Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX Concept First Drive: Sampling the Future
I did not win the efficiency contest here in Immendingen, Germany, home of the sprawling Test Center of Mercedes-Benz even though I had a handicap: the supremely slippery Mercedes-Benz Vision EQXX, a drivable concept car that can travel more than 1,200 km (745 miles) on a single charge.
The problem was not the car, it was me. I could not help busting out of the recommended conservative driving habits to gun it when the speed limits on the handling course allowed, which hurt my score, as did the need for manual braking when a speed limit was momentarily exceeded, prompting a warning. The benchmark was 7.9 miles per kWh; I recorded only 6.4 kWh of average consumption over the 10-mile course. On the plus side, after each burst of acceleration, I used the most aggressive of the four settings for regenerative braking and racked up more than three times the extra energy and range of the benchmark driver.
Which is to say, the beauty of the EQXX is that it can be fun, with a mighty torque pull, as well as efficient—I still recorded a single-digit consumption figure—so best of both worlds.
And that is good because this Vision concept is the future of Mercedes EVs. The learnings and stylings will show up in new vehicles coming in 2025 and beyond from the new Mercedes Modular Architecture or MMA. The EQXX is a street-legal prototype and the only one of its kind in the world. At 110.2 inches, it is a compact car, roughly the same wheelbase as the Mercedes-Benz EQB.
Its impressive range, beating the Lucid Air Grand Touring's 516 miles and the Tesla Model S Long Range at 405 miles per EPA, is attributable to a number of factors. The EQXX has a 100-kWH battery pack, similar to the one in the Mercedes-Benz EQS large sedan, but in the EQXX concept the unit is half the size and weighs 30 percent less, the cells are packaged differently and it has a carbon fiber top cover. The anodes use more silicon and hold more energy. While the rest of the Mercedes EV lineup have a 400-volt system, and some competitors have 800V, the EQXX system is more than 900V.
Stumbling onto the Teardrop Shape
The design team came up with the car's teardrop shape with the rear track two inches narrower than the front, a tapered cabin, and a long tail with an active diffuser which extends almost 8 inches. "We didn't set out to create this shape, we found it," Malte Sievers, project manager for the Vision EQXX tells us.
The result: a claimed drag coefficient of 0.17—more streamlined than a football—making the EQXX the most efficient model Mercedes, or perhaps anyone, has built. It could become a car for the ages as 0.17 will be hard to beat, physics is physics, says Sievers. And this slippery missile could never be built if it had to accommodate an internal combustion engine. "The whole thing falls apart," he says. "It shows the capability EVs brings to the industry."
Engineers say 62 percent of the EQXX's efficiency is from aerodynamics; meaning every change to aero affects everything else by 62 percent. You can make changes to rolling resistance, for example, but your efforts will never impact more than 20 percent of the total efficiency. And everything else amounts to an 18 percent impact. The team looked at every part to see if it was necessary and if so, how to make it light, efficient, and not heat up. The cooling plate underneath allows the car to be cooled by airflow and the overall efficiency means there is little to cool.
The summation of all the engineering efforts is a car where 95 percent of the energy sent from the battery makes its way to the wheels. For reference, the EQS sends 90 percent of its energy to the wheel well, which means the team had to make the EQXX twice as efficient.
First Outsiders to Drive the Mercedes-Benz EQXX
We were part of a media program that let non-Mercedes people drive the Vision EQXX for the first time. To date, only Mercedes employees have put it through its paces. That includes two road trips, the first April 5 from Singelfingen, Germany, to Cassis in northern Italy, 1,008 km (626 miles) and using 8.7 kWh/100 km or 7.1 miles per kWh, with 140 km (87 miles) left at the finish. The second run, June 21-22, was from Stuttgart to Silverstone in France, a distance of 1,202 km (747 miles) in summer heat requiring the air conditioning to run for 11 hours. Average consumption was 8.3 kWh/100 km or 7.5 miles/kWh, and it included 11 laps on the track when the car reached Silverstone to empty the remaining energy.
To work out the bugs, the team created a test mule by squeezing a 100-kW battery, DC/DC converter and DC charging controls, battery management system, other aspects of the EQXX powertrain, as well as testing equipment, into a Mercedes-Benz EQB. The mule is known as EMMA (the MMA for Mercedes Modular Architecture). EMMA made the Sindelfingen to Cassis trip first in a test run with its share of breakdowns, a learning curve that proved to be a total success as the EQXX did not have a single mishap in either of its long-distance tests.
We drove EMMA, who was a little clunky as the suspension was not adapted for the weighty equipment added or the fact that most of it bears down on the rear axle, throwing off the balance.
Then we hopped in the EQXX which was much quieter, balanced, nimble, and downright supple by comparison, riding on Ultralight 20-inch forged magnesium wheels with Bridgestone Turanza tires that are also lightweight and have ultra-low-rolling resistance. The car cornered nice and flat, the suspension was not challenged by the course, but neither did it stumble.
Impressive Regenerative Braking
Both cars have one-pedal driving with four degrees of regenerative braking—mild, two aggressive settings, and the option to have no reclamation at all, which works infinitely better on the EQXX. On one long straight in EMMA, we turned off regen and saw our speed drop about 9 mph within seconds. In the EQXX the speed never dropped at all.
Manual braking was harsher in EMMA, it was less grabby in the EQXX, but engineers wince if a foot ever touched that pedal because it means energy is being lost. We used the most aggressive regen setting for most of the EQXX drive; it was highly effective without being too harsh.
There is a satisfying weight to the EQXX's steering and the vehicle is not flighty at all. Input and response are nicely married. Acceleration on the 21-minute lap was not neck-snapping but the car picked up speed quicky and smoothly. It was easy to exceed the course's varying speed limits that were being closely monitored.
The big takeaway is that it felt like a production model more so than a concept.
Attempting the Impossible
The EQXX prototype was pulled together in 18 months, a project launched with a request in June 2020 from the board of management to build an electric vehicle capable of driving 1,000 km (621 miles) on a single charge. Almost all the teams involved worked to achieve the seemingly impossible target of 10 kWh/100 km, Sievers said. The car relied on expertise from Mercedes' Formula 1 and Formula E race engineering groups as well as the research department and production development team.
There are 117 heavy solar panels on the roof that send energy into a 12V system that powers many of the car's ancillaries which equates to a roughly 25-km (15-mile) bump in range. Engineers say the energy gains from the panels are greater than the losses due to the extra weight.
You cannot see out the glass of the back window; nor are there cameras for the rearview mirror—they would consume too much energy.
It all adds up to a highly efficient EQXX that exceeded the mandate.
Loving the Luxury Interior
The beautiful navy and white interior of the EQXX is serene and modern without looking too sci-fi or clinically cold, with sustainable vegan materials that look high end. There are 47.5 inches of curved OLED screen, perfect for using the real-time 3D navigation display—but only when absolutely necessary. The mini LEDs that backlight and dim the screen make for crackling crisp graphics. Dimming zones save power by not illuminating the parts of the screen not in use; there is zero energy consumption when the LEDs shut themselves off.
Mercedes provides eco guidance. The car knows the route conditions of the trip programmed into the nav system and tells the driver to speed up or slow down to be more efficient. The driver can look at data to show energy usage, solar energy produced, air pressure and wind direction, and forecast how much energy the trip will require. Almost ready for production is an Intelligent Avator to suggest movies to watch or restaurants to stop at, saving the driver from scrolling through menus on the screen and using energy.
They are tools I clearly need. Said the engineer who tried to keep a straight face as he analyzed the data spikes in my EQXX run: "I think you had fun." Then he confirmed Mercedes would not be hiring me anytime soon for their EV testing.
BASE PRICE Not for sale LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 2+2-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE MOTOR DC DC induction, electric, 100-kWh battery TRANSMISSION 1-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 3,900 lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 110.2 in L x W x H 195.9 x 73.6 x 53.1 in 0-60 MPH EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 250 mpg-e (est) EPA RANGE, COMB 747 miles ON SALE never Show AllYou may also like
Well, it looks like the 2022 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat manual option has been removed from Dodge's site, for now. You could potentially blame the lack of popularity of manuals in most new car sales, but it seems Dodge's reasoning is a bit more digital than that. The Powertrain Control Module (PCM) fitted to manual-equipped Challengers required a new calibration, putting any chance of getting a stick on the model on ice.A forum post, via Road & Track, dating back to December 10, 2021 shows that the manual transmission version of the Challenger Hellcat is not currently available. However, looking on Dodge's website, every other manual option of the Challenger can be ordered-but the Hellcat manual isn't even on the site. That same forum post also alleges that getting the manual transmission paired with the Hellcat's 6.2 liter supercharged Hemi V-8 to pass emissions is the issue, which could imply this is the required recalibration Dodge mentioned.There might be some grain of truth to that, but we weren't able to directly confirm. When we did ask if there was a calibration issue with the Challenger Hellcat, Dodge did confirm, but added that updating calibrations are a normal part of vehicle production and that this isn't related to the issues with silicon-based chip and PCM supply shortages currently disrupting the industry.It would appear that setting up this new calibration might take some time. Dodge says it's unsure of when the updated programming will be ready and when the Challenger Hellcat manual will come back for ordering. For now, if you were interested in a manual Challenger Hellcat (and why wouldn't you be?) you'll have to pick something else, go with the automatic, or just wait and hope Dodge can bring it back.
Related: MotorTrend+ is the exclusive streaming home for Mecum Auctions! Sign up for a free trial today to catch all the action, plus the best automotive shows anywhere!Rare Blend of Power and SUV PerformanceNot Stock but not a Deal-Breaker
It never fails: Each year after we award our Car of the Year, Truck of the Year, and SUV of the Year, we're inundated with your letters demanding to know why we didn't include your favorite vehicle. While many readers' theories border on conspiracy, the simplest explanation is that if a vehicle isn't at an Of The Year, you can blame one of three reasons: it wasn't eligible, it wasn't available, or on rare occasions the manufacturer wasn't interested in competing. We expect many of the same letters about our inaugural MotorTrend Performance Vehicle of the Year competition. So in the spirit of transparency, we're opening the curtains to let you know all the vehicles we invited and why they were missing this time around.Before we dive in, let's review our Performance Vehicle of the Year eligibility requirements. Like Car, Truck, and SUV of the Year, contenders must be all new or significantly updated and on sale in all 50 states by January 1 of the award year (2022, in this case) to receive an invitation. Manufacturers must commit to loaning us their vehicles without supervision for two weeks. But then our criteria for inclusion in Performance Vehicle of the Year begin to diverge from our older Of the Year awards.For starters, we had to define "performance vehicle." In our case, it means a road-going vehicle with a focus on speed, handling, and capability over all else. That means no off-roaders this year (though we'll keep the door open on that in the future). Next was the issue of which of a manufacturer's performance vehicles to invite when a model lineup includes many. To keep things simple, when multiple new performance variants exist (as in the case of the Volkswagen Golf GTI and R), we opted to invite the sportiest variant available. And last, our price cap—$150,000 for Car, Truck, and SUV of the Year—was eliminated.Head here for the contenders and here for the finalists to see the list of vehicles that participated in our inaugural Performance Vehicle of the Year competition; you can find out which vehicle took the crown here. What now follows is the list of 26 additional vehicles we invited, and the reasons they didn't participate.2022 Acura NSX Type SThe new NSX Type S certainly appears worthy of inclusion, but unfortunately the hybrid supercar wasn't ready yet (media drives still haven't occurred but are scheduled for February 2022). The NSX will remain on the invite list for the 2023 MotorTrend Performance Vehicle of the Year program.2022 Aston Martin DBX, 2022 Aston Martin ValkyrieWe extended an invite to Aston's new super SUV and its hypercar, but the company declined to participate for undisclosed reasons. Valkyrie production began as our PVOTY program kicked off in November 2021.2022 Audi RS E-Tron GT, 2022 Audi RS3The COVID-19 pandemic hasn't been easy on automakers, forcing many to trim their press fleets and be strategic with where they send vehicles. Unfortunately for us, that led to Audi declining to send us both the RS E-Tron GT (its press vehicles were on the East Coast) and the new RS3, as the media launch for the new sport compact conflicted with PVOTY.2022 BMW i4 M50The BMW i4 M50 wasn't ready in time for our program. We'll extend BMW's first electric sport sedan an invitation for 2023.2021 Dodge Durango HellcatThe hot-selling (and limited edition) 710-hp Durango Hellcat was already out of production by the time our program began.2022 Ferrari 296 GTB, 2022 Ferrari 812 GTS, 2022 Ferrari SF90Ferrari said it didn't have any cars, such as the SF90 we tested previously, stateside to send to Performance Vehicle of the Year. See you next year.2022 Hyundai Elantra N, 2022 Hyundai Kona NHyundai opted not to send either the Elantra N or the Kona N to our program. It held a media drive for both vehicles in California a few days after Performance Vehicle of the Year concluded.2022 Lamborghini Countach LPI 800-4Lamborghini told us it didn't yet have any of its hyper-limited edition 2022 Countachs available for media reviews.2022 Lucid Air Dream Edition PDespite its Car of the Year win, Lucid declined to participate in our Performance Vehicle of the Year program for undisclosed reasons.2022 Maserati Ghibli Trofeo, 2022 Maserati MC20, 2022 Maserati Quattroporte TrofeoMaserati said it didn't have any 2022-model-year vehicles in its fleet. We eagerly anticipate seeing the mid-engine MC20 at our next PVOTY, especially after getting a first drive of it recently.2021 McLaren 765LT Spider, 2022 McLaren ArturaMcLaren said the 765LT was unavailable and that the new Artura was not yet ready. The Artura is a shoo-in for the invite list next year.2023 Mercedes-AMG GT73e 4-DoorIt certainly seemed that the long-rumored hybridized AMG GT73e 4-Door would make its debut before our Performance Vehicle of the Year competition, but it still hasn't been revealed at the time of publication.2022 Pininfarina BattistaWe asked for the multimillion-dollar, Rimac-built electric hypercar, but the Italian design-house-turned-manufacturer said its car would be in Europe with clients.2022 Porsche Panamera Turbo S E-HybridThe refreshed Panamera Turbo S E-Hybrid was unavailable for our testing. Because the Turbo S E-Hybrid supersedes the Panamera GTS on the performance hierarchy, we didn't invite the GTS.2022 Rimac NeveraRimac expressed a great deal of interest in participating but claimed all of its pre-production and engineering cars were tied up in the final production-certification process. The Croatian electric supercar will remain on our short invite list for next year.2022 Subaru WRXThe new WRX simply wasn't ready in time for our PVOTY competition. Media first drives didn't occur until about a month after our program concluded, but we look forward to testing it at next year's program.2022 Tesla Model S Plaid, 2022 Tesla Model X PlaidAlthough Tesla famously no longer has an official public-relations department, a representative for the company responded to our invitation with, "Pass. Thanks." A shame, really, especially considering how the Model S Plaid performed in our previous test.
0 Comments