2024 Toyota Compact Cruiser: The Baby FJ EV You Didn’t Know You Wanted
WHAT IT IS: After initially doubling down on hydrogen and hybrids, Toyota appears to be pivoting slowly toward battery electric vehicles. One of the models that'll anchor this directional change is the new 2024 Toyota Compact Cruiser. A follow-up of sorts to the beloved FJ Cruiser (which left our market in 2014 but still soldiers on in the Middle East), the Compact Cruiser is a pint-sized electric off-roader built in the same vein as early '90s classics such as the Suzuki Samurai. This small electric off-roader sports four doors, plenty of ground clearance, tucked-away bumpers, all-terrain tires, and beefy-looking skidplates, all of which ought to make it a hoot off-road.
WHY IT MATTERS: Toyota is finally coming on strong in the EV space, promising 10 new "lines" of EVs by 2025, and the Compact Cruiser will be part of that salvo. While models like the 2023 Toyota bZ4X cover Toyota's more conservative audience, the Compact Cruiser, previewed here with images of the Toyota Compact Cruiser Concept from earlier this year, aims to satisfy legions of Toyota's hardcore off-road enthusiasts by offering more traditional Land Cruiser styling cues in an efficient, modern package.
PLATFORM AND POWERTRAIN: We don't know a ton about what's underneath the Compact Cruiser's sheetmetal, but we think it's a safe assumption we'll find Toyota's new e-TNGA platform, also found underpinning the bZ4x and Subaru Solterra. We expect the Compact Cruiser to offer dual-motor all-wheel drive and somewhere in the realm of 250 hp or so. If that's the case, don't expect it to be a range or charging champ—the more aerodynamic all-wheel-drive bZ4X nets 222 miles of range in its least efficient form and is among the slowest-charging EVs on the market.
ESTIMATED PRICE: $45,000EXPECTED ON-SALE DATE: Fall 2023
You may also like
The third-generation Ford Everest has made its global debut. If you've never heard of this three-row SUV—and you are scratching your head trying to figure out what it is—that's because it has never been offered in the United States, and it never will be. The Everest is sold in places like Australia, South Africa, the Philippines, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. Lament as you may from the highest mountaintops, but we won't be getting this mighty handsome, muscularly modern seven-seater. Add it to the list of forbidden fruit, alongside the Toyota Land Cruiser—the key difference being that the Land Cruiser was offered here, until recently.The third-generation 2023 Ford Everest is basically a global-market midsize 2023 Ranger pickup clad in SUV skin. Ever wonder what an SUV Ranger would look like? Look at the Everest. Ranger in the front, with a closed-in body (not bed) in the back. Recall that the Ranger's redesign for 2023 gives it a totally different look than the current Ranger, and the Everest adopts these same blocky new design cues. In addition to sharing the upgraded Ford T-6 platform, the Fords share a lot when it comes to the front fascia, including the C-clamp headlights and grille design.The next-gen Ford Everest will be offered with a trio of turbodiesel engines or a gasoline-fed 2.3-liter EcoBoost I-4, with availability depending on the market. The diesel engines include the 3.0-liter Power Stroke V-6 (a variant of what was offered in the F-150), a single-turbo 2.0-liter I-4, and a bi-turbo 2.0-liter I-4. These engines will be mated to six- or ten-speed automatic transmissions. Max towing is an impressive 7,716 pounds. At launch, it'll be available in Sport, Titanium+, and Platinum trims.Ford likens the improved interior of the Ford Everest to a "sanctuary," a quiet place where occupants from all rows can talk to each other without yelling. If that's what the new Ranger is like inside, great, because this Everest seems to share much with that pickup's interior. Like the Ranger, the Everest gets a portrait-oriented 10.1- or 12.0-inch vertical center stack touchscreen equipped with SYNC 4A. This screen displays a 360-degree camera view with a split-view display, making parking or negotiating tight spaces easier. Behind the steering wheel resides an 8.0- or 12.4-inch digital instrument panel, replacing analogue clusters.When it comes to off-road capability, the Everest is exploration ready. Its wider track, longer wheelbase, and tweaks to the damper settings help keep the SUV planted. Although some markets will have an available two-wheel drive offering, the Everest will mostly get one of two four-wheel drive systems (part-time and permanent). The Everest can ford through over 2.5 feet of water, just a few inches less than the Bronco. It has underbody protection, selectable off-road drive modes, a rear locking differential, two front tow hooks, engine bay space for a second battery, and upfitter accessory switches. There's an off-road screen display that shows pertinent vehicle information, a front camera view, predictive overlay guidelines, and more. Owners trying to set up camp in the dark can control the new exterior zone lighting system via the FordPass App.Is it selfish to lust after unobtainable factory vehicles like the Ford Everest and wish their presence in our stateside lineup? No. It would be awesome to have here. So why don't we get the Ford Everest? Because we get the Ford Bronco, which may be considered too similar and (probably) more popular. The Bronco and Everest would be in the same midsize SUV category, creating too much overlap. The Bronco is basically our Ranger-based SUV, meaning the Everest would be...another Ranger-based SUV. However, the Bronco is a beast of its own and is so fundamentally different than the Ranger—different suspension, different body—that one could argue there is room for the Everest, an actual Ranger-looking Ranger-based SUV.Going a step further, there would be utmost demand for an Everest Raptor in the U.S. After all, there is a Ranger Raptor that's already paved the way, and there's a Bronco Raptor. We're happy for the parts of the world that will get the the new SUV, but the real mountaintop high would be news of an Everest to call our own.
rivian r1s Full Overview Rivian R1T vs. R1S: What Are the Differences?Physically: Towing Capacity: Storage Capacity: Off-Road: Efficiency/Charging: How Does the R1S Rank as an SUV?What's the R1S Like Off-Road?How Does the R1S Drive On-Road?New Sand ModeHow About Adventuring?How Much Is a Rivian R1S?Is the Shorter R1S Sweeter than the R1T?Looks good! More details?2022 Rivian R1S Specifications BASE PRICE LAYOUT MOTORS TRANSMISSIONS CURB WEIGHT WHEELBASE L x W x H 0-60 MPH EPA FUEL ECON, CITY/HWY/COMB EPA RANGE (COMB) ON SALE Show All
mercedes-benz sl-class Full OverviewThe AMG gang in Affalterbach desperately wants you to know a few things about the 2022 Mercedes-AMG SL-Class. One, they designed it. From scratch and with little help from the Benz mothership. Two, it barely shares a screw or rivet with the AMG GT Roadster they also designed. Three, despite the new SL having grown a pair of vestigial back seats and adding a few inches in length, it promises to be the sportiest SL roadster since the racing-derived 300SL from 1957. And four, thanks to miracles of modern science, this new R232 SL also promises to deliver comfort on par with—if not exceeding—that of its Mercedes-developed R231 predecessor.Three months of engineering roundtable Zoom calls and even a low-speed ridealong event have sufficiently satisfied us on the first two points; it's the last two that we've been itching to verify. At long last we had the opportunity to flog both the SL55 and SL63 variants on a variety of highways and twisting roads. So, has AMG managed to channel the speed-record-setting, Mille Miglia-winning verve of the original W196 while making the car even more cosseting and comfy than the outgoing roadsters?Mercedes-AMG SL Performance in a Straight LineThe 2022 Mercedes-AMG SL63 will undoubtedly go down in our record books as the quickest SL we've tested. Mercedes claims this 577-hp, 590-lb-ft beast will dash from 0 to 60 mph in just 3.5 seconds, thanks in large part to newly standard all-wheel-drive traction that guarantees none of those ponies or pound-feet gets squandered generating tire smoke or brake heat from traction-control intervention. Converting those estimates to account for MotorTrend launch-control test conditions and a 1-foot rollout will probably boil that number down to something much closer to 3.0 seconds flat. (The last two SL models we tested each beat Mercedes' conservative estimates by exactly half a second.) The SL55, running the exact same engine but with smaller turbos and slightly less aggressive tuning produces "just" 469 horsepower and 517 lb-ft. The AMG team reckons it'll give up three-tenths to the SL63.For some perspective, that performance should rank the SL models somewhere about even with the Porsche 911 Carrera 4S and GTS cabriolets, which is to say, ahead of the BMW M850i xDrive cab (3.9 seconds to 60 mph) and way out in front Lexus LC500 (4.7 seconds) in the bucks-up 2+2 cabrio set.Trust us, if you never drive an SL63, that SL55 will seem like it has more than enough power. However, we might counsel those prepared to settle for the SL55 to consider opting for its AMG Dynamic Plus package, which brings with it a Race mode. We don't typically prefer Race modes because they usually disable all the stability controls, increasing amateurs' risk considerably. This one does not.What it mostly does, in addition to heightening all the car's responses, is switch to a perfectly linear throttle response map. There's more gain earlier in the pedal travel in the Sport and Sport+ modes, which may make the car seem more eager and powerful, but at some cost to the predictability serious drivers prefer. The computer programming in Sport+ and Race modes devotes a bit of extra fuel to generating delightful pops and snorts on overrun. That feature is fun, but this mode also tends to deliver some harsher downshifts when slowing, which can feel like grabbing brakes (this never happened in Comfort mode).We only got the SL63 up to triple-digit speeds briefly, but with the optional AMG Aerodynamics package, an air dam in front of the engine lowers 1.6 inches at speeds above 50 mph to help induce a venturi effect that helps suck the car down to the ground and reduce front-axle lift.SL-Class Handling BehaviorThese are heavy cars, pushing two-and-a-quarter tons. But AMG Active Ride Control, which connects opposite corners of the car hydraulically to limit body roll (as on various McLaren cars and now Rivian trucks), truly makes them feel as agile as cars weighing a half-ton less. This is another feature that's standard on the SL63, and available to help make your SL55 cost almost as much as a 63.Clicking the steering-wheel-mounted drive mode selector clockwise relaxes the stability nannies somewhat, making the cars progressively more neutral in their handling demeanor, but there's no "drift mode," no option to bar torque from reaching the front axle. (That's right—unlike the AMG GT family, the SLs are all-wheel drive.) And hence, even an aggressive drive up Mount Palomar on a cool morning with slightly dewy road surface, we never once sensed Race mode allowing the tail to run wide. More than a little credit here is due the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S tires—265/40 front, 295/35 rear on the standard 20-inch rims, or 275/35 front and 305/30 on the optional 21s we mostly ran.The carbon-composite brakes deserve honorable mention for being equally adept at shedding heroic speeds upon approach to a tightening-radius corner—corner after corner—as they are at executing a limousine stop in town. Both models share this standard six-piston front, single-piston rear brake system.Steering feel changes as you switch modes, and we generally found the comfort mode to be a bit too light. The other modes don't heighten the driver's feel for the road, per se, but the firmer helm feels better. We were blissfully unaware of the four-wheel steering (standard on both models) doing its thing, except when executing exceptionally tight U-turns.The California roads between Newport Beach and Palm Springs are relatively smooth, but we aimed for the bumpiest patches we could find and were impressed by the suspension compliance afforded in Comfort mode. The Sport and Race modes firm things up noticeably enough that we took the time to program the Individual mode with everything set to its raciest option and the suspension set to Comfort. This was our Goldilocks "just right" setting, but we also appreciated that individual characteristics (steering, ride, exhaust noise, etc.) can be easily adjusted on the fly using the round selector and twin toggle switches at the lower left side of the wheel, just opposite the main mode-selector switch. The super-rigid multi-material structure never seemed to twist or jiggle in response to bumps.What's the Mercedes-AMG SL-Class Like to Live With?Mostly wonderful. The cabin seems as quiet with the soft top up as the previous model did with its folding hard top raised. The Z-fold fabric roof lowers in 15 seconds at the touch of a button, and a switch allows all four windows to be lowered simultaneously. Happily, the sun visors swivel out, unlike on some convertibles. Raise the windows and pull up the mesh-screen wind blocker that covers the rear "seat" to keep the cabin remarkably calm and quiet even at highway speeds. In cooler weather, switch on the Airscarf neck-warmer to extend the top-down season (the cockpit isn't long enough to need the E-Class convertible's Air Cap windshield header air-management screen).The center info screen adjusts between 12 and 32 degrees to prevent sun from reflecting directly into the driver's eyes, though the buttons for adjusting this (and for raising and lowering the top) can be hard to see when that glare prompts you to fix the screen. We're also not completely sold on a lot of the capacitive switchgear in use here. The mirror switch, for example, didn't seem to respond as expected. We have yet to experience capacitive switches we love.As with all new Mercedes products, the all-digital instrument cluster can be set to display any of several different themes and tons of information, the most pertinent of which is redundantly shown on the head-up display (standard on 63, optional on 55). Track Pace screens will help folks monitor and improve their performance on their car country club track, and the additional stowage space behind the front seats and in the trunk should make the new SL much more useful as a daily driver.We reckon the new car is comfortable enough to retain the SL faithful and sporty enough to pull some customers out of 911s, the BMW 8 Series, and Lexus LCs. Of those, the BMW's nearly 5 inches of added wheelbase gives it a slightly more usable rear seat (the SL's is only rated for passengers shorter than 5 feet tall). A lighter Porsche will always feel nimbler, and the Lexus design may turn more heads, but this Mercedes-AMG enjoys nearly seven decades of heritage, and this R232 pays legitimate homage to its very best SL progenitors.When and How Much?The 2022 Mercedes-AMG SL-Class will go on sale in the second quarter of 2022. Mercedes isn't talking pricing just yet, but it seems a safe bet to assume that since the new 2+2-seat SL is effectively replacing both the four-seat S-Class cabriolet and two-seat R231 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class, pricing should represent an average of these models. Let's figure $132K for the SL55 and $175K for the SL63. That prices the new SL right in the thick of the 2+2-passenger convertible crowd.Looks good! More details?2022 Mercedes-AMG SL-Class Specifications BASE PRICE $132,000-$175,000 (est) LAYOUT Front-engine, AWD, 2+2-pass, 2-door convertible ENGINE 4.0L/469-577-hp/516-590-lb-ft twin-turbo direct-injected DOHC 32-valve V-8 TRANSMISSION 9-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 4,300-4,400 lb (est) WHEELBASE 106.3 in L x W x H 185.2 x 75.4 x 53.5 in 0-60 MPH 3.5-3.8 sec (mfr est) EPA FUEL ECON 16/21/18 mpg (est) EPA RANGE (COMB) 350 miles (est) ON SALE 2nd Quarter 2022 Show All
0 Comments