Super Sleds! 2022 BMW M5 CS vs. CT5-V Blackwing and GT63 S AMG
Dear Jonny,
I was terribly distressed to learn of your recent bout of COVID-19 and your unfortunate but necessary withdrawal from our long-anticipated rendezvous with the 2022 BMW M5 CS, the 2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing, and the 2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S.
Equally disappointed was your dear friend Reggie Watts, the delightful band leader of The Late Late Show with James Corden and quite the car expert. Much to our relief, our mutual friend Ed Loh was able to make time in his busy schedule to take your place as our third.
Still, I recognize what a great letdown this must be for you, so you have my word I'll write often of our experience so that you may find some small comfort in your time of recuperation.
Sincerely, Scott
2022 BMW M5 CS
Dear Jonny,
I hope my letter finds you well; may the following good news hasten your recovery. Today's activities reminded me of when we were last together with Ed. We had just become acquainted with the greatly anticipated M5 CS but were equally disappointed to learn BMW was unable to equip it with the proper tires. How sad we were the car couldn't perform at its best.
It is with much delight that I inform you this wrong has been put right. Finally, BMW has secured a set of the coveted Pirelli P Zero Corsa tires for our evaluation, and the difference is palpable to the skilled driver. No longer does the car seem skittish and struggling to maintain its hold of the road. Its monstrous power and sharp responses now are equaled by its purchase on the asphalt, doing away with the past concern the car would simply overpower the tires' rubber at a critical moment.
Curiously, these welcome subjective revelations are not supported by objectivity. Our colleagues in the testing department report the M5 CS is slightly less exceptional in all performance measurements on this gummy tire than on the Michelin tire we last experienced the car with, the one we both agreed wasn't up to the task. As highly as we regard our instrumented findings, surely you agree with Ed, Reggie, and myself that the confidence the operator has in the automobile is paramount. Ed and I, having previously flogged the car with the other tires, are of the same mind: These new tires are the driver's choice.
The M5 CS is an imperfect thing in some ways. None among us had kinder words for the front seats than we did the last time we were forced to occupy them. We also remained unenchanted by the needlessly thick steering wheel. Veteran critic Ed found it "fatiguing," and our newly minted judge Reggie agreed: "If I had to do a bunch of runs with that steering wheel, man, my hands would be so tired."
Less passionately, we were also disenchanted with the brake pedal response, which we all found soft under initial contact before firming up nicely. As Reggie put it to us, it's "a little light at the beginning of travel, and then it kind of bites down. Once you get used to it, it's fine, but I usually like—from beginning to end—a more firm pedal."
As you may suspect, we remain unimpressed with the complexity of the interface required to tailor the car's myriad performance settings. I know you disagree, but having the Cadillac and Mercedes on hand was illustrative of how the system could be simplified without losing its range of customization. It's rare we find cause to advocate for more features to migrate to the touchscreen, but done well it effectively corrals all the buttons necessary to adjust vehicle systems in one intuitive place rather than scattering them across the vehicle's interior.
Quibbles aside, we collectively found the M5 CS to be utterly enthralling on a fine mountain byway. The ferocity of its acceleration, the ceaselessness of its grip on the pavement, and the nimbleness of its responses impressed us greatly.
Sincerely, Scott
2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing
Dear Jonny,
I write in hopes your recovery has progressed since my last letter. I was recently reacquainted with a dear friend of ours who was with us when last we were together with Ed, the CT5-V Blackwing. These many months have been far too long, and we were thankful to have this time together again. It was as if nothing had changed, though the Cadillac did trade its lovely manual transmission for a more fashionable 10-speed automatic.
We introduced the Blackwing to our mutual friend Reggie in hopes they would hit it off, but it was not to be. Much as he enjoyed the car's poise and capability, he simply could not reach an accord with the programming of the automatic transmission. In addition to the Cadillac's many adjustable performance parameters, the manufacturer has of late introduced a performance gear-shifting algorithm that attempts to identify a driver's intent and deliver the transmission's most raceworthy calibration. While Ed and I took no issue with it, the program simply did not suit Reggie's driving style, and it frustrated him to no end.
The only other manner in which the Blackwing failed to endear us was in its top-end power delivery, an artifact of its pushrod-valved and supercharged engine design. In any normal circumstance, the car's power is intoxicating, but in the company of vehicles with enormous top-end power that never seems to taper off, the Blackwing never felt as powerful as the M5 CS or GT63 S despite having the greatest output of the three.
This dichotomy is represented clearly in the measured testing results and undoubtedly attributable to its status as the only rear-driven car present. In choosing not to route power to the forward axle, Cadillac has foregone the performance advantages offered in favor of the vehicle's dynamic character.
What a character it is! We have to say this is the best rear-drive sedan ever made. The Blackwing's ability to effectively translate such overwhelming power to just two wheels boggles the mind. The driver can be just about as aggressive with the accelerator as they like while exiting a corner, and the car is able to apply its power almost wholly to acceleration rather than lose some amount to oversteer. It is truly remarkable.
Equally impressive is the CT5-V Blackwing's ability to decelerate. We were all in agreement, the stopping power and tactile feedback of the Blackwing's brakes stood head and shoulders above the others'. Even Reggie, who found the Cadillac's transmission so disagreeable, said its brakes were the best in his estimation.
We were all similarly infatuated with the car's handling and composure. We deemed it the most capable of absorbing roadway imperfections without disturbing its balance and deeply confidence-inspiring in its movements and reactions. We even found its seats the most comfortable while still providing adequate adjustable lateral support.
We must tip our hat to Cadillac for remaining steadfast in its commitment to the powerful rear-drive sedan, not as an anachronism but as a statement. We applaud the firm not only for standing on principle but also for putting in the elbow grease necessary to bring this concept to its fullest potential in the Blackwing.
Sincerely, Scott
2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S
Dear Jonny,
I am optimistic this letter will see you soon reaching the end of your convalescence. I find occasion to write again after bumping into an old acquaintance, the GT63 S. It was The Before Times when last we met, and I remember thinking the AMG a skilled operator with a cold and detached personality. My memory served me well, as it has not changed its demeanor over the intervening years. Nor could it have recently, as Mercedes opted not to produce any for the 2022 model year.
Ed and Reggie agree. "It's sporty, but weirdly I didn't really want to drive it fast," Reggie said. "I drove it quickly, but not fast. This car's a really refined, badass tank that has power and can definitely corner, but it feels to me more luxurious than it does sporty."
Indeed, the instrumented results show it's either as capable as the BMW or nearly there in every metric. It is a truly quick car with stupendous brakes and delightful cornering prowess, but it makes no emotional connection with the driver. It's a shame, really. A car this capable ought to have no issue being enthralling.
Not just dispassionate, it hides its speed, as well. Each of us recounted at least one moment of arriving at a corner far more quickly than anticipated, the lack of feedback disguising the vehicle's true velocity. Thankfully, we found the brakes excellent, though they couldn't top the feel of the Blackwing's pedal.
Otherwise, the GT63 S is a fine piece of work. The interior is really quite an accomplishment, finely crafted in rich leather and sturdy stitching. True, the on-screen interface remains cumbersome and overly layered, but the new row of shortcut buttons is welcome. If only they weren't capacitive, and the same goes for the steering wheel controls.
The other issue meriting a mention is the dismal rear window. The car's massive hatch is certainly accommodating to cargo, but the necessary reinforcements encroach on the glass area. This would be a minor annoyance if not for the fixed rear wing, which bisects the window, further reducing visibility.
Although the GT63 S' flaws are few in number, the aloofness considerably dampened our enthusiasm for the car—especially considering its notably higher price.
Sincerely, Scott
A Final Correspondence
Dear Jonny,
I hope this last letter sees you fully recovered. I had a wonderful conversation with Ed and Reggie regarding our comparison and thought I should share our conclusions.
Between the M5 CS, CT5-V Blackwing, and GT63 S, we all shared a preference for the BMW. The power of its performance, the gracefulness of its handling, and the passion it showed us left us each in its thrall. It was a unanimous decision: The M5 CS is the greatest sport sedan in the land.
Our thoughts were less in lockstep regarding the other two. Ed and I were impressed by the poise and precision of the Blackwing, especially considering its two-wheel-drive chassis. Reggie, however, was still so frustrated by the transmission he ranked the Cadillac third.
We were similarly divided by the GT63 S. Here, Reggie found its style and demeanor appealing enough, but Ed and I remained unmoved. We struggled to find connection with the car despite our best efforts.
Sincerely, Scott
3rd Place: 2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63S
Pros
- Crazy quick
- Incredible Interior
- Least ostentatious
Cons
- No personality
- Squishy brake pedal
- Obnoxious touch-sensitive buttons
Verdict: Crazy capable but still unable to connect with the driver on an emotional level.
2nd Place: 2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing
Pros
- Puts the power down
- Excellent brakes
- Most comfortable seats
Cons
- Slowest despite being the most powerful
- Performance shift algorithm is wonky
- Doesn't feel as fast as it is
Verdict: The best rear-drive performance sedan ever made.
1st Place: 2022 BMW M5 CS
Pros
- Wickedly fast
- Endless grip
- Shockingly nimble
Cons
- Uncomfortable seats
- Too many buttons for performance setup
- Chunky steering wheel
Verdict: At BMW, "CS" now means what just "M" used to—the M5 CS is the performance division at its greatest.
2022 BMW M5 CS Specifications 2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing Specifications 2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S 4Matic+ Specifications DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD Front-engine, RWD Front-engine, AWD ENGINE TYPE Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads Supercharged direct-injected OHV 16-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads DISPLACEMENT 4,395 cc/268.2 cu in 6,162 cc/376 cu in 3,982 cc/243 cu in COMPRESSION RATIO 10.0:1 10.0:1 8.6:1 POWER (SAE NET) 627 hp @ 6,000 rpm 668 hp @ 6,500 rpm 630 hp @ 5,500 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 553 lb-ft @ 1,800 rpm 659 lb-ft @ 3,600 rpm 664 lb-ft @ 2,500 rpm REDLINE 7,000 rpm 6,500 rpm 7,000 rpm WEIGHT TO POWER 6.5 lb/hp 6.4 lb/hp 7.4 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic 10-speed automatic 9-speed automatic AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 3.15:1/2.02:1 2.85:1/1.82:1 3.27:1/1.99:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar Multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 14.3:1 11.6-15.5:1 14.4:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.3 2.2 1.6 BRAKES, F; R 15.8-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc; 15.0-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc 15.7-in vented cast-iron disc; 14.7-in vented cast-iron disc 15.8-in vented, drilled, 2-pc carbon-ceramic disc; 14.2-in vented, drilled, 2-pc carbon-ceramic disc, ABS WHEELS, F;R 9.5 x 20-in; 10.5 x 20-in forged aluminum 10.0 x 19-in; 11.0 x 19-in forged aluminum 10.0 x 21-in; 11.5 x 21-in, forged aluminum TIRES, F;R 275/35R20 102Y; 285/35R20 104Y Pirelli P Zero Corsa (star) 275/35R19 100Y; 305/30R19 102Y Michelin Pilot Sport 4S 275/35R21 103Y; 315/30R21 105Y Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 M01 DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 117.4 in 116.0 in 116.2 in TRACK, F/R 64.0/62.8 in 63.3/62.3 in 65.7/65.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 196.4 x 74.9 x 57.8 in 194.9 x 74.1 x 56.5 in 199.2 x 76.9 x 57.0 in TURNING CIRCLE 41.4 ft 42.6 ft 41.3 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 4,104 lb (56/44%) 4,253 lb (54/46%) 4,637 lb (54/46%) SEATING CAPACITY 4 5 4 HEADROOM, F/R 40.7/38.5 in 39.0/36.3 in 40.8/38.2 in LEGROOM, F/R 41.4/36.5 in 42.4/37.0 in NA/28.6 in in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 58.7/55.9 in 56.7/55.7 in 57.7/57.2 in CARGO VOLUME 14.0 cu ft 11.9 cu ft 13.0 cu ft ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.1 sec 1.6 sec 1.0 sec 0-40 1.6 2.2 1.5 0-50 2.2 2.9 2.1 0-60 2.9 3.7 2.9 0-70 3.7 4.5 3.7 0-80 4.5 5.4 4.7 0-90 5.5 6.5 5.8 0-100 6.7 7.6 7.1 0-100-0 10.5 11.6 11.0 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.4 1.5 1.5 QUARTER MILE 10.9 sec @ 127.9 mph 11.6 sec @ 124.9 mph 11.1 sec @ 124.6 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 101 ft 100 ft 103 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.07 g (avg) 1.01 g (avg) 1.05 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.3 sec @ 0.88 g (avg) 23.8 sec @ 0.85 g (avg) 23.3 sec @ 0.88 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,500 rpm 1,600 rpm 1,400 rpm CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $143,995 $90,390 $163,950 PRICE AS TESTED $148,995 $110,635 $199,910 AIRBAGS 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee 7: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, driver knee BASIC WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 6 yrs/70,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 4 yrs/Unlimited miles 6 yrs/70,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 20.1 gal 17.4 gal 17.4 gal EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 15/21/17 mpg 13/22/16 mpg 16/21/18 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 342 miles 272 miles 380 miles RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium Unleaded premium Unleaded premium ON SALE Now Now Sold out Show All
You may also like
The myth of the Cadillac coffin is one that has haunted pop culture for decades, even popularized in the song Willie the Wimp by blues legend Stevie Ray Vaughn in the mid-1980s. The idea of being buried in a luxury car might seem like a one-off tribute to the ancient Egyptian pharaohs (who were routinely interred with all of their worldly possessions), but the twist in Willie's tale is that it's based on a true story.Willie "Wimp" Stokes Jr., Chicago gangster and over-the-top gambler, was indeed laid six feet under in a bizarre coffin-sized replica of his pimp-mobile (pictured above), which combined the wheels, grille, and trunk from his personal ride with a windshield, dash, and license plate. Willie's corpse was propped up inside this creation to look as though he was driving himself through the gates of Hades.Dig a little deeper and even more exhumed urban legends acquire an unexpected factuality. It seems like car lovers have been bending the rules to be buried in their favorite rides for decades. One of the earliest recorded instances speaks of heiress Sandra Ilene West, a Texan who departed for the afterlife inside her 1964 Ferrari California. Aurora Schuck, another Cadillac fan (although without Willie's links to organized crime) and her 1976 Eldorado convertible were craned into a 24-by-12-foot plot dug specifically to accommodate the Caddy in 1989, followed by George Swanson taking his '84 Corvette to the afterlife six years later, and Lonnie Holloway in his 1976 Pontiac Catalina in 2009.Whither the extreme automotive enthusiast who desires to make a mausoleum of their favorite hunk of metal in the year 2022? As a Boomer-led tide of death pushes cemeteries to the brink of real estate availability, environmental legislation tightens regarding what you can legally put into ground, and social media lies in wait to pounce on anyone who elects to extend their flamboyance into the afterlife, we wanted to know if it was still possible to be buried in your car?Make Room!The answer to that question, it seems, varies significantly depending on where you plan to rest eternally. There's actually no single overarching framework that governs how cemeteries are managed, or how human remains must be disposed of, which means each jurisdiction is on its own to create (or not) a set of regulations regarding burials.The first daunting step in the quest for a car coffin is to secure a cemetery plot of adequate size. Ms. Schuck had the luxury of scooping up roughly 16 plots to combine into one Caddy-sized pit (taking into account the need to build a full concrete foundation and then surround the vehicle with even more cement). Even Swansons' more modestly-sized Corvette required four plots in total (with a layer of concrete poured on top to prevent settling). It can be a struggle in some urban areas to find standard-size side-by-side plots so that spouses can dream together forever, let alone carve out a car-sized slice of terrain, so it definitely helps if you plan on being eternally linked to a Miata rather than an Escalade.Then there's the question of access. The kind of heavy equipment required to dig a sizable hole in the ground needs a fair amount of space to operate, not to mention a pathway to the plot(s) in question, and that's before you take into account the logistics of fitting a car-capable crane onto ground that may or may not be hard enough to accommodate its weight.Of course, you could always opt for home burial, which alleviates many of the above problems (in all but Indiana, Washington D.C., Washington State, and California, where it's not legal). There are roughly 10 states that require you to get a funeral director to move the body to its intended burial spot, but almost everywhere else it's the Wild West when it comes to its transportation and burial/cremation (as long as you take care of it within the 24-48-hour window that precludes the need for embalming, and don't try to cross state lines).Don't Confuse Your Backyard For A DumpEven if burying someone on your own land is nearly 50-state legal, you still have to consider the environmental implications of stuffing a vehicle filled with toxic fluids and forever-plastics under the ground. It turns out the federal government is a bit touchy about what you can dump a shovel of dirt on, regardless of who owns the land.The flip-side of this is that cemeteries themselves aren't exempt from environmental concerns associated with even a traditional burial. Chemicals like formaldehyde (used in embalming), and arsenic (formerly used in embalming) have been leaking into groundwater from graveyards for decades, not to mention the myriad coffin paints, finishes, and metals that are part of a traditional funeral. Even cremation takes its toll on the environment at large.The bottom line? Each state has its own regulations that either modify or complement federal guidelines about waste management, and you'll have to take those into account when deciding how best to manage your auto-tomb's afterlife emissions, regardless of whether you're twisting the arm of a local cemetery manager or simply burying your loved one's motorcade in the backyard. In Pennsylvania, George Swanson's family had the entire drivetrain drained prior to interment, but in more permissive Indiana, Aurora Schuck's Cadillac was actually driven into the grave just before the burial began.Maybe Don't Do It?A final word of advice, should you choose to pilot your precious muscle machine or low-rider on the ferry across the river Styx: try to keep it on the down-low and avoid turning the burial into a show.What are we saying—there's absolutely no way to avoid word getting out about an automotive-adjacent event like this one. Be prepared for the onslaught of social media stars trying to score points as they alternately laud and lament your choice to go all-in on an automotive afterlife, not to mention the endless parade of purists who will roast your decision to deprive the world of one more example of whatever make and model coffin you select.A vehicular funeral isn't for the attention-averse, and while you might be slumbering peacefully on the rich, Corinthian leather of your casket, your loved ones will have to deal with the digital looky-loos and snide commenters haunting their Insta profiles and email inboxes.
ProsNear limitless gripQuicker-than-you-can-think responsesBiblical brakes ConsConfusing drive modesNo performance auto-shifting modeNeeds a bigger shift lightIt's not often a car comes along where the only thing you can find to complain about are the names, functions, and number of drive modes, but here we are. The 2021 Lamborghini Huracán STO is so insanely good to drive, we're left with the nittiest nits to pick."You look at the STO and its wings 'n' things," deputy editor Alex Stoklosa said, "then consider that it's shoving a V-10's worth of power to only the rear wheels, and you assume it'll be hairier than a barbershop floor. Not at all. There is so much grip front and rear, and the chassis is so balanced, that it drives nothing like it looks. There is no evil here. Sure, the Lambo hustles in ways most cars don't or can't, but it simply has no vices while furiously raging."You could call it a complaint for lack of others, but the amount of time some judges felt they needed to fully understand the car's limits was a bit longer than usual, simply because the limits are so high you need a telescope to see them. Once you truly understand what it's capable of, though, you never want to stop driving it. On the street, on the track, it doesn't matter.Credit the brilliant blending of adaptive magnetorheological shock absorbers, rear steering, racing brakes, and Bridgestone Potenza Race tires for the STO's direct connection to your brain's pleasure center. The front end changes direction quicker than you can think it while the rear stays behind you no matter the speed unless you very deliberately kick it out. When you do, the car breaks away beautifully, allowing you to ride that slip into the perfect amount of rotation.Mostly, though, it just goes. The damn near race-spec V-10 delivers a perfect progressive powerband that never wallops the rear tires with more torque than they can handle (which is, admittedly, a lot), so you can stand on the throttle leaving every corner, and the STO will grab and go. Get to the next turn, and the brakes require only gentle but deliberate pressure to stop the car like you just grabbed the No. 3 wire on an aircraft carrier's deck.Not just a one-lap pony, the Huracán STO will do it over and over, every corner, every lap, all day long. It's so rewarding and fulfilling to drive, you never want to stop. You can't automatically say these things about every mid-engine supercar with 600-plus hp.About those nits. Some judges found the drive modes confusing, assuming the STO mode would be the most aggressive since it shares the car's name. ("STO" stands for Super Trofeo Omologato, meaning this is the road version of the Huracán Super Trofeo track-only race car.) But STO is actually the "around town" mode, and many felt it was way too docile. Corsa is the mode you want to be in, but keep in mind it's the full race mode with manual-only shifting and reduced stability control. Several judges found themselves wishing for an intermediate mode with lighter steering than Corsa and far more aggressive automatic shifting. But alas, the only other mode is Pioggia, the wet weather mode.Since we're whining, an actual shift light instead of the graphics in the digital instrument cluster would be nice. The engine just revs forever, right until it suddenly doesn't, so you need the upshift indication in Corsa.But again, all you really need to know about how ridiculously awesome this car is to drive is that we can't find anything better to complain about. The Huracán STO is an apex predator at its apex, fully bestowing the thrill of the hunt to anyone who slips behind the wheel.2021 Lamborghini Huracán STO Specifications Base Price/As tested $333,633/$442,033 Power (SAE net) 630 hp @ 8,000 rpm Torque (SAE net) 417 lb-ft @ 6,500 rpm Accel, 0-60 mph 2.8 sec Quarter-mile 10.7 sec @ 132.3 mph Braking, 60-0 mph 95 ft Lateral Acceleration 1.16 g (avg) MT Figure Eight 22.3 sec @ 0.99 g (avg) EPA City/Hwy/Comb 13/18/15 mpg Vehicle Layout Mid-engine, RWD, 2-pass, 2-door coupe Engine, Transmission 5.2L port- and direct-injected DOHC 40-valve 90-degree V-10, 7-speed twin-clutch auto Curb Weight (F/R DIST) 3,390 lb (42/58%) Wheelbase 103.1 in Length x Width x Height 179.0 x 76.6 x 48.0 in On Sale Now Show All
hyundai ioniq-5 Full OverviewThe 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 is the most consequential new Hyundai since the original Genesis sedan. The Genesis changed people's perception of Hyundai as a brand, for the first time putting the Korean automaker in the luxury conversation alongside names such as Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Lexus. The new 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 is destined to change the perception of Hyundai again—only this time the conversations will be around Tesla.What Is It?The Ioniq 5 is the first Hyundai EV built on Hyundai Motor Group's Electric-Global Modular Platform (E-GMP). The Ioniq 5 is available worldwide with either a 58-kWh or 77.4-kWh battery pack and a single motor driving the rear wheels or (with the 77.4-kWh battery) motors front and rear providing all-wheel drive. In North America, the 77.4-kWh battery pack is the sole option.Even by the standards of today's topsy-turvy automotive taxonomy, the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 is something of a segment buster. In photos, its crisp styling and taut proportions suggests a Veloster-sized hatchback with a sort of Hyundai-does-VW-Golf vibe. Look again and consider: It's rolling on 20-inch wheels and 255/45 Michelin Primacy Tour tires. In the metal, the Ioniq 5 is almost as big as a BMW X3, with a 118.1-inch wheelbase—that's an inch longer than a BMW X5's.Car Style, SUV SubstanceOur test vehicle is the range-topping 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited HTRAC, which comes equipped with the big battery and all-wheel drive courtesy of two motors that produce a total of 320 hp and 446 lb-ft of torque. It also boasts a swag of premium goodies ranging from a power driver's seat with memory to a high-end Bose audio system to a head-up display and adaptive cruise control. You get all of this for $55,725.That's considerably less money than you'll spend for a dual-motor Tesla Model Y Long Range, which is listed at $60,900. What's more, the Hyundai looks and feels like a much more premium product. Where the Model Y's cabin is stark and austere, the Hyundai Ioniq 5's interior is thoughtfully detailed and well-finished, and it has buttons and knobs and targeted touch panels that mean you don't have to waste time looking away from the road to peck furiously at a giant screen to access mundane functions as you do in the Tesla. And while from the outside the Model Y looks as if it's been thrown together in a tent, with inconsistencies in the panel fits you can see from, er, Mars, the Hyundai's fit and finish is first rate.Testing, TestingThe new Ioniq 5 initially feels like a softer car to drive than many of its EV contemporaries, with its suspension seemingly tuned more for comfort than corners. But that's not to say it's slow. At the test track, the 0-60-mph sprint took just 4.4 seconds en route to a standing quarter-mile time of 13.2 seconds at 102.7mph. And unlike some EVs—the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition is a notable example—the Hyundai's rate of acceleration didn't fall off dramatically as speeds increased. Instead, it was able to sustain its forward push right through the quarter mile.Yes, the Tesla Model Y Long Range is quicker overall, whooshing down the quarter mile in 12.4 seconds at 114.8 mph, but the difference between the two is mostly at high speed, which has little relevance in real-world driving. The Hyundai's superior torque—its twin motors produce an additional 70 lb-ft compared to the Tesla—effortlessly punches the Ioniq 5 away from a standstill, and it's only 0.3 second slower to 60 mph than the 7 percent lighter and 20 percent more powerful Model Y.Despite its soft suspension, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 is surprisingly adept in the twisty bits. We recorded a figure-eight lap time of 25.7 seconds, just 0.2 second slower than the BMW X3 M40i we happened to test on the same day. This caused us to exclaim, "Holy smokes!" Frankly, we didn't expect this car to be as fun and capable as it is; it's quick and has way more grip than we anticipatedThe biggest surprise was how playful the Ioniq 5 can be on corner exits with all the nannies switched off: It actually drifts. Just for fun, we tried for a full sideways lap of the skidpad, and the Hyundai made it two-thirds of the way around before letting go.The asymmetric front-to-rear power and torque split of the dual-motor Ioniq 5—the front motor makes 99 hp and 188 lb-ft, while the rear pumps out 225 hp and 258 lb-ft—combined with near neutral front/rear weight distribution doesn't just make the Hyundai a giggle when you want to play at the track. It also makes it feel more poised on normal roads at normal speeds, despite steering that, though precise and direct, doesn't provide a lot of feedback.Brake feel is the car's biggest dynamic niggle. The blending between regenerative and mechanical braking is smooth, and the system hauled the 4,684-pound Hyundai to a stop from 60 mph in 123 feet, 5 feet more than the Tesla Model Y required. But we disliked the lack of feedback through the pedal: There's very little travel or pedal pressure under heavy braking before the ABS kicks in.More DetailsYou can actuate one of three drive modes—Eco, Normal, and Sport—via a large button beneath the steering wheel's left spoke. In simple terms, the modes change the weighting of the accelerator pedal, effectively encouraging the driver to make smoother and gentler inputs. Six regenerative braking levels are offered, ranging from zero (which allows the Ioniq 5 to coast freely) to a mode that enables one-pedal driving, with the car slowing to a gentle halt the moment you lift off. There is also an auto mode. Drivers can switch between these modes via steering wheel paddles.After a bit of experimentation, we preferred to set the drive mode to Sport, which allowed us to make the most of the powertrain's instant-on response, and the lift-off regenerative braking to Level 1, which enabled the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 to flow down the road much like a regular combustion-engine car with an automatic transmission when lifting off the accelerator.Range FinderHyundai says the 77.4-kWh battery gives the dual-motor Ioniq 5 a range of 256 miles. Our stints on the road, which included highway cruising at 70 to 80 mph and some brisk bursts along quiet back roads, as well as endless fiddling with drive modes and regen settings, saw the Ioniq 5 consume 2.7-kWh per mile, according to the onboard computer, which translated to a range of just about 200 miles. Driven normally, you should expect a usable range of 220 to 230 miles, more if you are content to noodle along in Eco mode.No, the Ioniq 5 Limited won't travel as far between charges as the Tesla Model Y Long Range, which has a claimed range of just more than 300 miles. But you'll spend about 30 percent less time at the charging station with the Hyundai. Find a 350-kW DC fast charger, and the Ioniq 5's battery can be juiced from 10 percent charge to 80 percent in just 18 minutes and topped up fully in less than an hour. No other mainstream EV, apart from the identical-under-the-skin Kia EV6, can recharge so quickly.Do You Want One?In terms of overall practicality, the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a mixed bag. The long wheelbase and flat floor mean the rear seat easily accommodates 6-foot-tall adults, and there's plenty of storage space around the cabin. But unlike most two-box SUVs, it is truly a hatchback, not a wagon. The raked C-pillars and angled backlight chew into the shallow load space at the rear, and there's only a small storage tray in the frunk.If driving range and load lugging are your absolute priorities, the Tesla Model Y Long Range, which will travel 28 percent farther between charges and has about 60 percent more luggage capacity with the rear seats up, would seem the obvious choice. But those two advantages come at a price.The Ioniq 5 Limited not only costs about $5,000 less than the Model Y, but it's also quieter and more comfortable to drive, is a visibly higher-quality vehicle inside and out, and can recharge much quicker. That it's also brisk and fun to drive if you want it to be are bonuses.Indeed, the 2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 Limited HTRAC is a compelling all-arounder for the buyer who wants a premium EV, without paying top dollar.Looks good! More details?2022 Hyundai Ioniq 5 HTRAC (Limited Long Range) SPECIFICATIONS BASE PRICE $55,725 PRICE AS TESTED $55,920 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV MOTOR TYPE Permanent-magnet electric POWER (SAE NET) 320 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 446 lb-ft TRANSMISSION 1-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 4,684 lb (51/49%) WHEELBASE 118.1 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 185.2 x 74.4 x 63.0 in 0-60 MPH 4.4 sec QUARTER MILE 13.2 sec @ 102.7 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 123 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.88 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.7 sec @ 0.71 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 110/87/98 mpg-e EPA RANGE, COMB 256 mi ON SALE Early 2022 Show All
0 Comments