Mercedes S580 V-8 vs. Electric EQS580: Which $100K+ Sedan Is Best?
The Mercedes-Benz S-Class has been untouchable, until now. Finally, another flagship sedan stands a chance of intercepting Benz intenders before they default to an S-Class, and that party-crasher sedan is from Mercedes itself. The fully electric EQS aims for the same top end of the market as the S-Class, but does so with a fresher formula than its conventional, almost stagnant counterpart.
At the top of the non-AMG EQS range is the EQS580, which keeps up with a Mustang Shelby GT500 in a straight line while suffocating occupants with silence and luxury. But this gas-versus-electricity battle is about more than just numbers and stifling quiet. If you have more than $100,000 for a luxury car that symbolizes wealth and good taste, you're probably going to look for a three-pointed star. Now, there are two choices when you get to the dealer. Both full-size Mercedes four-doors are 2022 Car of the Year finalists, but only one earns a first-place recommendation in this comparison. Which one is it—the gas model, or the new-age EV?
Mercedes Luxury, Imagined Very Differently
"S580" may literally be a part of the EQS580's name, but the two expensive luxury cars execute six-figure luxury in vastly different ways. The S-Class doesn't stray too far from what's made it a dominating force in its segment. Now available with I-6 and V-8 engines, the S-Class will add a plug-in hybrid model soon for those not ready to plunge into a fully electric future. And thanks to the EQS, loyal Mercedes buyers no longer need to look to the nearly $100,000 Tesla Model S or the spectacular—but barely established—Lucid Air. We're using the term luxury sedan loosely in this comparison; because the EQS580's rear glass lifts with the trunk lid, it's technically a hatchback.
Both the S580 V-8 and the EQS580 are far quicker than most owners will expect, yet each car relaxes its occupants with quietness and layer after layer of luxury and technology. Under its long hood, the S580's twin-turbo 4.0-liter V-8 pumps out 496 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque. Acceleration to 60 mph comes in just 4.0 seconds despite an as-tested 4,961-pound curb weight, impressive in most comparisons but not this one.
The EQS580 weighs 5,822 pounds, but that heft is propelled by front and rear motors combining for 516 hp and 631 lb-ft. With standard all-wheel drive like the S580, the EQS580 hits 60 mph in only 3.7 seconds (the single-motor, rear-drive EQS450+ model is a bit slower). The Lucid and Tesla are (much) quicker but really, who cares? These are luxury sedans, not dragsters. Numbers aside, the sensation of hushed and near-instant acceleration at any speed is an amusing sensation we enjoy, and it's one the gas-fed S580 can't quite match.
Surreal Ride Quality
The S-Class also—shockingly—falls behind in ride quality. The way the EQS580 isolates passengers from what's underneath their feet is simply extraordinary, even when you opt for 22-inch wheels. Compare that with the S580, which delivers a merely decent ride with 21-inch wheels, an experience that improves if you stick with 20s. Still, it's no match for the EQS, and "merely decent ride" is never a phrase we want to use in the same sentence as "S-Class."
Four-wheel steering makes both cars more maneuverable at city speeds than you'd expect from four-doors measuring in well over 200 inches in length. Thanks to that technology, the EQS580 has an astoundingly tight 35.8-foot turning radius. We'd recommend considering the option on both cars.
The EQS580's light-weighted steering belies its Tahoe-esque curb weight, but don't expect much feel or sports-car-like behavior on a winding road.
"The EQS580 is a gigantic, electric sofa that moves around under its own power," said deputy editor Alex Stoklosa, encapsulating how the new Mercedes feels.
The S580 handles itself better, but you never forget how much car you're hauling around those curves. Unless you're interested in the AMG version of both models, don't expect the EQS and S to beckon you to drive faster.
No matter how you drive these dueling flagships, neither is engineered with natural-feeling brakes. The S580's stoppers were described as "mushy," and the more sensitive types out there (hi, Mom and Dad!) may feel the car slow down uncomfortably quickly right before you come to a stop. Brake feel is worse in the EQS. Technical director Frank Markus called the EQS580's brakes "spongy and imprecise." We appreciate the technology behind the brake pedal that moves based on the regenerative braking's rate of deceleration, which is supposed to make the entire system feel more natural as the driver adds their own braking input to slow the EQS to a complete stop. Even so, take it from road test editor Chris Walton: "The soft brake pedal is not confidence inspiring in the least."
Comparing Electric to Gas, Mercedes-Style
If the EQS450+ or EQS580 could match the 406-520-mile Lucid Air in EPA-rated driving range, the scales might tip in the favor of the electric Mercedes. But as it is, the EQS580 can drive for 340 miles before needing a full recharge. Compare that with the S580's 442 miles in the same combined city/highway EPA cycle, or the six-cylinder S500's 530 miles. As good as the S580's V-8 is, our experience with Mercedes' mild hybrid I-6 has been so positive, we'd suggest S-Class intenders try an S500 before signing for an S580.
Like most electric cars, the EQS580 can be recharged to from 10 to 80 percent in only 31 minutes, but the S580 can refuel to 100 percent in 5 minutes at utterly common gas stations. The EV's disadvantage is only important on a road trip; everywhere else, the EQS wins in the luxury of convenience. It's hard to beat the convenience of pulling into your driveway, plugging in for the night, and never visiting a gas station again except for pit stops.
The S580 is quiet most of the time, but the EQS580's EV powertrain takes things to a higher level. There's nothing like the quiet of an electric car to enhance the sound quality of whatever you're enjoying on the highway. That hushed cabin and slick aerodynamics come at a steep price, however. To achieve a drag coefficient of only 0.20 on the EQS, it feels to us as though Mercedes sacrificed too much in terms of design. We can appreciate a new design direction, but the blob-like EQS leaves a lot to be desired, stylistically. The Tesla Model S and Lucid Air manage similar or better EPA-rated efficiency with superior range and arguably more pleasing design.
EQS vs. S: Which Executes the Details Better?
Neither the EQS nor the S-Class inspired uniform praise among MotorTrend editors, but it's impossible to miss the premium touches everywhere you look. The interiors attempt to mix luxury with technology in such a way that the latter doesn't overwhelm the former. That's a challenge in the EQS580, whose Hyperscreen combines a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster with a 17.7-inch central touchscreen and a 12.3-inch touchscreen for the front passenger. Spend a little time with the system and its voice commands, and you'll get used to it. The EQS interior feels airier up front than the S-Class and offers exquisitely designed air vents, but we noticed a couple less-than-premium interior materials in both cars. We also found the front seat controls of the EQS and S-Class harder to use than they've been in previous models with similar controls. One unusual advantage for the EQS: Its hatchback design makes loading cargo easier.
You sit higher in the EQS than you do in the S-Class, but the high cowl means some drivers may feel claustrophobic inside, as they have a limited view above the dash. That won't be a deal-breaker for most buyers—there is no such thing as a perfect car—but the back seat of the EQS can't compare to the excellent rear quarters of the S. What you'll notice first: The S-Class has a longer and more comfortable seat cushion. The floor of the EQS is also too high for rear passengers, an oddity necessitated by the floor-mounted battery.
Where both cars need urgent attention is—and we're not joking—the exterior door handles. They sleekly emerge from their flush housings on the doors so you can pull them out and open the door. The problem comes with the strength you must muster to open the doors. It's a silly issue to have, but it's real, and we hope a fix is on the way, though in the EQS you can option it with power-opening doors that offer up mechanical assist once the doors are unlatched.
A Frustrating Conclusion
The EQS and S-Class earned their way to the finalist round of MotorTrend's 2022 Car of the Year competition, despite naysayers in both camps suggesting the Benzes weren't quite up to par. Some suggested the S-Class had lost its way as a tech leader of the brand, while criticism of our S580 test car's ride quality and brake feel didn't help. The EQS has incredible ride quality and a pleasing sense of heft—exactly what we want in a six-figure luxury car. Even brushing aside its odd brake feel and OK driving range, where the EQS really loses is the rear seat and styling.
"The EQS is a technological tour de force, and it's an even better sensory deprivation chamber," digital director Erik Johnson said. "It's a masterclass in luxury, and clearly points the way to what cars will eventually be in our [SAE autonomy] Level 4 or Level 5 future, and how the luxury companies like Mercedes intend to set themselves apart. And yet, the cowl is so high that I feel like I'm sitting at the kid's table when I drive it, and it looks like a prescription shoe."
Were we comparing E-Class-level cars, this might go a different way. But despite its imperfections, the S-Class provides a good all-around experience without any significant missteps. That's why we're frustrated. We like where Mercedes is headed, but in a segment of cars you want, not need, the EQS can't yet match the mighty S-Class. That legendary nameplate has been continually updated and improved over a half century; we suspect it won't take nearly as long for Mercedes to engineer and design a true S-Class of electric cars.
First Place: 2021 Mercedes-Benz S580
Pros:
- Looks expensive
- Great back-seat packaging
- Longer driving range than EQS
Cons:
- Ride quality could be better
- End-of-travel brake feel
- Frustrating exterior door handles
Verdict: Despite its limitations, this is still the luxury sedan standard-setter, for now.
Second Place: 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS
Pros:
- Superb ride quality
- Quiet and immediate acceleration
- Hatchback practicality
Cons:
- Knees-high rear seat experience
- Space lozenge styling
- EQS580's Hyperscreen may be too much for some
Verdict: Intriguing and solid electric luxury sedan from Mercedes let down by a couple tough-to-fix flaws.
POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2021 Mercedes-Benz S 580 4Matic SPECIFICATIONS 2022 Mercedes-EQ EQS 580 4Matic SPECIFICATIONS DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD Front and rear-motor, AWD ENGINE/MOTOR TYPE Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads Permanent-magnet electric DISPLACEMENT 3,982 cc/243 cu in — COMPRESSION RATIO 10.5:1 — POWER (SAE NET) 496 hp @ 5,500 rpm 516 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 516 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm 631 lb-ft REDLINE 6,300 rpm — WEIGHT TO POWER 10.0 lb/hp 11.3 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 9-speed automatic 1-speed automatic AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 2.82:1/1.69:1 9.72:1 (front)/9.64 (rear) SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar Multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll STEERING RATIO 15.5:1 13.8:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.0 2.0 BRAKES, F; R 14.5-in vented, drilled disc; 14.1-in vented, drilled disc 14.9-in vented disc; 14.9-in vented disc WHEELS, F;R 8.5 x 21-in; 9.0 x 21-in, cast aluminum 9.5 x 22-in cast aluminum TIRES, F;R 255/35R21 98Y; 285/30R21 100Y Pirelli P Zero MO-S 265/35R22 102H Pirelli P Zero MO-S Elect DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 126.6 126.4 TRACK, F/R 65.4/66.4 in 65.6/66.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 208.2 x 76.9 x 59.2 in 207.3 x 75.8 x 59.6 in TURNING CIRCLE 41.9 ft 35.8 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 4,961 lb (54/46%) 5,822 lb (50/50%) SEATING CAPACITY 5 5 HEADROOM, F/R 42.1/39.4 in 40.4/37.0 in LEGROOM, F/R 41.7/43.8 in 41.7/39.1 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 59.6/59.0 in 59.5/57.3 in CARGO VOLUME 12.9 cu ft 22.0 cu ft TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.6 sec 1.6 sec 0-40 2.3 2.1 0-50 3.1 2.8 0-60 4.0 3.7 0-70 5.2 4.8 0-80 6.5 6.1 0-90 8.1 7.5 0-100 9.9 9.3 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.9 1.8 QUARTER MILE 12.5 sec @ 112.9 mph 12.2 sec @ 113.3 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 112 ft 115 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.87 g (avg) 0.88 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.8 sec @ 0.72 g (avg) 25.2 sec @ 0.76 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,200 rpm Not applicable CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $117,350 $119,110 PRICE AS TESTED $143,230 $125,310 AIRBAGS 14: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, rear belt, rear front, driver knee, front pass thigh 10: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, driver knee, rear belt BASIC WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles, 8 yrs/80,000 miles Hybrid/EV battery ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 4 yrs/50,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 22.1 gal 108 kWh Li-Ion EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 17/25/20 mpg To be determined RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium 240-volt electricity, 480-volt electricity ON SALE Now Fall 2021 Show AllYou may also like
The automotive industry is in a tight squeeze right now, wedged within the transition from internal-combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) amid a global pandemic, a war in Europe, and supply constraints and rising material costs. Several BEV automakers including Tesla, Hummer, Lucid, and Rivian have raised their prices in recent weeks, and other automakers have delayed orders, limited buyer options, and in some cases, shipped vehicles without supply-limited components, with a promise to fulfill missing parts when supplies are available. And here is why it's not likely to change very soon.That's the outlook through 2024, according to a report from industry analyst AlixPartners. In particular, the report says semiconductor shortages will continue to negatively impact new vehicle production through the next couple of years, caused in part by the rising market share of BEVs planned to go on sale as the majority of the industry shifts away from internal combustion.BEVs will increase chip demand at a growth rate of 55 percent per year, according to the study, which will remain a key bottleneck in new vehicle production. That means that, as automakers introduce a lineup of new BEVs, the technical requirements of these new vehicles will increase the strain of supply because BEVs typically require more chips than ICE vehicles.That will likely force automakers to continue to hold back on production levels, meaning the number of cars on sale will probably remain limited for a few more years. This gives automakers more pricing power if demand for new cars remains high, so cars likely won't get any cheaper anytime soon.That doesn't necessarily mean automakers are making too much profit from higher pricing. As an example, via CNBC, Ford recently said the Mustang Mach-E has lost most of its profitability due to rising commodity costs.Pricing will continue to be negatively impacted by rising material costs, for both new BEVs and ICE vehicles. AlixPartners puts the raw material costs for ICE vehicles at $3,662 per vehicle, and BEVs materials cost more than twice that at $8,255 per vehicle since the battery and motor requirements require more raw materials.Those costs per vehicle are more than double what they were just two years ago, according to CNBC, reflecting the impact of the market constraints mentioned above.AlixPartners predicts that BEVs will only overtake ICE vehicles in the majority of market share way out in 2035, as suppliers and automakers likely scale back or slow down the recently rapid introduction of the resource-heavy, higher priced BEV models planned to be introduced, and customer interest and EV infrastructure need time to grow.AlixPartners says $48 billion in infrastructure investment is needed by 2030, but so far only $11 billion has been committed, so infrastructure support for BEVs will be catching up for years to come.
hyundai tucson-plug-in-hybrid Full OverviewWe're slinking silently down a stretch of Southern California's traffic strangled I-405 freeway in the plug-in hybrid version of the 2022 Hyundai Tucson, and for a minute, it's as if we're in an all-electric crossover. But then we hit the go pedal hard to fill a gap in traffic, its turbo-four wakes up, the six-speed automatic downshifts, and we're suddenly back in the world of the internal combustion engine.Such are the trade-offs you'll experience in plug-in hybrids like the Tucson. It's not a bad thing, mind you, just different, though as with all vehicles of this type, it's how you drive them that determines how efficient they'll ultimately be.When you drive the Tucson plug-in hybrid in its all-electric mode (there are three drive modes in all: Automatic, Electric, and Hybrid) and have its 13.8-kWh battery pack topped off, Hyundai says you can eke out as much as 33 miles of electric-only range. Of course, that number will vary, as we found out during our time behind the wheel. But thanks in part to its 7.2-kilowatt onboard charger, if you have a 240-volt Level 2 wall box installed in your garage, Hyundai says you can charge the battery in as little as two hours, so filling it up with electrons at home is relatively quick. Regenerative braking also helps put power back into the battery.As far as the powertrain goes, the company's 1.6-liter turbocharged inline-four with 180 hp and 195 lb-ft of torque is the 2022 Hyundai Tucson plug-in hybrid's gas-powered heart. Add in the power from its 66.9-kW permanent-magnet synchronous motor mounted at the rear axle, and those numbers rise to an estimated 261 horses and 258 lb-ft all in, which is the most any version of the Tucson offers. Power is routed to a six-speed automatic transmission, and all Tucson plug-ins come with Hyundai's HTRAC on-demand (mechanical) all-wheel-drive system as standard equipment.How Well Does the Tucson Plug-In Perform?What does that mean for its overall performance? We took the 2022 Hyundai Tucson plug-in hybrid to the test track to find out. With the battery at 95 percent charge, it launched under EV power at first and then the engine kicked in later in the run, which we clocked at 7.1 seconds from 0 to 60 mph and 15.3 seconds at 92.2 mph through the quarter mile. That's far better than the 2022 Tucson HTRAC we tested with the 2.5-liter inline-four (9.3 seconds), though it was a fair bit off of one of its primary competitors, the 2021 Toyota RAV4 Prime plug-in, which we recorded at an impressive 5.5 seconds to 60 mph. But it did outperform its other main bogey, the 2021 Ford Escape plug-in, which reached the 60-mph mark in 7.7 seconds during our testing.Stopping power of the 2022 Hyundai Tucson PHEV is more than acceptable for a 4,179-pound crossover, with 124 feet required to haul down from 60 mph to 0. That distance essentially splits the difference between the lighter Ford (123 feet) and the heavier Toyota (127 feet). The brakes performed well despite a steeper than normal initial push before they began to bite.But the Tucson plug-in's dynamic performance really brought out the kudos from the MotorTrend test team. Road test director Chris Walton had this to say about the Hyundai midsize crossover after his time wringing it out at the track: "Wow, a much sportier experience than I had anticipated. I found it easy to trail brake into the skidpad, and lateral acceleration registered 0.83 g average. In Sport mode, the steering feels unnecessarily heavy; I prefer the feel of it in other modes. Very mild but predictable understeer on the skidpad, and good acceleration off the corner. It covered the figure-eight course in 27.3 seconds at 0.63 g average. Well done, Hyundai."How Efficient Is the Tucson Plug-In?Although we were surprised by its track performance, when you pit it against its plug-in hybrid crossover competitors in the EPA efficiency arena, the 2022 Hyundai Tucson PHEV brings up the rear. The lighter Ford Escape PHEV carries an EPA-rated 105 mpg-e combined figure, followed by the Toyota RAV4 Prime AWD at 94 mpg-e. The Tucson PHEV AWD checks in at just 80 mpg-e, largely because its six-speed transmission setup is less efficient than the e-CVT setups Ford and Toyota use.There are trade-offs to be sure, another being that today you can only get the Tucson plug-in in the most expensive trim levels like the Limited we tested, and only with all-wheel drive, which guarantees you'll pay more than $40,000 to get into one. On the plus side, you should be able to take advantage of government tax breaks to offset the upcharge.Lots of Good Stuff for the PriceThe good news is that the extra scratch you pay for the Tucson PHEV Limited nets you an impressive-looking package in the cabin with a highly functional 10.3-inch instrument panel featuring screens designed to help you better understand how well you're doing in terms of efficiency, complemented by a 10.3-inch infotainment screen and upscale leather seating. It's also loaded to the gills with safety technology, an advanced stop-and-go adaptive cruise control system, and Hyundai's Smart Park, to name a few.When underway, the Tucson plug-in pulls away from stoplights stealthily yet with authority when you desire a quick pace, and if you want to play a bit, there's a Sport mode with paddles to wind through the six gears. At freeway speeds it happily moves along, and when the road gets rough and rugged, the Tucson plug-in hybrid is more than adept at soaking up imperfections and keeping impact harshness at bay. In essence, it's what you'd expect a family-friendly crossover to deliver in the ride and handling departments.But this vehicle is at its best when you take it easy and use it for what it's meant to do, which is to maximize your opportunities to increase efficiency. Because in the end, plug-in hybrids like the 2022 Hyundai Tucson PHEV are all about using those precious electric-only miles to your advantage.Looks good! More details?2022 Hyundai Tucson Limited HTRAC Plug-In Specifications BASE PRICE $43,945 PRICE AS TESTED $44,140 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine front-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV ENGINE 1.6L direct-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4 plus permanent-magnet electric motor POWER (SAE NET) 180 hp @ 5,500 rpm (gas), 90 hp (elec); 261 hp (est comb) TORQUE (SAE NET) 195 lb-ft @ 1,500 rpm (gas), 224 lb-ft (elec); 258 lb-ft (est comb) TRANSMISSION 6-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 4,179 lb (59/41%) WHEELBASE 108.5 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 182.3 x 73.4 x 65.6 in 0-60 MPH 7.1 sec QUARTER MILE 15.3 sec @ 92.2 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 124 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.83 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 27.3 sec @ 0.63 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 35/35/35 mpg (gas), 87/74/80 mpg-e* EPA RANGE, COMB 420 mi* ON SALE Now *EPA blended-PHEV (charge-depleting) mode testing, with vehicles set to their default drive and brake-regeneration modes. Show All
As you're probably aware, there's an ever-diminishing roster of cars available with a manual transmission. But that doesn't mean there aren't still choices. While manual cars no longer can be counted on to save money at the gas pump—today's automatics are generally more efficient—for a certain subset of the population, including many of us here at MotorTrend, there's nothing like a car, truck, or SUV with three pedals.Among the changes to this list for 2022, the sole entrant from Lotus has sailed into the sunset, while a renewed sports car by Nissan joins the analog squad. In 2021 we also said au revoir to the iconic VW Golf, at least here in America. The workaday Hyundai Veloster got the axe and now only exists in N form, and Aston Martin has decided to kill the manual from its upcoming lineup. Finally, the Genesis G70, Hyundai Accent, and Kia Soul have also parted ways with the manual transmission for the 2022 model year. But there are still holdouts, thank goodness; read on to find out where you can still exercise your left foot.
0 Comments