Rivian EVs Base Prices Stay the Same, But With Fewer Motors and Smaller Battery

lincoln navigator Full OverviewThe Lincoln Navigator is well established among ginormous three-row luxury SUVs, having initiated the full-size segment some 25 years ago. The latest iteration of the Navigator made its debut for the 2018 model year and has been refreshed for 2022 with updated styling and some new technology. We usually welcome changes like these, but in the case of the 2022 Navigator at least one addition isn't, er, particularly great.ActiveGuide Is New but Has FlawsLet's dive right into the trouble: The headline technology for the updated Navigator is Lincoln's ActiveGlide semi-autonomous driving technology, effectively an adaptive cruise control and lane centering system that allows drivers to take their hands off the steering wheel on certain pre-mapped roads, the ever-expanding database of which will be beamed to Lincolns through over-the-air updates. (ActiveGlide is effectively a rebadged version of the BlueCruise system used in the parent company's Ford-branded vehicles. Lincoln offers it free for the first three years before owners need to subscribe.)Like all hands-free systems, in order to let you take your hands off the wheel, ActiveGlide needs to be able to detect that you are watching the road. To do this, the Navigator employs cameras atop the steering column that detect head and eye movements. If the system senses that the driver's eyes are off the road, it sounds repeated aural warnings before canceling lane guidance.We are intimately familiar with this sequence of events because we experienced it repeatedly—not because we weren't watching where we were going, but because we forgot to bring sunglasses to the press preview. Turns out that if you squint, ActiveGlide loses track of your eyes and thinks you aren't looking at the road. It also turns out that if a short driver doesn't position the steering column low enough, the steering wheel hub partially blocks the camera, generating more false alarms."Watch the Road"? We Are Watching the Road!We experienced ActiveGlide's full automation on Phoenix's 202 loop freeway and found it worked beautifully—right up until the road curved west into the afternoon sun, when it started shouting warnings to our squinting selves. (Interestingly enough, when the Navigator came to a section where it couldn't steer itself and needed the driver to put hands back on the wheel, the warnings were silent.)Now, we'd normally dismiss this as not such a big deal if it only affected hands-free driving, but there is a major caveat here: The face-recognition camera is also required for the normal lane centering function. So even when we weren't letting the Lincoln do the driving—so, when we were on non-ActiveGlide-mapped roads and turned on cruise control and lane guidance, with our hands firmly on the wheel—the Navigator continued to yell at us to watch the road, even though we were.This annoyance is piled on top of another one: Like most vehicles, when lane centering is engaged, the Navigator sounds a warning if it believes you've taken your hands off the wheel. Instead of a capacitive touch sensor, Lincoln uses the cheaper torque sensor, which detects inputs on the steering wheel. The problem—which we've experienced on other vehicles as well—is that on long straightaways, which require no steering, the Navigator yells at you to put your hands on the wheel even when they are already there. This is the reason why the Cadillac Escalade, equipped with GM's competing Super Cruise system, invested in the pricier touch sensors. Lincoln could do better for its top-of-the-line vehicle—after all, it's not like it's selling these full-sizers at razor-thin profit margins.Were these isolated incidents or due to a malfunctioning vehicle? We don't think so. We drove two different Navigators, and both exhibited the same behavior. Furthermore, other staffers have experienced these issues with the BlueCruise-branded version of the system in Ford vehicles. However, aside from the bedeviled lane-centering system, we found lots to like in the face-lifted Navigator.The Actual Improvements to the 2022 Lincoln NavigatorThere are other changes to the '22 Navigator, and some are genuine improvements, like the styling. The 2022 model has thinner headlights, a bolder grille, and better taillights, i.e., ones that no longer look like they've been installed upside down. There's a new Central Park Edition available with a dark green interior that looks in person better than it sounds on paper, as well as the blue-upholstered Yacht Club version. (Is this a return to the 1970s, when you could get your car's interior done up in colors other than black and beige? Gosh, we hope so.)The newly expanded 13.2-inch center screen, which runs Ford's Sync 4 system, is intuitive and easy to use, and the optional premium sound system is nothing short of spectacular. We also remain fascinated by Lincoln's 30-way power front seats, though we're not convinced they're a great idea. Automakers pay ergonomic experts to craft seats that are supportive and comfortable, with a few simple adjustments so we can tweak them to our needs. Lincoln's 30-way seats make, well, the occupants into the experts. Except most people aren't orthopedic spine physicians, and they will have the same trouble we do molding the seats into a perfect position. Perhaps there is such a thing as too many choices. Lincoln, how about a few ergonomically optimized presets that we can then fine-tune?The Best Seats Are the Rear SeatsWe had a much better time in the back seat (stop giggling, you children). Before our drive, we were chauffeured around in a Navigator equipped with Lincoln's new-for-'22 rear-seat entertainment system, which now incorporates Amazon Fire TV. Two of us streamed two separate programs from Amazon Prime (the system also does Netflix and Disney Plus), all while enjoying the class-exclusive massaging rear seats. (OK, so maybe there isn't such a thing as too many choices.) It was a far more enjoyable experience than being yelled at by the lane-centering system.The 2022 Lincoln Navigator also gets the latest version of Ford's Pro Trailer Assist system, which lets you steer a trailer in reverse via a knob on the dash. Programming is now easier than ever: No separate transponder is needed (as on the Ford F-150), just a checkerboard sticker on the trailer that Ford devotees will recognize from the system's first generation. In addition, no measuring is required to set up the system as with the original sticker-based system. Drive a calibration pattern, and the cameras do all the measuring for you. We're pleased to see this in the Navigator; its ability to tow up to 8,700 pounds—more than half a ton better than the Escalade—is a compelling reason to buy it.Likable, But Still Needs to Be BetterIn all other respects, the 2022 Navigator is basically the gentle giant we've come to know and love enough to make it our top-ranked full-size luxury SUV. It has authoritative power from the 440-hp 3.5-liter twin-turbo V-6, a smooth-shifting 10-speed transmission, and a somewhat noisier, choppier ride than you might expect from Lincoln's flagship. And, of course, the Navigator is woefully inefficient—count on fuel economy numbers in the mid-teens. Lincoln tells us it has no plans to add a hybrid powertrain because gas mileage is not high on the priority list of the Navigator's target buyer.Hopefully said buyer is willing to deal with the driver-assistance foibles, too. Lincoln could dramatically mitigate the Navigator's problem by disabling the face cameras for hands-on lane centering, but it would be better still if the brand invested more in the engineering of the system. ActiveGlide's current functionality is enough to give us major pause, and that's really a shame—among big SUVs, the Lincoln has a lot to offer. Let's hope Lincoln sees the wisdom in investing in a rapid update to this update.Looks good! More details?2022 Lincoln Navigator Specifications BASE PRICE $78,405-$107,720 LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD/4WD, 7-8-pass, 4-door SUV ENGINE 3.5L/440-hp/510-lb-ft twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 24-valve V-6 TRANSMISSION 10-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 5,700-6,050 lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 122.5-131.6 in L x W x H 210.0-221.9 x 79.9 x 76.1-76.4 in 0-60 MPH 5.9 sec (MT est) EPA FUEL ECON, CITY/HWY/COMB 16-17/22-23/18-19 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 414-513 miles ON SALE Now Show All

cadillac ct4 Full OverviewWhen the Cadillac ATS-V first hit the streets in 2016, we immediately threw it into comparison tests with the heavyweights: the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio, BMW M3, and Mercedes-AMG C63. The ATS-V came close, but it never won any of those comparisons. The new 2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing—the CT4 is essentially a heavily updated ATS—attempts to right the wrongs of the older car.The CT4-V Blackwing should be immediately familiar to ATS-V drivers, despite the new name, face-lift, and extra 4 inches in length. Under the skin, the CT4-V Blackwing (not to be confused with the CT4-V, which is more of an interim performance model than full-blown V) features a carryover 3.6-liter twin-turbo V-6. Although the engine is upcycled, thanks to intake and tuning changes, it makes eight more horsepower now; output now totals 472 hp and 445 lb-ft of torque. Transmission options include a Tremec-sourced six-speed manual or a new 10-speed auto like the one on our test car. The latter replaces the old eight-speed unit, and it's quicker-shifting.Unlike some of its German rivals, rear-wheel drive is the only drivetrain option for this Cadillac. Other performance-minded changes include the adoption of Delphi's fourth-generation MagneRide shocks, the latest iteration of GM's Performance Traction Management (PTM) system, and two optional carbon fiber packs, which combine for a claimed 214 percent reduction in lift. Prices for the CT4-V Blackwing begin at $59,800, and our near-loaded car stickered for $80,235.The Performance NumbersDespite its eight horsepower and two-gear advantage over   (we also tested the ATS-V in coupe form), the new CT4-V Blackwing is pokier at the test track than the ATS-V it replaces. The Blackwing accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in 4.0 seconds and through the quarter mile in 12.4 seconds at 114.0 mph; its best 60-0 stop was 106 feet. An automatic-equipped 2016 ATS-V sedan, for comparison, ran from 0 to 60 in 3.7 and through the quarter in 12.1 at 116.2 mph. Despite the Blackwing's more modern hard and software, it's the same story around the figure eight; its best lap was 23.8 seconds at a 0.84 g average, while the ATS-V did it in 23.7 seconds at 0.88 g. We suspect the new car's 100-pound weight disadvantage is to blame for the disparity.Although the CT4-V Blackwing doesn't offer up objective performance advantages over the car it replaces, it is significantly quicker than the CT4-V. Powered by a 2.7-liter turbocharged I-4 good for 325 hp and 380 lb-ft of torque and mated to a 10-speed auto, the non-Blackwing accelerates to 60 mph in 5.5 seconds and through the quarter in 14.2 seconds at 95.2 mph, and it stops from 60 mph in 110 feet. The CT4-V's best figure-eight lap was 25.4 seconds at 0.73 g.The DrivingOn the road, the CT4-V Blackwing driver is phenomenal—light on its feet, buttoned down, and practically telepathic. Few cars on sale today can match the CT4-V Blackwing in terms of pure feel and connection with its driver on a good, twisty bit of pavement. The Cadillac's PTM system deserves special praise, as it allows for tail-out antics while maintaining its undetectable leash on the rear end (and keeping you on the road).We wish we were as in love with the CT4-V Blackwing's powertrain. It's not that there's anything outright wrong with the V-6/automatic combo; it's punchy and powerful, and the transmission does its damnedest to convince you it's Porsche's PDK in terms of quick and precognitioned shifts. It's just that it's … boring, and this lack of character is perhaps the biggest sin you can make in creating a performance car. If those complaints sound familiar, it's because they are. We said the same thing five years ago when we first drove the ATS-V, suggesting that Cadillac fit the Chevrolet Camaro's (its platform mate) naturally aspirated V-8 into its sport sedan. Cadillac still hasn't done so, and given its promise that the CT4-V Blackwing and CT5-V Blackwing are its last two gas-powered V cars, it likely never will.The Rest of the StoryInside, the CT4-V Blackwing's interior takes a noticeable step up from that of the ATS-V's. The older car had a bit of a "low-spec German rental car" vibe inside, but the new CT4 bursts with quality and craftsmanship, even if there's still room for improvement. We really liked the redesigned dash the most. It features Cadillac's latest CUE infotainment system and a fully digital dash. We also took a shine to the redesigned steering wheel, which now prominently features a PTM switch at the 5 o'clock position—an infinitely better solution than burying the feature in traction control menus as in past products. We were also fans of the thickly bolstered, leather-wrapped bucket seats and carbon-fiber trim, though we found the armrests to be hard and the car rather cramped in general.Although the 2021 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing isn't quicker than the ATS-V or the V-8-powered small Cadillac sport sedan of our dreams, it nevertheless is one of the most enjoyable and fun luxury performance cars on the road. As for how it stands up to the latest and greatest competition? Well, we already staged round one.As far as I can find, we never wrote anything about the sedan despite testing it. The previous link went to the coupe, which we tested on the same day.It's in MT Numbers and also the first link in the opening grafBlanked on my end there. Meant I couldn't find a stand-alone first test.Looks good! More details?2022 Cadilac CT4 V Blackwing Specifications BASE PRICE $59,900 PRICE AS TESTED $80,235 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 3.6L Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 24-valve 60-degree V-6 POWER (SAE NET) 472 hp @ 5,750 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 445 lb-ft @ 3,500 rpm TRANSMISSION 10-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,888 lb (53/47%) WHEELBASE 109.3 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 187.6 x 71.4 x 56.0 in 0-60 MPH 4.0 sec QUARTER MILE 12.4 sec @ 114.0 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 106 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.05 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.8 sec @ 0.84 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 16/24/19 mpg EPA RANGE (COMB) 331 miles ON SALE Now Show All

acura nsx Full OverviewProsThe most satisfying modern NSX, Engine pulls hard, Strong lateral grip.  ConsIt's dying just as it gets good, Needs a price-appropriate interior, Lacks ultimate steering feel. For decades, General Motors was notorious among its own loyalists for underfunding and underdeveloping a promising new car, expressing shock when initial sales excitement evaporated, reluctantly spending the money it should have in the first place to make the car as good as it should have been from the start, wondering why sales didn't rebound despite the tarnished reputation, then canceling the car once that it was finally good (see: Pontiac Fiero). Acura's parent company, Honda, has collaborated with GM in the past and continues to collaborate with GM today, and this is one tradition it shouldn't adopt. Case in point: the 2022 Acura NSX Type S. Not to put too fine a point on it, but the Type S is what the NSX should've been from day one. The reborn NSX held such promise, and Acura engineers benchmarked the right cars. Their insistence in thinking like Honda engineers, though, and worrying about how practical their mid-engine supercar was and how it drove in Ohio winters, compromised its final form. They studied the Ferrari 458 Italia but built a car that didn't drive anywhere near as well or as viscerally.The limited-edition Type S makes great strides toward righting that wrong. It's far more engaging to drive than any NSX before it. Much of the feel and feedback missing from the standard car has finally broken through in the Type S.Test Numbers Trail Regular NSX'sUnfortunately, it seems to have come at the cost of some performance. Despite driving better than any other NSX we've tested, the Type S is also the slowest NSX we've ever tested. At 3.4 seconds to 60 mph, it's 0.4 second behind the quickest we've evaluated, and it doesn't get any better by the quarter-mile mark. To get there, the Type S needs 11.6 seconds, and it's traveling at 120.7 mph by the finish line, 0.4 second and 3.3 mph slower than the quickest one. It's not down to a bad launch, either, because the Type S is 0.2 second slower accelerating from 45 mph to 65 mph than the quickest NSX we've tested. This despite the Type S being the most powerful NSX ever at 600 hp and 492 lb-ft, 27 hp and 16 lb-ft more than any other.It's worth saying, though, that the NSX Type S experience is delightful. The engine revs very quickly and has a broad powerband thanks to the pancake electric motor mounted between the engine and transmission. It pulls hard all the way to redline, and the transmission, in Track mode, won't upshift until you've actually reached the redline, so you get every last pony. It's also happy to not upshift and let the engine wind back down if you lift off the throttle, helpful on a twisty road with short straights between tight corners. And despite all the electrification, the powertrain even manages to sound pretty good for a V-6. The engine noise is surprisingly melodious, and the turbo flutter is icing on the cake.Back to the instrumented testing results, it wasn't any better going the other way. Stopping the Type S from 60 mph required 103 feet, a massive 8 feet longer than the best one we've tested. On a mountain road, that translated to several instances of standing on the brakes and not getting the stopping power a 600-hp car ought to have. Making the experience somehow worse, the squishy, spongy brake pedal response provides no feedback. Better brakes would let this car go down the road considerably faster.There is a bright spot in the Type S' numbers, and it's shining on the handling results. Pulling 1.03 average lateral g on the skidpad ties it with the stickiest NSX, as does its 23.2-second figure-eight lap time, though the 0.89 average g it pulled on in the figure eight was 0.03 g off the leader.And you know what? We're OK with all of that. We're willing to give up a tenth here and two tenths there for a car that drives better. Still, this should've been the starting point six years ago, not the swan song.You do still have to drive it like an NSX, though. To get the most out of this powertrain, you need to treat it the way your high-performance driving instructor told you not to. Brake early, point it at the apex, and then get back on the power as soon as possible. Before the apex if you can. Normally, this delivers guaranteed understeer, but in the NSX, the front motors go to work, the nose bites, and it pulls you through the corner while accelerating hard. You can actually correct understeer by going to the power. Once you figure this out, the car becomes far more impressive than it is when driving it like a typical all-wheel-drive car.Tips For the Next One (Which Isn't Coming)Were this car to get the next generation it deserves, there are a few other components that could be further improved, as well. Body control, for one. The Type S is stiff, which is fine, but it lacks compliance. It's bouncing around way too much on bumpy pavement, making you constantly chase it with the steering or back out of throttle. It's especially bad in big brake zones where the car starts shimmying around in its lane. It's all manageable, but it shouldn't have to be managed. Tie it down, and, again, the car could go down the road noticeably faster.The steering is better than before, but it could be even better still. In this case, it's not so much holding the car back as it isn't making it better. It's very precise, but it lacks feel. Other companies have figured out how to get steering feel out of a car with electric motors powering the front axle, and Acura could, too.Then, of course, there's the interior. It was never up to snuff, and it still isn't because it hasn't changed. It looks like an Acura interior, and Acura doesn't make $200,000 interiors. A next-generation car would need a complete interior redo with much less plastic, a much more expressive design, and for the love of all that's holy, a modern infotainment system with a volume knob. You can't put Civic parts or even TLX parts in a car priced nearly on par with an entry-level Ferrari.Hopefully, Acura will get all those details right when the NSX returns as an EV in the future—as it's promised to, after a hiatus—but this still feels like a missed opportunity for the high-performance hybrid iteration of the car. The Type S proves the current NSX formula wasn't fundamentally flawed—it was just unfinished. It's a shame this car missed the mark so widely that its sales can't support a second generation of this model to finish the job. If the NSX Type S is any indication, it could've been great. Instead, Acura is pulling a GM and canceling it just as it started to get right. Everyone loses.Looks good! More details?2022 Acura NSX Type S Specifications BASE PRICE $171,495 PRICE AS TESTED $185,995 VEHICLE LAYOUT Mid-engine, 2 front and 1 rear motors, AWD, 2-pass, 2-door hatchback ENGINE, MOTOR Twin-turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 24-valve 60-degree V-6, plus 3 permanent-magnet electric motors POWER (SAE NET) 520 hp @ 6,500 rpm (gas), 72 hp (comb front elec), 47 hp (rear elec); 600 hp (comb) TORQUE (SAE NET) 443 lb-ft @ 2,300 rpm (gas), 108 lb-ft (comb front elec), 109 lb-ft (rear elec); 492 lb-ft (comb) TRANSMISSIONS 1-speed auto (fr), 9-speed twin-clutch auto (rr) CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,903 lb (42/58%) WHEELBASE 103.5 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 178.5 x 76.3 x 47.8 in 0-60 MPH 3.4 sec QUARTER MILE 11.6 sec @ 120.7 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 103 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.03 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.2 sec @ 0.89 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 21/22/21 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 328 miles ON SALE Now Show All