Ford Warns Dealers and Customers Alike: Don’t Screw With F-150 Lightning Sales
It seems that Ford is ready to do nearly anything to protect the upcoming F-150 Lightning EV pickup from negative news or a poor customer experience. The automaker is hoping to head off a big potential doozy that's endemic to hotly anticipated new car debuts: Egregious dealer markups on new F-150 Lightnings. Dealers are being warned against asking for additional deposits or any other presale payments. It also puts in a new "no-sale" provision upon purchase for the customers, to prevent folks from flipping their Lightnings for a quick buck.
Extra Deposits
The warning memo to the Ford dealers—that was originally screenshot and posted on the F150Gen14.com forum before it was deleted at the request of Ford—is more of a way to protect the brand from negative reviews from customers after much of the debacle from new Bronco sales. That is, customers put up a deposits to reserve their new Ford 4x4s on Ford's site only for franchise dealers to come back and demand more money before they would sell that customer a new Bronco.
Ford already has a tool on their franchise dealer agreement under "Paragraph 6(i)" that states: "The Dealer shall conduct dealership operations in a manner that will reflect favorably at all times the reputation of the dealer, other company (Ford) authorized dealers, the company, company products and trademarks and trade names used or claimed by the company or any of its subsidiaries." This includes a provision that the dealer "shall avoid in every way any 'bait,' deceptive, misleading, confusing, or illegal advertising or business practices." Any dealer caught doing this by Ford will have their allocation of F-150 Lightnings "redirected" for the entirety of the 2022 model year.
Scalper Prevention
A later portion of the Ford memo answers the potential scalper issues seen with many limited products, be it by design or by supply issues. The "No-Sale Provision" laid out by Ford prevents new owners of the 2022 F-150 Lightning from immediately reselling their new truck after getting it from the dealer. Ford said its dealers may add the following paragraph to their closing documents or as a new, standalone document.
"Purchaser hereby agrees that it will not sell, offer to sell, or otherwise transfer any ownership interest in the vehicle prior to the first anniversary of the date hereof. Purchaser further agrees that seller may seek injunctive relief to prevent the transfer of title of the vehicle or demand payment from purchaser of all value received as consideration for the sale or transfer." In other words, you buy the Lightning, you're stuck with it for a full year from your purchase date. It's a similar solution tried by Ford for the GT supercar, but we also know how that actually worked.
However, the one problem Ford didn't address in this letter? Anti-consumer markups. We understand the need for markup due to market demand and that it's a part of the capitalist marketplace. It's the markup of nearly half or even double the price of MSRP is what ruins the dealership experience for consumers and gives the biggest blackeyes to the automakers. This also needs to be curved, but it seems like this isn't a priority for any OEM with a franchise dealership model, at the moment. So prepare to possibly pay more for your Lightning, but not in the form of extra deposits or the like.
You may also like
ford mustang-mach-e Full OverviewLest you think we don't read your letters, we get it: You think a Ford Mustang should be a two-door, rear-drive, V-8-powered pony car. But let's face facts, shall we? The Ford Mustang Mach-E electric SUV is very much here and very much a Mustang; it even says so on the label. But that's not to say there hasn't been room for improvement; for example, Ford launched the Mustang Mach-E last year without a higher-powered GT variant at the outset. That's like rolling out a new-generation Mustang without a V-8 to start. It took them a while, but the 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition is finally here, so naturally we strapped our test gear on it to find out if the wait was worth it.Mustang Mach-E GT and Mach-E—What's the Difference? What Is the Performance Edition?Like the decades of gas-powered Mustangs that've preceded it, the Mustang Mach-E GT follows the same tried-and-true formula: make a sportier-looking, better-handling, and more powerful pony SUV. The standard Mustang Mach-E GT sports two upsized permanent-magnet electric motors—one at each axle—good for a combined 480 hp and 600 lb-ft of torque, backed up by the Mach-E's larger 93-kWh battery pack, upsized brake rotors, a retuned suspension, and 20-inch wheels wrapped in performance-oriented all-seasons. The Mach-E GT Performance Edition takes things a bit further. Although horsepower is unchanged, torque rises to 634 lb-ft, and it also gets MagneRide dampers, sticky summer rubber, and upgraded Brembo brakes at the front wheels. Range falls by just 10 miles versus the standard Mustang Mach-E GT, from 270 miles to 260.Does the Mustang Mach-E GT Feel Like a Mustang on the Road? How Fast Is It?Straight-line speed is traditionally where a Mustang GT offers the most thrills, and the Mach-E GT Performance Edition is no exception. Although it isn't as violent off the line as some other high-performance electric SUVs, the Ford launches hard, and without a more conventional transmission to deal with, its twin motors are almost always in the meat of their powerband. Interestingly, the Mach-E's power starts to quickly taper off as you near triple-digit speeds—something that undoubtedly affected its performance numbers.With our test gear strapped into the passenger seat and GPS receiver gaff-taped to the roof, the Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition's best 0-60-mph run took 3.6 seconds, just a tenth of a second behind the last 2021 Tesla Model Y Performance we tested, but seven-tenths quicker than the V-8-powered 2021 Mustang Mach 1. Weirdly, our best launches weren't made using the Mach-E's sport mode (cheekily named "Unbridled"), but in the default "Engage" drive mode. We found Engage to be quicker for both our 0-60 and quarter-mile runs, the latter of which saw the Mach-E GT run down the dragstrip in 12.6 seconds at 100.6 mph. That ties the latest Mustang Mach 1's quarter-mile time (though 12.5 mph slower), but it lags significantly behind a Model Y Performance, which runs the quarter in 12.0 seconds at 114.7 mph."Very strong low-end acceleration, but when it got beyond 80 mph, there was a very noticeable power drop, also indicated on the power bar on the instrument cluster," road test analyst Alan Lau said.The Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition's braking and handling didn't disappoint, either. It hides its nearly 5,000 pounds well with quick and precise steering, and its firm yet not punishing ride mitigates body roll. Things get particularly fun in Unbridled mode with traction and stability control off; this EV SUV allows a surprising(ly fun) amount of oversteer. Its stopping power is particularly good, too. "The best of any EV I've tested," road test editor Chris Walton said of the Mach-E GT's brakes. "They are highly effective and very well tuned for trail-braking: easy to predict, control, and release."Walton's impressions hold up when breaking down the Mustang EV's 60-0-mph and figure-eight test numbers. On the former, the Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition stops in just 105 feet—that's 9 feet longer than a Mach 1 but 8 shorter than a more comparable Model Y Performance. On the figure eight, it busted out a 24.9-second lap at 0.78 g average in Unbridled Extend mode—a sport performance mode designed to keep the battery and motors in their optimal temperature range for autocross and track days. Although the mode worked as advertised, the Mach-E generally needed to sit parked for at least 15 minutes before we could get it to engage. The Mach-E GT's lap is just a tenth of a second and 0.01 g less than a Model Y Performance, but not surprisingly it lags a fair bit behind a Mustang Mach 1, which lapped the course in 23.7 seconds at 0.82 g.A Nerdy Note on Charging the Mustang Mach-E GTAlthough the Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition doesn't disappoint on the road, we're a bit perplexed by its Level 3 DC battery charging speed. It's nominally rated for a 150-kW peak rate (to put that in perspective, Teslas max out at a 250-kW peak, while the 2022 Kia EV6—a direct competitor—will allow for a 350-kW peak). In real-world testing, the Mustang Mach-E's charge curve was aggressively conservative.Utilizing a 350-kW Electrify America fast charger, it took us 41 minutes to charge from 15 to 80 percent capacity, which is bang on what Ford advertises the Mach-E to be capable of achieving. (Plugging it into a 350-kW charger is a bit like filling up a Prius with premium, but we chose that particular charger because we knew it worked well.) So, what's the problem? Our issue is that once you get past that 80 percent rate—like, say, if you'd like to add a little bit more of a range buffer during a road trip—the charge rate drops from the low-90-kW range to just 13 kW, or about the rate a Level 2 overnight charger delivers electricity to a vehicle. Long story long, it will lead to Mach-E owners spending more time than they need to at the charger.There isn't another EV on the market we can recall that has such a slow post-80 percent charge rate, so we reached out to Ford for comment. A spokesperson told us the automaker designed the slow post-80 percent rate in an attempt to maximize the Mustang's battery life but that it has committed "to expand [the DC fast charge] curve 'ceiling' to greater than 80 percent state of charge through a Ford Power-Up over-the-air software update." No official word on what the new ceiling will be, but Ford's general manager of battery electric vehicles told InsideEVs the automaker is currently looking at raising the fast-charge ceiling from 80 to 90 percent. No word yet on when Mach-E owners can expect the over-the-air update.How Much Does the Mustang Mach-E Cost?Prices for the Mustang Mach-E GT are competitive for the segment, with prices starting at $61,000. That undercuts the Model Y Performance ($65,190 this week), even when you match equipment levels. The Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition's value proposition is a little murkier. The package adds $5,000 to the bottom line, and if you opt for the panoramic glass roof, Ford's BlueCruise advanced driver assist system, and a premium color like that found on our test car, the sticker balloons to an as-tested price of $69,800.So, Is the Mach-E GT Really a Mustang?The Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition doesn't look or sound like a traditional Mustang, but the performance it offers certainty lives up to the promises implied by the Mustang GT name. While it isn't perfect, the electrified pony SUV is a promising rethink of what the Mustang is, and what it can be.Looks good! More details?2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E4x (Performance Edition) Specifications BASE PRICE $66,000 PRICE AS TESTED $69,800 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV MOTOR TYPE Permanent-magnet electric POWER (SAE NET) 480 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 634 lb-ft TRANSMISSION 1-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 4,980 lb (50/50%) WHEELBASE 117.5 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 186.7 x 74.1 x 63.5 in 0-60 MPH 3.6 sec QUARTER MILE 12.6 sec @ 100.6 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 105 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.96 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 24.9 sec @ 0.78 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 88/75/82 mpg-e EPA RANGE, COMB 260 miles ON SALE Now Show All
Best Driver's Car has become MotorTrend's Performance Vehicle of the Year. There are two key positives we netted by changing our annual high-performance hullaballoo to a MotorTrend Of The Year program. First, the number of cars competing increases substantially. With Best Driver's Car we were hamstrung by logistics—BDC was a traveling road show, after all—and could only ever evaluate a maximum of 12 vehicles. Year One of Performance Vehicle of the Year saw a field of 22 contenders and finalists, and if not for the pandemic, the semiconductor chip shortage, and general supply chain woes, the number would have been greater. Second, the amount of time our judges get with each car increases by orders of magnitude, especially on the track. We did lose the amazing contributions of our friend and professional race car driver Randy Pobst, as well as his WeatherTech Raceway Laguna Seca lap times, but these changes allow us to deliver to you a better story with a better verdict.We began the inaugural MotorTrend PVOTY at Hyundai's desert proving ground in California City, California. Our test team arrived a week early to get numbers (curb weights, 0-60 and quarter-mile times, 60-0 braking distances, and figure-eight and skidpad figures) from every contender. Our test team members remain our unsung heroes, but to give you an idea of what they do, they fling each car around our figure-eight course at least five times. If the team isn't happy about the performance, three cooldown laps occur before another five hard laps. Plus, with some vehicles rolling on R-compound tires, you need to heat up the rubber before your laps, so there's even more driving. Best-case scenario with 22 cars is more than 200 laps, and please see Murphy's Law for the odds of best cases ever working out. Our photo team arrived with the test team and shot roughly 1,000 images—per vehicle!Next, the official judges arrived at Hyundai and proceeded to conduct walkarounds of every vehicle to make sure everyone was up to speed about what they faced. Few on staff had driven many of the contenders, and certainly no one had driven them all. Only one judge had previously driven the Lamborghini Huracán STO. We had the Volkswagen Golf R and Toyobaru twins at our Car of the Year event, but not everyone present at PVOTY attended this year's COTY.What's in a walkaround? Well, for example, I was tasked with explaining the BMW XB7 Alpina to the rest of the judges. I broke down why it's in the contest (it's a 612-hp SUV) and what vehicles it competes with in reality. I pointed out its engine's unique tune, the hidden shift buttons, and the Alpina-spec 23-inch Pirelli P Zero tires—"Cool Features," as we term it on our internal template, that you wouldn't necessarily figure out while flinging cars around a proving ground.We then drive quite a bit, and for the next two days we had free rein of Hyundai's awesome facility. We used the high-speed, 6-mile oval to evaluate ride quality—how does a car feel cruising at 120 mph for three minutes? The judges also had access to the figure-eight and skidpad, as well as the special surfaces area (split mu, potholes, Botts' dots, broken pavement, and the like). The bulk of our evaluations took place on Hyundai's winding road course, which, let's face it, is what you want out of a performance vehicle test. The winding layout isn't quite a true racetrack, but it's not not a racetrack, either. Wink, wink.After every judge drove every vehicle, we all sat down to cull the herd from 22 contenders to a certain number of finalists, though we had no set number in mind. The finalists would go on to the canyon and track portions of our test. This, of course, proved very straightforward and easy. Kidding! What's the line from A Christmas Story? "In the heat of battle my father wove a tapestry of obscenity that, as far as we know, is still hanging in space over Lake Michigan." Yeah, well, if you ever find yourself in the Mojave Desert, don't look up.There were many fearsome battles. The one that stands out most prominently concerned the BMW M5 CS. Because of supply chain issues, BMW was unable to deliver us a car with the proper tires equipped (the ones the CS was developed around). Even though some of us couldn't comprehend the M5 CS getting cut, well, cut it was. That's democracy for you, and we wound up with nine finalists. Also, #M5CSwasrobbed.The next leg of PVOTY activities began with a bang, as deputy editor Alexander Stoklosa managed to battle a bear (a bear!) with the Mercedes-AMG GT Black Series on the way to our meeting point atop Angeles Crest Highway, just north of Los Angeles. Fortunately, it was a small bear, a glancing blow, and only an aerodynamic canard was knocked from the car. With the help of the California Highway Patrol, we ran each car on a 12-mile loop from our basecamp above the twin tunnels down to the Mount Waterman Ski Lifts and back.We quickly began to realize the difference between the smooth, wide-open proving ground laps and the reality of keeping a vehicle in a single lane over quite beaten-up tarmac. Some vehicles, like the Hyundai Veloster N, gained favor in our collective estimation. Others, like the AMG, lost points, figuratively speaking. We had an inkling we'd discover things like this, based on the years of running our other OTY programs in this same manner. It was nice to be proven correct.Our next and final stop was the Streets of Willow, the smaller, curvier track at Willow Springs International Raceway. Monster vehicles like the three in our Big Wing Gang (Mercedes-AMG GT Black Series, Porsche 911 GT3, Lamborghini Huracán STO) would be a bit restricted on this shorter course. The other side of that coin was that vehicles like Toyota's GR86 and the Veloster N would be lost at sea on Willow's big track. Moreover, we elected to run Streets backward, for two reasons. First was safety, specifically because the infamous high-speed downhill kink is taken out of the equation. With each judge running five laps per car and nine finalists, that's 45 hot laps per judge, 315 laps total. That's a lot of opportunities for something to go wrong. Second, if you've ever driven Streets backward, you know it's more fun.As we discovered the day before on ACH, opinions about the vehicles changed based on the environment. A couple of the darlings of ACH quickly lost some appeal as they suffered horrible brake fade on the racetrack. We're looking at you, Hyundai and Toyota. On the other hand, the Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing and CT5-V Blackwing drew massive praise and huzzahs over their world-class, repeatable stopping prowess. Then there was the case of the AMG, which was collectively deemed "too much" for the street but did better on the track. However, there were two vehicles that sang and danced wonderfully in all three locations. After a surprisingly mellow debate, and by a 5-to-2 margin of victory, we had the inaugural 2022 MotorTrend Performance Vehicle of the Year winner.
In the world of Honda building, the Civic and Integra chassis reign supreme in terms of popularity and aftermarket support. But even within the ranks of multiple generations and trim levels, some models just don't get as much attention as others. The second-generation Integra, for example, was a hit with both the mainstream and enthusiast groups when it debuted over 30 years ago. Aspirational for the Civic and CRX crowd, it served as a step up with its 1.8-liter DOHC engine and refined interior chock full of additional amenities and modified versions could be found virtually everywhere. As the third-generation Integra was introduced, the DA chassis took a backseat as parts development and popularity surrounded the newer model and the number of 1990-93 Integra builds dropped considerably.Reliving the Glory YearsThat was then, and lately, early 190s Honda nostalgia is at an all-time high. With those old school vibes comes a renaissance of sorts for the DA chassis. Along with those that have always owned and modified these cars, there is a wave of new and return owners that appreciate the sleek styling and charm of Acura's early '90s, entry-level offering. And for any Honda enthusiast looking for a '90s-era chassis to start on, the "mechanic's special" that Enrique Guerra found on Craigslist four years ago is the stuff of dreams. A 1992 LS model with faded paint and an undiagnosed engine issue that resulted in an asking price of just $500—something Guerra jumped on immediately.Like any older Honda chassis, finding aftermarket support can be tough, while sourcing OEM replacement parts is almost impossible. He adds, "It's been a stressful couple of years sourcing new parts and buying products that will work with the DA chassis, but with the help of social media, close friends, and networking, finding parts became a lot easier."As with most DA chassis owners, the initial plan called for a deep clean and some very basic updates to freshen the car up while maintaining its '90s-era feel. "In the Bay (Area) we have a very diverse car community with a little of everything which influenced the Integra to go through a couple of phases—I eventually ended up going as far as restoring the car completely."JDM x USDMThe restoration portion of the build included a Captiva Blue Pearl respray that covered the entire car, including a set of classic Wings West side skirts and matching rear bumper cap. Every DA build needs JDM one-piece headlights to consider it complete, which Guerra sourced, along with a set of thin side moldings from the Japanese DA model that match the bumper moldings much better with their flatter appearance. Other less obvious parts from overseas included the front fenders and bumper. From there, carbon fiber replacement parts became Guerra's main focus with the build.The requisite carbon fiber Seibon hood and VIS hatch were in order, and matched to a slew of other carbon parts, including a JDP Engineering front lip and rear spoiler, Tracklife Composites bumper ducts, I-Sport side and rear window visors, a custom windshield cowl, and a set of Cactus Composites mirror bases to anchor Imagine Racing side mirrors. Adding even more contrast against the uncommon factory body color are gloss black 16x8 TE37 wheels highlighted by bright orange front and rear Wilwood brake calipers.Modern ReliabilityHaving a personal connection to the 1990-93 Integra chassis, one thing I've noticed time and time again is that many nice-looking DA builds ignore under-hood enhancement - but that's not the case here. The original engine issues that came with the car are ancient history with a B18C1 swap now powering Guerra's LS. Avoiding shaved sheet metal or a tucked wiring loom, the appearance is clean and tidy with an OEM-plus aura. The A/C, power steering, and cruise control are all still intact and operational, while the B-series' weak link ignition system is modernized by way of Hondata's coil-on-plug conversion with a Rywire coil plate and engine harness included. The high-quality wiring is a welcome addition as Guerra notes that the car included some frustrating wiring issues provided by its previous owners, but he was fortunately able to work them out.The OEM-style intake is based on a Comptech Ice Box with a velocity stack that routes outside air to an Integra Type R factory intake tube before feeding a Skunk2 throttle body and Ultra Street intake manifold. Exhaust is routed through a PLM header and Thermal cat-back system and a Vibrant Ultra Quiet resonator was added to control drone. It's not pushing big peak power or running on the ragged edge, but instead offers a huge improvement over the Integra's original output while remaining entirely reliable and doesn't force Guerra to give up any of those create comforts that come in handy on his lengthy drives up and down the California coast.More modern touches were applied to the interior, starting with an S2000 gauge cluster swap and a flocked dash. Just in front of the updated cluster is a Renown Champion HP steering wheel that Guerra fitted with a custom mount for the cruise control buttons. The original seats were pulled for a pair of Corbeau buckets with upholstery that matches perfectly to the suede pillars and headliner.The Parts HunterDuring the build process, Guerra was a regular at local junk yards in search of replacement parts for his Integra as well as offering to help his fellow enthusiast outside of the state or country that might be in search of something he had access to. In addition, he spends his free time coming up with his version of some much-needed Integra replacement parts which he offers through his Ninety93 website with the promise to add more as development continues.Getting his hands on a starter chassis for such a cheap price came with its fair share of issues, as he states, "It needed a lot of attention, but it was definitely fun to build, nonetheless. It pushed me to learn how to do things on my own such as powdercoat and understand what parts work and don't work with the DA chassis, and even quickly trouble shoot anything wrong with the car. The idea behind the build was to have something modern and aggressive with some old school appeal while also steering away from the rest of the other Integra builds you usually see."The tale of the $500 mechanic's special isn't over just yet. "The car still has a long way to go as 2022 rolls in and I have big plans to change the look of the exterior very soon, along with other small things here and there."Car: 1992 Acura Integra LSOwner: Enrique GuerraInstagram: @pincheenriqueEngine GS-R swap; Hasport engine mounts; PLM header; Skunk2 intake manifold, throttle body; ITR intake arm; Comptech Ice Box intake; Thermal R&D cat-back exhaust; Vibrant ultra-quiet resonator; ATI crankshaft pulley; RC 440cc injectors; MPC Motorsports fuel rail; Grams 255lph fuel pump; custom catch can; Rywire Motorsports Electronics engine harness, coil-on-plug plate; Mishimoto aluminum radiator, slim fans, silicone hoses w/heat shrink clamps; G Development titanium hardware; Hondata S300 V3 management, coil-on-plug conversion kitDrivetrain B16 transmission; OEM LSD; Innovative DC2 shift linkage, half shaft, axlesSuspension Megan Racing coilovers; Skunk2 front/rear camber kits; Buddy Club extended ball joints; K-Tuned traction bar; Password:JDM 3-pt. shock tower bar; Hardrace front control arm bushings; ASR rear LCA w/spherical ends, subframe, 24mm sway bar w/spherical end links, trailing arm bushings; G Development titanium hardwareBraking Wilwood DynaPro 6-piston front calipers, rear calipers, 12.9 front/rear rotors, parking brake cables, stainless linesWheels & Tires 16x8 Volk Racing TE37; 225/45 Toyo Proxes R1R; Rays Engineering lug nutsExterior JDP Engineering carbon fiber lip, trunk spoiler; Seibon carbon fiber hood; VIS carbon fiber hatch; Tracklife Composites carbon fiber brake caliper ducts; Cactus Composites side mirror plates; Imagine Racing carbon fiber mirrors; I-Sport carbon fiber window visors, hatch visor; custom carbon fiber wiper cowl; JDM 1-piece headlights, fenders, front bumper, bumper support, thin moldings; Wings West side skirts, rear bumper cover; OEM optional sunroof visorInterior Corbeau seats; flocked dash; S2000 gauge cluster; Renown Champion HP steering wheel w/custom-mounted cruise control; NEXT Miracle X-bar roll bar; Phase2Motoring floor mats; ZOOM Engineering carbon fiber rear view mirror; Cactus Composites carbon shift plate, S2000 cluster bezel; Mugen sport pedals; JDM manual seatbelt conversion, armrest w/cupholder, Gathers optional rear speaker covers; suede headliner, pillars; Optima battery relocated to trunk; custom subwoofer enclosure, Pioneer double-din head unitThank You I just want to thank my old friends who got me into Hondas 10 years ago and to all of the friends I made along the way. Also a huge thanks to Patrick for all of these amazing shots and also all of the big to small companies that support making replacement and performance parts for these very old cars
0 Comments