Volkswagen Introduces Oettinger Body Kit For MkVIII Golf GTI and R Hatchbacks

lucid air Full OverviewOne of the best things I've done in my career was scoring the world's first drive review of the Lucid Air electric sedan. It was a big moment, one that I'm still amazed happened. That said, the headline-grabbing part of the two days I spent driving an Air Dream Edition R—that we drove from Los Angeles to San Francisco and then some on a single charge—didn't go the way I wanted. Oh, in terms of the sheer traffic and interest that first drive generated, it couldn't have gone any better. But to achieve the impressive range that we did, my co-driver (and Lucid CEO Peter Rawlinson) did the unimaginable. We went the speed limit. Oh, the humanity! Truth be told, going 70 in a 70-mph zone freaked me out, so I kept cranking it up to 72 mph. The thing made 966 horsepower, people! And 57 in a 55 sucks even worse. Fast forward 11 months and my assignment is to jet up to the Bay Area, grab the new 1,050-hp Air Grand Touring Performance, and drive it back to Los Angeles. All by myself. Speed limits? We don't need no stinking speed limits!About six months ago, after the Air took home our 2022 MotorTrend Car of the Year honors, Lucid gave me a quick opportunity to drive its Dream Edition P—that's the 1,111-hp version that's well and truly sold out. More interesting, however, was another car that was also there: a development mule of the Air Grand Touring. What was so special? The handling, specifically because of changes made to the front end. Driving the two back to back was fascinating. Sure, the Dream Edition P made more than 300 additional hp than the 819-hp Grand Touring, but I massively preferred how the latter felt. The improvement was apparent just leaving the parking lot.How the Lucid Air ImprovedTwo things made the difference. First, the front suspension received some new dampers. Second, the car's suspension software had been altered, adjusted, and improved. The story of the process is worth sharing. Lucid's director of chassis and vehicle dynamics, David Lickfold, Turo'd himself a 991.2 Porsche GT3 RS and spent a weekend driving the two vehicles. Just him, by himself, working until the wee hours of the morning. David would do a run in the Porsche, then one in the Lucid, pull over, plug his laptop into the latter, and tweak away. The results impressed the hell out of me. Naturally, I was looking forward to driving the 1,050-hp version of the Grand Touring.After a brief meeting with Lucid's head of design, Derek Jenkins, I left the company's Newark, California, headquarters with 87 percent of the Air GTP's battery charged. That meant I had a range of 388 miles, seeing as how the Performance variant of the Grand Touring only comes on 21-inch wheels and has an EPA range of 446 miles. The "regular" GT has a range of 469 miles on 21-inch wheels, or a whopping 516 miles on 19-inchers. As the crow flies, it's 359 miles from Lucid's headquarters to my house. However, my plan (that I'd spent about six adolescent seconds on) was to reverse the route we took the last time but go faster. Essentially, that meant heading down the 101 South until Paso Robles, taking advantage of an Electrify America location, then heading over to the 5 South for the bulk of the rest of the trip. What could possibly go wrong?Soul-crushing traffic, for one. (If I can diverge into a little provincial Hatfield and McCoy-style nonsense for a second, anyone from the Bay Area that says Los Angeles has bad traffic is projecting.) A drive that should have taken just over two hours to Paso Robles turned into a four-hour slog. By the time I got to the charging station, I was down to 162 miles of remaining indicated range. Which means I used 211 miles of range to cover 177 road miles. That's not actually bad, especially given I had the A/C set to "meat locker," the massaging seat going full bore, and the pretty damn great stereo cranked up to a high volume. And, yes, I also had the adaptive cruise (or Dream Drive as Lucid calls it) set to 84 mph and was enjoying occasional bursts into triple-digit territory when traffic would allow. Hey, the car makes 1,050 hp and I'm a doctor of automotive journalism, dammit. Besides, those Priuses parked in the left lane ain't gonna pass themselves.Charging-Station ChallengesThen the inevitable happened. All three chargers plopped incongruously in a Bank of America parking lot were occupied. I got out of the GTP and heard, "Hey, us and this car are ahead of you." I nodded at the Chevy Bolt owner and admired the Hyundai Ioniq 5 waiting behind him. Just then, the couple that was standing next to their VW ID4 threw their hands up in celebration. "It's working," the man said into his cell phone, presumably to the poor EA employee who'd just reset the charger, an all too common occurrence. "How'd you get it to work?" asked a flustered Kia Niro EV owner. Then a Ford F-150 Lightning pulled in and I made the decision to just go eat lunch. I had about 160 miles of range left, and there's a 350-kW Electrify America station a bit further south in Pismo Beach. The Electrify America app does tell you when all the chargers are in use; I stopped in Paso Robles specifically because the app had erroneously reported two chargers as available. Welcome to EV road trips using the nascent charging infrastructure.There's a back way to Pismo that offers a few miles of twisting roads, too, so I figured this would be the time to get some dynamic driving done. Look, the Air GTP is a monster. There's no other way to say it. To get its full capabilities, touch the on-screen button to activate Sprint mode to unleash full power and all 921 lb-ft of torque. The Air's default comfort drive mode is Smooth, a sportier mode is called Swift, and Sprint is like track mode. In Sprint, the suspension, braking, torque vectoring, throttle, and steering responses are all tweaked for maximum yeehaw. Not only can you use all 1,050 horses—a preposterous statement, I'm aware—but mein gott this thing sticks to the pavement when cornering. In fact, the more you treat it like a track car by using as much of the lane/road as possible, the happier and more impressive it is bounding from apex to apex. We've yet to weigh a Grand Touring Performance, but the "regular" Air Grand Touring clocked in at 5,266 pounds; figure this new car to be roughly identical. But, hand to heart, it feels like 1,000 of those pounds magically disappear when the Lucid is driven angry. Like a GT3 RS? Not quite, but perhaps like a 2.6-ton GT3 RS.Luxury LinerYeah, yeah—these Lucids make incredible power and Lickfold's chassis team has found a way to put it all down and make the big girl dance a jig. But Lucid vehicles are pitched as luxury machines. How's the luxury? I mentioned earlier that I had the air conditioning going full bore. This was because once I got south of a little farming town called Gonzales, the external temperature was 97 degrees Fahrenheit. For the time being all Lucid Airs have these massive glass roofs and in the sort of California sun I experienced on the drive, you just get cooked. I don't care how much UV-jamming, anti-solar whizbangery Lucid claims it's treated the glass with—it gets very warm. I've brought this up several times with several Lucid executives, including Rawlinson, and they acknowledge my point. The entry Pure model will only come with a steel roof, and the next-step-up Touring will make the glass canopy an option. So, that's nice if you want to save some dough and not have to wear a hat when it's sunny.Going beyond that peeve, the other negatives are minor. The lane departure warning graphic is overeager, the map takes five seconds before it fully loads, and sometimes the car needs 10 to 15 seconds to completely wake up when you first jump inside. But here's the awesome part about software-defined vehicles (SDVs). There's an over-the-air update (OTA) coming in a couple of months that will radically revise all of this. Just like that. Also, hot tip, when the integration's ready, owners will get Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, too.Enough with the bad stuff. The seats are incredible, not just because of the design and comfort, but because of how powerful the massage settings are. Like, dang man. A couple of the programs felt vaguely inappropriate—you have to love that. The materials are top shelf (especially the fabrics), the screens aren't too omnipresent, and the large lower screen can be stowed out of the way, which not only opens up a big, purse-size cubby but also reduces the amount of visual clutter fighting for your eyeballs' attention. I also love the physical temperature, fan speed, and volume switchgear. I find it luxurious not having to dig into a damn screen for every single little thing. Let's not forget that our buddy, Randy Pobst, just lost Pikes Peak because he couldn't easily access the Tesla Model S Plaid's fan.I pulled into the charging station in Pismo and—hooray!—found an open 350-kW charger. The car was showing 96 miles of range left. I plugged in and watched how the Lucid's 912-volt electrical architecture helps the battery just suck down the kilowatts. The juice was flowing into the car at speeds from 245 to 275 kW, adding 19 miles of range per minute. Five minutes later (another) Hyundai Ioniq 5 plugged in next to me and the charging speed was cut in half. Nineteen minutes later, the car had absorbed 205 miles worth of energy. The range read 301 miles as the battery was charged to 68 percent. Did I mention the Air charges faster than any other EV? I only had to drive about 175 more miles, so I figured I was good. Spoiler alert: I was good. I made it home with 49 miles of range left, plugged the GTP into my Rivian charger, and awoke to an 80 percent full battery (where'd I'd set the charging limit), meaning the GTP was good for 360 miles of driving. Well, if you're one of those go-the-speed-limit types.We don't give out our Car, Truck, or SUV of the Year trophies willy nilly. Despite what you may have heard, it's the most rigorous, repeatable, and labor-intensive process in the industry.  If a vehicle receives the Golden Calipers, it's earned them. Still, I always find it nice to go back and recheck our math. Spending a day with the Lucid Air Grand Touring Performance reminded me why I was so blown away by this machine that first time out. Nothing on earth has the power/range combo of this EV, and at this point in time, no other company's even close.Lucid isn't stopping there. It's creating a 360-degree luxury brand, where every aspect of the customer experience—from the website to the studios (Lucid-speak for showrooms) to the promotional photography—is curated in-house. The result is an epic brute in a suit, a car that effortlessly blends mid-century modern with a California ethos, a technological tour de force that obsoletes its competitors. And this is just the first Lucid—the Gravity SUV will be its second vehicle—and one that hasn't even been in production for a whole calendar year yet. I'm excited about what Lucid will dream up next. Hopefully I'll get to tell you about that one first, too.Looks good! More details?2022 Lucid Air Grand Touring Performance Specifications   BASE PRICE $180,500 LAYOUT Front- and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan MOTORS 2 AC permanent-magnet electric, 1,050 hp/921 lb-ft (comb) TRANSMISSION 1-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 5,200-5,250 (mfr) WHEELBASE 116.5 in L x W x H 195.9 x 76.2 x 55.4 in 0-60 MPH 2.6 sec (MT est)  EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 112/112/112 mpg-e (MT est)  EPA RANGE 446 miles ON SALE Now Show All

Is the GMA T.33 better than the McLaren F1? Gordon Murray smiles. "Oh, yes," he says. "The engine's better, the gearbox is better. It's lighter and has a slightly better power to weight ratio. The finish and the quality are much better."The McLaren F1, created by Murray in the early 1990s at the height of his fame as a rock star grand prix race car designer, is widely regarded as the seminal hypercar, a car that set absolute benchmarks for on-road performance. One sold last year for more than $20 million. The GMA T.33, Murray's new ultralight, driver-focused mid-engine coupe will be priced from about $1.85 million, plus tax, when production starts in 2024.In the context of today's McLaren F1 market, it sounds like a bargain.The T.33 is the follow up to last year's T.50, the car Murray designed specifically as a 21st century successor to the McLaren F1 and a halo for his GMA brand. Like the T.50, it's powered by a high-revving naturally aspirated V-12 and will be available with a six-speed manual transmission. But beyond elements of the powertrain—and the air conditioning system and interior switchgear—the T.33 shares nothing with the T.50. It's a completely different car, designed for a completely different purpose.The T.33's engine has less power, less torque, and a lower rev limit than the version used in the T.50 and T.50 Niki Lauda. Dubbed the Cosworth GMA.2 and distinguished by its yellow cam covers (the T.50's were orange and the T.50 Niki Lauda's red) it makes 607 horsepower at 10,500 rpm and 333 lb-ft of torque at 9,000 rpm, 47 hp and 11 lb-ft fewer than in T.50 spec. This is due to different cams, revised valve timing and engine mapping, and new intake and exhaust systems.The decision to lop 1,000 rpm from the engine's top end wasn't just a case of ensuring differentiation between T.50 and T.33. "To be really honest," Murray says, "the main reason is that 12,100 rpm in a 4.0-liter engine with valve springs is getting right up there on the ragged edge. Going to 11,100 rpm makes much more sense." Just for reference, in T.50 spec the engine makes peak power at 11,500 rpm.The other benefit is improved drivability. Murray says in T.50 spec the engine delivers 70 percent of its peak torque from just 2,500 rpm, but the T.33 version pumps out 75 percent of its peak torque at the same crank speed and 90 percent from 4,500 rpm. "I've never driven a V-12 with such low-down torque," he says of his test sessions in the T.50, "but the T.33 is on another level altogether."As in the T.50, the T.33 V-12 drives the rear wheels through a six-speed manual transmission designed and developed by British motorsport specialist Xtrac. The T.33's transmission, which weighs just 177 pounds, shares its ultralight casing with the T.50 unit, but all the internals are new.Unlike the T.50, the T.33 can be ordered with a paddle-shift transmission. Also developed by Xtrac, this transmission features the company's ingenious Instantaneous Gearchange System (IGS), which features an integrated ratchet and pawl mechanism between each gear hub and the main shaft so that two consecutive gear ratios can be selected and engaged simultaneously, but with only one set of gears driving. As there are no clutches to actuate, switching from one ratio to the next is, well, instantaneous, and there's no interruption to the torque flow.Murray says the paddle-shift T.33 will be significantly quicker than the manual car, both in a straight line and on the track, but notes that of the 60 cars already pre-sold—like the T.50, just 100 are being built—only three have so far been ordered with the IGS transmission.The T.33's chassis eschews the usual practice of bolting front and rear subframes to a central carbon-fiber tub. Instead, the car's central structure comprises Formula 1-style aluminum-core carbon-fiber panels bonded around aluminium tubes that run from front to rear. The carbon-fiber elements provide the essential torsional and bending stiffness, as well as a strong structure for crash safety, and the design eliminates the need for bolted joints."A bolted joint is messy and heavy, and it's flexible," Murray says. "No matter how well you do it, there's always a bit of joint movement at the transition from tube to carbon."Up front, supporting the suspension, steering rack, and stabilizer bar, is a single aluminum casting, which Murray won't describe in detail other than to hint it's similar in concept to the organic Bionicast structure used at the rear of the Mercedes-Benz EQXX concept. At the rear, aluminum tubes simply cradle the engine, which is attached with just four bolts. The rear suspension is bolted directly to the transmission, and although the engine is rubber-mounted to reduce noise, vibration, and harshness, a clever trapezoidal link setup is used to lock the engine and transmission into place when subjected to loads through the rear wheels.Murray reckons the innovative design of the T.33 chassis, which is loosely based on the iStream process he developed to build lightweight cars at low cost and high volume, makes it about 44 pounds lighter than a contemporary supercar chassis of a similar size. "It's taken two years to develop the technology, and we're thinking we might build the T.33 chassis ourselves to keep it in-house," he says. Like all Gordon Murray cars, the T.33 is light. Target weight is just 2,403 pounds, a mere 230 more than the T.50 despite the car being engineered to be built in both left- and right-hand drive and meeting all U.S. and European crash regulations. That means the T.33 doesn't need massive brakes, wheels, or tires. The standard brakes are carbon ceramic, with relatively modest 14.6-inch-diameter rotors in front and 13.4-inch units at the rear. The tires are relatively modest, too—235/35 Michelin Pilot Sport 4s on 19-inch forged wheels up front and 295/30 items on 20-inch wheels out back. Power steering is by way of a new hydraulically assisted system specially developed for the car.And like all Gordon Murray cars, the T.33 will have a relatively comfortable ride. "I never do stiffly sprung cars," Murray says. "I just don't like them. If you are going to drive it on a track, you're going to feel a bit of roll and pitch." However, for those customers who want to spend most of their time in their T.33s at track days, GMA will offer a sportier suspension setup. "The cars are so handbuilt, we can do virtually anything for the customers."It's difficult to judge from the photos, but the T.33 is about the same length overall as a Porsche 718 Cayman even though its roofline is 5.5 inches lower and its 107.7-inch wheelbase is an astounding 10.3 inches longer. The pictures don't show the subtlety of its design, either, the overall flavor of which has been inspired by Murray's passion for 1960s mid-engine sports cars such as the Ferrari 206 SP Dino and the Alfa Romeo 33 Stradale.The central driving position of the T.50 dictated a very cab-forward proportion. As the T.33 has a conventional driving position, which allows the pedals to be located farther rearward in the chassis, its cabin is, like those 1960s cars, more centrally located between the wheels. The wasp-waisted car also has a broad front air intake, pronounced haunches over all four wheels, and just the merest hint of a Kamm tail at the rear.The relatively clean and simple surfacing belies some truly clever design details. There are no visible door handles; access to the cabin is via touch-sensitive buttons in the Gordon Murray Automotive logos at the base of the B-pillar. The fuel and oil fillers are hidden behind the panels on the pillars. The small vent at the base of the vertically stacked headlights not only ducts air to the front brakes but also allows the car to pass low-speed crash requirements while echoing iconic 1960s headlight graphics."There's nothing just for styling's sake on the car at all," Murray says. "Every single element has something to do. "  The wide front air intake, for example, houses all the cooling hardware, which means there's no need for unsightly and un-aerodynamic ducts in the body side. Extra cooling air is ducted into the engine compartment from under the car.The ram air intake above the cabin is another case in point. While in other mid-engine cars such intakes are part of the bodywork, in the T.33 it's mounted directly to the engine and stands proud of the bodywork so it can move. That eliminates the need for a flexible coupling, which means the internals of the entire intake can be kept perfectly smooth.The other benefit, Murray explains, is more subtle: "If the intake is flush to the roof, you get a boundary layer buildup [of slow-moving air], which renders the bottom slice of the intake quite useless. By having the intake separate and floating above the car, we bleed off the boundary layer into the engine bay, which is low pressure, and then we can have a smaller, more aerodynamic duct."Although the T.33 doesn't have the downforce of the fan-forced T.50, learnings from that car have been incorporated into the floor design. Two big diffusers at the front of the car help deliver downforce to the front axle. And while testing the T.50, Murray's team found the unique stepped diffuser at the rear of the car, which had been designed to work in conjunction with the fan drawing air through it, delivered 30 percent more downforce than expected with the fan switched off.A revised version of the stepped diffuser layout is now a feature of the T.33's floor. "It was a happy accident," Murray says of the discovery. "But it means most of the downforce is developed at the front of the diffuser, near the car's center of gravity."Combined with the two-thirds total downforce developed by the front diffuser, that means the T.33 doesn't need a splitter protruding from underneath the front air intake. The only active aero device on the car is a rear wing that tilts to maintain aero balance at high speed and flicks to near vertical under braking.All this careful attention to aerodynamic detail has resulted in one very practical benefit: luggage capacity. In addition to being able to accommodate two cases in its full-width frunk, the T.33 can also carry two each in either side of the car, in compartments between the door opening and the rear wheel. To access the compartments, the entire rear quarter panels are hinged at the rear.The GMA T.50, with its central driving position and fan-forced active aerodynamics, is a trophy car, the state-of-the-hypercar-art as expressed by the man who invented the concept 30 years ago. The GMA T.33 has been designed to similarly celebrate light weight and ultimate driving thrills, but also to have the ride quality and ground clearance and luggage capacity that allows it to be driven every day."I could see myself using one all the time," says Murray, whose current daily driver is the delightful, delicate Alpine A110. "If you had to have only one supercar, the T.33 is it."There's another reason to desire a T.33, too. More V-12-powered GMA cars are coming—another two are planned over the next decade—but all will have some form of electrification to enable them to meet emissions regulations. "This will be our last nonhybrid car," Murray says. "If anybody wants the last, beautiful V-12 without any hybridization, this is the one."

Whether we're talking features per dollar, calories burned per hour, or hours played per video game, enthusiasts of all kinds search for solutions that extract the most out of what we put in. That applies to EVs, too.Range is not the end-all be-all when it comes to EV bragging rights. Even an eight-ton abomination with the aerodynamics of a townhouse could reach 500 miles of range if it was fitted with an impractically heavy and expensive high-capacity battery. Instead, we want to praise the EVs that travel the farthest per gallon of gasoline equivalent (33.7 kWh).