Clever ZF EasyTurn Suspension Concept Allows Incredibly Tight U-Turns

Time and again, the number one complaint we hear about EVs (besides non-existent mandates) is driving range. To some, even a Tesla Model S doesn't have enough range, even though versions of it now top 400 miles on a charge. Even the affordable Chevrolet Bolt gets 259 miles. What mileage would be enough for these naysayers? 500 miles? 600? How about 752 miles without needing a charge?Our Next Energy—stylized as ONE and based out of Novi, Michigan—has achieved just that using a battery the same size as the Tesla Model S P100's battery pack. Dubbed "Gemini," the battery pack employs ONE's own battery management and controls, and it was installed in an otherwise unmodified the Model S.The TripAccording to ONE, its upgraded Tesla Model S tester went on a road trip from its headquarters north up the "Mitten" of Michigan and back, traveling on highways and averaging about a speed of 55 mph. The semi-scientific trip hooked east over through Detroit using I-96 and then followed I-94 west to Ann Arbor before joining with State Route 52 to get back to I-95 and Lansing. Then the team took I-69 to stay on the west side before heading north on State Route 127 and merging with I-75 around Pere Cheney.https://youtu.be/fWj2YCdoc9AThey continued north until they crossed over the Mackinac Bridge to get on State Route 2 for a bit before turning around somewhere close to Brevort. This time, they merged back with I-75 and stayed with it, going through Gaylord, close to Bay City, through Saginaw and Flint before arriving back at their Novi headquarters. The entire trip was 752 miles without needing to stop to recharge the Gemini battery and a total discharge rate of C/10, or about a 20 kW rate. (The drivers, of course, needed and took breaks.) According to ONE, the battery hovered at around 32 degrees and required no active cooling for the entire (apparently cold-weather) drive.Dyno EvaluationThe eye-popping driving distance wasn't enough, however. After arriving back at ONE headquarters, the team put the Gemini-equipped Model S on a charger at a rate of 1C, or about a 200 kW charge rate. For now, that's all that has been tested and ONE has not tried a higher rate than that. Once at full capacity, the Model S was driven to a third party dyno facility, where it was put through a simulated 20 percent Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) and Highway Fuel Economy Test (HWFET) drive cycles and 80 percent driving at a constant 55 mph. While observing roughly the same Wh per mile consumption, the dyno test was able to achieve 882 miles of range—only a 17 percent difference over what they saw during their real world drive.No Exotic MaterialsThe Gemini isn't some wild idea battery using unobtainum minerals, nor is it some unusual chemistry. We asked Mujeeb Ijaz, president and CEO of ONE, what the battery was made of. "The production intent Gemini battery will be LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate, also known as LiFePo4) for the traction battery portion," he said, "and a new cell ONE is designing for the range extender without cobalt, nickel, and graphite." We also asked about the weight of the cells and how many they were able to fit in the Model S, however, Ijaz stated that the cells were still experimental, but, "We had a total of 203.7 kWh at a system level."The standard P100 pack is roughly 103.9 kWh, so they were able to double the capacity without needing a larger space and without much of a weight penalty, either, and that is the goal. "The ONE Gemini battery aims to eliminate range as a barrier to electric vehicle adoption by doubling the available energy on board in the same package space," said Ijaz. He and ONE feel that the current solution of adding more chargers just isn't entirely feasible, especially if you need to stop every 150 miles with smaller battery packs.Market ExpectancyWhile the ONE Gemini battery isn't quite ready for market now, it's not far off. Ijaz said that ONE will have a production sample ready by 2023 with production of their Gemini battery pack by 2026. An exact cost of the Gemini hasn't been released yet, either, but ONE expects it to initially cost the same as current nickel-cobalt based lithium batteries. If all of this can be accomplished and put into production, the Gemini solves another portion of the "EV problem" detractors scream about, as well: the mining of cobalt.We'll still need lithium, but new recycling techniques have proven to be able to extract that from current batteries with a reduction of wastewater and the energy needed for its extraction, eliminating or, at the very least, reducing the need to mine for new lithium deposits. ONE also said that it is "currently developing a proprietary range-extender cell, which deletes the graphite materials used in conventional anodes and contributing to a significant reduction in cost." It's also working on a new cathode material that "can be sourced at less than $0.46/lbs versus conventional batteries at around $10/lbs." Just more proof that owning an EV won't be as expensive or even as "environmentally unfriendly" as EV haters like to portray it.

Most people wouldn't associate the turbocharged, all-wheel-drive Subaru WRX with extraordinary fuel economy, though the four-door sedan caters to young buyers who care about fun driving dynamics as well as saving their money. That may soon change—albeit not because its fuel economy is extraordinarily good. The new 2022 Subaru WRX has just been rated by the EPA and its fuel economy numbers slide past mediocre and fall below those of the outgoing model, landing weirdly close those of a full-size, four-wheel-drive Ford F-150 pickup truck powered by the midrange 2.7-liter EcoBoost V-6 engine.Yep, you read that right. The WRX has been rated at 19/25/21 mpg on city/highway/combined with the CVT transmission, while Ford's much larger, heavier, and larger-engined truck delivers 19/24/21 mpg—just 1 mpg short of the Subaru on the highway. Even if you opt for the manual transmission (like you should), the Subie's EPA figures only improve to 19/26/22 mpg. There's no other way to put it—those numbers are pretty bad for a car of the WRX's size and power output.The 2022 WRX gets a new 2.4-liter turbo-four engine that makes 271 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque. That's just three extra ponies and no more torque than the old WRX's 2.0-liter boxer engine. That extra displacement means fuel economy drops by 1 mpg across the board (except for the automatic's combined rating) compared to the previous model, which itself was no model for efficiency.Looking at the Subaru's direct competition, the story stays pretty bleak. A Honda Civic Type R makes more power and carries EPA estimates of 22/28/25 mpg; the also more powerful Hyundai Elantra N sedan with the manual is rated for 22/31/25 mpg; and the (you guessed it, also more powerful) Volkswagen Golf R six-speed gets 20/28/23 mpg (it also has AWD like the Subaru, while the Honda and Hyundai are front-drive). While some of those are hatchbacks, they still play in the same sporty compact segment, and all three at least deliver something close to or above 30 mpg on the highway. If you can deal with a little less power and front-drive, the 200-hp 2022 Honda Civic Si delivers 27 mpg city, 37 mpg highway, and 31 mpg combined.Subaru said the EPA tested the WRX in Sport mode, its most performance-oriented set up as default, which obviously doesn't maximize fuel efficiency. While the WRX has never been a fuel efficient car, the fact the competition is much more efficient is uneasy.We are very pleased with the way the 2022 Subaru WRX drives, which again is largely the point of a car like this. It's fun, sticky, and practical. It has all the right ingredients to stand out in the sport compact world—except wallet-friendly fuel economy. Although the WRX's pricing hasn't been announced, we don't think it will deviate much from the outgoing model, which starts at $28,420, when it arrives at dealerships this spring.We do not believe that customers view the WRX as an economy car. The WRX is designed as a performance vehicle first and foremost and does sacrifice some economy as a result. The automatic WRX did improve over the previous generation, even though it is EPA tested in Sport mode, its most performance oriented set up as a default, which doesn't maximize economy.

EdisonFuture, a California-based startup, is looking to cash in on the e-pickup craze by launching an F-150-sized light-duty full-size electric truck of its own, powered by a range of battery and motor options that includes a 450-mile battery pack and a three-motor configuration good for a reported 700 combined horsepower. Should the legacy and better-established newcomers to this space be worried?What the Heck Is EdisonFuture?This subsidiary of SPI Energy used to be aligned with another spinoff called Phoenix Motorcars. That group made a business of retrofitting Ford medium-duty trucks to electric power.But don't let this fact—and the resemblance of its steel wheels to those of a Ford F-150 XL work truck—lead you to presume this is another modified Ford. EdisonFuture VP of product management Edmund Shen assures us the EF1-T pickup and its van counterpart, the EF1-V are both engineered from scratch by Livermore, California-based EdisonFuture.Ford F-150-Sized, Not F-150-BasedEdisonFuture sees the heart of the e-pickup market as the traditional half-ton size and capacity. So the EF1-T's dimensions and mission don't stray far from the perennial best-selling F-150 and its Lightning electric variant, though it's proportioned more like the forthcoming 2024 Chevrolet Silverado EV—that is, with a shorter "dash to axle" in front, a roomy four-door crew cab, and a 6.5- or 8-foot bed. (Exact body dimensions have yet to be released.)In person, the flat nose and primary headlamp details are more reminiscent of Chevy's electric pickup, while the continuation of the LED lights to form a C-clamp look resembles an F-series Super Duty. Remember, though—it's not a Ford!Three Drive Configurations, Multiple BatteriesEdisonFuture plans to cover the market much like Chevrolet and Hummer EV, with offerings ranging from rear-wheel-drive, single-motor to dual- and tri-motor all-wheel-drive setups. Likewise, there will be a choice of battery pack sizes available to suit various budgets and expectations. To date we only know that the single motor version will accelerate to 60 mph in 6.5 seconds. The two-motor version will produce about 600 hp and be good for 0-60 mph in 4.5 seconds. The three-motor version will produce 700 hp and drop the 60-mph time to 3.9 seconds. EF1-V van models will only offer rear or two-motor all-wheel drive, each of which is rated to hit 60 mph in 6.5 seconds.These will be permanent-magnet motors, and we're told one or more may be clutched, allowing them to idle when not needed during cruising. There's no word yet on battery sizes, but the base truck is said to be good for 300 miles, the two-motor one will go 380 miles, and the top model can cover 450 miles on a charge. A DC fast charge will bring the battery from 0 to 80 percent charge in 25 minutes.Aero Sleek, With an Optional Solar RoofThe "SPI" in the parent company's name stands for Solar Power Innovations, so it should come as no surprise that EdisonFuture will offer a solar roof option on both the truck and van leveraging SPI Energy's latest photovoltaic solar cells. Each will have a similar solar-collecting surface area, and in southern California sunshine we're told it should be capable of adding 15-25 miles of range on a sunny day.The pickup features a three-piece nesting fastback cover that shelters the cargo area, adds to the total solar-cell surface area, and greatly improves aerodynamic drag when fully closed. Rear visibility is provided by camera mirrors, as the cargo cover obscures rear visibility.Three-Seat Front Bench, Two- or Three-Row Van SeatingBoth models displayed at CES 2022—a high-spec pickup and low-spec van—featured a roomy three-seat bench in front. The EF1-V van on display was built for cargo-schlepping fleet duty, showing the lowest of three roof heights. This one is more consumer focused and hence designed to fit comfortably in residential garages, but we're told the highest roof will allow a person to stand in the back (given the height of the floor, that'll be a tall van).Passenger-oriented versions with windows will feature a choice of two or three rows of seating. The van can be configured to carry 260 to 400 cubic feet of cargo and features sliding doors on either side with "barn doors" in the rear.Pickup Cab and Box FeaturesA 17.5-inch floating touchscreen controls all the infotainment features, the long dash surface provides extra solar cells, when so equipped, and the doors can be equipped with removable toolboxes. Side view mirror images are supplied via camera and displayed on dedicated screens located near the A-pillars. A full set of tie-down points is provided in the box, along with what looks like provision for a gooseneck or fifth-wheel trailer hitch.Towing CapacityThe EF1-T Standard model with a single rear motor is rated to tow 7,500 pounds, the EF1-TP premium two-motor variant can do 9,000, and the top EF1-TS Super tri-motor range topper is good for 11,000 pounds. For the EF1-V van, rear-drive models can tow 7,500 pounds, two-motor AWD long-range models are rated for 8,000 pounds.So Should the Others Worry?Competition is competition—unless or until it isn't. Funding could run out, investors may lose their nerve, the executive suite might get raided, or any of a million other potential pitfalls could darken EdisonFuture's, future. But the truck looks intriguing and the initial specs are promising, so we wish the new venture luck.