the horsepower. Considering the GTE is over a million buck-a-roos, the Dragon could still easily top the Aston Martin DBX, Bentley Bentayga, Lamborghini Urus, and Rolls-Royce Cullinan, for example.As for the guys behind the Drako GTE and now the Dragon—they'll never compete with Elon Musk's Tesla, and they're perfectly fine with that. During an interview with MotorTrend, Shiv Sikand commented, '"We're crazy. You know, I was down in Newport Beach. I met one of the main guys out there who've been around in the industry for a long time. He says, 'Why are you getting into the car business?' Looking at me stupidly, like 'is there something wrong with you?' I'm like, 'yeah, there's something wrong with us. You know, Dean [Drako] and I are kind of crazy. '"'
The double whammy of increasing fuel and vehicle prices has a lot of SUV shoppers not knowing which way to turn. A more efficient modern ride could ease the pain at the pump, but with inflation and rising borrowing costs, many are delaying big-ticket purchases like new cars. Expanding a search to include slightly used SUVs with strong fuel economy might be the way to go if you're looking for an alternative.Knowledge is power, and in our methodology below, you'll find how we came to our tally. Most of the SUVs on this list are subcompact and compact crossovers, but a single midsize offering also managed to qualify. All received an EPA combined fuel economy rating of 27 mpg or greater, and a couple of the entries can be found priced from roughly $15,000. Keep reading to find out which used SUVs under $30,000 have the best fuel economy.About MotorTrend's methodology: The Buyer's Guide recognizes how important a used car purchase can be, which is why we take this so seriously. Our methodology considers many of the same factors in our new-car rankings system, starting with value. The experts at IntelliChoiceconduct extensive research to assess long-term value on 3-5-year-old vehicles, which means our picks start at the 2018 model year. IntelliChoice considers resale value, the cost of insurance, maintenance costs, fuel costs, and more. We prioritize models receiving a Good or Excellent IntelliChoice used-car value rating. An above-average J.D. Powerquality and reliability rating is also a plus. Any vehicle we recommend must have earned anIIHSTop Safety Pick award or NHTSA overall five-star safety rating, and have some used-car inventory with under 80,000 miles (the upper limit on many automaker CPO programs).
chevrolet silverado-1500 Full OverviewProsPowerful V-8New interiorSuper Cruise ConsSome questionable exterior styling decisionsDoor-mounted mirrorsRough rideIt happened not once but twice, and it's the only time we recall it ever happening. As if SiriusXM satellite radio knew how to mitigate the uneasiness we felt by the fact our test truck—a 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country pickup—was driving us courtesy of its Super Cruise system, we couldn't help but sing heartily along to Bob Seger's "Like a Rock." If you're of a certain age, you know this song backed Chevrolet's epic pickup ad campaign of the 1990s. And in this moment as we drove the Silverado 1500 High Country, it magically and nostalgically bridged the gap between the Silverado of the past and the Silverado of the present. Yes, the Chevy Silverado 1500 has come a long way since its "Like a Rock" days, but it's still a Chevy truck through and through.By the StickerHere's a quick rundown of the Monroney label—otherwise known as the window sticker—for the 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country 4x4. The High Country is the Silverado lineup's top trim alongside the off-road-oriented Silverado ZR2. We'll leave it to you to decide whether you love or hate the idea of a street-oriented luxury Chevy with 22-inch painted aluminum wheels featuring chrome inserts. One opinion is that the wheel's complexity could render well in an even larger 24-inch (or more) diameter.Chevrolet delivered the Dark Ash Metallic (a new color for 2022) Silverado High Country to us equipped with a bounty of add-ons: High Country Premium package (power sunroof, all-weather floor liners, 22-inch wheels), Super Cruise, Technology package (rear camera mirror, head-up display, adaptive cruise control, enhanced automatic emergency braking), power-retractable assist steps, adaptive ride control suspension, wheel locks, and Multiflex tailgate.0-60 MPH: Trailing the Twin-Turbo V-6s, Leading Other V-8sThe 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country is powered by Chevy's 6.2-liter EcoTec3 V-8 gasoline engine. It's good for 420 hp and 460 lb-ft of torque, backed by a 10-speed automatic transmission. This is the largest-displacement, most powerful naturally aspirated V-8 in the segment. Bigger doesn't always mean better, though: While GM continues to smash this stout V-8 under the hood, many of its competitors offer smaller-displacement twin-turbo V-6 variants.To the point, how does the 5,578-pound Silverado High Country stack up against the new 2022 Toyota Tundra Platinum? The latter is a prime example of a truck that ditched its V-8 in favor of a 3.4-liter twin-turbo six-cylinder that makes 389 hp and 479 lb-ft of torque. (There's also a stronger hybrid version.) According to our previous test numbers, the Tundra—532 pounds heavier (woof) while lacking 31 hp but gaining 19 lb-ft compared to the Chevy—accelerates from 0 to 60 mph a mere 0.1 second slower than the Silverado's 6.0 seconds. Sure, there are a bunch of additional variables at play here—we didn't test the two trucks at the same time, and they feature different gearing, transmission tuning, and so on—but the lighter, higher-horsepower 6.2-liter V-8 Silverado didn't run away from the turbo-V-6-powered Tundra.As for Ford's EcoBoost V-6? The 2021 Ford F-150 4x4 Lariat FX4 twin-turbo EcoBoost 3.5-liter V-6 (400 hp, 500 lb-ft, and 238 pounds lighter than the Silverado) hit 60 mph in 5.3 seconds. The 2021 Ford Raptor (with the high-output 450-hp, 510-lb-ft EcoBoost and 391 pounds heavier) needed 5.6 seconds, followed by the High Country 0.4 second behind. Ultimately, the Silverado's 6.2-liter V-8 is unsurprisingly better suited for heavy towing up grades than it is for track sprints against turbocharged V-6 trucks. Interestingly, the 6.2-liter Silverado RST—158 pounds lighter than the High Country—put down a 5.5-second 0-60 time, which spanks the High Country by half a second and lands it between the two EcoBoost Fords.How does the 6.2-liter 2022 Chevrolet Silverado High Country fare against other V-8 trucks in its class? The 2021 Ford F-150 4x4 King Ranch, packing a 400-hp, 410-lb-ft 5.0-liter V-8 and carrying an additional 109 pounds, hit 60 mph in 6.2 seconds. The 2019 Ram 1500 Limited 4X4 eTorque featuring a 395-hp and 410-lb-ft 5.7-liter V-8 Hemi (and 298 pounds heavier) did so in 6.5 seconds. So the 6.2-liter Silverado is no slouch against the other naturally aspirated V-8s in its segment.Finally, on paper and in certain conditions, GM's 6.2-liter V-8 certainly outperforms the 355-hp, 383-lb-ft 5.3-liter V-8, another engine option for the High Country, as is a 3.0-liter diesel. For daily trundling, though, it would be hard to discern a 5.3-liter from the 6.2. Worth noting: The 6.2 is available only with four-wheel drive.Track Attitude: Getting Aggressive in a Luxury TruckGranted, not many folks will ever drive their 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country like a sports car. But if you overheat its brakes, the truck tells you so via a dashboard message. A 45-mph speed limit kicks in at that point for a short period while the brakes cool down.As for the High Country's performance on the MT figure-eight course, which tests handling characteristics, tester Chris Walton was surprised by how sporty the upscale Silverado was in auto four-wheel-drive mode. "The firm brake pedal is quite effective, so long as you stay out of the ABS," he said. "Do it right, and you can bleed the brakes into the skidpad almost like a sport sedan. The truck doesn't roll much on the skidpad and stays quite neutral with a mild bit of understeer. The throttle mapping, however, is a bit off. The throttle is sensitive and makes it difficult to maintain a constant speed on the skidpad. Overall, it comes off as quite sporty for a luxury pickup truck."(Not) Driving With Super CruiseOne of the big deals about the 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 High Country is that it has available Super Cruise, a $2,200 option. Yes, GM's semi-autonomous hands-free-driving system has trickled down to Chevy trucks. We found some compatible freeways and gave it a try; despite some inherent trust issues, it worked, but we have a few stories.On one occasion, a car was merging onto the freeway at a substantially slower rate than we were traveling. We could see it was going to merge in front of us, but when it seemed like the truck "missed" seeing the car and did not lift, we took control and initiated braking. It's likely the Silverado would have seen the other vehicle by the time it was fully in our lane, but it might have left "unsmart" cars behind us braking too hard for comfort.On another occasion, Super Cruise deemed there was room for a lane change, but traffic in our new lane slowed substantially as the truck made its move. The High Country, still wanting to leave a rather big gap between itself and the car in front, also slowed substantially. We saw the driver behind us needed to unexpectedly brake hard—and our maneuver came across as a "brake check." Super Cruise was just doing what it computed was best for the situation, but we received an angry middle finger in return.A Cockpit Worth Talking AboutThe 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country's new interior is one of its other big deals. Good news: it's not offensive anymore. It feels and looks like it belongs in 2022, and it's competitive with other pickups on the market. It's natural and contemporary, more horizontally oriented than upright. The 13.4-inch color touchscreen, 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster, and 15.0-inch head-up display contribute to its modern feel.Did you notice the shifter on the center console? That's different for a Chevy truck. It took a split second to figure out how to work it, but we never looked back once we did. Also, the location of the wireless charging pad cubby is perfect and out of the way—and not inherently serving double duty as a crap pad. You know that spot where fast food trash, banana peels, and loose change resides. Don't worry, Chevy left some removable rubberized pads around three sides of the shifter for miscellaneous things.In terms of interior colors, our tester was labeled as Jet Black and Nightshift Blue. In true Chevrolet fashion, there's an uncountable number of available colors—variants of chrome, piano black, blue, gray, tan, brown, silver—in a cornucopia of materials including smooth plastic, textured plastic, open-pore wood, and leather. All in all, the touch points are soft, the seats are comfortable, charge ports are accessible, and it's all palatable and impressive.Indeed, this 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 High Country is "like a rock," but one that's unrecognizable compared to what it used to be. Consider it a big win for Chevy.2022 Chevrolet Silverado High Country Specifications BASE PRICE $64,945 PRICE AS TESTED $75,820 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, 4WD, 5-pass, 4-door truck ENGINE 6.2L direct-injected OHV 16-valve 90-degree V-8 POWER (SAE NET) 420 hp @ 5,600 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 460 lb-ft @ 4,100 rpm TRANSMISSION 10-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 5,578 lb (57/43%) WHEELBASE 147.4 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 231.9 x 81.2 x 75.5 in 0-60 MPH 6.0 sec QUARTER MILE 14.4 sec @ 96.8 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 133 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.75 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.1 sec @ 0.60 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 15/20/17 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 408 miles ON SALE Now Show All Looks good! More details?
People trip over Amazon boxes to get inside their homes. Online shopping was big business before the pandemic and is now the go-to for many consumers for most goods with one notable exception: buying cars.The auto industry is behind the rest of the world when it comes to online purchases, even though buyers consume everything else digitally, TrueCar President and CEO Mike Darrow said during a presentation at the Automotive Press Association in Detroit.Death, Taxes, and Car SalesBut that will change—and fast. In 2019, a mere 1 percent of auto sales, new and used, were conducted digitally. It grew to 10 percent in 2020, spurred by COVID shutdowns and lockdowns. By 2025, 40 percent of auto purchases in the U.S., about 23 million new and used vehicles, will be conducted completely online, Darrow says, and surveys show 62 percent of people say they would buy online if they could.It shouldn't be that hard. The IRS reported that 71 million people filed their U.S. income tax online this year with no help—that's gotta be harder than buying a car online, Darrow says.The transition from a century-old way of selling cars by visiting a dealership is also being fueled by new automakers, starting with Tesla which prominently adopted a direct sales strategy that is being followed by other new electric carmakers including Rivian, Lucid, and VinFast.Ford Wants to Sell EVs OnlineConventional automakers also want the flexibility. Ford CEO Jim Farley recently said he would like to switch to haggle-free pricing and digital sales for EVs, with dealers as service centers for customers who buy their vehicles online.Darrow sees it as a way for automakers like Ford to stimulate conversation with their retailers and while he sees EVs as a good focus initially, he favors digital sales for all vehicles regardless of age or powertrain. The TrueCar CEO fully expects automakers to develop their own in-house digital sales process that will compete with TrueCar. The difference: Ford will sell to those who already know they want a Ford; TrueCar will offer cross-shopping across multiple brands for the consumer looking at a wider field.TrueCar+TrueCar has used a leads-based model to date where it helps consumers find a car and passes the lead on to a dealer to complete the transaction. But TrueCar is testing a new model called TrueCar+ in Florida that would be the first new and used car online marketplace, allowing its 8.6 million monthly visitors to conduct the entire car-buying process online, from sourcing and pricing to insurance and financing, before handing it off to the dealer to supply the vehicle.New ways of doing business are taking over during difficult times for dealers and online shopping sites alike with the scarcity of inventory. TrueCar has about 1 million vehicles listed on its site, half the usual menu. Of those, less than 300,000 are new cars; the site usually has 1 million new cars that dealers are offering up for sale.