Lincoln Model L100 Concept: Are 14-Foot Doors the Future of Luxury?

mazda mazda3 Full OverviewAspiration toward a higher plane of luxury and refinement is a near-universal notion. Plenty of us Yanks would call it the American dream, but the idea is far from exclusive to those living in the States. Mazda has been working at it for years.The Japanese automaker has been known for decades as the sportier alternative to similarly priced Hondas and Toyotas (insert the well-worn "zoom-zoom" tagline here), but it's been striving toward a different brand identity as of late. Based on its product strategy over the past five years and having developed a rear-drive hybrid inline-six platform for the next Mazda 6 and a pair of new SUVs, it's obvious Mazda is working to go upscale along the lines of Lexus or Acura.But what of its current lineup? With the optional turbocharged engine, AWD, and the Premium Plus package, our 2022 Mazda 3 test vehicle rang in at a steep for the segment $34,115—more than $10K richer than a base Honda Civic and within three grand of a BMW 228i Gran Coupe. So the question becomes, is a loaded Mazda 3 a proper luxury alternative, or a cheap compact with a handful of extra features?Test Figures and Driving ImpressionsOne thing's for sure, this particular Mazda 3 isn't your basic front-drive compact sedan with a wheezy four-cylinder. Its optional 2.5-liter turbo inline-four develops 227 hp (or 250 hp on premium fuel) and 310 lb-ft of torque; both numbers are the highest you'll find in the compact segment this side of a Civic Type R or a Subaru WRX.Here are the numbers: 0-60 mph in 6.4 seconds and the quarter mile in 14.8 seconds at 94.6 mph. For context, when we tested an AWD Mazda 3 with the standard naturally aspirated four-pot kicking out 186 hp and 186 lb-ft, it reached 60 mph in 8.1 seconds and took 16.2 seconds to run the quarter. (By comparison, our long-term BMW 228i Gran Coupe took 6.0 seconds to hit 60 mph.) Braking from 60 to 0 mph was slightly better in the Mazda 3 turbo car, too, taking 120 feet and 122 feet, respectively, to get to a full stop. That's quite a bit off the stopping power of the new Honda Civic Si, however, which hauls to 0 mph in just 110 feet.On the road, this top-spec Mazda 3 delivers a driving experience that's more refined and mature than you'd expect of this class of vehicle. The turbo-four's plentiful torque provides a good shove any time you explore the latter half of the throttle's pedal travel, plus the earlier peak torque disguises the aging six-speed automatic tranny's lack of cogs compared to some of its peers. Additionally, noise, vibration, and harshness levels from the powertrain are better than some entry-level luxury cars.The steering is weighty and accurate, even providing a bit of feel. This is one area where Mazda's sporting history shines through. Ride quality is firmer than a more relaxed compact like the Hyundai Elantra, but that pays off in the 3's superb body control and stable handling. The platform feels rock-solid through corners and is happy to keep up when you get excited on a twisty two-lane. We had a chance to drive in snow and ice, too; the AWD system shuffled torque fore and aft to keep the little Mazda pointed straight and the driver unworried. The traction control system severely limits power, but you can turn it off and have a bit of fun when you do.All that said, Mazda's driver assist system isn't programmed to be nearly as supportive as those from Honda, Hyundai, Kia, or Toyota. Lane centering hardly ever engages, and the adaptive cruise control occasionally exhibits unnatural braking behavior. If you want something that minimizes fatigue on the highway with modern active safety features, the Mazda 3 isn't it.Design ExcellenceThe Mazda 3 easily looks like the most expensive vehicle in the compact segment, with a dash-to-axle spacing that disguises its FWD underpinnings better than competitors like the Mercedes-Benz CLA-Class and BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe. Its LED head- and taillights are distinctively premium, and the way the turn signals blink on strong and slowly fade looks like it's straight off an Audi.Inside, the 2022 Mazda 3's interior layout is minimalist without feeling cheap, and there are no finicky touch buttons; you get expensive-feeling knobs for climate control and volume, which is a huge plus. This is what elegance and class can feel like in a relatively inexpensive vehicle. Materials and build quality feel top notch, too, and the ergonomics are excellent other than the cupholders, which aren't ideal for taller drinks.Some staffers experienced issues with the infotainment system (it can take a few too many steps to find basic functions like a radio tuner), but in many ways it comes off as a better-executed version of an older BMW iDrive system. Mazda's use of a rotary infotainment controller rather than a touchscreen allows the standard 8.8-inch infotainment display to be mounted high on the dash, which means drivers can keep their peripheral vision on the road while selecting a podcast or adding a gas station to their navigation route.That's not to say the interior isn't missing a few features given its nearly $35,000 price point. Even fully loaded, the Mazda 3 lacks cooled seats, wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, rear climate control vents, and a wireless charging pad—all of which are available in lower-priced competitors. It's also worth noting that the Mazda's rear seat is the tightest in the segment. Six-footers will be brushing their noggins on the headliner, and sharp impacts aren't going to be easy on the spine.Is the Mazda 3 Turbo a Good Car?The turbocharged and loaded-up 2022 Mazda 3 isn't a vehicle for everyone. Its back seat is exceedingly small and poorly equipped, the driver-assist tech is way behind those of the competition, and some folks won't vibe with the infotainment system's occasionally convoluted layout. There are competitors with more features, too. But would we take it over an entry-level luxury sedan like the BMW 2 Series Gran Coupe? In a heartbeat.Looks good! More details? 2022 Mazda 3 Sedan AWD Turbo Specifications BASE PRICE $31,565 PRICE AS TESTED $34,115 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 2.5L Turbo direct-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4 POWER (SAE NET) 227 hp @ 5,000 rpm* TORQUE (SAE NET) 310 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm TRANSMISSION 6-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,376 lb (62/38%) WHEELBASE 107.3 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 183.5 x 70.7 x 56.9 in 0-60 MPH 6.4 sec QUARTER MILE 14.8 sec @ 94.6 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 120 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.84 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 26.6 sec @ 0.67 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 23/32/27 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 343 miles ON SALE Now *250 hp on 93-octane fuel Show All

Dear Jonny,I was terribly distressed to learn of your recent bout of COVID-19 and your unfortunate but necessary withdrawal from our long-anticipated rendezvous with the 2022 BMW M5 CS, the 2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing, and the 2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S.Equally disappointed was your dear friend Reggie Watts, the delightful band leader of The Late Late Show with James Corden and quite the car expert. Much to our relief, our mutual friend Ed Loh was able to make time in his busy schedule to take your place as our third.Still, I recognize what a great letdown this must be for you, so you have my word I'll write often of our experience so that you may find some small comfort in your time of recuperation.Sincerely, Scott2022 BMW M5 CSDear Jonny,I hope my letter finds you well; may the following good news hasten your recovery. Today's activities reminded me of when we were last together with Ed. We had just become acquainted with the greatly anticipated M5 CS but were equally disappointed to learn BMW was unable to equip it with the proper tires. How sad we were the car couldn't perform at its best.It is with much delight that I inform you this wrong has been put right. Finally, BMW has secured a set of the coveted Pirelli P Zero Corsa tires for our evaluation, and the difference is palpable to the skilled driver. No longer does the car seem skittish and struggling to maintain its hold of the road. Its monstrous power and sharp responses now are equaled by its purchase on the asphalt, doing away with the past concern the car would simply overpower the tires' rubber at a critical moment.Curiously, these welcome subjective revelations are not supported by objectivity. Our colleagues in the testing department report the M5 CS is slightly less exceptional in all performance measurements on this gummy tire than on the Michelin tire we last experienced the car with, the one we both agreed wasn't up to the task. As highly as we regard our instrumented findings, surely you agree with Ed, Reggie, and myself that the confidence the operator has in the automobile is paramount. Ed and I, having previously flogged the car with the other tires, are of the same mind: These new tires are the driver's choice.The M5 CS is an imperfect thing in some ways. None among us had kinder words for the front seats than we did the last time we were forced to occupy them. We also remained unenchanted by the needlessly thick steering wheel. Veteran critic Ed found it "fatiguing," and our newly minted judge Reggie agreed: "If I had to do a bunch of runs with that steering wheel, man, my hands would be so tired."Less passionately, we were also disenchanted with the brake pedal response, which we all found soft under initial contact before firming up nicely. As Reggie put it to us, it's "a little light at the beginning of travel, and then it kind of bites down. Once you get used to it, it's fine, but I usually like—from beginning to end—a more firm pedal."As you may suspect, we remain unimpressed with the complexity of the interface required to tailor the car's myriad performance settings. I know you disagree, but having the Cadillac and Mercedes on hand was illustrative of how the system could be simplified without losing its range of customization. It's rare we find cause to advocate for more features to migrate to the touchscreen, but done well it effectively corrals all the buttons necessary to adjust vehicle systems in one intuitive place rather than scattering them across the vehicle's interior.Quibbles aside, we collectively found the M5 CS to be utterly enthralling on a fine mountain byway. The ferocity of its acceleration, the ceaselessness of its grip on the pavement, and the nimbleness of its responses impressed us greatly.Sincerely, Scott2022 Cadillac CT5-V BlackwingDear Jonny,I write in hopes your recovery has progressed since my last letter. I was recently reacquainted with a dear friend of ours who was with us when last we were together with Ed, the CT5-V Blackwing. These many months have been far too long, and we were thankful to have this time together again. It was as if nothing had changed, though the Cadillac did trade its lovely manual transmission for a more fashionable 10-speed automatic.We introduced the Blackwing to our mutual friend Reggie in hopes they would hit it off, but it was not to be. Much as he enjoyed the car's poise and capability, he simply could not reach an accord with the programming of the automatic transmission. In addition to the Cadillac's many adjustable performance parameters, the manufacturer has of late introduced a performance gear-shifting algorithm that attempts to identify a driver's intent and deliver the transmission's most raceworthy calibration. While Ed and I took no issue with it, the program simply did not suit Reggie's driving style, and it frustrated him to no end.The only other manner in which the Blackwing failed to endear us was in its top-end power delivery, an artifact of its pushrod-valved and supercharged engine design. In any normal circumstance, the car's power is intoxicating, but in the company of vehicles with enormous top-end power that never seems to taper off, the Blackwing never felt as powerful as the M5 CS or GT63 S despite having the greatest output of the three.This dichotomy is represented clearly in the measured testing results and undoubtedly attributable to its status as the only rear-driven car present. In choosing not to route power to the forward axle, Cadillac has foregone the performance advantages offered in favor of the vehicle's dynamic character.What a character it is! We have to say this is the best rear-drive sedan ever made. The Blackwing's ability to effectively translate such overwhelming power to just two wheels boggles the mind. The driver can be just about as aggressive with the accelerator as they like while exiting a corner, and the car is able to apply its power almost wholly to acceleration rather than lose some amount to oversteer. It is truly remarkable.Equally impressive is the CT5-V Blackwing's ability to decelerate. We were all in agreement, the stopping power and tactile feedback of the Blackwing's brakes stood head and shoulders above the others'. Even Reggie, who found the Cadillac's transmission so disagreeable, said its brakes were the best in his estimation.We were all similarly infatuated with the car's handling and composure. We deemed it the most capable of absorbing roadway imperfections without disturbing its balance and deeply confidence-inspiring in its movements and reactions. We even found its seats the most comfortable while still providing adequate adjustable lateral support.We must tip our hat to Cadillac for remaining steadfast in its commitment to the powerful rear-drive sedan, not as an anachronism but as a statement. We applaud the firm not only for standing on principle but also for putting in the elbow grease necessary to bring this concept to its fullest potential in the Blackwing.Sincerely, Scott2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63 SDear Jonny,I am optimistic this letter will see you soon reaching the end of your convalescence. I find occasion to write again after bumping into an old acquaintance, the GT63 S. It was The Before Times when last we met, and I remember thinking the AMG a skilled operator with a cold and detached personality. My memory served me well, as it has not changed its demeanor over the intervening years. Nor could it have recently, as Mercedes opted not to produce any for the 2022 model year.Ed and Reggie agree. "It's sporty, but weirdly I didn't really want to drive it fast," Reggie said. "I drove it quickly, but not fast. This car's a really refined, badass tank that has power and can definitely corner, but it feels to me more luxurious than it does sporty."Indeed, the instrumented results show it's either as capable as the BMW or nearly there in every metric. It is a truly quick car with stupendous brakes and delightful cornering prowess, but it makes no emotional connection with the driver. It's a shame, really. A car this capable ought to have no issue being enthralling.Not just dispassionate, it hides its speed, as well. Each of us recounted at least one moment of arriving at a corner far more quickly than anticipated, the lack of feedback disguising the vehicle's true velocity. Thankfully, we found the brakes excellent, though they couldn't top the feel of the Blackwing's pedal.Otherwise, the GT63 S is a fine piece of work. The interior is really quite an accomplishment, finely crafted in rich leather and sturdy stitching. True, the on-screen interface remains cumbersome and overly layered, but the new row of shortcut buttons is welcome. If only they weren't capacitive, and the same goes for the steering wheel controls.The other issue meriting a mention is the dismal rear window. The car's massive hatch is certainly accommodating to cargo, but the necessary reinforcements encroach on the glass area. This would be a minor annoyance if not for the fixed rear wing, which bisects the window, further reducing visibility.Although the GT63 S' flaws are few in number, the aloofness considerably dampened our enthusiasm for the car—especially considering its notably higher price.Sincerely, ScottA Final CorrespondenceDear Jonny,I hope this last letter sees you fully recovered. I had a wonderful conversation with Ed and Reggie regarding our comparison and thought I should share our conclusions.Between the M5 CS, CT5-V Blackwing, and GT63 S, we all shared a preference for the BMW. The power of its performance, the gracefulness of its handling, and the passion it showed us left us each in its thrall. It was a unanimous decision: The M5 CS is the greatest sport sedan in the land.Our thoughts were less in lockstep regarding the other two. Ed and I were impressed by the poise and precision of the Blackwing, especially considering its two-wheel-drive chassis. Reggie, however, was still so frustrated by the transmission he ranked the Cadillac third.We were similarly divided by the GT63 S. Here, Reggie found its style and demeanor appealing enough, but Ed and I remained unmoved. We struggled to find connection with the car despite our best efforts.Sincerely, Scott3rd Place: 2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63SProsCrazy quickIncredible InteriorLeast ostentatious ConsNo personalitySquishy brake pedalObnoxious touch-sensitive buttonsVerdict: Crazy capable but still unable to connect with the driver on an emotional level. 2nd Place: 2022 Cadillac CT5-V BlackwingProsPuts the power downExcellent brakesMost comfortable seats ConsSlowest despite being the most powerfulPerformance shift algorithm is wonkyDoesn't feel as fast as it isVerdict: The best rear-drive performance sedan ever made. 1st Place: 2022 BMW M5 CSProsWickedly fastEndless gripShockingly nimble ConsUncomfortable seatsToo many buttons for performance setupChunky steering wheelVerdict: At BMW, "CS" now means what just "M" used to—the M5 CS is the performance division at its greatest.  2022 BMW M5 CS Specifications 2022 Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing Specifications 2021 Mercedes-AMG GT63 S 4Matic+ Specifications DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD Front-engine, RWD Front-engine, AWD ENGINE TYPE Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads Supercharged direct-injected OHV 16-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads DISPLACEMENT 4,395 cc/268.2 cu in 6,162 cc/376 cu in 3,982 cc/243 cu in COMPRESSION RATIO 10.0:1 10.0:1 8.6:1 POWER (SAE NET) 627 hp @ 6,000 rpm 668 hp @ 6,500 rpm 630 hp @ 5,500 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 553 lb-ft @ 1,800 rpm 659 lb-ft @ 3,600 rpm 664 lb-ft @ 2,500 rpm REDLINE 7,000 rpm 6,500 rpm 7,000 rpm WEIGHT TO POWER 6.5 lb/hp 6.4 lb/hp 7.4 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic 10-speed automatic 9-speed automatic AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 3.15:1/2.02:1 2.85:1/1.82:1 3.27:1/1.99:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar Multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 14.3:1 11.6-15.5:1 14.4:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.3 2.2 1.6 BRAKES, F; R 15.8-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc; 15.0-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc 15.7-in vented cast-iron disc; 14.7-in vented cast-iron disc 15.8-in vented, drilled, 2-pc carbon-ceramic disc; 14.2-in vented, drilled, 2-pc carbon-ceramic disc, ABS WHEELS, F;R 9.5 x 20-in; 10.5 x 20-in forged aluminum 10.0 x 19-in; 11.0 x 19-in forged aluminum 10.0 x 21-in; 11.5 x 21-in, forged aluminum TIRES, F;R 275/35R20 102Y; 285/35R20 104Y Pirelli P Zero Corsa (star) 275/35R19 100Y; 305/30R19 102Y Michelin Pilot Sport 4S 275/35R21 103Y; 315/30R21 105Y Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 M01 DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 117.4 in 116.0 in 116.2 in TRACK, F/R 64.0/62.8 in 63.3/62.3 in 65.7/65.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 196.4 x 74.9 x 57.8 in 194.9 x 74.1 x 56.5 in 199.2 x 76.9 x 57.0 in TURNING CIRCLE 41.4 ft 42.6 ft 41.3 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 4,104 lb (56/44%) 4,253 lb (54/46%) 4,637 lb (54/46%) SEATING CAPACITY 4 5 4 HEADROOM, F/R 40.7/38.5 in 39.0/36.3 in 40.8/38.2 in LEGROOM, F/R 41.4/36.5 in 42.4/37.0 in NA/28.6 in in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 58.7/55.9 in 56.7/55.7 in 57.7/57.2 in CARGO VOLUME 14.0 cu ft 11.9 cu ft 13.0 cu ft ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.1 sec 1.6 sec 1.0 sec 0-40 1.6 2.2 1.5 0-50 2.2 2.9 2.1 0-60 2.9 3.7 2.9 0-70 3.7 4.5 3.7 0-80 4.5 5.4 4.7 0-90 5.5 6.5 5.8 0-100 6.7 7.6 7.1 0-100-0 10.5 11.6 11.0 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.4 1.5 1.5 QUARTER MILE 10.9 sec @ 127.9 mph 11.6 sec @ 124.9 mph 11.1 sec @ 124.6 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 101 ft 100 ft 103 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.07 g (avg) 1.01 g (avg) 1.05 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.3 sec @ 0.88 g (avg) 23.8 sec @ 0.85 g (avg) 23.3 sec @ 0.88 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,500 rpm 1,600 rpm 1,400 rpm CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $143,995 $90,390 $163,950 PRICE AS TESTED $148,995 $110,635 $199,910 AIRBAGS 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee 7: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, driver knee BASIC WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 6 yrs/70,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 4 yrs/Unlimited miles 6 yrs/70,000 miles 4 yrs/50,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 20.1 gal 17.4 gal 17.4 gal EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 15/21/17 mpg 13/22/16 mpg 16/21/18 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 342 miles 272 miles 380 miles RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium Unleaded premium Unleaded premium ON SALE Now Now Sold out Show All

To the surprise of the few and the horror of those trying to purchase one for sticker price, the 2022 Porsche 911 GT3 is MotorTrend's 2022 Performance Vehicle of the Year. The competition was fierce for this year's inaugural award, but in the end most of the judges voted for the GT3. The two who didn't score it first had Porsche's latest and greatest in second place—quite a close second place, at that. And yes, the word "greatest" is apropos here. That is, until the next GT3 iteration drops—which should be any time now. Why so dominant, why so loved, why so great? Several reasons, but first let's go backward.We considered ourselves fortunate to attend the launch of the old 991.2 911 GT3 in Spain back in 2017. Fortunate not only because that GT3 generation (the new GT3 is the 992.1) was magnificent but also because attendees got to chase rally legend Walter Röhrl around a racetrack for five laps. Life was good. On a personal note, I mention this because I distinctly remember writing this next part before I drove the 991.2 version: "[The 991.1] GT3 marked the first time in my career I had nothing negative to say about a vehicle." Followed by, "I don't have the foggiest idea how the wizards of [Weissach] can make the GT3 any better than it already is. Although I suspect Porsche will tell me once I get to Spain."In other words, it was impossible to conceive how Porsche could even kind of improve upon the already spectacular 991.1 GT3. But it sure did. Fast-forward to hours before the 2022 PVOTY competition began, and our judging panel collectively thought the same thing. Guess what? The unfathomable has been achieved. Again.A sampling of initial comments from meine Kollegen once they spun a turn behind the Porsche's wheel: "This is pure driving pleasure," features editor Scott Evans said. "Honestly, it's the only car that made me lose my breath." Features editor Christian Seabaugh added, "My gosh, this is such a good car." Deputy editor Alexander Stoklosa recounted, "I took this on two laps of the winding road circuit at the Hyundai Proving Ground, and by the time I exited, I was sweaty and feeling absolutely jacked, wanting more." Good thing for him we then went to the racetrack, no? Director of editorial operations Mike Floyd said, "Holy hell, this thing is amazing. Wow."Head of editorial Ed Loh went a bit cerebral trying to explain what's so great about the GT3: "It makes you feel sharper and more in tune with everything—from the soles of your feet to the pads of your fingertips, all the way to the base of your skull and the lizard part of your brain that ensures you don't die in your sleep." Executive editor Mac Morrison was more succinct, simply offering, "Sheeeeeezus H. Porsche. Maaaaannnnnnn."Yeah, friends, this car is absurdly great. It serves up unbelievable levels of performance paired with unbelievable levels of grip, head-ringing aural thrills thanks to a 502-hp humdinger of a 4.0-liter naturally aspirated flat-six that revs all the way to 9,000 rpm, and perhaps most important, the best manual transmission in automotive history. Hashtag fight us. Did we mention the gobs and bushels and duffel bags full of both horsepower and revs? Perhaps the 992 GT3 is not as laser-guided or quick as the other two big wingers present (the Lamborghini Huracán STO and the Mercedes-AMG GT Black Series), a whole host of McLarens, or even Porsche's own upcoming GT3 RS. However, this car boasts a solidity, an everyday ease of use, and the resulting desire to just drive it more and more that separates the GT3 from the rest of the frontrunners for this year's PVOTY trophy. The 2022 911 GT3 is a deeply satisfying sports car that just so happens to have supercar reflexes.But what about the criteria? Oh yes, we are fully aware that transitioning away from our old Best Driver's Car competition to one of our signature Of The Year formats means any winner is subjected to our six key criteria. In case this is your first time, they are: Advancement in Design, Engineering Excellence, Performance of Intended Function, Safety, Value, and Efficiency. Even when keeping every one of these in mind when picking our winner, the Porsche excels. Hell, forget excels; the GT3 dominates.Advancement in DesignThis one is as simple as … just look at it. At first glance and across but two dimensions, you may not "get" the nostrils on the GT3's hood. We assure you the two speed holes (they're actually part of the car's aerodynamics, similar to openings on the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ) grow on you after repeated viewings. Back to the launch of the old 991.2 GT3, I'll never forget something Porsche GT-division boss Andy Preuninger said during the press conference: "The GT3 has to be the most attractive 911." Targa fans might disagree, but the newest GT3 looks fabulous, even in muted orange sherbet (actual color name: Lava Orange). And that wing! A piece of functional sculpture. Anyone opting for the wingless GT3 Touring version is nuts. Ahem.We also loved the interior's design, specifically the well-executed sparseness. Countless gallons of ink have been spilled, both actual and virtual, rightly chastising Tesla for that brand's signature near lack of an interior, but the GT3 isn't that. No, this car's guts represent minimalism done right. "I love how simple it is inside—just get in and go," Stoklosa said. "There's a button for ESC, one for the shocks, and that's pretty much it. No fiddling, all fun." Yes, you get right down to business inside the GT3, the business of woohoo!Loh was particularly impressed. "The control layout is awesome," he said. "It's not as spaceship-weirdo-wild-looking as the Huracán STO. It's also not as plasticky as the AMG GT. I'm Goldilocks, and this supercar is juuuust riiiiight. Love the seats, love this vehicle. Awesome."Not only is the layout awesome, but the controls themselves also inspire awe. We've only partially told you about the fabulous gear lever. One reason it's so spot on is that the transmission's synchros are made from brass, not plastic; when you shift gears, you're actually pushing metal through metal. So cool. But just holding the stick feels wicked. The clutch is perfectly weighted, too. Porsche truly nailed the small stuff. "It's a little thing, but I love the steering wheel," Seabaugh said. "It's a dinky little 7/8ths-sized thing that just feels perfect in your hands." Amen.Engineering ExcellenceThe criteria's lines are easy to blur. For instance, the stick shift bleeds over from Advancement of Design into Engineering Excellence. So be it. As associate road test editor Erick Ayapana asked, "Why can't all shifters be like this?" It's no shock to say the latest from Porsche's freaking racing division—after all, that's what the GT crew does—is excellently engineered. But, brothers, sisters, this is one of those hard-to-overstate situations.As an example, let's look at the car's grip. We were impressed. "The amount of mechanical grip, aided at times by the aero, is stupefying," Morrison said. "Like, it's just criminal, and I use that word as a positive. You should not be able to drive the front end into corners as hard as you can, and you should not be able to go back to power so hard and early and easily as the new GT3 allows you to."Want to talk brakes? Evans does. "The brake feel is the real accomplishment here, and that's saying something," he said. "You can feel exactly how hard the pads are biting at every moment, intuit exactly how much braking you're using and how much you have left in reserve." Road test editor Chris Walton added, "The brakes are nuclear."Grip and brakes, that's just tires, right? Well, partially, sure, but we promise you that while slapping the GT3's sticky Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R N0s on your car will improve its performance, the GT3 is better engineered. It pulled 1.19 g (average) on our skidpad, tying it with the 2019 911 GT2 RS for the highest average number we've ever recorded. Its figure-eight time was just 0.2 second off the 720-hp AMG GT Black Series, a car that makes 218 extra horsepower. And the GT3 beat the incredible 630-hp Lambo STO here by 0.2. If that's not engineering excellence, what is?Performance of Intended FunctionThe 911 GT3 crushes this category. This is the part where we break down both what a GT3 is and what makes a Performance Vehicle of the Year. Starting with the 911, it's the sportier, racier, harder-core, no-compromise version. And the 911 is a hell of a sports car to start with. From that not so humble origin point, the wizards and witches of Flacht work their magic, transforming a superlative sports car into an everyday supercar. Yes, supercar, because the GT3 certainly is.The ride isn't soft, but you can live with this car. "Old dudes like me might have some trouble with ingress and egress," Floyd said, "but once you get yourself snug in the seat, you can easily drive the GT3 all day in slow traffic or on a long highway stretch. The clutch pedal action doesn't punish your left leg, and loping around town is a breeze."You simply can't say the same about either the STO or the Black Series. Everyday? Maybe every track day, and even that's a stretch. For instance, assuming your head isn't too big, you might be able to fit your helmet—just one—into the Lambo's frunk. Emphasis on "might." The Black Series, while deeply impressive, is really just a bridge too far for a street car. The GT3? Let's just say we understand why people are paying $50,000 more than sticker for a street car that can also rip up a racetrack."It's just a joy to drive hard on a circuit, which is what the GT3 is absolutely made to do," Floyd said. "It's so obvious how long Porsche has been developing this car and the 911 in general. There's a next-level feel you just don't get with the Huracán or GT Black." In other words, it's a special 911 doing precisely what its maker intended. Talk about performance of intended function, indeed. That alone makes it a great candidate for Performance Vehicle of the Year.ValueIncome inequality must be causing mass psychosis for us to say a car with a base price of $164,150 and an as-tested kitty of $195,850 is a great value, but humor us for a moment. When you consider the two cars in this test that most closely compete with the Porsche—the $355,595 AMG and the $442,033 Lamborghini—the GT3 looks like a steal. Toss on that $50,000 ADM (adjusted dealer markup), and the Porsche is still a steal.EfficiencyWe cannot, however, with a straight face tell you a car that carries an EPA rating of 16 mpg combined is efficient. But this is Performance Vehicle of the Year; none of the competitors was designed with astounding efficiency in mind. Additionally, the GT3's fuel economy is in line with the other contenders in its performance plane. Hot tip: Opt for the extended-range gas tank, and you'll feel as if you're getting great mileage.SafetyCars like the Porsche 911 never get crash ratings, never mind the GT3. That's just how it is. So we can't tell you about its passive safety worthiness. However, a car that superlatively grips and stops the way the GT3 does is inherently safe in the hands of a skilled driver. Oh, and we seem to remember it has adaptive cruise control, too.Dominant Winner WinsThere's so much more to say. We haven't mentioned the Davante Adams-like way the GT3 changes direction. Or the switch to a double control arm suspension up front. Or how for the first time in Porsche 911 history, you don't need to trail-brake your way into every corner, because (surprise!) the front suddenly has copious grip. The front end is like a race car, or as Seabaugh put it, "It digs hard into corners like a skate into ice." There's also the part about how with only 2 additional hp, the 992.1 GT3 is nearly 18 seconds quicker around the Nürburgring Nordschleife than the 991.2 GT3 it replaces. If only we could show you all the notes from all the judges, including our dedicated test team, just so you could see how consistently overwhelming the superlatives are. It's without end.Anything we don't like? Evans and Loh thought the ride quality was lacking, to the point Evans recommends never putting the dampers into Sport. Not everyone agreed with him. But that's about it for the negatives. Looking over my own notes, one line caught my eye: "If the GT3 isn't second place, it's first." As much as I and the rest of the judges loved the Porsche, the Lamborghini STO was also exceptional. But by a vote of five judges to two, the GT3 claimed the crown.EpilogueAfter the vote, and because I was the judge writing this winner story, I took the new Porsche 911 GT3 home for about a week. A friend of mine owns a 991.2 GT3 Touring; we decided to drive them back to back. I figured this new GT3 would be slightly better, but I quickly learned it's about 70 percent better. The 2022 model made the old one feel like a couch. I'm not kidding. And remember, this was a couch that at one point in time we said was the best-driving car in the world.If that's not enough, I'll leave you with something 20-year veteran auto scribe and motorsports/track-driving aficionado Morrison wrote in his notes. "This might sound nuts," he said, "but I thought hard about it for several days after our PVOTY activities concluded: I'm not sure I've ever driven a better car. In my entire career."Nicely played, Porsche, and congrats on winning the first MotorTrend Performance Vehicle of the Year award. Now comes the hard part: Do it again next year. As I wrote before about the 991.2 GT3, "How do you take something with no apparent flaws, no visible weaknesses, and improve upon it anyway?" None of us knows the answer, but we're sure Preuninger and the gang have some ideas. We can't wait to test them out.POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2022 Porsche 911 GT3 SPECIFICATIONS DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Rear-engine, RWD ENGINE TYPE Direct-injected DOHC 24-valve  flat-6, alum block/heads DISPLACEMENT 3,996 cc/243.9 cu in COMPRESSION RATIO 13.3:1 POWER (SAE NET) 502 hp @ 8,400 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 346 lb-ft @ 6,100 rpm REDLINE 9,000 rpm WEIGHT TO POWER 6.4 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 6-speed manual AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 3.09:1/2.72:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Control arms, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 11.2-14.2:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.4 BRAKES, F; R 16.1-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc; 15.4-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc WHEELS, F;R 9.5 x 20-in; 12.0 x 21-in forged aluminum TIRES, F;R 255/35R20 97Y; 315/30R21 105Y Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R N0 DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 96.7 TRACK, F/R 63.0/61.1 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 180.0 x 72.9 x 50.4 in TURNING CIRCLE 34.1 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 3,188 lb (40/60%) SEATING CAPACITY 2 HEADROOM, F/R 37.9/ — in LEGROOM, F/R 42.2/ — in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 52.6/ — in CARGO VOLUME 4.6 cu ft TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.5 sec 0-40 2.0 0-50 2.8 0-60 3.4 0-70 4.2 0-80 5.2 0-90 6.2 0-100 7.3 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.5 QUARTER MILE 11.4 sec @ 126.0 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 93 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.19 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 22.1 sec @ 0.95 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2,500 rpm CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $164,150 PRICE AS TESTED $195,850 AIRBAGS 8: Dual front, front side, front curtain, front knee BASIC WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 4 yrs/50,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 23.7 gal EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 14/18/16 mpg RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium ON SALE Now Show All