Mercedes S580 V-8 vs. Electric EQS580: Which $100K+ Sedan Is Best?
The Mercedes-Benz S-Class has been untouchable, until now. Finally, another flagship sedan stands a chance of intercepting Benz intenders before they default to an S-Class, and that party-crasher sedan is from Mercedes itself. The fully electric EQS aims for the same top end of the market as the S-Class, but does so with a fresher formula than its conventional, almost stagnant counterpart.
At the top of the non-AMG EQS range is the EQS580, which keeps up with a Mustang Shelby GT500 in a straight line while suffocating occupants with silence and luxury. But this gas-versus-electricity battle is about more than just numbers and stifling quiet. If you have more than $100,000 for a luxury car that symbolizes wealth and good taste, you're probably going to look for a three-pointed star. Now, there are two choices when you get to the dealer. Both full-size Mercedes four-doors are 2022 Car of the Year finalists, but only one earns a first-place recommendation in this comparison. Which one is it—the gas model, or the new-age EV?
Mercedes Luxury, Imagined Very Differently
"S580" may literally be a part of the EQS580's name, but the two expensive luxury cars execute six-figure luxury in vastly different ways. The S-Class doesn't stray too far from what's made it a dominating force in its segment. Now available with I-6 and V-8 engines, the S-Class will add a plug-in hybrid model soon for those not ready to plunge into a fully electric future. And thanks to the EQS, loyal Mercedes buyers no longer need to look to the nearly $100,000 Tesla Model S or the spectacular—but barely established—Lucid Air. We're using the term luxury sedan loosely in this comparison; because the EQS580's rear glass lifts with the trunk lid, it's technically a hatchback.
Both the S580 V-8 and the EQS580 are far quicker than most owners will expect, yet each car relaxes its occupants with quietness and layer after layer of luxury and technology. Under its long hood, the S580's twin-turbo 4.0-liter V-8 pumps out 496 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque. Acceleration to 60 mph comes in just 4.0 seconds despite an as-tested 4,961-pound curb weight, impressive in most comparisons but not this one.
The EQS580 weighs 5,822 pounds, but that heft is propelled by front and rear motors combining for 516 hp and 631 lb-ft. With standard all-wheel drive like the S580, the EQS580 hits 60 mph in only 3.7 seconds (the single-motor, rear-drive EQS450+ model is a bit slower). The Lucid and Tesla are (much) quicker but really, who cares? These are luxury sedans, not dragsters. Numbers aside, the sensation of hushed and near-instant acceleration at any speed is an amusing sensation we enjoy, and it's one the gas-fed S580 can't quite match.
Surreal Ride Quality
The S-Class also—shockingly—falls behind in ride quality. The way the EQS580 isolates passengers from what's underneath their feet is simply extraordinary, even when you opt for 22-inch wheels. Compare that with the S580, which delivers a merely decent ride with 21-inch wheels, an experience that improves if you stick with 20s. Still, it's no match for the EQS, and "merely decent ride" is never a phrase we want to use in the same sentence as "S-Class."
Four-wheel steering makes both cars more maneuverable at city speeds than you'd expect from four-doors measuring in well over 200 inches in length. Thanks to that technology, the EQS580 has an astoundingly tight 35.8-foot turning radius. We'd recommend considering the option on both cars.
The EQS580's light-weighted steering belies its Tahoe-esque curb weight, but don't expect much feel or sports-car-like behavior on a winding road.
"The EQS580 is a gigantic, electric sofa that moves around under its own power," said deputy editor Alex Stoklosa, encapsulating how the new Mercedes feels.
The S580 handles itself better, but you never forget how much car you're hauling around those curves. Unless you're interested in the AMG version of both models, don't expect the EQS and S to beckon you to drive faster.
No matter how you drive these dueling flagships, neither is engineered with natural-feeling brakes. The S580's stoppers were described as "mushy," and the more sensitive types out there (hi, Mom and Dad!) may feel the car slow down uncomfortably quickly right before you come to a stop. Brake feel is worse in the EQS. Technical director Frank Markus called the EQS580's brakes "spongy and imprecise." We appreciate the technology behind the brake pedal that moves based on the regenerative braking's rate of deceleration, which is supposed to make the entire system feel more natural as the driver adds their own braking input to slow the EQS to a complete stop. Even so, take it from road test editor Chris Walton: "The soft brake pedal is not confidence inspiring in the least."
Comparing Electric to Gas, Mercedes-Style
If the EQS450+ or EQS580 could match the 406-520-mile Lucid Air in EPA-rated driving range, the scales might tip in the favor of the electric Mercedes. But as it is, the EQS580 can drive for 340 miles before needing a full recharge. Compare that with the S580's 442 miles in the same combined city/highway EPA cycle, or the six-cylinder S500's 530 miles. As good as the S580's V-8 is, our experience with Mercedes' mild hybrid I-6 has been so positive, we'd suggest S-Class intenders try an S500 before signing for an S580.
Like most electric cars, the EQS580 can be recharged to from 10 to 80 percent in only 31 minutes, but the S580 can refuel to 100 percent in 5 minutes at utterly common gas stations. The EV's disadvantage is only important on a road trip; everywhere else, the EQS wins in the luxury of convenience. It's hard to beat the convenience of pulling into your driveway, plugging in for the night, and never visiting a gas station again except for pit stops.
The S580 is quiet most of the time, but the EQS580's EV powertrain takes things to a higher level. There's nothing like the quiet of an electric car to enhance the sound quality of whatever you're enjoying on the highway. That hushed cabin and slick aerodynamics come at a steep price, however. To achieve a drag coefficient of only 0.20 on the EQS, it feels to us as though Mercedes sacrificed too much in terms of design. We can appreciate a new design direction, but the blob-like EQS leaves a lot to be desired, stylistically. The Tesla Model S and Lucid Air manage similar or better EPA-rated efficiency with superior range and arguably more pleasing design.
EQS vs. S: Which Executes the Details Better?
Neither the EQS nor the S-Class inspired uniform praise among MotorTrend editors, but it's impossible to miss the premium touches everywhere you look. The interiors attempt to mix luxury with technology in such a way that the latter doesn't overwhelm the former. That's a challenge in the EQS580, whose Hyperscreen combines a 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster with a 17.7-inch central touchscreen and a 12.3-inch touchscreen for the front passenger. Spend a little time with the system and its voice commands, and you'll get used to it. The EQS interior feels airier up front than the S-Class and offers exquisitely designed air vents, but we noticed a couple less-than-premium interior materials in both cars. We also found the front seat controls of the EQS and S-Class harder to use than they've been in previous models with similar controls. One unusual advantage for the EQS: Its hatchback design makes loading cargo easier.
You sit higher in the EQS than you do in the S-Class, but the high cowl means some drivers may feel claustrophobic inside, as they have a limited view above the dash. That won't be a deal-breaker for most buyers—there is no such thing as a perfect car—but the back seat of the EQS can't compare to the excellent rear quarters of the S. What you'll notice first: The S-Class has a longer and more comfortable seat cushion. The floor of the EQS is also too high for rear passengers, an oddity necessitated by the floor-mounted battery.
Where both cars need urgent attention is—and we're not joking—the exterior door handles. They sleekly emerge from their flush housings on the doors so you can pull them out and open the door. The problem comes with the strength you must muster to open the doors. It's a silly issue to have, but it's real, and we hope a fix is on the way, though in the EQS you can option it with power-opening doors that offer up mechanical assist once the doors are unlatched.
A Frustrating Conclusion
The EQS and S-Class earned their way to the finalist round of MotorTrend's 2022 Car of the Year competition, despite naysayers in both camps suggesting the Benzes weren't quite up to par. Some suggested the S-Class had lost its way as a tech leader of the brand, while criticism of our S580 test car's ride quality and brake feel didn't help. The EQS has incredible ride quality and a pleasing sense of heft—exactly what we want in a six-figure luxury car. Even brushing aside its odd brake feel and OK driving range, where the EQS really loses is the rear seat and styling.
"The EQS is a technological tour de force, and it's an even better sensory deprivation chamber," digital director Erik Johnson said. "It's a masterclass in luxury, and clearly points the way to what cars will eventually be in our [SAE autonomy] Level 4 or Level 5 future, and how the luxury companies like Mercedes intend to set themselves apart. And yet, the cowl is so high that I feel like I'm sitting at the kid's table when I drive it, and it looks like a prescription shoe."
Were we comparing E-Class-level cars, this might go a different way. But despite its imperfections, the S-Class provides a good all-around experience without any significant missteps. That's why we're frustrated. We like where Mercedes is headed, but in a segment of cars you want, not need, the EQS can't yet match the mighty S-Class. That legendary nameplate has been continually updated and improved over a half century; we suspect it won't take nearly as long for Mercedes to engineer and design a true S-Class of electric cars.
First Place: 2021 Mercedes-Benz S580
Pros:
- Looks expensive
- Great back-seat packaging
- Longer driving range than EQS
Cons:
- Ride quality could be better
- End-of-travel brake feel
- Frustrating exterior door handles
Verdict: Despite its limitations, this is still the luxury sedan standard-setter, for now.
Second Place: 2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS
Pros:
- Superb ride quality
- Quiet and immediate acceleration
- Hatchback practicality
Cons:
- Knees-high rear seat experience
- Space lozenge styling
- EQS580's Hyperscreen may be too much for some
Verdict: Intriguing and solid electric luxury sedan from Mercedes let down by a couple tough-to-fix flaws.
POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2021 Mercedes-Benz S 580 4Matic SPECIFICATIONS 2022 Mercedes-EQ EQS 580 4Matic SPECIFICATIONS DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD Front and rear-motor, AWD ENGINE/MOTOR TYPE Twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve 90-degree V-8, alum block/heads Permanent-magnet electric DISPLACEMENT 3,982 cc/243 cu in — COMPRESSION RATIO 10.5:1 — POWER (SAE NET) 496 hp @ 5,500 rpm 516 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 516 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm 631 lb-ft REDLINE 6,300 rpm — WEIGHT TO POWER 10.0 lb/hp 11.3 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 9-speed automatic 1-speed automatic AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 2.82:1/1.69:1 9.72:1 (front)/9.64 (rear) SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar Multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, air springs, adj shocks, anti-roll STEERING RATIO 15.5:1 13.8:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.0 2.0 BRAKES, F; R 14.5-in vented, drilled disc; 14.1-in vented, drilled disc 14.9-in vented disc; 14.9-in vented disc WHEELS, F;R 8.5 x 21-in; 9.0 x 21-in, cast aluminum 9.5 x 22-in cast aluminum TIRES, F;R 255/35R21 98Y; 285/30R21 100Y Pirelli P Zero MO-S 265/35R22 102H Pirelli P Zero MO-S Elect DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 126.6 126.4 TRACK, F/R 65.4/66.4 in 65.6/66.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 208.2 x 76.9 x 59.2 in 207.3 x 75.8 x 59.6 in TURNING CIRCLE 41.9 ft 35.8 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 4,961 lb (54/46%) 5,822 lb (50/50%) SEATING CAPACITY 5 5 HEADROOM, F/R 42.1/39.4 in 40.4/37.0 in LEGROOM, F/R 41.7/43.8 in 41.7/39.1 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 59.6/59.0 in 59.5/57.3 in CARGO VOLUME 12.9 cu ft 22.0 cu ft TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.6 sec 1.6 sec 0-40 2.3 2.1 0-50 3.1 2.8 0-60 4.0 3.7 0-70 5.2 4.8 0-80 6.5 6.1 0-90 8.1 7.5 0-100 9.9 9.3 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.9 1.8 QUARTER MILE 12.5 sec @ 112.9 mph 12.2 sec @ 113.3 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 112 ft 115 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.87 g (avg) 0.88 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.8 sec @ 0.72 g (avg) 25.2 sec @ 0.76 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,200 rpm Not applicable CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $117,350 $119,110 PRICE AS TESTED $143,230 $125,310 AIRBAGS 14: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, rear belt, rear front, driver knee, front pass thigh 10: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, driver knee, rear belt BASIC WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 4 yrs/50,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles, 8 yrs/80,000 miles Hybrid/EV battery ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 4 yrs/50,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 22.1 gal 108 kWh Li-Ion EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 17/25/20 mpg To be determined RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium 240-volt electricity, 480-volt electricity ON SALE Now Fall 2021 Show AllYou may also like
porsche taycan Full OverviewLeave it to Porsche. Going into our 2022 SUV of the Year competition, no vehicle had more pre-shade thrown its way than the Taycan 4 Cross Turismo. We've enjoyed a mixed, ambiguous relationship with the Taycan sedan since we first drove it. On the one hand, kudos to Porsche for making a great-handling electric vehicle that emphasizes performance and feel over everything else. On the other, where's the range, bro?Yes, we like performance, but institutionally we just can't fully get behind the industry's least efficient EV. As for the "SUV" version, well, it's just a barely lifted station wagon, right? No different than the crass, "we're not that gullible" efforts from Audi (the A6 Allroad) and Mercedes-Benz (E450 All-Terrain) to pitch station wagons as some sort of off-roaders. But then we made the terrible mistake of actually taking the Cross Turismo in the dirt, and yeah, Porsche strikes again.Before we get to how it drives, let's talk about what the Taycan 4 Cross Turismo is. First off, it's a station wagon by all definitions of the term. Yes, the legal definition of an SUV has something to do with ride height, but as I'm so fond of saying, "Just look at it." Talk about obvious. The Cross Turismo is an incredibly handsome wagon, especially on the tough-looking five-spoke wheels Porsche bolted to our test subject. Tangentially speaking, Taycan wheel design is all over the map, ranging from goofy to horrible to "yeah, baby." These are the latter. Since we drove the Cross Turismo, Porsche went and confusingly launched an uncladded wagon version of the Taycan, the 2022 GTS Sport Turismo, which looks approximately 10 percent better. That's mostly due to the 0.8-inch drop in ride height, meaning the Sport Turismo is technically a car. More on that in a bit.Under the lovely, Chalk-colored metal you'll find two motors: one driving the wheels at the front axle, and the other driving those at the rear. Unlike all other EVs on the market save for its Audi twin, the E-Tron GT, the Taycan has a two-speed transmission that's only connected to the rear motor. As for power, this gets a bit confusing. Combined output from the two motors is 375 horsepower and 368 lb-ft of torque. However, activate launch control, and the two motors go into overboost and the output increases to 469 horsepower, a more than 20 percent increase. Hey, it's a brave, new EV world. The battery pack is large at 93.4 kWh, and the range is EPA-rated at 215 miles. That's down 10 from the mechanically identical Taycan sedan, due a little to the increased weight of the wagon body but more so the increased ride height that also decreases aerodynamic efficiency and forces the halfshafts to sprout from the motor at an angle. Did I mention it weighs 5,134 pounds?The odd part about driving the Taycan 4 Cross Turismo only occurs when you realize there are three more powerful versions available: the 4S, the Turbo, and the Turbo S. There is a non-4, RWD sedan that makes less power (321 hp, 402 in overboost), but this particular version—$92,250 base, $109, 980 as tested—is pretty far down the Taycan lineup, which also includes the GTS sedan and Sport Turismo. Let me also point out that as far as the Taycan—cough—SUVs go, this is the entry-level Cross Turismo. The entry version that can hit 60 mph in 4.5 seconds, of course.The Taycan 4 Cross Turismo can also run the quarter mile in 12.7 seconds at 115.9 mph. That quarter mile is pretty quick, especially for an off-road-capable station wagon. But it's not that quick for an EV, as the Porsche barely edges out the 470-hp Jeep Wrangler 392 that does the quarter in 12.9. Hey we're talking SUVs, right? And remember, that using launch control this Taycan makes precisely 1 fewer horsepower than the double live-axle, brick-shaped Jeep.The Porsche's braking performance is good. Not so much as to stand out, but not bad, and there's nothing wrong with how the pedal feels. It takes 109 feet for the Cross Turismo to stop from 60 mph, 5 feet longer than the much more powerful, capable, expensive Taycan Turbo S with its 17.3-inch front rotors and super-sticky tires. Likewise, the Taycan 4's figure-eight time is good, at 25 seconds flat. I always say any car in the 24-second range is a sports car, and this slightly jacked-up wagon is oh, so close. To give you an idea of how well the Porsche did, remember the Mercedes E450 All-Terrain we discussed earlier? Another gussied-up station wagon pretending to be an SUV? It took 26.2 seconds to get around our figure-eight course. The Audi A6 Allroad? 26.5. Oh, and the Jeep 392? A frankly pathetic 29.3 run, which our test team chalked up to "aggressive ESC."Based on time spent with other Taycans we knew going in that this Porsche would be more fun to drive than the competition on the street. We wrongly assumed that since it's obviously only pretending to be an SUV, it would be weak sauce in dirt. We were totally wrong. Did we attempt any rock crawling? No, and you'd be insane to try. But we did try dirt, sand, and gravel, and, man, was the Cross Turismo not only competent and capable, it was a blast, as well. Especially in sand, where the EV loved kicking up giant rooster tails while simultaneously not even kinda getting stuck. Whatever off-road advantage there is from a 0.8-inch lift, Porsche fully exploited it.Unlike the aforementioned Audi and Mercedes "SUVs," I'd actually recommend the Taycan 4 Cross Turismo as both a driver's car and a light-duty off-roader. It's a genuine double-threat. At this stage in the game do we have the right to be surprised that a Porsche is fun to drive? Naw, probably not. Now, if the fine folks at Zuffenhausen could just do something about the meager driving range.Looks good! More details?2021 Porsche Taycan 4 Cross Turismo BASE PRICE $92,250 PRICE AS TESTED $109,980 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door wagon MOTOR TYPE Permanent-magnet electric POWER (SAE NET) 469 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 368 lb-ft TRANSMISSION 2-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 5,134 lb (49/51%) WHEELBASE 114.3 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 195.8 x 77.4 x 55.5 in 0-60 MPH 4.5 sec QUARTER MILE 12.7 sec @ 115.9 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 109 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.89 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.0 sec @ 0.76 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 75/81/77 mpg-e ON SALE Now Show All
Does the world need a Cadillac Escalade V, a high-performance version of the iconic full-size SUV? That question is moot, because the company—in a blink-and-you'll-miss-it deleted tweet (that we screenshot, see below) paired to a press release saying something huge is coming soon—has left very little to the imagination about what this exciting Cadillac is. What the Escalade V can do, and how much power it'll pack, however … those questions have our imagination fired up.The Escalade V has been rumored and spied in prototype guise, but always shrouded in some degree of mystery. Would it be a true V or something more like the regular, non-Blackwing V cars (née V-Sport)? Would it be track-capable, as Cadillac claims V-series cars should be, or merely a high-horsepower variant with sporty styling?Given the wonderful absurdity of the latest ultimate Cadillac, the CT5-V Blackwing, we presume Cadillac will take no half-measures with the Escalade. That means the top-dog Escalade engine right now, the 6.2-liter V-8 making 420 hp, would be transplanted for a supercharged LT4. In the CT5-V Blackwing, it makes 668 hp and 659 lb-ft of torque, numbers that may be altered in order to provide sufficient lower-end motivation to a massive SUV like the Escalade. That is to say, it might be slightly detuned, but perhaps torquier.Whatever's under the hood, it's almost certainly a V-8, judging by the sound. And it'll shift quick, too—just listen to those gearchanges snap in the audio we embedded above.It won't be long until we know everything. Cadillac promises all will be revealed tomorrow, January 21. Until then, enjoy what Cadillac calls "the roar of luxury" and ponder whether 2022 will be the year you plunk down some coin on the ultimate Escalade.
honda hr-v Full OverviewProsHigh-quality interiorSpacious cabin for a small SUVStandard active safety tech ConsSlow, even for an entry-level SUVSmall 7.0-inch touchscreen on two of three trimsLess efficient than beforeTime for some crazy talk: The redesigned 2023 Honda HR-V might soon be the company's only SUV with an MSRP comfortably less than $30,000. That's not big news for car enthusiasts, but buyers not aware of the new 2023 Honda CR-V's upmarket move are in for a surprise. Suddenly, price-conscious CR-V intenders will be kicking tires on the more affordable HR-V, which takes on a more important role in Honda's SUV lineup. Those buyers will find in the 2023 Honda HR-V a refined ride with influences from the excellent Civic as well as from the outgoing HR-V—the latter not quite in the way we'd like.0-60-MPH Acceleration Versus Its RivalsAt MotorTrend, we track-test cars—even small SUVs like the 2023 Honda HR-V—so we can establish how each vehicle's performance compares to the competition. And in this Honda's case, it's not a great story.Every new HR-V is powered by a 158-hp naturally aspirated 2.0-liter I-4 good for 138 lb-ft of torque. Those numbers match the latest Civic, which uses the same engine. As you'd expect, the engine sweats less with the front-wheel-drive Civic sedan, which is hundreds of pounds lighter than our 2023 HR-V EX-L test SUV with more features and all-wheel drive.OK, so let's compare the new HR-V's 9.8-second 0-60-mph time to vehicles its own size. A 2022 Toyota Corolla Cross XLE AWD is nearly a half-second quicker (9.3 seconds), while a Subaru Crosstrek with a 2.5-liter engine is a startling 2.0 seconds quicker. As if that isn't enough, the AWD Subaru is also more efficient. Even against the last-gen HR-V, the new model comes up short; a 2019 HR-V Sport AWD we tested reached 60 mph in 9.6 seconds.Behind the wheel, the HR-V feels slow, but you can still execute highway passes as long as you plan them out a bit. That type of compromise used to be a given in this segment, but that's no longer the case. The Kia Seltos, Subaru Crosstrek, and a couple other competitors won't feel quite as slow as the HR-V. It's not the end of the world, and it won't be the top priority for most buyers, but it's worth noting. This engine doesn't show much power until it revs past 4,000 rpm.Braking and HandlingThe 2023 Honda HR-V doesn't gain competitive ground in 60-0-mph panic-braking, either. Or, rather, it covers more ground than its competitors. A distance of 125 feet is fine for a small SUV like this one, but so is 120 feet (the Corolla Cross), 114-124 feet (two Crosstreks we've tested), or 114 feet (a 2019 HR-V). Clearly, this Honda isn't a numbers car, but at the test track we found brake-pedal feel to be fine for a daily driver. The brakes also remained trustworthy and consistent across our figure-eight testing, being both effective and predictable.On the figure-eight course—a MotorTrend evaluation that assesses acceleration, handling, braking, and the transitions in between—the 2023 HR-V finished in 28.5 seconds at 0.56 g (average), placing it behind the most recent Subaru Crosstreks, and the Toyota Corolla Cross and Kia Seltos Turbos we tested. The steering felt a little heavy but was precise. The engine displayed merely adequate power, and made lots of noise.The new HR-V's story improves away from the track. Its continuously variable transmission feels well-tuned around town and on the highway, delivering smoother performance than any conventional or dual-clutch automatic ever could. The suspension is well-damped for a small and inexpensive SUV, too. In other words, put up with the mild acceleration and there's a payoff in the general feeling of solidity you don't get with all of the HR-V's rivals.Ups and DownsHonda backs up that feeling with an interior sprinkled with surprising and delightful touches. There's soft material on the side of the center console (perfect for resting your leg against during a long red light), and you get the honeycomb dash-trim design we've seen on the Civic and CR-V. That real metal trim disguises air vents and separates two physical knobs on top to control the audio system (volume and tuning), as well as three knobs below for the HVAC system. A small open storage area can hold your keys, and the back seat is spacious for such a small SUV.You simply don't get these touches on every HR-V competitor. Where many of them make up ground is digital screen-space. The 2023 HR-V LX and Sport trims come standard with a 7.0-inch touchscreen—smaller than what you can get elsewhere; a larger 9.0-inch unit comes on the top EX-L trim. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across the line, but we'd welcome a bigger screen or one tilted a bit toward the driver on the lower two trims. By the way, we asked Honda whether it expects any feature omissions due to parts shortages affecting the industry, and the automaker said all HR-Vs should have "the full features and functions listed for each trim level." Great.The entry-level SUV segment is much larger than it was when the first-generation HR-V arrived, which helps put the Honda's pros and cons into perspective. With fuel economy and driving range, for example, it doesn't quite keep up with our chosen competitive set. An EPA-rated 26 city/32 highway mpg with FWD and 25/30 with AWD is not bad on its own, but it's inferior to the 2022 Toyota Corolla Cross—31/33 mpg with FWD and 29/32 with AWD—and the AWD-only Subaru Crosstrek. For the 2023 model year, the Subaru comes in at 28/33 mpg with its standard 2.0-liter engine and 27/34 with the 2.5-liter unit.The Subaru also holds a huge advantage compared to the Honda in combined city/highway driving range; you'll travel about 100 miles farther in either automatic-transmission Crosstrek than you will in the Honda.The TakeawayThe Honda HR-V remains a good choice in its second generation. But with its physical growth, the new 2023 model is slower and less efficient than a couple key competitors. The former isn't a huge deal for an entry-level SUV, but if you don't need to make that compromise, why should you? In the HR-V's case, it would be because of the trust some have in the Honda name and because the SUV drives well. The Civic-based platform means the 2023 Honda HR-V feels good on the road before you even consider its spacious interior. Standard Honda Sensing safety tech and good anticipated safety-test results should also provide buyers with confidence.Honda loyalists should also appreciate the new interior design and improved HVAC system, but cross-shoppers will want to consider what they really want from an inexpensive SUV. The Kia Seltos is spacious and much quicker, but it lacks a five-star overall safety rating from NHTSA. Subaru's popular Crosstrek offers standard AWD, better efficiency, and a good driving experience, but doesn't look like a traditional SUV.Especially in LX and Sport trims, the 2023 Honda HR-V represents the brand well enough in this crowded space. For the rare customer seeking a loaded HR-V EX-L, however, we suggest giving a closer look to the competition, and especially the new 2023 CR-V.Looks good! More details?2023 Honda HR-V AWD (EX-L) Specifications BASE PRICE $30,195 PRICE AS TESTED $30,590 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV ENGINE 2.0L port-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4 POWER (SAE NET) 158 hp @ 6,500 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 138 lb-ft @ 4,200 rpm TRANSMISSION Cont variable auto CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,271 lb (58/42%) WHEELBASE 104.5 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 179.8 x 72.4 x 63.4 in 0-60 MPH 9.8 sec QUARTER MILE 17.5 sec @ 83.0 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 125 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.80 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.5 sec @ 0.56 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 25/30/27 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 378 miles (est) ON SALE Now Show All
0 Comments