XPeng P7 First Drive: China’s (Better-Built) Tesla Model S
The Tesla Model S was a two-year-old car when Chinese auto execs Heng Xia and Tao He got together with tech billionaire Xiaopeng He in 2014 to found the electric vehicle manufacturer XPeng. Five years later, at the 2019 Shanghai Show, Guangzhou-based XPeng unveiled its homegrown Model S rival, the P7 EV sedan.
The latest XPeng P7 is one of three EVs the automaker now has on sale in China, all built on the company's own platforms and featuring its own end-to-end software architecture. The P7 is already being marketed in Norway, and XPeng plans to launch the sedan in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands in the second quarter of 2023.
A fourth XPeng model, a midsize SUV called the G9 that will feature a fast-charging 800-volt electrical architecture and a Lidar-supported autonomous drive system, is due to go on sale in China this fall. The G9 is widely believed to be under consideration for launch in the U.S.
Xpeng X7 Power, Range, and a Porsche Co-Developed Platform
Move fast and break things—Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's motto is one Silicon Valley's tech bros love to invoke to explain why Tesla deserves to be worth more than any run-of-the-mill automaker like Volkswagen or Toyota or Hyundai. But Tesla needed 17 years to get four models into production and into showrooms. Eight-year-old XPeng is moving so fast it makes Tesla look like General Motors.
The XPeng P7 is built on a bespoke EV platform, known internally as "Edward," that was co-developed with Porsche. It's a conventional skateboard design, with multi-link suspension front and rear and an 80 kWh battery pack between the axles. Behind the standard 19-inch alloy wheels, which are shod with 245/45 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires, are Brembo brakes.
The entry-level P7 RWD Long Range is powered by a single rear-mounted e-motor that develops 263 horsepower and 288 lb-ft of torque. Our tester, the P7 4WD High Performance, packs a total system output of 424 hp and 483 lb-ft, thanks to the addition of a 161-hp e-motor that drives the front wheels.
The P7 is 5.6 inches shorter overall than the Model S but rolls on a wheelbase that's 1.6 inches longer. The XPeng is also slightly narrower and taller than the Tesla, and, unlike the Tesla, it's relatively light for an EV of its class—XPeng claims the single motor RWD Long Range weighs 4,380 pounds, while the dual motor 4WD High Performance is claimed to tip the scales at 4,623 pounds. That's almost 200 pounds less than a dual motor Model S.
XPeng claims a range of up to 329 miles on the WLTP test cycle for the RWD Long Range, and a 0-60 mph acceleration time of less than 6.9 seconds. Claimed WLTP range for the 4WD High Performance is up to 292 miles, with a claimed 0-60 mph acceleration time of less than 4.5 seconds. (Note: EPA range is usually 20-30 percent lower on average than the WLTP quoted figure.) The P7's 80 kWh battery pack will accept up to 90 kilowatts on a DC fast charge, which allows it to go from five- to 80-percent charge in about 51 minutes, according to Xpeng.
The P7's Overall Refinement Impresses
Neither version of the P7 threatens the Tesla Model S in terms of outright range or performance. But to airily dismiss this Chinese EV because of that is to miss the point. Entirely.
It may not be a world-beater, but the XPeng P7 is one of the most impressive new cars we've driven this year. It has, of course, the punchy, silent acceleration you expect from a contemporary electric car, but what makes it stand out is how refined everything else about it feels, both at low speeds around town, and when cruising on the highway.
Noise levels—wind, tire, and mechanical—are impressively low. The ride is good, though in truth the well-maintained roads of our test drive hardly exercised the suspension, other than over the occasional speed hump in the suburbs near XPeng's Dutch headquarters, which elicited some mild secondary body motions. Choppy surfaces induced occasional pattering from the tires, but impact harshness was well-suppressed.
The steering is reasonably accurate and well-weighted, and the transitions between regenerative and mechanical braking are smooth. The P7 has just two regen modes —high and low. High regen delivers near-one-pedal driving capability, while low regen gives the car a slowing effect similar to lifting off the gas in a conventional internal combustion engine vehicle with an automatic transmission.
P7 Price, Equipment, and Fit and Finish
In Norway, the XPeng P7 4WD High Performance costs less than two-thirds the price of a dual-motor Tesla Model S Long Range. In U.S. dollars, using the conversion rate current at the time of writing, that would make it a $53,000 car.
You get a lot of EV for that money. Standard equipment includes a panoramic roof, heated front and rear seats, and the choice of black, beige, or red Nappa leather trim. The digital dash is a 10.25-inch screen, and the central touchscreen is a 15-inch unit. Standard driver assistance systems include adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, forward collision warning, and autonomous emergency braking.
It's easy to see the influence of the Model S in the XPeng P7's design. One area where the Chinese automaker has followed Tesla's lead a little too closely is the HVAC system, where all the functions—right down to setting the direction of the air vents— are controlled via the central touchscreen. As in Teslas, this requires taking your eyes off the road to go through a menu to do something that's easily done without looking or thinking in a HVAC system with physical buttons.
The fit and finish throughout is superior to the Model S, though. Exterior panel gaps are more consistent and trim pieces better aligned, and the interior looks and feels plusher. But what makes the XPeng P7 perhaps more of a threat to the Tesla is not the hardware, but its software.
It's All About the Software-Defined Vehicle
"This is a software-defined car," says Piotr Chmielewski, XPeng's head of EV Charging in Europe, who points out that company co-founder Xiaopeng He—XPeng is a contraction of his name—made his fortune in software before deciding to get into the auto industry. Sound familiar, Elon?
A Polish software engineer, Chmielewski says XPeng is the only automaker other than Tesla to use an end-to-end software architecture. The architecture is used on all XPeng models, and Chmielewski believes this software stack will give the company's products a competitive advantage over the long term.
As on its other models, XPeng's XSmart operating system (initially Android-based but now highly evolved and unique) controls the P7's driver assistance systems, dubbed XPilot. The XSmart OS also controls the car's connectivity functions, infotainment systems, and its nascent AI capabilities, including a "Hey XPeng" voice activation function and smart navigation setup. It also allows for a wide range of over-the-air updates and remote vehicle diagnostics.
It's Tesla-level stuff, though some of the P7's standard XPilot functions, most notably the lane keep assist, don't feel quite as well-resolved in terms of their operation. It's all in the software tuning, said Chmielewski, who noted our test car was running Chinese-spec software. He added that a team is already at work on tweaks to suit European operating conditions.
XPeng Represents a New Age of Automaking
The XPeng P7 is a graphic example of the new reality of the auto business in the EV age. In the past, the cost and complexities of developing and optimising internal combustion engines and suitable transmissions meant newcomers faced huge challenges in terms of delivering vehicles that performed as well as those from companies with long experience building automobiles—look how many years it took Toyota and Honda and Hyundai and Kia to become established in the U.S. as legitimate alternatives to GM, Ford, and Chrysler.
However, EV powertrains are inherently smooth and quiet, and deliver plenty of easy driving torque. There are no pesky calibration issues in terms of driveability or to meet emissions and fuel economy targets. Making a car that's instantly competitive with mainstream rivals from established automakers has never been easier.
The XPeng P7 proves the point. The way it looks and feels and drives means it would be right at home on any driveway in America right now, with no excuses needed. Were the P7 to be launched here, with software updated to suit the U.S. operating environment and American consumer tastes, and priced as competitively as it is in Norway, it would shock the automotive establishment. Tesla included.
You may also like
ford f-150-lightning Full OverviewProsBig, clear screenNavigation with charging stations180-degree lie-flat seat backs ConsBorrows F-150's cabinNot as nice as a Rivian's interiorThe Ford F-150 has been the bestselling truck in America for decades, but its interior hasn't stood out much. And when the latest Ram 1500 made its debut, it became the new benchmark not only because of the way it drove, but also because of the cabin's attention to detail. Although pickup trucks are generally known for being work vehicles, Ram took its truck to the next level. And even though a new F-150 generation arrived for 2021, Ford kept most of its interior the same. However, with the introduction of the F-150 Lightning, Ford has finally upgraded its cabin experience.Similar but BetterThe 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning was made for existing F-150 customers interested in going electric. So there are many similarities between the two models, and just like its exterior design, the Lightning's interior comes straight from the regular F-150. There's no learning curve; everything is exactly where it's supposed to be, and you can still fold down the shifter and open the center console to set up your workstation.What's better, though, is the massive 15.5-inch screen that's straight out of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. Although we aren't usually fans of "soft" virtual buttons, Ford's screen makes it easy to adjust the temperature or fan speed and hop between menus. Everything is displayed via cool graphics, and the computing processor works quickly. What's more, the navigation shows all the electric charging stations nearby and will tell you where to stop and for how long, depending on your state of charge. It's not as useful as Tesla's supercharger map, which lets you know how many superchargers are available in real time, but it displays each station's brand and kilowatt-hour rating.The vertical display will also wow your friends; it takes up the entire center dashboard, upping the technology and in-cabin experience.Our 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning Lariat example came with a denim-like trim on certain parts of its door panels and dashboard, and it looked premium and different from the regular F-150. Other textured plastics around the cabin don't feel as nice as the materials inside the Rivian R1T, but it's not a huge drawback, as the rest of the truck feels fancy.Time to RelaxFord made some changes to the driver's and front passenger's seats, allowing them to recline 180 degrees so you can nap while the truck charges. This is a clever feature, but it's not the most comfortable position—your knees still have to be bent, and you have to lift the rear seats to get the full 180-degree experience. Still, it's nice to have and something we're sure some folks will use. (And, hey, why not take a nap when waiting at a public charger?) Overall, the seats are comfortable, supportive, and wide, should you want to turn on your side when catching some Zs.Just like the regular F-150, there's plenty of space in the back with lots of headroom and legroom for rear passengers. Heck, there's even more space than in a Mercedes-Benz S-Class.Should I Buy a 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning? We've already compared a 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning with a 2022 Rivian R1T, and although the competition was incredibly close, the F-150 Lightning claimed the win. Although these pickup trucks live in different segments, we found more value in the F-150. But it's worth noting that as software and over-the-air updates play a more important role in the EV market and in the vehicles' performance in the future, our comparison result could flip.All in all, the 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning's in-cabin experience is superior when compared to the regular F-150, and we appreciate the upgrades Ford's designers delivered. So if you're thinking of purchasing an F-150 soon, the Lightning is your best option and certainly worth taking a long look at.Looks good! More details?
Welcome to MotorTrend's inaugural Performance Vehicle of the Year (PVOTY) competition. A quick history: We've awarded our Car of the Year title since 1949. In 1978, we added Truck of the Year and then SUV of the Year in 1999. Alongside Person of the Year, these have been our automotive Of The Year awards for decades. Until now.Why, and why now? It's instructive to look back at MotorTrend's old Import Car of the Year. First awarded in 1970, the idea of ICOTY was to finally acknowledge an indisputable truth: Cars from auto manufacturers outside of America were here to stay and should be celebrated, at least for a while.We awarded ICOTY alongside COTY until 1999, when my predecessors decided to fold the former back into the latter because shifts in automotive manufacturing and global economics challenged the notion of what constitutes foreign and domestic vehicle production. What is a car's country of origin if the engine is made in Brazil, the body panels are stamped in Canada, the transmission and wiring harness are produced in Mexico, and final assembly occurs in Michigan? Or if multiple factories around the world assemble the same vehicle? Our editorial forebears ultimately decided none of this matters and that the inherent goodness of the car, the breakthrough experience it delivers, and how history would view it were much more important.They read the room and made the right call, which is what we are doing here with our focus on performance. I submit to you the following:We live in a golden automotive age. Thirteen years ago, we reported the horsepower wars were over. We were wrong. To twitch an eyebrow these days, you need at least 500 hp, if not four figures for tongues to really start wagging. This inflation is not just limited to hyper-expensive exotic cars. For $37,000, you can buy a Ford Mustang GT with 460 ponies. Need more vroom? Try the 505-hp Alfa Romeo Stelvio. Or if you need to move a couch, in a hurry, up a sand dune? The 702-hp Ram 1500 TRX has you covered.These power and torque increases, along with all the fancy systems that allow their delivery, have resulted in a golden age of performance, as well. Those who monitor lap records at the vaunted Nürburgring Nordschleife know what I'm talking about. It used to be that a stock production car lapping the iconic German test track in less than 8 minutes joined an exclusive club. Now, a hot hatch like the Honda Civic Type R is quicker than that, and we see Porsches, Mercedes-AMGs, and Lamborghinis running in the 6:40 (or quicker) bracket. Our own testing bears this out; in the past two years, we've seen our 0-60 record fall twice—first to less than 3.0 seconds and then to almost less than 2.0. This is bonkers.Megawatt advances in automotive tech are responsible for a lot of this golden-era shine. While one of the highest-horsepower production cars is still a 16-cylinder, quad-turbo, gas-burning Bugatti Chiron Super Sport, you can order our electrifying 2022 Car of the Year Lucid Air with up to 1,111 hp, or a Tesla Model S with 1,020 hp. On the truck side, the Hummer EV pickup is also available with 1,000 hp, and our 2022 Truck of the Year, the Rivian R1T, comes standard with 835 hp. Oh, and the two vehicles that broke our 0-60 record? Electric all-stars from Porsche and Tesla.As we continue to cover the evolution of the automobile and the automotive industry, we believe our electrified future is inevitable, so we're going to walk a second, parallel path with all the existing, mostly gas-burning vehicles we know and love.Internal combustion technology has never seen higher outputs, greater efficiency, or more thrills per cubic inch than right now. But as more carmakers trumpet about going all in on EVs, we receive quietly distributed notices about their final run of internal combustion engines, starting with the burliest V-10s and V-8s. Exiting right alongside: manual transmissions.We know some of you mourn the coming loss of dropping the clutch, mashing the gas, and ripping your right hand through six or seven gears. You loudly curse this transition; we hear you and understand. Every year, for more than a decade, we sent dozens of staffers on the road for two weeks, testing and driving the world's top sports cars in search of the Best Driver's Car. But that BDC program has run its course; PVOTY is Version 2.0, built upon the belief it's possible to be excited for the future, embracing all the broken barriers to come, while celebrating the end of an era. That is what we set out to do with our Performance Vehicle of the Year. We're applying our decades of experience and rigorous, industry-leading Of The Year framework to the realm of performance machines, whatever body style they happen to come in.Time is short. The world is changing. So let's round up the stickiest-tired whoop machines—whether gas- or electron-powered—and smoke 'em while we got 'em (and can still drive 'em). Please enjoy our first MotorTrend Performance Vehicle of Year competition.
There are likely tons of enthusiasts who think this comparison test would never be a fair fight. Conventional wisdom suggests all-wheel-drive sport compacts like the 2022 Subaru WRX are inherently better than front-drive cars like the 2022 Honda Civic Si, thanks to their four-corner traction. They offer stability and performance you supposedly can't get with only two driven wheels.Additionally, since the 1990s, Subaru has unlocked impressive grunt from its turbocharged flat-four engines—something Honda only figured out for its inline-fours in the past decade. In the important area (to hardcore fans, anyway) of racetrack worthiness, the Subaru always seemed to have so much more to offer than the Honda: more power, a better chassis, and traction for days. So where do we get off having an entry-level performance car like the 2022 Honda Civic Si challenging a rally-bred motorsports titan like the 2022 Subaru WRX?In fact, the Civic is positioned better than you might think. Certainly, Honda building more turbocharged cars of late is part of the 2022 Civic's current position of strength. Honda's powertrain engineers have had success with not just the model's 1.5-liter turbo inline-four engine but also the 2.0-liter forced-induction inline-four workhorse in the previous Civic Type R, as well as turbo-hybrid systems like the one in the Acura NSX.This explains why we rounded up a 2022 Civic Si with the grippier summer tires option and a 2022 Subaru WRX Limited for a little comparison test. The WRX Limited is presently the highest-trim model in the lineup that's available with a standard manual transmission. So both sedans are affordable sport compact standouts, but which makes the smarter all-around choice?SpecificationsHonda equips every 2022 Civic Si with the same 1.5-liter turbo-four engine as in the previous generation. It makes 5 fewer peak horsepower than the old Si, for a total of 200 hp, but its peak torque of 192 lb-ft of torque arrives sooner at 1,800 rpm. The engine also maintains more output when wound out to its 6,500-rpm redline.The 2022 Subaru WRX's new and larger 2.4-liter turbo-four seems huge by comparison. It develops a peak of 271 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque, which is 3 more hp and no more torque than the outgoing WRX's 2.0-liter boxer. Here, too, Subaru indicates the new unit's torque curve is broader than before.Both cars get a standard six-speed manual transmission, but only Subaru WRX Limited shoppers have the option of a CVT. Our judging panel agreed the shift action for both manuals was satisfyingly short and notchy.Both drivetrains are equipped with a limited-slip differential, and the WRX's continuous all-wheel-drive system also includes torque vectoring. MacPherson struts up front and a multilink rear suspension return on the Civic; the WRX is outfitted as always with MacPherson struts in front and a rear double A-arm and toe-link arrangement, plus electronically adjustable dampers. Curb weight for the 2022 Honda Civic Si with manual transmission is 2,981 pounds, and the shift-it-yourself 2022 Subaru WRX Limited checks in at 3,412.All 2022 Honda Civic Si models ride on 18-inch wheels, whether they be wrapped in the base grade's all-season tires or the sticker summer rubber. The WRX has a slight performance edge because its base configuration features summer tires on 17s, but the upgrade for the Limited is a wider summer tire on 18s—245 width compared to the Si's 235. That said, both sets of tires never seemed to quit.The Nitty GrittyNot unexpectedly, the more powerful all-wheel-drive 2022 Subaru WRX is quicker than the 2022 Honda Civic Si. When we tested it, our WRX Limited sprinted from 0 to 60 mph in 6.1 seconds and covered the quarter mile in 14.3 seconds at 97.8 mph. Most of our comparison drivers loved the Subie's grunt but lamented its narrow powerband and early redline. Features editor Scott Evans said, "All the action is between 4,000 and 6,000 rpm; we know boxer engines can rev higher. Make it happen, Subaru."The Civic Si needed an additional second—7.1 seconds in the sprint to 60 mph, 15.3 seconds in the quarter mile—in each test, and it finished the quarter mile traveling 5 mph slower. This highlights the Si's biggest drawback: It seems like there's barely any power on tap in comparison to the WRX. But although it's tame, the Honda's engine now pulls until redline, a bit of tuning that was absent in the last Si. "Makes the car feel quicker, even if it isn't," Evans said. "It's more rewarding to drive fast."Although the Subaru is swifter than the Honda, it's worth mentioning both cars are slower than the versions they replace. Every WRX we've tested since the 2013 model year has been slower than the one before it (an outlier 2018 model was marginally slower than the 2022). The Civic Si is slower than the turbo Si we tested as a 2017 model, and it's slower than every 2.0- and 2.4-liter naturally aspirated Si we've tested since the seventh-gen model (2000 to 2005).Handling BusinessBeyond the test track, there's never a shortage of grip in the WRX. In fact, the car still feels like the homologation Impreza model first issued decades ago so Subaru could compete with it in the World Rally Championship. There was a rawness to the old WRX that made the Subaru a fitting sparring partner for its former nemesis, the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, itself an AWD rally car for the streets. Some of that spirit—papered over by years of development—is still alive in the WRX today.Our judges were split on the WRX's handling feel at the limit, though. They either thought it was firm and forgiving or bumpy and choppy. Evans' take is probably the most succinct. "There's a lot of compliance in the suspension; it feels like it has a lot of wheel travel. But as much as it moves vertically, it's glued to the road. You quickly learn to stop worrying about the body movements because the tires are not letting go."We appreciated the modern WRX's power and grip during spirited canyon runs, but its ride was less likable in day-to-day driving. At modest speeds, road imperfections transmit into the car. This is an area where the Civic shines, striking a better handling balance between sport and comfort."It seems if Honda engineers had to make a choice between civility and agility, they chose civility, but only by the slightest of margins," summed up senior editor Aaron Gold. "I think that was the right decision. I doubt they could keep the body strapped down any better without making the ride unacceptably hard for day-to-day driving, and that's best left to the Civic Type R."Steering in each car felt direct, though there was a bit more heft to the Civic Si's tiller. This was another area of split opinions among our judging panel. Some, like executive editor Mac Morrison, gave the Honda steering a thumbs-up for "its weight and the size of the steering wheel, the way it feels, [and] how it fits my hands."But the WRX's lighter steering also had fans among our jurists, like features editor Christian Seabaugh. "I could see some ham-handed drivers being turned off by how quick and aggressive the steering is, but if you drive with your fingertips, it's so communicative and enjoyable."The 2022 Honda Civic Si's greatest performance metric in this fight might not be power, or quickness, or driving dynamics. You could say it's efficiency. Its engine produces 133 hp per liter compared to the WRX's 113 hp per liter. (Remember when Honda nerds made a big deal about the 1.6-liter naturally aspirated B16 inline-four's 100 hp-per-liter ratio back in the late 1990s?) And the Honda is rated at an impressive 27/37/31 mpg city/highway/combined compared to the Subaru's 19/26/22 mpg. With way better fuel economy, the Si offers almost 20 miles more range on a full tank of gas (384 miles) despite that reservoir being 4.2 gallons smaller than the WRX's.Both cars are equipped with disc brakes at all four corners, but the WRX comes with standard rear ventilated rotors (the Si's are solid). It took the Subaru 113 feet to bring the car to a stop from 60 mph in our testing; the lighter Honda needed 110 feet. Our panel was generally on the same page about brake feel for each. The WRX has soft initial bite, but the pedals in both cars were progressive, and the stopping power was easy to modulate.Equipment and SpaceYou'll find a bit more head- and legroom in the front row of the Subaru, but the Honda is more spacious in the back seat. The Civic Si's trunk can hold more, as well, 14.1 cubic feet compared to the WRX's 12.5 cubic feet. Both cars are designed with 60/40-split folding rear seat backs.Each also comes with standard automatic headlights, keyless entry, moonroof, trunklid spoiler, dual-exhaust finishers, and remote trunk release. Additional standard equipment includes push-button start, leather-wrapped steering wheel, rear center armrest with cupholders, sun visors with illuminated vanity mirrors, and sport pedals.Standard equipment the 2022 Subaru WRX Limited boasts beyond the Civic Si includes foglights, steering-responsive headlights, dual rear USB charge ports, and heated front seats. Where the Civic's seats are trimmed in cloth, WRX's feature faux suede. Meanwhile, Gold pointed out how the WRX's seating position "is very tall compared to other cars—feels like you're driving an SUV." Seabaugh was bummed by the lack of lumbar support in the Si's front seats.In fact, the Si's seats are fully manual when it comes to adjustments. The WRX, on the other hand, gets a 10-way power-adjustable driver's seat. Other WRX advantages include dual- versus the Si's single-zone climate control, and an 11.6-inch central touchscreen compared to the Si's 9.0-inch screen (though we preferred the Honda's smaller display for its conventional horizontal orientation).We also liked the Si's aluminum shift knob more than the leather-wrapped item in the WRX. Further Civic Si strengths include a 7.0-inch gauge cluster screen (only 4.2 inches in the WRX), wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatibility (both are wired in the WRX), and 12 speakers (the upgraded premium system in the WRX Limited gets only 11 speakers).Overall, there's a lingering familiarity to the 2022 WRX's interior. Materials and build quality are high, but the overall dash and center console designs haven't evolved much over the years. This is in sharp contrast to the 2022 Civic's redesigned cabin, which is clean and modern. Honda's choices in cabin textures—like the hexagonal honeycomb grille that extends across the dash, textured plastic trim pieces on the doors and center console, and ridged center-stack knobs—help the Civic look premium for its class.PricingThe base 2022 Honda Civic Si starts at $28,595, with summer tires adding just $200, which is a steal. Our test car also carried premium Blazing Orange paint for an additional $395, which took its final retail price to $29,190.That's more than $1,000 less than the 2022 WRX's base price of $30,600. And when you move up to the WRX Limited, which sits just below the GT top trim, the price jumps by almost $7,000 to $37,490. But the Subaru also gets features the Honda lacks, such as all-wheel drive, enhanced exterior lighting, nicer front seats, a bigger touchscreen, and rear USB ports.VerdictIf track sessions are in your future, the 2022 Subaru WRX isn't a bad choice. We might even argue it's the cooler car from a historical context. But the modern WRX is also frenetic to drive. Our judges were unanimous when it came to how much easier it was to pilot the Civic quickly. And with the way gas prices are, we'd be less inclined to take the Subaru out for fun days considering how thirsty it gets.The 2022 Honda Civic Si is a better choice for both its affordability and all-around excellence. Honda took a great foundation into the 11th-generation Civic and built a fun little machine that also comes through with plenty of practicality. It's not a "numbers" car by any stretch, but it does inspire confidence behind the wheel—enough so that we could repeatedly take it to its limits, and it simply kept chugging along. It also delivered refinement levels we've frankly never seen in an Si, and it might just be the most fun version yet.2nd Place: 2022 Subaru WRXProsQuicker and more powerfulStandard AWDLarger infotainment touchscreen ConsSlower than the previous WRXLackluster fuel economyNot a performance valueVerdict: The WRX is the same beast as always, but it's more sport than compact and lacks a small car's price or efficiency.1st Place: 2022 Honda Civic SiProsBetter suspension-tuning balanceGreat priceMore room ConsSlowNo power driver's seatFewer standard featuresVerdict: Just as the Civic has aged into a great all-arounder, the Si has matured into an entertaining sport sedan. 2022 Honda Civic Si Specifications 2022 Subaru WRX Specifications DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, FWD Front-engine, AWD ENGINE TYPE Turbo direct-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4, alum block/head Turbo direct-injected DOHC 16-valve flat-4, alum block/heads DISPLACEMENT 1,498 cc/91.4 cu in 2,387 cc/145.7 cu in COMPRESSION RATIO 10.3:1 10.6:1 POWER (SAE NET) 200 hp @ 6,000 rpm 271 hp @ 5,600 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 192 lb-ft @ 1,800 rpm 258 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm REDLINE 6,500 rpm 6,000 rpm WEIGHT TO POWER 14.9 lb/hp 12.6 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 6-speed manual 6-speed manual AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 4.35:1/2.98:1 4.11:1/2.74:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 11.5:1 13.5:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.2 2.6 BRAKES, F; R 12.3-in vented disc; 11.1-in disc 12.4-in vented disc; 11.4-in vented disc WHEELS 8.0 x 18-in cast aluminum 8.5 x 18-in cast aluminum TIRES 235/40R18 95Y Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 245/40R18 97Y Dunlop SP Sport Maxx 600A DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 107.7 in 105.2 in TRACK, F/R 60.5/61.7 in 61.4/61.8 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 184.0 x 70.9 x 55.5 in 183.8 x 71.9 x 57.8 in TURNING CIRCLE 38.1 ft 36.7 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 2,981 lb (59/41%) 3,412 lb (60/40%) SEATING CAPACITY 5 5 HEADROOM, F/R 37.6/37.1 in 38.8/36.7 in LEGROOM, F/R 42.3/37.4 in 43.1/36.5 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 57.0/56.0 in 56.7/55.6 in CARGO VOLUME 14.1 cu ft 12.5 cu ft ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 2.3 sec 1.7 sec 0-40 3.8 3.2 0-50 5.1 4.3 0-60 7.1 6.1 0-70 9.0 7.6 0-80 11.7 9.5 0-90 14.5 12.3 0-100 17.6 14.9 0-100-0 21.8 19.3 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 3.7 3.1 QUARTER MILE 15.3 sec @ 92.8 mph 14.3 sec @ 97.8 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 110 ft 113 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.93 g (avg) 0.94 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 26.3 sec @ 0.67 g (avg) 25.0 sec @ 0.74 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2,500 rpm 2,200 rpm CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $28,595 $30,600 PRICE AS TESTED $29,190 $37,490 AIRBAGS 10: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, front knee 7: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, driver knee BASIC WARRANTY 3 yrs/36,000 miles 3 yrs/36,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 5 yrs/60,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 3 yrs/36,000 miles 3 yrs/36,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 12.4 gal 16.6 gal EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 27/37/31 mpg 19/26/22 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 384 miles 365 miles RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded regular Unleaded premium ON SALE Now Now Show All
0 Comments