2023 Alfa Romeo Tonale First Look: Alfa’s Small SUV Is Finally Here
The launch of any new vehicle is significant, but for the 2023 Alfa Romeo Tonale it's doubly so. The new Tonale isn't just Alfa's first small SUV (not to mention only its second SUV). It also marks the first step in Alfa Romeo's sprint toward a promised all-electric lineup by 2027. With three full-hybrid drivetrains on top of traditional gas and diesel options, the new 2023 Tonale is Alfa's way of stylishly setting the tone for its electrified path into the future.
What's the Tonale?
Alfa Romeo unveiled the Tonale at the Geneva Motor Show in 2019 (remember those, auto shows?) in concept form. Aside from the requisite side mirrors, door handles, and windshield wipers, the production 2023 Tonale is a virtual dead ringer for the now 2-year-old show vehicle.
That's just as well because the concept was a looker. Designed to compete against the Audi Q3 and Q4, BMW X1 and X2, Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class, and Volvo XC40, the Tonale stands out with its understated "necessary beauty" sheetmetal, set off by new 3+3 LED lighting elements on its nose and tail, both of which Alfa says harken back to the SZ and Brera.
What Powers the Tonale?
Underpinned by a heavily modified version of Stellantis' SCCS crossover platform (versions of which are found in the Jeep Compass and Renegade and Fiat 500L and 500X), the Tonale aims to offer the signature Alfa driving experience in an efficient, practical package. Designed from the get-go to be both a global vehicle and the linchpin in Alfa's inevitable pivot to electrification, the Tonale will offer up five powertrain options globally, two of which are coming to North America.
The Tonale's standard North American powertrain will be familiar—Stellantis' turbocharged 2.0-liter I-4, versions of which can be found in vehicles such as the Jeep Cherokee. Under the Tonale's hood, that engine produces 256 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque. It's paired with a nine-speed automatic and standard all-wheel drive.
Alfa's first-ever plug-in hybrid powertrain—expected to be the volume seller—is optional. The Tonale PHEV will sport a 1.3-liter turbocharged I-4 paired with an eTorque-like electric assist motor and six-speed automatic driving the front wheels, while an electric motor backed by a 15.5-kWh battery pack sits at the rear axle, giving the Tonale a total system output of 272 hp and an unspecified amount of torque. (A source at Alfa indicates 350 lb-ft is likely, but that figure isn't official.)
Alfa says the new Tonale PHEV will be both the sportiest Tonale in the lineup and the most efficient. It'll sprint from 0 to 60 mph in an Alfa-estimated 6.0 seconds, and it will be capable of traveling more than 30 miles on electricity alone when fully charged. Like most plug-in hybrids, the Tonale PHEV's battery pack is small enough that it doesn't need Level 3 fast charging; a Level 2 charger will charge the battery from empty to full in about two hours and 30 minutes.
Europe, Asia, and Africa will have the choice of three additional powertrains. In Europe and Asia, the new Tonale Hybrid will be standard. Consisting of a brand-new 1.5-liter turbocharged I-4 paired with a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic with a built-in electric motor, the front-drive-only Tonale Hybrid will be available in both 130- and 160-hp forms.
Alfa will also offer a 130-hp turbodiesel Tonale with front-wheel drive and a six-speed dual-clutch automatic in Europe and Africa. Alfa says it has no plans to bring the new Tonale Hybrid or diesel stateside, as neither is powerful or torquey enough for North American tastes.
With sportiness a priority for any Alfa, the brand spent much of its time tweaking the Tonale's chassis, making it stiffer and lighter than versions of the SCCS platform found elsewhere in parent company Stellantis' portfolio. Alfa fit all four of the Tonale's corners with struts and frequency-selective damping to ensure a comfortable yet sporty ride. An optional electronically adjustable suspension turns up the wick even more. Alfa promises the Tonale's brake-by-wire tech will "seamlessly" balance regenerative and mechanical braking, as well as ABS functions, while its electronic power steering will be quick and precise. We're eager to test those claims.
Inside the New Tonale
With Alfa positioned as Stellantis' new global premium brand, the automaker went to great lengths to make the Tonale's cabin upscale without stepping on the toes of its fellow Italian Stellantis brand, Maserati. The cabin isn't revolutionary, but the richly appointed, driver-focused cabin appears to be a step forward in functionality compared to the at times finicky controls in the Giulia and Stelvio.
As with most new vehicles these days, the cabin's centerpieces are the two large screens up front. In front of the driver is a 12.3-inch digital dash. This reconfigurable screen features the usual assortment of adjustability but also an analog-dial-aping option inspired by the instrument panels of the iconic Alfa Giulia Super and GT Junior.
The 10.3-inch central display features Stellantis' latest Uconnect 5 infotainment suite, but with Alfa-exclusive graphics and functionality. Alfa says this sharp-looking system offers over-the-air update capability, wireless CarPlay and Android Auto integration, and Amazon Alexa.
SpeakiNg oF Tech …
Speaking of tech, the Alfa Romeo Tonale is the first vehicle we're aware of to use NFTs to manage vehicle data. Alfa says each Tonale will be given its own NFT as it rolls down the assembly line in Italy, tracking the features and options of that particular vehicle. Then, once the vehicle reaches its owner, the Tonale's NFT can be continually updated by Alfa dealers with mileage, service history, and accident information. Alfa says the goal of its NFT program is to improve residual values, as the NFT can be passed down from owner to owner as part of Alfa's new certified pre-owned vehicle program. The automaker says owners can opt out of the NFT if they desire.
Aside from NFTs, the new 2023 Tonale will feature the Level 2 Advanced Driver Assist Systems (ADAS) buyers in the segment expect. The Tonale's ADAS suite includes convenience features such as adaptive cruise control, with traffic jam assist, and lane centering, as well as safety features like automatic emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, and rear cross-path protection.
How Much Is the Tonale and How Do I Buy One?
Alfa isn't talking prices for the new 2023 Tonale yet, but it is talking about how you can buy one. In a first for Alfa, the Tonale will be available for purchase both at the 138 Alfa dealers nationwide and online. Designed to simplify the purchasing process, Alfa says it will partner with its small dealer base to both expand each dealer's geographical footprint and make the purchasing process easier and more transparent for Tonale buyers. As part of this effort, Alfa is introducing "video checks" at the dealer, where vehicle and service techs will show owners any potential issues with their cars, with the goal of improving customer peace of mind.
Although Alfa Romeo says it won't release 2023 Tonale pricing until closer to its early 2023 launch, it has told us that prices would be "competitive" with the segment. The Tonale will be offered in just three trims at launch: The base Tonale Sprint will be available with the gas engine only, the midlevel Tonale Ti will offer both gas and PHEV options, and the loaded Tonale Veloce will be PHEV only. Our best guess is that the Tonale Sprint will begin around $37,000 or so, Tonale Ti around $42,000, and Tonale Veloce around $45,000.
Regardless of what the Tonale costs, there's no denying it's a significant transition for Alfa as it races to become the first manufacturer in the Stellantis family to go all-electric.
Looks good! More details?You may also like
We've all known a Ford Bronco Raptor was coming, but nobody in the public Broncosphere has known for sure how Ford Performance planned to endow the Bronco with F-150 Raptor-worthy performance—would it do so using an EcoBoost V-6 (and if so, which one?) or a Coyote V-8? Well, now we know: The Ford Performance gang has worked its magic on the 3.0-liter EcoBoost twin-turbo V-6 from the Explorer ST, modifying it extensively to suit the Bronco Raptor's mission, which is to "reward the revs." (For more on the V-6/V-8 decision, head here.)That means the engine should produce meaningful power all the way out to the far reaches of the tachometer while the standard 10-speed automatic transmission's gearing ensures that power is easy to explore the top of the tach. Here's what it took to turn a family SUV motor into a desert stormer for a hardcore 4x4, plus the modifications needed to get that power safely routed to the ground.What's Under the Bronco Raptor's Hood?You'll recall that the 3.0-liter EcoBoost is basically a bored and stroked EcoBoost Nano family sibling of the compacted-graphite-iron-block 2.7-liter powering other Broncos, so it bolts in with relative ease. Relative to the Explorer application, this Bronco Raptor 3.0 features unique cylinder heads that eliminate the exhaust-gas recirculation and emphasize maximum air flow into and out of the engine.A giant high-flow intake airbox and filter drop air straight down into the turbos on each side, helping to reduce the overall restriction on the low-pressure side by 50 percent. The turbos themselves are new for the Raptor, and the plumbing to, from, and through the intercooler is improved to lower restriction. The combustion chambers flow more air, then aft of the turbos there is a full true dual exhaust system with 2.7-inch pipes and a new-to-Bronco four-position active-valve (Quiet, Normal, Sport, and Baja) that reportedly helps deliver a total drop in backpressure of 20 percent.The combined effect of all these mods is greater "boost durability," which means the boost sustains to enhance high-end power and prevents that feeling of power falling off a cliff as you near the engine redline. The new Baja drive mode also activates an anti-lag turbo calibration that further maximizes performance during high-speed desert running. As of press time, the team is still six weeks or so from finalizing the engine's state of tune and certifying it with the EPA, but we're assured it will make north of 400 horsepower. Considering this engine makes 400 hp at 5,500 rpm and 415 lb-ft at 3,500 rpm in the Explorer ST, we'd expect a healthy increase in peak power, probably at a higher rpm, with peak torque rising less but remaining available over a wider plateau.Driveline ModsIt takes a lot more torque to get a big 37-inch tire spinning than it does a 30-inch 255/70R16 or even a 35-inch 315/70R17 Sasquatch tire—especially if one tire ends up pulling the entire vehicle, due to locked axles and slippery conditions under the other three tires. Then there's the driveline shock that comes when a big, spinning tire suddenly finds traction and stops or slows upon landing from, say, a jump. To cope with these magnified driveline forces, both front halfshafts and both ends of the stronger front drive shaft get beefy constant-velocity joints—no simple universal joints here. The outer hubs and bearings are also strengthened.Following the torque aft, the rear drive shaft is also beefed up and it feeds a stronger new Dana 50 Heavy-Duty AdvanTEKrear axle (up from a Dana 44) made of thicker (9-mm) steel tubes capped at each end by a unique forging that helps widen the track. The differential is fitted with a bigger, stronger 235 ring gear (up from 220) and pinion, retaining the Sasquatch model's 4.70:1 axle ratio. Ford Performance developed both these axles and fits them to the Bronco DR race truck. They increase the track width by 8.2 inches front, 6.7 inches rear, relative to the Sasquatch package.Upstream of all this, the transfer case gets a stronger clutch for 4A automatic on-demand engagement, but it carries over the 3.06:1 low-range ratio and overall 67.8:1 crawl ratio. The standard 10-speed automatic is unchanged but for a revised torque converter and the addition of a second transmission oil cooler.Fearless Bronco Raptor 0-60 Time PredictionFord doesn't estimate acceleration times, but it says the base Bronco Raptor's curb weight should come in just under 5,750 pounds. If we conservatively estimate engine output at 430 horsepower, that gives a weight-to-power ratio of 13.4 pounds/horsepower. That's almost exactly what we measured on the last Ford F-150 Raptor 37 pickup we tested (13.3 lb/hp), and that full-size truck took 5.6 seconds to hit 60 mph on the same tires, with virtually the same transmission and a slightly taller axle ratio. So we're guessing the smaller truck will improve on that just slightly and lay down a 5.5-second 0-60 time, shaving at least a second off the quickest Bronco time we've measured.
Sifting through 120 years of history of a brand like Cadillac is a delightful exercise in automotive archeology. Cadillac cars have spanned every era and in many ways have come to symbolize what American luxury and performance mean in the context of the automobile. Like every other American brand, Cadillac has experienced numerous ups and downs, has had its reputation burnished and tarnished. But through it all, Cadillac has persevered, and as the electrified vehicle era dawns, the marque once dubbed "the standard of the world" appears poised for yet another renaissance, thanks to EVs like the new Lyriq SUV and coming Celestiq ultra-luxury sedan.So in celebration of Cadillac's 120 years as a going concern (the Cadillac Automobile Company was formed on August 22, 1902 and named after the founder of the City of Detroit), we decided to pick 12 of what we think are the coolest and otherwise most significant cars Cadillac has produced. This is in no way an exhaustive list, and as a result we left numerous vehicles off that no doubt deserve to be on it. But that's what makes a brand like Cadillac special—there are so many to choose from. In order from oldest to newest, we hope you enjoy our 12-car trip through Cadillac's rich and storied history.
Ford revealed the Mustang Mach-E in both form and, most important, name on a chilly California evening at an event held at the Hawthorne Municipal Airport in November 2019. The announcement was met, as one might expect, with mixed reaction. How could the Mustang—a gasoline-fired, V-8-packin', two-door pony car icon—suddenly be a four-door electric crossover SUV? Not only was that happening, but it would, Ford said, target Tesla's Model Y, which was designed literally next door.Although details were scarce at the time, Ford promised the Mach-E lineup would include a performance-oriented GT model to take the fight to the Model Y Performance. Which leads us directly to now and the execution of MotorTrend's first-ever comparison test of performance-oriented electric SUVs.Earlier this year we paired the Tesla Model Y against the Ford Mustang Mach-E, evaluating their driving characteristics, interior space, technology, charging times, infrastructure, and more. The Model Y took home the gold, but we acknowledged the Mach-E has much to recommend it. For this performance-oriented showdown, we focused on the same items but paid additional attention to the vehicles' handling and how fun to drive they are. As performance SUVs, the Model Y and Mach-E were built to deliver thrills and to be more emphatic and enthusiastic behind the wheel.As you can expect, our Model Y and Mach-E test cars are closely aligned in terms of performance and price. Both share the same basic setup of a single front and a single rear electric motor, single-speed automatic transmission, and all-wheel drive. The Model Y Performance pumps out 456 horsepower and 497 lb-ft of torque from its dual-motor setup, while our Ford Mustang Mach-E GT makes 480 horsepower and 634 lb-ft, the latter number making it the torquiest Mustang of all. The Mustang's 260-mile range is shorter than the Tesla's 303 miles, but both should be enough for most buyers.At $69,800, the Ford is not inexpensive. Its starting price is just over $60K, but our vehicle came equipped with a plethora of options, including a $5,000 GT Performance Edition package that adds magnetic dampers, a torque increase from 600 lb-ft, 20-inch wheels with summer tires, and a few other bits. Our Model Y Performance checked out at $66,190, with the only option being its $1,000 Deep Blue Metallic paint.Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: Behind the WheelAlthough the Mach-E has more muscle, the Model Y is faster in a straight line. It was close, though: The Ford hit 60 mph in 3.6 seconds, while the Tesla did it in 3.5 seconds. The delta was a bit more in the quarter mile, where the Mach-E crossed the line in 12.6 seconds at 100.6 mph and the Model Y in 12 seconds flat at 114.7 mph.The differences between the two were more evident on public roads. Using our Of The Year Loop that covers mountain roads, city streets, and highways, the Model Y felt considerably more eager. Smash its accelerator, and the Model Y Performance absolutely rockets away without any hesitation, never letting up until you do. And its quick, talkative steering means placing it precisely where you want in corners is a snap, with its responsive accelerator pedal making it similarly easy to rotate the nose. And the pinpoint primary controls and the way it piles on speed make highway passes more fun than they have a right to be.The Mach-E doesn't quite have the lightswitch acceleration of the Tesla; it doesn't deliver full power right off the bat, but it's no turtle, either. Indeed, once on the roll, the Ford feels fairly tireless until about 80 mph, when power delivery is significantly reduced. Alan Lau, MotorTrend road test analyst, also noticed the power bar in the instrument cluster drops noticeably when reaching this speed and that the Mach-E struggled to reach 120 mph at the test track. Even given how impressive the Tesla is, the Mach-E takes the lead when it comes to handling—with a caveat. The Ford is extremely well balanced, but occasionally it responds differently to driving into the exact same corner the exact same way, with either under- or oversteer, lacking the predictability we prefer in something we're going to drive hard. And the fact that a performance SUV that has 480 hp and 630 lb-ft fails to deliver consistent rip-snorting acceleration is disappointing.Between the two, the Mach-E GT rides with more refinement, offering a cushier experience and passing less of a given impact to occupants over broken pavement or, say, railroad crossings. Even when driving hard on twisty roads, the Ford is more settled and composed, with better control of its wheel and body motions. The Tesla is by no means unrefined or a poor handler—quite the opposite—it's just that the Ford is slightly ahead in these areas.Both SUVs come with drive modes that tailor the driving experience. But the Mach-E only allows the driver to shift between full modes—Whisper (eco), Engage (normal), and Unbridled (sport)—whereas the Tesla driver can individually alter its acceleration, steering, and braking settings. Acceleration choices are limited to Chill and Sport, but drivers can choose between Comfort, Standard, and Sport for the steering, and Creep, Roll, and Hold for the brakes in the Model Y. Since the Tesla allows the driver to mix and match as desired, there's likely a just-right setting for everyone.As with its suspension, the Mach-E's brakes feel stronger and more tuned for serious driving. Our Mach-E stopped from 0 to 60 mph in 105 feet compared to 113 feet in the Tesla. Those numbers might be close, but in real life they can make a big difference. During our road loop, the Ford felt like it had more grip and allowed us to brake later when approaching a corner.But it was the stronger, relentless acceleration of the Model Y, as well as the Tesla's consistency and predictability in its handling characteristics that made it our choice to drive on this day. We'd never turn down more miles in a Mach-E GT, of course, and further fine-tuning of its software and chassis hardware ought to make it truly special in the future.Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: Charging TimesAlthough most EV buyers will have access to their own charger at home, how long it takes for a vehicle to refill its battery pack is an important consideration when owning an electric car. During our own experience at public charging stations, the Tesla charged faster than the Mach-E.The Ford allows a peak rate of 150 kW—pretty good considering you can add about 150 miles of range in 30 minutes. Using a 350 kW Electrify America fast charger, we went from 15 to 80 percent charge in 41 minutes. However, once the battery got to 80 percent, the charge rate dropped to just 13 kW, or about the rate of a Level 2 charger, meaning it dramatically increased the time needed to fill up.The Model Y, on the other hand, can charge at a peak rate of 250 kW, but we had mixed experiences at Supercharger stations. On the way home, we stopped at a busy Mojave Supercharger, with our Model Y taking 50 minutes to charge from 30 to 80 percent; we were only getting a 48-kW rate. At a less busy Supercharger station, however, the Model Y needed just 15 minutes to go from 28 to 65 percent, charging at a steady 190 kW. Like the Mach-E, the Tesla's charge rate dropped once the battery reached an 80 percent charge, but it stayed around 60 kW.Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: ValueAlthough Tesla seems to increase the Model Y's price every other week, a short list of options helps keep the SUV's price down slightly compared to the Mach-E, especially when the Ford is loaded up. While $66,190 isn't exactly attainable, there is good value in terms of performance, overall excellence, and technology. In the ICE realm, the closest competitor, a comparably equipped Porsche Macan GTS, costs more and is slower than the Model Y Performance.The Mach-E GT is a bit more expensive than the Tesla, but the premium only gets you slight edges in ride, handling, and braking, so those might need to be your priorities if choosing the Ford. Its interior design is handsome enough but isn't as modern or as crisp as the Tesla's, although it does come with technologies like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto that are simple and easy to use. The Ford's build quality also feels superior to the Model Y's, and its sports seats are supportive and appropriate for a performance-oriented SUV.Given that the as-tested costs, being just $3,610 apart, might as well be identical in this price range, and that both are stellar performers overall, the Tesla feels ever so much more worth the money thanks to an interior experience that feels more modern.Mach-E GT vs. Model Y Performance: The VerdictWe expected this comparison test to be a close call—and it was. Both the Mach-E GT and Model Y Performance offer joyful, satisfying driving experiences. These versions of their makers' entry (or only) electric SUVs were developed to please enthusiasts, and more than anything they show how fun EVs can be.But as in our comparison test of the mainstream models, the Tesla comes out on top here. Yes, the Mach-E rides and handles better, and its braking is superb, but the Tesla is the better all-around choice. It gets going incredibly quickly, has no qualms about reaching speed, charges at a faster rate, feels more premium, and it drives very nearly as well on a twisty road.The Mach-E GT is Ford's first attempt at making a performance-oriented electric SUV, and it's hugely impressive. There are some rough edges to sand down, but it updates an icon for a new age and certainly puts Tesla on notice. But for now, the newer brand on the block remains on top.2nd Place: Ford Mustang Mach-E GTPros:Handsome stylingSuperb ride and handlingGrabby brakesCons:High-speed limitationsElevated PriceLonger charging time1st Place: Tesla Model Y PerformancePros:Quick accelerationsFast chargingFuturistic interiorCons:Ride is a bit harshInterior quality could improveRange is misleadingPOWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E4x (GT Performance) SPECIFICATIONS 2021 Tesla Model Y Dual Motor Performance SPECIFICATIONS DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front and rear-motor, AWD Front and rear-motor, AWD MOTOR TYPE Permanent-magnet electric Induction electric (front), permanent-magnet electric (rear) POWER (SAE NET) 480 hp 456 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 634 lb-ft 497 lb-ft WEIGHT TO POWER 10.4 lb/hp 9.7 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 1-speed automatic 1-speed automatic AXLE RATIO 9.05:1 9.0:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar Control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs STEERING RATIO 14.6:1 10.3:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.6 2.0 BRAKES, F; R 14.3-in vented disc; 12.4-in disc 14.0-in vented disc; 13.2-in vented disc WHEELS 8.0 x 20-in cast aluminum 9.5 x 21-in; 10.5 x 21-in, cast aluminum TIRES 245/45R20 103Y Pirelli P Zero Elect 255/35R21 98W; 275/35R21 103W Pirelli P Zero Elect T1 DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 117.5 in 113.8 TRACK, F/R 63.5/63.4 in 64.8/64.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 186.7 x 74.1 x 63.5 in 187.0 x 75.6 x 64.0 in TURNING CIRCLE 39.7 ft 39.8 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 4,980 lb (50/50%) 4,408 lb (49/51%) SEATING CAPACITY 5 5 HEADROOM, F/R 40.4/39.3 in 41.0/39.4 in LEGROOM, F/R 43.3/38.1in 41.8/40.5 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 57.6/55.9 in 56.4/54.0 in CARGO VOLUME, BEH F/R 59.5/26.6 cu ft (4.7 cu ft frunk) 72.1/30.2 (4.1 cu ft frunk) TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.4 sec 1.6 sec 0-40 2.0 2.2 0-50 2.7 2.8 0-60 3.6 3.5 0-70 4.7 4.5 0-80 6.1 5.6 0-90 8.5 7.0 0-100 12.3 8.7 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.8 1.5 QUARTER MILE 12.6 sec @ 100.6 mph 12.0 sec @ 114.7 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 105 ft 113 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.96 g (avg) 0.91 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 24.9 sec @ 0.78 g (avg) 24.8 sec @ 0.79 g (avg) CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $61,000 $65,190 PRICE AS TESTED $69,800 $66,190 AIRBAGS 9: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, driver knee 8:Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee BASIC WARRANTY 3 yrs/36,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 5 yrs/60,000 miles, 8 yrs/100,000 miles EV/Battery 8 yrs/Unlimited miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 5 yrs/60,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles BATTERY CAPACITY 88 kWh 82.0 kWh EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 88/75/82 mpg-e 115/106/111 mpg-e ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 38/45 kWh/100 miles 29/32 kWh/100 miles EPA RANGE 260 miles 303 miles RECOMMENDED FUEL 240-volt electricity, 480-volt electricity 240-volt electricity, 480-volt electricity ON SALE Now No Show All
0 Comments