2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. Rivian R1T: The Closest Finish in MT History
Comparing the 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning with the 2022 Rivian R1T makes little sense. Sure, both are electric pickups (the third and first to hit the market, respectively), but beyond that, these two pickups have about as much in common as we do with American Journal of Botany.
The Rivian R1T, our 2022 Truck of the Year, is an immensely capable pickup with a lifestyle-oriented bent. It's great to drive on-road and damn near unstoppable off-road, and it can tow and haul far more than something just bigger than a Toyota Tacoma has any right to. That's why it vanquished the 2022 GMC Hummer EV pickup—a similarly lifestyle- and off-road-oriented EV—in our first-ever electric pickup truck comparison.
The Ford F-150 Lighting is, well, different. If the R1T is aimed at "electrifying the outdoors," the F-150 Lighting is aimed at electrifying the modern American full-size pickup truck—the bestselling one on the market at that. The F-150 Lightning is intended to work, with the definition of "work" left to the imagination of the owner—F-150s are just as likely to be found towing horses or exploring country two-tracks as they are hauling lumber or whisking families off on interstate road trips.
Although these pickups are built for different purposes, they're priced similarly, which means they're inevitably going to be cross-shopped. With that in mind, we got our hands on a 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Lariat Extended Range—likely the most widely available Lightning for the foreseeable future—and snagged the keys to our long-term 2022 Rivian R1T Launch Edition (effectively an R1T Adventure with unique paint) to pit them against each other.
F-150 Lightning vs R1T: Spec Showdown
To most pickup buyers, the F-150 Lightning Lariat Extended Range ought to feel quite familiar. Solely available in the popular crew-cab, short-bed (5.5-foot) configuration, the subtle tells that this F-150 is electric are minor sheetmetal changes, the full-width light bars front and rear, some badging, a faux grille, and that the engine bay is now a massive 14.1-cubic-foot frunk (complete with four 120-volt outlets, no less).
The Lightning isn't very different under the skin from gas-powered F-150s, either. It rides on a heavily modified version of the gas F-150's frame, with an optional 131-kWh battery pack stacked neatly between and on top of the frame rails. Power comes courtesy of two permanent-magnet motors mounted where you'd find differentials in conventional four-wheel-drive F-150s; the two motors combine here for a healthy 580 hp, 775 lb-ft of torque, and 320 miles of EPA-rated range. (Lightnings with the smaller 98-kWh battery pack have 426 hp and 230 miles of range). The switch to electric motors also allowed Ford to rethink the F-150's suspension, swapping the conventional F-150's rear live axle and leaf springs for coil springs.
The Rivian R1T will likely look out of this world to the typical pickup buyer, but as far as EVs go, it's fairly conventional. Rather than squeezing batteries around a frame, the Rivian's 133-kWh battery pack (currently the only one available) is the frame. Nestled around the big battery are four motors (a two-motor version is planned), two at either axle, good for a combined 835 hp, 908 lb-ft of torque, and 314 miles of range. Like the Ford, the R1T's four corners are independently sprung, though the Rivian uses air springs, active dampers, and novel cross-linked hydraulic anti-roll bars to help improve the truck's capability. The tidy dimensions of the R1T's mechanicals also allowed Rivian to think outside the box when it comes to the pickup's design. Like the Ford, the Rivian features a frunk and a stubby bed—4.5 feet in this case—but it also features additional storage spots, namely an in-bed trunk and the pass-through Gear Tunnel sited between the cab and bed.
Living with the Rivian R1T and F-150 Lightning
If you've ever spent any time driving an F-150 built within the past decade, the Lightning feels like home. "What I like from the get-go is the instant familiarity," senior editor Aaron Gold said. "This is like any one of the dozens of F-150s I have driven in my career, except it's quieter and a heck of a lot quicker." If you enjoy the conventional F-150's twin-turbocharged EcoBoost V-6s but find yourself wishing for a touch more meat to its powerband, you're really going to like the Lightning's twin motors. Despite a touch of torque steer under hard acceleration, the Ford pulls effortlessly, with a seemingly endless supply of power. The closest internal combustion analogue would be if Ford somehow engineered a Power Stroke diesel with a 15,000-rpm redline and squeezed it into an F-150.
The R1T's powertrain is that but more. With double the motors aboard, the R1T is both quicker and more sure-footed than the Lightning, never struggling for traction or grip, no matter the surface. Both trucks are so quick that it won't make a difference to the average buyer, but you can jump down to the chart below to see how they performed at the track. It's a shame electric vehicles have been politicized by those who clearly don't understand them—the truth is, Americans are really going to like experiences like this.
Both trucks feature pin-drop-precise one-pedal braking modes. Should you need to use the brake pedal itself, the Ford's feels more natural, though in panic-stop situations the Lightning's brakes could sometimes be prone to surging as the truck bounced between its regenerative and mechanical systems.
Where the two trucks most differentiate themselves on the road is in how they ride and steer. America's legions of full-size truck buyers will find familiar territory in the way the Ford goes down the road. Like the standard F-150, the Lightning's ride is somehow firm but floaty, shuddering slightly over harsher impacts like most body-on-frame trucks do. It's never punishing or harsh, but it couldn't feel more different than the Rivian. The R1T in its default All-Purpose drive mode is firm and well-controlled, almost like it's pushing back down into the road, attempting to flatten out the impacts it just encountered.
The same dynamic plays out in how the two trucks corner. The Ford steers far better than any conventional F-150 thanks to its lower center of gravity, but the steering itself is trucklike, with a slow ratio. But good weighting and feedback allow you to accurately place the Lightning on the road. The R1T's steering is springy and precise, which, coupled with the instant torque vectoring provided by its four motors, results in a pickup that'll likely surprise quite a few sports car drivers on a good back road. "I don't think there's any pickup truck that can match the entertainment value of the R1T in curves," Gold said.
Which Pickup Is Better Off-Road?
It's a similar story when the pavement ends.
Off-road, the Rivian is an order of magnitude more capable than the Ford. With five off-road modes (All-Purpose, Rock Crawl, Rally, Drift, and Sand—the last a recent over-the-air update addition), there's very little that can stop an R1T off the pavement. Its height-adjustable suspension gives it a tremendous amount of ground clearance, while the hydraulic dampers help the Rivian keep all four all-terrains on earth. Its quad-motor system is incredibly impressive, too, combining the gearing of a low range, the traction of locking differentials, and the precision of electric motors to conquer the types of obstacles that'd make a Toyota Land Cruiser owner blush.
The Ford isn't in its element off-road, but it's not necessarily out of place, either. The Lightning doesn't have the body control to move quickly when it's away from asphalt, but at slower speeds the truck comfortably ambles down hard-packed dirt and through loose sand. On more technical terrain, the F-150's rear diff-lock helps the truck maintain forward momentum, though it could use a locking front differential, too, as it tends to spin the driver-side front wheel quite a bit. Trying to keep pace with the R1T will result in nothing but frustration and body damage, but if you take things slow and choose your line carefully the Lightning will get you where you need to go.
Battle of the Beds
In the battle of the beds, the Ford scores some points back. With the Lightning rated for a 1,606-pound payload and the R1T a 1,760-pound load, both shrugged off our 1,500-pound standard payload test weight. The Rivian simply didn't notice it had anything out back, while the Ford saw some minor improvements in ride quality. Range was unaffected by hauling.
But when it comes to the beds themselves, the Lightning's is superior. Not only is it bigger than the R1T's, but it's also easier to work out of and access, with meatier tie-downs, an auto up and down tailgate, and a tailgate step and work surface. The Rivian makes up for its lack of real estate with its gear tunnel (the doors of which also double as steps), but the bed isn't as easy to access, and the composite flap that bridges the gap between the bed and tailgate tends to collect debris. The Ford also has more powerful rear power outlets, the better for running high-draw tools and other items.
Towing Showdown
While the Ford had the better bed area, the Rivian surprised us with how much more confidence-inspiring it was with a trailer hanging off its hitch. Our load—Sassy and Corazon, two friendly horses loaded up in a 22-foot warmblood trailer, totaling about 5,200 pounds—didn't come close to taxing either truck's towing capacity (the Rivian can yank 11,000 pounds, the Ford 10,000), but it was representative of what the average full-size pickup owner tows.
Sassy and Corazon aboard, the F-150 Lightning felt much like the conventional F-150 we towed with on this same loop. "The Lightning towed as we expect a half-ton pickup to, except for having much better acceleration," Gold said. "You can feel the trailer pushing the truck a bit on downhills, but it's nothing excessive—good stability."
Interestingly, engaging Tow/Haul mode in the Ford turns off one-pedal driving, which makes it more difficult to drive the truck smoothly— especially crucial when your load stands on four spindly legs. The lack of regenerative brakes when towing is also a negative, as regen provides an engine-braking-like effect that makes it easier to safely decelerate the trailer.
As we found when the R1T won Truck of the Year, the Rivian punches well above its weight with a trailer hitched. The R1T makes towing effortlessly smooth. Its buttery power delivery, heavy brake regen in Towing mode, long accelerator pedal travel, and well-sorted suspension give the Rivian the feeling of an understressed heavy-duty truck when pulling a load. "Better stability than the Ford, and a much better ride," Gold said. "Great motor control, too, especially for starting on steep inclines." Our biggest issue is that the R1T's trailer brake controller—operated via the thumbwheel on the right spoke of the steering wheel—doesn't allow for the same precise adjustments as the traditional trailer brake switch in the Ford.
Which Electric Truck Has the Better Driver Assist Systems?
It's worth a quick look at both trucks' advanced driver assist systems (ADAS), each of which allow for hands-free driving on highways and interstates. Rivian's setup, Driver+, is the less polished of the two. It currently works in fewer areas (though Rivian is constantly mapping and adding roadways) and often hugs lane lines and gets "bumped" by traffic either driving too close or sneaking in front of the truck. Taller drivers also reported difficulty seeing the Driver+ status icon around the steering wheel rim. Ford's system, dubbed Blue Cruise, is the better of the two. It drives as a human driver would, sends clear signals as to when it's safe to have your hands off the wheel, and lets you know when it needs you to take control with plenty of warning. Neither system is as good as GM's Super Cruise.
Charging the F-150 Lightning and Rivian R1T
The biggest concern with an EV purchase is charging and range. Despite both trucks being comparable in battery size and range (130 kWh and 320 miles for the Ford, 133 kWh and 314 miles for the Rivian), we were initially apprehensive about the Lightning's peak charge rate of 150 kW against the Rivian's 220 kW. The slower your battery charges, the more time you spend tethered to a Level 3 DC fast charger while road-tripping.
Despite the Rivian's initial higher charge rate, it underperformed at a 207-kW peak; the Ford overperformed (holding 172 kW) and was able to hang on to that higher rate for longer. The end result is that it took the R1T 44 minutes to go from 5 percent to 80 percent indicated state of charge, and the F-150 Lightning 50 minutes to do the same. However, neither result is particularly impressive in the big picture compared to the 350-kW charge rate capability of the Hummer EV pickup and upcoming 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV. Here's hoping both truckmakers continue to improve their charge rates via over-the-air updates, as our long-term Rivian has already done once during its stay with us.
Of note: The Ford F-150 Lightning offers vehicle-to-load capability—the ability to run power to your home—via an included 80-amp charger. Although this is a neat feature, we're skeptical of its utility given it will likely require most people to spend thousands of dollars on electrical upgrades to their homes, and early reports from owners on Ford's installation partner, Sunrun, are largely unfavorable.
Software Sweets
The ways we interact with these two trucks is just as important as charging. In most internal combustion vehicles, it's fairly easy to ignore the automaker's included software suite and use your phone or apps via Apple CarPlay or Android Auto for most tasks, but in electric vehicles, the embedded software plays an outsized role in how the vehicle functions and how we use it.
Digital natives will likely take to the Rivian's system. Operated via a large, Tesla-style 15.3-inch landscape display, the Rivian's system is snappy, responsive, intuitive, and feature-rich, with functions like a native Spotify app and a Pet Comfort mode. (Pet Comfort keeps cabin temps between 68 and 74 degrees while parked, provided at least 50 miles of range remain. It also displays a bold message indicating your critter is safe on the central screen.)
It's also tremendously easy to deal with recharging; the Rivian offers up a dedicated charging screen that allows you to set its charge limit (70 percent for daily use, 85 percent for extended range, and 100 percent for road-tripping), schedule charge times for off-peak hours, and see live and historical charging information, like the current peak charge rate or kWh of energy dispensed. With how finicky Electrify America (the nation's largest fast-charging network) can be, that information can be the difference between a quick charge and a long one.
Still, it's not perfect. The Rivian is overly reliant on soft buttons. Simple tasks in other vehicles, such as changing drive modes, are made complicated in the R1T as they require multiple taps and various menus to access and adjust. The most annoying are the fully digital HVAC vents, which turn something you can do in seconds with your eyes on the road in the Ford to a distracting, drawn-out affair.
The F-150 Lightning is better in some ways but worse in others. Featuring the 15.5-inch portrait display from the Mustang Mach E (lesser Lightnings trade screen real estate for more hard buttons), the Ford's display has a volume knob and large, relatively easy-to-hit soft buttons. It lacks a pet mode (a feature we hope to see added via an OTA update), but it does feature some basic games, truck-specific apps like onboard payload scales, and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto—the latter two unlikely to be added to the R1T.
Still, there's a lot of room for improvement with Ford's software. Ignoring the fact that the Ford's system is laggier to respond, we found there's far too much of its core functionality buried in menus—especially as it relates to charging information. It takes at least three swipes and taps to get to the Lightning's EV settings menu to view simple info such as the battery's current state of charge or to set a preferred departure time.
More annoying, the Lightning defaults to 90 percent charge after every single charge, requiring an owner to menu surf and reset the charge limit to 100 percent each time they want a little extra range. On one occasion, we had a charging session set for 100 percent charge. When it failed at 88 percent, we had to unplug and plug the truck back in to start a new session, only for the Ford to stop the session a few minutes later at 90 percent, forcing us to run through the dance again. In addition, there's no way to view the vehicle's current charge rate or the amount of kWh dispensed during a session, though you do get a very brief look at the kWh consumed after a session concludes via a pop up that quickly disappears. (Ford's phone app—also not quite as polished as Rivian's—does at least allow you to view information from your past charges, excepting peak rates.)
Which Truck Has the Better Interior?
Although the R1T has a distinct software advantage on the Ford, the Ford has an equally big hardware advantage on the Rivian. Ripped straight out of conventional F-150s, the Lightning's cabin is positively massive, besting the smaller Rivian in every conceivable metric when it comes to outright passenger volume. It also beats the R1T when it comes to storage, featuring about a dozen cupholders, big door pockets, fold-away underseat storage in back, a flat floor, and a massive center console cubby, the lid of which folds out into a worktable. Some material pieces are too plasticky and flimsy for the Ford's price tag, but the Lightning is nevertheless a great place to spend time and get work done.
Our feelings on the R1T's cabin are more nuanced. As far as vehicles go, it's attractively designed, built incredibly well, and features a lovely mix of colors and materials befitting the R1T's cost. It's not as roomy as the Fords's, but it's easily spacious enough for four adults and generally comfortable, though taller passengers complained of the rear seat-back shape. However, storage is lacking. There are but four cupholders in the entire truck, there's no glove box, the door pockets are small, and the deployable drawers in the front seats are really too narrow to be used for anything meaningful. That means the average-size center console and the wireless charging pad become the de facto places you pile all the stuff you accumulate while driving a pickup, like your phone, keys, wallet, gloves, or tools.
Value and Verdict: Which Truck Wins?
There's no dancing around the fact that both of these trucks are incredibly expensive for the average buyer. Technically speaking, our R1T Launch Edition long-termer is the cheaper of the two with its $76,875 as-tested price. Thing is, if you were to buy our exact same truck today, you'd be spending $96,250, as Rivian has increased prices of the R1T to make room for the upcoming dual-motor R1T variant, making it much less of a value than it once was.
Despite Ford touting the F-150 Lightning's affordable $41,669 starting price, our F-150 Lightning Lariat Extended Range isn't exactly cheap, either, stickering for $80,839. We think the Lightning XLT is the better buy due to its similar equipment and interior quality levels, but shoppers are still looking at a $74,309 outlay for the cheapest F-150 Lightning Extended Range, about the price of the promised dual-motor R1T.
We spent some time on both Ford and Rivian's configurators in an attempt to equalize our trucks' equipment levels and paint a clearer picture of the price differences between them. Losing just the optional all-terrains on our test F-150 but keeping the extended-range battery, spray-in bedliner, and Max Tow package would see the Ford's sticker fall slightly to $80,689. Using the R1T Adventure as our starting point (the cheaper R1T Explore doesn't have a premium audio system to match the Ford's Bang & Olufsen), we shed our R1T's all-terrain tires, off-road package, premium paint option, and power-operated tonneau cover but kept its optional full-size spare (standard on the Ford) and added the optional wall charger (standard with the big-battery F-150). That totaled up to $87,645, about $7,000 more than the Ford.
So which is the better truck?
Well, it's complicated, as they clearly target different buyers and there's not really a wrong answer here on an individual basis. In the Rivian's favor, it's the better tow rig, more engaging on pavement, and more capable off of it, and its software smooths the switch from gasoline to electricity. But the Ford drives nearly as well empty, tows almost as well, and has a far more functional bed and a roomier, more comfortable cabin. It also charges just about as quickly as the R1T while going slightly farther per charge. Ford's software team would benefit from a few months spent in the Rivian, but that's an easier fix than adding interior storage to the R1T.
Given the teeter-totter battle in every other area, we then look to value. Is the Rivian $7,000 better than the Ford? For many shoppers, the R1T's superior off-road capability, on-road dynamics, tow capacity, lifestyle elements, and software will rightly win them over. But after carefully considering both trucks, the Ford F-150 Lightning offers up 90 percent of the capability of the R1T, similar charging performance, a better bed, and a more practical cabin—for slightly less money. So the Lightning takes this round by the hair of its chinny-chin-chin, but given how quickly software is changing our cars and trucks, we're already planning on revisiting this comparison in 12 months or so to see if it's still worthy of the crown.
2nd Place: 2022 Rivian R1T Launch Edition
- Pros: Silly fun to drive on the road, unstoppable off of it, advanced software and a premium cabin.
- Cons: Revised pricing greatly diminished value, there isn't much interior storage, underperformed in charging tests.
- Verdict: Even with this result, the Rivian R1T remains one of the best EVs on the planet.
1st Place: 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Lariat Extended Range
- Pros: Quicker and better to drive than any F-150 in history, huge cabin with tons of storage, robust charging curve makes road-tripping feasible.
- Cons: Its software suite needs refinement and deeper data, not quite as polished as the Rivian, still expensive.
- Verdict: The F-150 Lightning wins by the tip of a whisker—but this battle will continue to turn on over-the-air updates.
You may also like
The Bronco name is redolent of history and nostalgia, but when this iconic brand was rebooted for the 2021 model year—first as the Ford Escape-based Bronco Sport compact crossover, then later as proper 4x4 SUV foil for the Jeep Wrangler, with two or four removable doors and open-top options—the styling of both variants served up a modern interpretation of the OG Bronco design cues. Two model years in, the 2023 Ford Bronco and Bronco Sport lineups seek to strengthen their already overt visual ties to the first-gen Bronco with new retro Heritage edition packages.Two Heritage Editions Per BroncoTo keep nostalgia affordable, Ford is offering both the Bronco Sport and the big Bronco (two- or four-door) as a mid-level-spec Bronco Heritage edition or a better-equipped Heritage Limited Edition. Each will feature a fun throwback pastel color palette, Oxford White accents, and vintage Bronco script badging, and all will be offered with few option packages to choose. And in paying homage to the original GOAT (Goes Over Any Terrain), every Heritage edition comes standard with the most aggressive rubber available on the base model.That means 17-inch Continental All-Terrains on the 1.5-liter Bronco Sport Heritage, Falken Wildpeak A/Ts on 2.0-liter Bronco Sport Heritage Limited variants, and the Sasquatch package's 35-inch-diameter Goodyear Territory tires on all big Broncos. A full-size spare also comes standard.2023 Big Bronco Heritage Model UpgradesTwo- and four-door Bronco Heritage editions start from a Big Bend equipment basis available with a four- or six-cylinder engine and manual or automatic transmission. Heritage Limited models build from a Badlands basis, and hence are 2.7-liter V-6, 10-speed-automatic-only. Both are upgraded with the Sasquatch off-road package and use the more retrolicious square-top fenders introduced on the Everglades model. Each shares a new white grille based on the Black Diamond model's grille insert, featuring F-O-R-D lettering in red (all other Broncos, save the Raptor, spell out "Bronco" here).Base 2023 Ford Bronco Heritage and Limited models get unique wheel treatments, with the base wheel painted white with a steely look, and the Heritage Limited wheel leaving only the outer rim white with a black center and a "dog dish" cap covering the lug nuts. Both designs feature a Bronco horse on the center cap. Each gets the Bronco script from the '60s along with a tape-stripe job, with the entry Heritage making do with a decal and the Limited getting a proper chrome badge. Exterior color options for the Bronco Heritage include Race Red (very close to the original Rangoon Red), black, Carbonized gray, Cactus gray, and Azure gray. You'll have to pop for the Heritage Limited to get the most fun colors: Robin's Egg blue (based on the 1966 color Arcadian Blue) will be available at launch, with Yellowstone (Ford Prairie Yellow) arriving later in 2023 and, and a more medium Peak Blue coming in 2034. All Heritage Broncos and Bronco Sports get an Oxford White roof, and standard assist steps.Inside, all models get a white dashboard with red accents on the assist handles, vent aiming knobs, bungee straps on the map and seatback pockets, and steering wheel stitching. They also all get a modern riff on plaid seats, and the auxiliary switches are standard. For the base Heritage edition it's a gray denim-type cloth joined with light-blue stitching on the bolsters and vinyl inserts printed with sort of a digital plaid in shades of white, light blue, and grays. Heritage Limited models get brown leather accented by white and red stitching on the bolsters, and a plaid pattern of perforations in varying sizes.2023 Ford Bronco Sport Heritage ModelBronco Sports share a steel-wheel-look design (in white, with bronco center caps), but the two variants get unique white grilles. The base 1.5-liter Heritage edition shares the Big Bend grille design, but here it's flanked by the fancier (Outer Banks and up) headlamps with LED daytime running lights. The Limited runs the Badlands grille. Both are rendered in white with red BRONCO lettering. Here again the base model makes do with a Bronco script decal, only this time it's reversed out of the white bodyside stripe. Heritage Limited models get a chrome Bronco script, here augmented with a red box that includes the word "Sport" and a bucking bronco. Heritage Limited models are functionally equivalent to the Bronco Sport Badlands, and that model's underbody armor can be ordered as an option on base Bronco Sport Heritage editions. Bronco Sport Heritage models offer seven paint options including Robin's Egg Blue; Heritage Limited Editions can only be had in Robin's Egg Blue, Yellowstone Metallic and Peak Blue.Interior color schemes echo those of the big Bronco, with worsted-look cloth and plaid-pattern vinyl on the base car, set against the Navy Pier (blue) cabin colorway, complete with red and light blue stitching on the bolsters. The Bronco Sport MOLLE strap storage system on the front-row seatbacks includes Navy Pier straps and Race Red zipper grips. Both variants get white accents on the dash and doors, but they're far less dramatic than the broad swathe of white on the bigger Bronco. All Heritage models also get an "Established 1966" plate like the ones all big Broncos get, only here the little Ford grille lettering is painted red.Bronco and Bronco Sport Heritage Pricing, AvailabilityThe Bronco Sport Heritage edition will start at $35,840, with Limited models at $46,250—not bad, considering a Big Bend with the all-terrain tire upgrade currently goes for $32,425 and a Bronco Sport Badlands with leather and Falkens starts at $40,995. The Bronco Heritage two-door starts at $45,900 with the 2.3-liter seven-speed stick, up from $44,960 for a Big Bend with Sasquatch and the auxiliary switches package (add about $2,100 for the four-door). A two-door Heritage Limited will start at $68,490, up from $55,765 for a Badlands Sasquatch with leather and the 2.7L V-6/10-speed powertrain. Sales start this September, with an allotment of just 1,966 copies of the 2023 Ford Bronco Sport Heritage Limited Edition and the Ford Bronco Heritage Limited Edition to commemorate the year of the original truck's debut, with each run to be divided between the three colors and the Bronco's body styles. As with the Everglades and other models, ordering priority will be granted to current reservation holders who choose to change their order. 2023 Ford Bronco (Heritage Edition) Specifications 2023 Ford Bronco Sport (Heritage Edition) Specifications BASE PRICE $45,900-$68,490 $35,840-$46,250 LAYOUT Front-engine, 4WD, 2- or 4-pass, 5-door SUV Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV ENGINES 2.3L/275-hp/315-lb-ft turbo direct-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4; 2.7L 315-hp/410-lb-ft twin-turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 24-valve V-6 1.5L/181-hp/190-lb-ft turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 12-valve I-3; 2.0L/250-hp/277-lb-ft turbo, direct-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4 TRANSMISSION 7-speed manual, 10-speed auto 8-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 4,750-5,100 lb (mfr) 3,600 lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 100.4-116.1 in 105.1 in L x W x H 173.7-189.5 x 76.3 x 73.8-73.9 in 172.7 x 74.3 x 71.4 in 0-60 MPH 6.6-7.9 sec (MT est) 6.5-8.6 sec (MT est) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 16-18/17/17-18 mpg (est) 21-25/26-28/23-26 mpg (est) EPA RANGE, COMB 287-374 miles (est) 368-416 miles ON SALE September, 2022 September, 2022 Show All
Do you want the good news or the bad news first? Well, we can't hear you, unfortunately, so we'll start with the good and get to the bad in a second. This is the 2022 Mazda CX-60, a plug-in hybrid (PHEV) crossover SUV that combines impressive total system output with what appears to be impressive overall fuel economy (if, of course, you plug it in often). The numbers are impressive, and so is the latest evolution of the company's Kodo design language, which looks more premium than ever.Power!Let's start with the PHEV powertrain. It combines the company's familiar 2.5-liter I-4 gas engine with a 100-kW e-motor and a 17.8-kWh battery, good for a total of 323 horsepower. That, Mazda says, makes it the most powerful road-going car the company's ever made. And with a 5.8-second sprint to 62 mph, this Mazda won't be a slouch at a stoplight, either.Mazda also claims this PHEV can travel 37 miles on pure electric power before its gas engine must fire and work in tandem with the electric motor as a hybrid. Its fuel consumption and emissions figures look impressive, too. And in the future, the CX-60 will get a number of additional powertrains, including a 3.0-liter e-Skyactiv-X I-6 and a 3.3-liter Skyactiv-D diesel, both equipped with 48V mild-hybrid systems that Mazda calls M Hybrid Boost. The CX-60 will feature i-Activ AWD, but when the I-6s come around, they will have the option of rear-wheel-drive. The CX-60 PHEV can even tow more than 5,500 lbs.KodoThe CX-60 is a shapely SUV, with proportions that draw attention to its new, rear-drive-based architecture in a huge way. The long hood and short front overhang give it a sleek look. The new grille has a premium texture that's accentuated by its bright surround and interesting divorced/integrated running light arrangement. Out back, things are handsome if a bit more generic. Devoid of badges, it could be an Infiniti or a BMW. The quad rhomboid exhausts are a nice touch, and well-integrated into the rear end. Chrome brightwork and fender garnishes add a bit of jewelry to the flanks.Inside, it's typical modern Mazda stuff, but the dash adopts a layered appearance with stacked horizontal elements, some of which surround and partially shroud the wide infotainment screen. Some specs will use interesting textiles and woods, giving it a bit more character than the rather drab appearance provided in these photos. The CX-60 is a two-row vehicle, by the way, although it's about six inches longer than our market's 2022 Mazda CX-5.What Does This Mean for Us?If all of this sounds a little too fantastical for an upcoming American-market Mazda, you're right. The bad news is that we won't get the CX-60. What we will get is the slightly larger CX-70, which will be related to the CX-60 and share many of its powertrains. It's unlikely that either of these I-6s will arrive on these shores, but it's possible a non-Skyactiv-X gasoline I-6 might arrive with the same 3.0-liter displacement. Meanwhile, it's a safe bet that our CX-70 PHEV will match or exceed the CX-60's 323-hp rating.So, good news, bad news, and something to look forward to.
We got all excited when Honda introduced the new Euro-market HR-V (known in some parts of the world as the Vezel), but Honda was quick to tell us to calm the hell down—this wasn't the subcompact HR-V we were looking for. The U.S., Honda told us, would be getting a new HR-V all its own. Not to cast aspersions on our friends at Honda, but any time an automaker tells us something like this—any of them, not just Honda—we have to wonder if we aren't just being put off.Today, Honda released sketches of the North American-market 2023 HR-V (actually, they look like paintings, which is rather cool). And no, we weren't being put off—this definitely is a different vehicle. Look at the back doors, and what do you see? Door handles on the body. The new Euro-HR-V/Vezel has its rear door handles concealed in the door pillar, just like the current (and soon-to-be-outgoing) HR-V.From what the paint-sketches show, North America won the HR-V lottery, because if the real thing looks similar, it's going to be a much cuter critter than the HR-V going to Europe. We like the big blacked-out grille—it's rather Kia-esque, from the days when ex-Audi designer Peter Schreyer was trying to make all of his Kias look like Audis. It's certainly a better look than the chromed confusion of the bigger CR-V. (Honda has a new CR-V coming for 2023, and we hope it looks this good.) Speaking of Audis (which we were, weren't we?), the new HR-V's bulbous back end bears quite a resemblance to that of the Audi Q3. We're hoping the swank exterior style is an indicator of what we'll see inside. We rather like the HR-V, and we've always thought a more upscale version would do well with buyers.And what lurks under that handsome skin? Honda's two-sentence statement accompanying the sketches helps little. As a rule we don't copy and paste press releases, but we'll make an exception, given the dearth of other info here: "Honda kicks off its Year of the Crossover with a sneak peek at the all-new sporty and versatile 2023 HR-V. The all-new HRV will launch in North America this year." Okay, so that yields no information. If we had to guess—which, obviously, we do—we'd predict that one of the new HR-V's powertrains will be the 212-hp hybrid powertrain from the Euro-market HR-V, which is based around a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated engine.We assume there will be a non-hybrid version, and as we've complained about the current HR-V's leisurely acceleration, it wouldn't surprise us if its 1.8 liter engine is replaced by something with a little more gumption, perhaps the 2.0-liter naturally-aspirated engine from the entry-level Civic and (if we're lucky) Honda's 1.5-liter turbo, also found in the spectacular new Civic.The fact that the sketches show the HR-V dashing through the snow with snowboards strapped to the roof rack indicates an all-wheel-drive option. That may seem like a no-brainer for an SUV, but remember that some entry-level sport-utes (Toyota CH-R and Nissan Kicks, to name two) don't offer AWD; today's HR-V does offer AWD, however.Whatever the final HR-V looks like and however it's configured, this teaser has done its job: We are genuinely excited to see what the real thing looks like. We don't need to tell you what a hot market segment the compact SUV field is, one chock full of new and credible contenders like the Toyota Corolla Cross, the Kia Seltos, and our pick of the bunch, the Subaru Crosstrek. We're looking forward to seeing how the new 2023 Honda HR-V stacks up.
0 Comments