Ford Mustang Mach-E GT vs. Tesla Model Y Performance: The Future Is Lookin' Fun and Fast
Ford revealed the Mustang Mach-E in both form and, most important, name on a chilly California evening at an event held at the Hawthorne Municipal Airport in November 2019. The announcement was met, as one might expect, with mixed reaction. How could the Mustang—a gasoline-fired, V-8-packin', two-door pony car icon—suddenly be a four-door electric crossover SUV? Not only was that happening, but it would, Ford said, target Tesla's Model Y, which was designed literally next door.
Although details were scarce at the time, Ford promised the Mach-E lineup would include a performance-oriented GT model to take the fight to the Model Y Performance. Which leads us directly to now and the execution of MotorTrend's first-ever comparison test of performance-oriented electric SUVs.
Earlier this year we paired the Tesla Model Y against the Ford Mustang Mach-E, evaluating their driving characteristics, interior space, technology, charging times, infrastructure, and more. The Model Y took home the gold, but we acknowledged the Mach-E has much to recommend it. For this performance-oriented showdown, we focused on the same items but paid additional attention to the vehicles' handling and how fun to drive they are. As performance SUVs, the Model Y and Mach-E were built to deliver thrills and to be more emphatic and enthusiastic behind the wheel.
As you can expect, our Model Y and Mach-E test cars are closely aligned in terms of performance and price. Both share the same basic setup of a single front and a single rear electric motor, single-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive. The Model Y Performance pumps out 456 horsepower and 497 lb-ft of torque from its dual-motor setup, while our Ford Mustang Mach-E GT makes 480 horsepower and 634 lb-ft, the latter number making it the torquiest Mustang of all. The Mustang's 260-mile range is shorter than the Tesla's 303 miles, but both should be enough for most buyers.
At $69,800, the Ford is not inexpensive. Its starting price is just over $60K, but our vehicle came equipped with a plethora of options, including a $5,000 GT Performance Edition package that adds magnetic dampers, a torque increase from 600 lb-ft, 20-inch wheels with summer tires, and a few other bits. Our Model Y Performance checked out at $66,190, with the only option being its $1,000 Deep Blue Metallic paint.
Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: Behind the Wheel
Although the Mach-E has more muscle, the Model Y is faster in a straight line. It was close, though: The Ford hit 60 mph in 3.6 seconds, while the Tesla did it in 3.5 seconds. The delta was a bit more in the quarter mile, where the Mach-E crossed the line in 12.6 seconds at 100.6 mph and the Model Y in 12 seconds flat at 114.7 mph.
The differences between the two were more evident on public roads. Using our Of The Year Loop that covers mountain roads, city streets, and highways, the Model Y felt considerably more eager. Smash its accelerator, and the Model Y Performance absolutely rockets away without any hesitation, never letting up until you do. And its quick, talkative steering means placing it precisely where you want in corners is a snap, with its responsive accelerator pedal making it similarly easy to rotate the nose. And the pinpoint primary controls and the way it piles on speed make highway passes more fun than they have a right to be.
The Mach-E doesn't quite have the lightswitch acceleration of the Tesla; it doesn't deliver full power right off the bat, but it's no turtle, either. Indeed, once on the roll, the Ford feels fairly tireless until about 80 mph, when power delivery is significantly reduced. Alan Lau, MotorTrend road test analyst, also noticed the power bar in the instrument cluster drops noticeably when reaching this speed and that the Mach-E struggled to reach 120 mph at the test track. Even given how impressive the Tesla is, the Mach-E takes the lead when it comes to handling—with a caveat. The Ford is extremely well balanced, but occasionally it responds differently to driving into the exact same corner the exact same way, with either under- or oversteer, lacking the predictability we prefer in something we're going to drive hard. And the fact that a performance SUV that has 480 hp and 630 lb-ft fails to deliver consistent rip-snorting acceleration is disappointing.
Between the two, the Mach-E GT rides with more refinement, offering a cushier experience and passing less of a given impact to occupants over broken pavement or, say, railroad crossings. Even when driving hard on twisty roads, the Ford is more settled and composed, with better control of its wheel and body motions. The Tesla is by no means unrefined or a poor handler—quite the opposite—it's just that the Ford is slightly ahead in these areas.
Both SUVs come with drive modes that tailor the driving experience. But the Mach-E only allows the driver to shift between full modes—Whisper (eco), Engage (normal), and Unbridled (sport)—whereas the Tesla driver can individually alter its acceleration, steering, and braking settings. Acceleration choices are limited to Chill and Sport, but drivers can choose between Comfort, Standard, and Sport for the steering, and Creep, Roll, and Hold for the brakes in the Model Y. Since the Tesla allows the driver to mix and match as desired, there's likely a just-right setting for everyone.
As with its suspension, the Mach-E's brakes feel stronger and more tuned for serious driving. Our Mach-E stopped from 0 to 60 mph in 105 feet compared to 113 feet in the Tesla. Those numbers might be close, but in real life they can make a big difference. During our road loop, the Ford felt like it had more grip and allowed us to brake later when approaching a corner.
But it was the stronger, relentless acceleration of the Model Y, as well as the Tesla's consistency and predictability in its handling characteristics that made it our choice to drive on this day. We'd never turn down more miles in a Mach-E GT, of course, and further fine-tuning of its software and chassis hardware ought to make it truly special in the future.
Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: Charging Times
Although most EV buyers will have access to their own charger at home, how long it takes for a vehicle to refill its battery pack is an important consideration when owning an electric car. During our own experience at public charging stations, the Tesla charged faster than the Mach-E.
The Ford allows a peak rate of 150 kW—pretty good considering you can add about 150 miles of range in 30 minutes. Using a 350 kW Electrify America fast charger, we went from 15 to 80 percent charge in 41 minutes. However, once the battery got to 80 percent, the charge rate dropped to just 13 kW, or about the rate of a Level 2 charger, meaning it dramatically increased the time needed to fill up.
The Model Y, on the other hand, can charge at a peak rate of 250 kW, but we had mixed experiences at Supercharger stations. On the way home, we stopped at a busy Mojave Supercharger, with our Model Y taking 50 minutes to charge from 30 to 80 percent; we were only getting a 48-kW rate. At a less busy Supercharger station, however, the Model Y needed just 15 minutes to go from 28 to 65 percent, charging at a steady 190 kW. Like the Mach-E, the Tesla's charge rate dropped once the battery reached an 80 percent charge, but it stayed around 60 kW.
Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: Value
Although Tesla seems to increase the Model Y's price every other week, a short list of options helps keep the SUV's price down slightly compared to the Mach-E, especially when the Ford is loaded up. While $66,190 isn't exactly attainable, there is good value in terms of performance, overall excellence, and technology. In the ICE realm, the closest competitor, a comparably equipped Porsche Macan GTS, costs more and is slower than the Model Y Performance.
The Mach-E GT is a bit more expensive than the Tesla, but the premium only gets you slight edges in ride, handling, and braking, so those might need to be your priorities if choosing the Ford. Its interior design is handsome enough but isn't as modern or as crisp as the Tesla's, although it does come with technologies like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto that are simple and easy to use. The Ford's build quality also feels superior to the Model Y's, and its sports seats are supportive and appropriate for a performance-oriented SUV.
Given that the as-tested costs, being just $3,610 apart, might as well be identical in this price range, and that both are stellar performers overall, the Tesla feels ever so much more worth the money thanks to an interior experience that feels more modern.
Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: The Verdict
We expected this comparison test to be a close call—and it was. Both the Mach-E GT and Model Y Performance offer joyful, satisfying driving experiences. These versions of their makers' entry (or only) electric SUVs were developed to please enthusiasts, and more than anything they show how fun EVs can be.
But as in our comparison test of the mainstream models, the Tesla comes out on top here. Yes, the Mach-E rides and handles better, and its braking is superb, but the Tesla is the better all-around choice. It gets going incredibly quickly, has no qualms about reaching speed, charges at a faster rate, feels more premium, and it drives very nearly as well on a twisty road.
The Mach-E GT is Ford's first attempt at making a performance-oriented electric SUV, and it's hugely impressive. There are some rough edges to sand down, but it updates an icon for a new age and certainly puts Tesla on notice. But for now, the newer brand on the block remains on top.
2nd Place: Ford Mustang Mach-E GT
Pros:
- Handsome styling
- Superb ride and handling
- Grabby brakes
Cons:
- High-speed limitations
- Elevated Price
- Longer charging time
1st Place: Tesla Model Y Performance
Pros:
- Quick accelerations
- Fast charging
- Futuristic interior
Cons:
- Ride is a bit harsh
- Interior quality could improve
- Range is misleading
You may also like
audi s8 Full OverviewOur MotorTrend test team cycles through hundreds of vehicles a year, and an old pro like road test editor Chris Walton has been in and out of thousands of them during his career. So when he starts waxing poetic about a car like the 2022 Audi S8, you better believe we sit up and take notice."Wow. What a sleeper," Walton said of the S8 super sedan we recently had in for testing. "It's way too easy to find yourself driving 90 mph without noticing it. I could live with this car for the remainder of my life." That's a bold statement, Chris, do go on. "The whole thing kind of shrinks around you and makes it feel like an S6. Goodness, what an achievement this thing is."He's right, of course, about all the sleeping and shrinking 2022 S8 does. This particular car looks downright menacing, as well, thanks in large part to its Daytona Gray pearl paint scheme offset by a Black Optic Plus package ($2,100) that adds 21-inch, 10-spoke gloss black rims shod with summer tires, and other blacked-out elements including Audi's famed four-ring badge adorning (what else?) a bold black grille.There's also some menace in its exhaust note, a bombastic baritone that bellows out from its 4.0-liter twin-turbo V-8, which produces 563 horsepower and 590 lb-ft of torque. The engine is paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission that proved smooth and quick under hard acceleration. It all works in concert to move the S8's significant 5,204-pound mass with authority.Audi S8 0-60 mph Time: Very ImpressiveGiven its prodigious poundage, the 2022 S8's 0-60-mph time of 3.7 seconds is darn impressive. Its Quattro all-wheel-drive system and attendant sport differential certainly don't hurt matters when you're firing it out of the starting block, and the S8 also has a launch control feature that further aids the cause.The test team reported some issues getting the S8 to launch right—but when it does, it launches hard. "Because the window of optimal boost and rpm is brief, and if you miss it you must wait a bit before trying launch control again. But when everything works, you get neck-snapping acceleration. Very harsh shifts from 1-2-3," road test analyst Alan Lau noted.Audi S8 Quarter-Mile Time: Low 12s Will Do After hammering past the 60-mph mark, the 2022 S8 barreled its way to a quarter-mile time of 12.2 seconds at 113.0 mphagain, a heck of a number for a car of its size and class. It's hard to find an apples-to-apples comparison to the 2022 S8 given its curb weight and configuration other than maybe the BMW Alpina B7 xDrive or the last-generation Mercedes S63 AMG, as most of the 2.5-ton machines we've tested in the past few years are either SUVs or EVs.Interestingly, one of the closest EVs we found to compare the S8 against is another Audi, the dual-motor E-Tron GT Prestige sedan, which weighs in at 5,095 pounds. That car hit 60 mph in 3.6 seconds and on to a quarter mile of 11.9 seconds at 118.8 mph. Of course, the E-Tron doesn't get the S8's twin-turbo terror of a V-8, but you won't have to pay a gas-guzzler tax or live with the S8's officious inefficiency, either (it's EPA rated at 14/23/17 mpg city/highway/combined). Different power strokes for different folks.Audi S8: Getting Its Oversteer OnAs for the rest of the 2022 Audi S8's overall abilities, once again, with the "for its weight" caveat out of the way, its stopping distance of 105 feet from 60 mph is as impressive as its acceleration. Lau reported the following: "The brake pedal feel seems to be tuned with a good balance between comfort and performance. It's not overly touchy and easy to modulate. When it comes to very aggressive braking, they get the job done very well." Walton added that the brakes were "tremendous and easy to modulate to just stay barely out of the ABS" during his testing.But it was out at our figure-eight (24.4 seconds at 0.79 g avg) and skidpad (0.95 g avg) tests where Walton truly fell in love with the S8 and its capabilities. "The way it turns in makes it feel so much smaller and lighter," he wrote in his notes. "The steering is a bit vague in feel but very precise. The car takes a very neutral attitude, just barely dancing on oversteer. The way it drives off the corner with the all-wheel drive (the S8 also comes standard with a four-wheel-steering system) is phenomenal."Comfort, Plus a Whole Lot MoreSo yes, the S8 does things cars of its size, heft, and weight distribution (55/45 percent front/rear) have no business doing from a performance standpoint. But when it comes to its other mission as a cosseting luxury limo, all play and no relaxation can make for a bone-jarring bad time. That's where the S8's Comfort+ setting and its optional predictive active suspension ($6,000) come in to help smooth the road ahead. As with other systems of its type, the predictive suspension uses a camera to read the oncoming surface, sense jarring impacts or other undulations, and react accordingly to soften the S8's ride.In addition to the fancy active footwork, the 2022 S8 has all manner of standard and optional luxury trappings (this particular S8's black interior, trimmed with carbon accents, looked stealthy chic), as well as safety systems and other craftsmanship befitting a car that starts at $118,995 and rang up at $135,595 as tested.It's a car you won't see many of to begin with and one that you can be assured won't be around for much longer in its present configuration. It's a special sport sedan for a chosen few. So if you happen to be in the Los Angeles area and see one blow past you, it could very well be a certain MT staffer at the wheel (if he robbed a bank or raided his 401(k) to get one, that is). Be sure to say hi—if you can catch him.Looks good! More details?2022 Audi S8 Specifications BASE PRICE $118,995 PRICE AS TESTED $135,595 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 4.0L Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8 POWER (SAE NET) 563 hp @ 6,000 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 590 lb-ft @ 2,050 rpm TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 5,204 lb (55/45%) WHEELBASE 123.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 209.5 x 76.6 x 58.5 in 0-60 MPH 3.7 sec QUARTER MILE 12.2 sec @ 113.0 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 105 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.95 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 24.4 sec @ 0.79 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 14/23/17 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 369 miles ON SALE Now Show All
With the retirement of the third-generation 6 sedan, just two car models remain in Mazda's 2022 lineup, the MX-5 Miata roadster and 3 compact (and really, it's more like three cars since the 3 comes in both sedan and hatchback varieties). Model year updates for each include new exterior colors, interior materials, drivetrain technology, and even a new trim for the 3.The 6 is gone, but that might be only for now. There's a promise of something wearing the 6 badge on the horizon. Keep reading for more about that future sedan as well as what's new and different with every 2022 Mazda car.
Mecum is auctioning a rare 1942 Harley-Davidson XA military motorcycle from World War II that boasts many early engineering firsts in the company's long history. Developed after the U.S. and its allies came up against superior BMW motorcycles during the war, it aimed to beat the Nazis at their own game. Now one newly restored example can be yours.The XA was an attempt to overcome the Nazis' all-terrain superiority, particularly in North Africa, and to address issue that American bikes had involving chains in rough terrain. Harley landed on a shaft drive setup, solving that problem. And the most expedient way to engineer a shaft-drive bike was to reverse-engineer an existing one, like the excellent overhead-cam BMW R75M used by the enemy. Perhaps unable to get its hands on an R75M, the XA copied the civilian flathead R71, which wasn't quite as well-optimized for the task.Despite being a copycat, be reassured that the XA is still a true Harley-Davidson. Around 1,000 XAs were built in Milwaukee for the U.S. Army during the war, according to the Mecum, and it resulted in many production firsts for the company. It is claimed to be Harley-Davidson's first shaft-drive, four-speed, foot-shift and hand-clutch motorcycle, and also the first equipped with two carburetors. The motor's opposed cylinders were positioned "across the frame" for improved cooling in the wind compared to Harley's longitudinal V-twin designs of the time. It was also the first Harley to feature a rear-suspension plunger, and had a top speed of over 60 MPH back in 1942. The XA Type II (this example is a Type I) got Harley's first telescopic forks, which didn't reappear on Harley-Davidson designs again until years after the war.The XA, innovative as it was relative to Harley's native bikes, wasn't a success. Consider that Harley produced over 80,000 units of its V-twin motorcycles during the war, while the XA was only ordered for testing. Ultimately, the Army declined to order any more, and its role fell to the Jeep, far superior for general purpose tactical mobility. You may find it a little more adaptable to suit your interests, which are hopefully more peaceful.This isn't the first time this exact motorcycle has been auctioned in recent years. It appears to have previously been auctioned by Mecum in 2015, according to the matching plate numbers in both sets of images, where it failed to meet reserve at a high bid of $30,000. It was expected to go for as much as $50,000, but this time it's offered with no reserve.The restoration finished this XA with leather saddle-bags, a beautiful speedometer detail, and according to the listing, the auction lot includes a special mounted case for a period-appropriate "non-firing" Thompson sub-machine gun that is apparently included in the deal. The auction is in Vegas, in case that wasn't obvious.Whatever else this XA is, it's a newly restored WWII Harley-Davidson that's also particularly rare and interesting, and at least we know the bike should run very cool and catch plenty of attention. The lot is up for auction with no reserve until Jan. 29, according to the Mecum website.
0 Comments