It’s 2037, and These Tech Breakthroughs Have Radically Transformed Your Car

mercedes-benz eqb-class Full OverviewThe electrification of Mercedes-Benz in America is off to a good start. The U.S. is already the top market in the world for the flagship EQS sedan, and dealers are eagerly anticipating the arrival of the more affordable EQE sedan this fall. Insiders are quietly confident that Mercedes-Benz can sell up to 45,000 electric vehicles stateside in 2023. And the perky 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQB will be a key contributor to hitting that number.Unlike the EQS and EQE sedans, the EQB is not built on a dedicated EV platform. Instead, it shares much of its structure with the conventional internal combustion GLB subcompact SUV. As we reported in our preview drive of the EQB350 4Matic late last year, the smooth, silent, punchy electric powertrain transforms the subcompact SUV. The EQB feels much more like a miniature Mercedes than the GLB.We've covered the EQB350 4Matic in detail, though since our drive Mercedes-Benz USA has confirmed the 288-hp, 383-lb-ft SUV will start at $59,100. And although no official figures have been released, informed sources suggest the EQB350's 70.5-kWh battery (its usable capacity is 66.5 kWh) will deliver an EPA-rated range of about 220 miles.The EQB300 4Matic is priced from $55,550, and at first glance it's the more compelling buy of the two. It's identical to the EQB350, right down to the last nut and bolt, as well as the 188-hp motor at the rear axle. The only difference is the power and torque output of the motor at the front axle, which has been dialed back to deliver a total system output of 225 hp and 288 lb-ft.Less power means slightly less performance—Mercedes says the EQB300 is about 1.8 seconds slower to 60 mph than its more powerful sibling, stopping the clock at just under 8.0 seconds. But less power also means there's less demand on the battery, which should equate to more range.Unofficial figures suggest the EQB300 4Matic will have an EPA range of 230 miles. Now, just as with an internal combustion engine, your mileage may vary, depending on how, when, and where you drive. But a 10-mile improvement in rated range isn't quite the headline number you might expect.That's because Mercedes has chosen to optimize energy consumption in both EQBs by using the permanently excited synchronous electric motor driving the rear wheels as often as possible, as the front motor's asynchronous design means it generates only minimal drag losses in partial-load operation. And that means the EQB350's more powerful front motor isn't always sucking down extra electrons. For most of your driving time, the two models are—in energy consumption terms—identical.Our key takeaway from the EQB350 drive—that the EV powertrain adds a level of refinement and performance that's missing from the gasoline-powered GLB—holds true for the EQB300. But keen drivers will notice a difference between the two EQBs on the road, especially if the road is one that twists and turns.In simple terms the EQB300 doesn't claw its way out of the corners with the same urgency as the EQB350. As a result, it doesn't feel as surprisingly lively or quite as much fun to drive. There's not a lot in it, and in truth few EQB customers are likely to notice, especially on the school run or the daily commute. The transition between regenerative and mechanical braking didn't feel quite as seamless as in the EQB350, either. That said, the multilink rear axle felt just as well-planted and delivered plenty of traction out of corners.Our European-spec EQB300s were all on optional 20-inch rims shod with 235/45 tires. That setup won't be available in the U.S., and we won't be missing anything. Our experience with the EQB350 suggests the standard 18-inch wheels and optional 19s will offer better low-speed ride. What's more, the 20s appeared to make the steering feel gluier and less linear, as if the system was working harder to twist a bigger contact patch.Mercedes offers three driver-selectable lift-off regen levels, actuated via the paddles on the steering column. There's also a mode that allows the car to use navigation data, traffic information, and speed sign recognition to automatically adjust the regen level itself. As with its more powerful sibling, on anything but busy city streets the EQB300 feels best to drive with the least amount of regen, as it enables it to flow more freely down the road.Visually, the EQB300 is identified by EQ-specific design tweaks such as the front and rear LED light bands. The tall, boxy bodywork delivers an interior that is surprisingly roomy. The second-row bench seat slides fore and aft 5.5 inches, and in the rearmost position, there's plenty of leg- and knee room for 6-footers. There's lots of headroom, too, even though the rear seat H-point is higher than that of the front to give rear passengers better all-around visibility. Load space ranges from 16.4 cubic feet with the third row in place, to 57.2 with the second and third rows folded flat.Although Mercedes-Benz makes it clear that in the event of a rollover it considers the optional third row suitable only for those under 5 feet 5 inches tall, the $1,250 option will appeal to those using the EQB for the school run. Why does it cost $400 more than in the GLB? The third-row seats fold flat into the load space floor, so the electrical hardware stored there in the EQBs must be moved into a compartment underneath that's accessed via a flap in the rear bumper.Standard equipment on the EQB300 includes the 10.3-inch digital instrument cluster and 10.3-inch touchscreen multimedia display for the MBUX multimedia system. Standard safety features include active lane keeping assist, blind-spot assist, and active brake assist.Those who prioritize range and performance over everything else will almost certainly opt for Tesla's Model Y Long Range, which also offers seven-passenger capability. But the Model Y costs a whopping $11,640 more than the EQB300— $13,390 more if you're comparing seven-seat versions.No, this Mercedes won't go as far or as fast as the Tesla. But it drives and feels like a real Mercedes and boasts a better-packaged and better-finished interior than the Tesla. Unless you're planning a lot of long, fast road trips in your compact luxury electric SUV, the quieter, more comfortable Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4Matic is a better value—and worth a second look.Looks good! More details? 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4Matic PRICE $55,550 LAYOUT Dual motor, AWD, 5-/7-pass, 4-door SUV ENGINE Permanent-magnet synchronous motor (rear) and asynchronous motor (front) 225 hp/288 lb-ft TRANSMISSION 1-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 4,800 lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 111.3 in L x W x H 184.4 x 72.2 x65.6 in 0-60 MPH 7.8 sec (MT est) EPA FUEL ECON, CITY/HWY/COMB Not yet rated ENERGY CONSUMPTION, CITY/HWY N/A CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB N/A ON SALE Fall 2022 Show All

A Definitive End to the Malaise Era Inside the 1986 Acura Integra: Like, Totally Tubular! The Engine of Tomorrow, TodayBack in the '80s, the Integra's 16-valve 1.6-liter engine really turned our heads. It's easy to chuckle at the oversized DOHC PROGRAMMED FUEL INJECTION decal on the Integra's flanks, but in 1986 this was exotic stuff. Detroit's four-cylinder engines were awful eight-valve lumps that were only just beginning to be tamed with throttle-body fuel injection, a cheap single-injector assembly bolted into the same spot as a carburetor. Even Honda, already known for the best four-bangers in the biz, still offered only single-cam 12-valve engines, all with carburetors (with fuel injection as a new-for-1986 option).Of course, MotorTrend was no stranger to two-cam multi-valve heads; we tested plenty of European supercars, but to see such exotica on a reasonably priced car was a novelty. Same for multi-port fuel injection, which in 1986 was only just making its first appearance on Chevrolet's Corvette and IROC-Z. To see such hardware put together with Japanese precision and refinement, though, was something new, even for us."The Integra's four-valve-per-cylinder 1.6-liter engine proved much more than anticipated," we wrote, "with a blend of flat-torque-curve power-on-demand, quick throttle response, and effective NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) damping unsurpassed in engines of its kind on the market today."In the muscle-car '60s—not too distant in 1985's rearview mirror—1-horsepower per cubic inch was the Holy Grail. The Integra drew a righteous 113 horsepower from a mere 97 cubic inches, this at a time when GM's 231-cid (3.8-liter) V-6 only delivered 110. We clocked the then-new 1986 Acura Integra to 60 in 8.9 seconds, just 1.8 seconds behind a 1985 Ford Mustang GT.The Engine of Yesterday, TodayToday we're driving this classic Integra amid fast-moving Los Angeles traffic, and it's a struggle. We're trying to keep up with KJ Jones from MT's Truck and Off-Road Group in his Banks-enhanced Chevy Colorado, and we need every last bit of the Integra's 99 lb-ft of torque. This example has 168,000 miles on the clock and feels appropriate for her age. But Jones knows where we're going and we don't, so museum piece or not, we've no choice but to flirt with the Integra's near-7,000-rpm redline. At least that's our excuse because we like pushing the Integra—and the Integra likes being pushed.With any luck, you are too young and/or fortunate to have driven a four-cylinder car in the early '80s. Trust us, they weren't great, with low and feeble torque peaks concentrated at low or mid revs. Few Americans had experienced anything like the Integra's engine, it's thin low-end torque gradually building and building before surging at 4,000 rpm into a crescendo of power delivered all the way to its exotically-high 6,700-rpm redline—and all the while accompanied by a wonderful sonorous snarl. Today's drivers might say, "So what? That's how every engine drives!" Sure, today they do—and we have the Integra's influence to thank for it.The Correct Tire Transforms the 1986 Acura IntegraBelieve it or not, in our original 1986 test report we complained about the Acura Integra's handling, fixing blame on its Michelin MXV tires which put low limits on the Integra's grip for both turning and braking. (Back in those days we had to modulate brake lock-up in panic stops; there was no ABS to do it for us.) "It was as if the chassis dynamics were tuned to a much more high-performance set of tires," we wrote, "only to be replaced at the last minute." We surmised that better rubber would make the Integra a handling gem.Thirty-five years later, our supposition is confirmed. Our classic Integra's 14-inch aluminum wheels are fitted with a modern set of Falken Azenis RT660s, and the car is masterful. Out on one of our favorite curvy roads, it simply refuses to relinquish its grip on the pavement. The suspension—struts and torsion bars up front, twist-beam in the back—keeps body motions under control, and despite a complete lack of electronic stability control, the Integra never does anything sudden or scary. The steering reminds us why people miss hydraulic assist; it feels alive and chatty with feedback. The effort to turn the tiller is light, and yet the power assist is dialed back enough that you almost forget it's there at all. If a brand-new car drove like this 35-year-old Acura, we'd have nothing to complain about.Lost in TimeAnd that, right there, is the conundrum we face in writing about this classic 1986 Acura Integra in modern times. Not long ago we drove another classic Honda, the foundational first-generation Accord, and there was no mistaking it was a disco-era relic. The timeline is a mind-bender: Only eight years separate that Accord from this Integra. Meanwhile, the time gap between the Integra and modern cars is more than four times as long. And yet it feels like 35 years separate the original Accord and this original Integra, which surely can't be more than a decade older than modern day cars, tape deck and gnarly upholstery notwithstanding.We understand why. In the wake of the Acura Integra's introduction, the 16-valve, dual-overhead-camshaft, multi-port-injected engine would become the industry standard, reigning right up until the recent adaptation of turbochargers, direct injection, and electrification. Detroit would give up its ribbon-style speedometers and one-finger-light power steering to better emulate the Integra. Thanks to Acura, upscale cars would soon be judged not by their size but by their performance, agility, and build quality.Indeed, Honda, Toyota, and the other Japanese automakers fundamentally changed what American automobile buyers wanted, and the 1986 Acura Integra was the car that pointed the way. And so, we can forgive this three-and-a-half-decade-old classic for feeling ordinary. After all, it defined what ordinary would become.

The RML Short Wheelbase (SWB) is not a Ferrari. It's inspired by the classic 250 GT SWB, but it's a new build powered by a modern-era 5.5-liter Ferrari V-12. Think of it as the best sort of homage—not a replica, not a restored, but something tweaked, improved, and usable. The images you're looking at are the first we've seen of the preproduction model, the one RML will use for durability testing. A lot of prepro mules are ugly, taped-together things with temporary lights and lots of warts. Not this RML—it's undeniably gorgeous.This isn't RML's first rodeo. The outfit has been doing kits to make the Aston Martin DB4 and DB5 continuation cars road legal, and even converted an Aston Martin Vulcan for road use. It's dabbled in stranger projects, too, like building a Nissan-GT-R-powered Juke-R crossover for that automaker's European operations. The SWB, though, is something different.And it's real. That's the important part. Whatever happens with the RML SWB at this point—and given where the market for things like this is right now, we doubt RML will lack for customers if they can bring the car to production—this prepro mule is a beautiful, physical testament to the enduring appeal of Golden Era Ferraris. RML says production will start soon, for whatever that's worth.This car will be put through its paces at the UTAC proving grounds (formerly Millbrook, built by GM and modeled after the Milford facility in the U.S. ), which will surely create some wear and tear. Rather than finish it to a lesser standard before it deteriorates, RML decided to make it look nice and grab a set of beautiful images beforehand. This, we greatly appreciate, because who doesn't love to gawk at a beautiful shape? That said, we hope RML isn't afraid to show the SWB doing its thing on the track, warts and all.