2023 Genesis G90 First Drive: Benchmarks, Consider Yourself Marked

ram 2500 Full OverviewThere's trail running, and then there's overlanding. The former portends day trips or weekend jaunts; possibly longer trips with primitive tent camping. The latter conjures extended off-grid adventuring where you may need to be self-sufficient for days weat a time while exploring the wilderness on logging trails, forest-service roads, and the like. American Expedition Vehicles seeks to cover the trail-runners with its Jeep Wrangler/Gladiator and Chevy Colorado offerings while offering overlanders the Ram Heavy Duty pickup-based Prospector and Prospector XL.What Is AEV?Founder Dave Harriton got his start stretching his dad's old TJ Wrangler in Montana, did a few more for some friends, then started American Expedition Vehicles. When the company's builds earned design kudos from Chrysler, it found Detroit-area partners to help step up its engineering game. Before long it was cranking out hits like the Jeep Hemi V-8 conversions that predated the Wrangler 392, as well as the Brute and Brute Double Cab Wrangler pickups that presaged the Gladiator. The AEV-designed, GM-manufactured Chevy Colorado ZR2 Bison Edition is a factory-orderable $5,750 option package that transforms the desert-runner ZR2 into more of a technical rock crawler. In addition to supplying parts for these GM builds, AEV upfits roughly 800 vehicles per year in its Wixom, Michigan, facility, evenly split between Jeeps (Wrangler and Gladiator) and Ram Heavy Duty pickups (2500 and 3500).What Is the AEV Prospector XL?AEV offers two packages applicable to either the Ram 2500 or 3500: Prospector and Prospector XL. Both get toughened AEV bumpers, a 3.0-inch suspension lift, AEV wheels, plus interior and exterior badging and graphics. Tires are the main difference between the two packages. Base Prospectors get 37-inch tires that fit under stock fenders with Mopar flares. XLs get 40-inch tires that require the fender and rear quarter openings to be expanded by about 3.0 inches (XL is 40 in roman numerals). Choose the XL if you're looking for the ultimate rock-climber/mud-bogger; go for the entry Prospector on a 3500 for max payload capacity when fitting heavy overlanding gear like an in-bed camper. That's because AEV de-rates the rear gross-axle-weight rating from 7,000 to 6,390 pounds for the 40-inch tires, but not for the 37s (our 2500's factory RGAWR of 6,000 is unchanged with either tire). XL versions comprise the majority of AEV's Ram business, with roughly a 60/40 split between 2500/3500. They're almost all Cummins diesel-powered except for Power Wagon upfits (some folks just gotta have those diff lockers). The base Prospector package costs $15,987; the Prospector XL costs $20,999.Chassis ModificationsAt the heart of this upfit is AEV's 3.0-inch DualSport suspension, with the "dual" referring to its goal of improving technical off-road prowess with no penalty to the original ride and handling. AEV accomplishes this trick by maintaining the stock springs and the original suspension geometry. To do this, it relocates the various mounting points for the suspension hardware. The front axle, for example, is articulated down and forward, increasing the wheelbase by 1.6 inches. This saves AEV having to custom make longer versions of the 40-some different Ram springs tailored to every different weight class. AEV also fits a hydraulic-assist steering upgrade to help swivel the giant tires. Our XL was upgraded further with optional AEV/Bilstein 8100 external-reservoir shocks ($2,140) designed to keep their cool and resist the fade that comes from boiling the shock fluid in prolonged hard running in a hot desert. And it all rides on a set of AEV 10- x 17-inch black Katla 10 wheels wrapped in 40 x 13 50R17 Cooper Discoverer STT Pro tires.Overlanding GearPerhaps the most vital piece of overlanding kit for self-preservation is a sturdy winch. AEV front bumpers are all designed to accept one, but they cost extra. Our AEV Prospector XL featured a Warn 16.5ti with synthetic rope that rang in at $2,711. Nighttime adventuring requires lighting, so we also had $2,801 worth of auxiliary LED lamps that mount to the $1,700 bumper brush guard, plus a set of rear-bumper LED lights ($594). The bed is fitted with a matching spare wheel and tire on a vertical mount ($1,736) that obscures most of the rear-window visibility and blocks the location where a rearview camera would go. We'd opt for the lay-flat spare option (there's no slinging any spare tire larger than stock underneath). A bed rack with crossbars provides a mounting point for a rooftop tent, axes, Jerry cans, etc. And finally, to fortify the underbody we added hardened differential covers front and rear ($381.50 and $409.50) and a breathable intercooler skidplate ($531.50). This all brings the estimated curb weight to within 1,000 pounds of the truck's gross rating, so some judicious expedition packing is called for (or an upgrade to the 3500). Along with some cosmetic upgrades, total AEV optional equipment came to $19,150.50, bringing the all-in price of our well-equipped Laramie to $119,194.50.How Does the Prospector XL Drive?Having recently spent a year in a stock Ram 2500 Laramie Cummins, the most indelible initial impression is how loud the tires are, the sound and vibration even coming up through the steering wheel in turns. This is followed closely by how high the AEV Prospector XL sits. You'll look down on lifted Super Dutys and across at semi drivers. Getting comfortable with the size takes a few miles; sitting so high off the road dulls your sense of speed. So if your natural pace is 10 mph beyond the speed limit, you may frequently find yourself 15 or 20 over. The taller, heavier tires and added curb weight blunt the acceleration, but it's still plenty strong. The added inertia is also noticeable in braking, where stops take more pedal effort than in our long-term Ram 2500. But sure enough, the ride feels almost identical—maybe smoother, thanks to the additional mass (AEV estimates ours weighs just shy of 4.5 tons). That is, until one of these jumbo donuts hits a single-wheel bump and sends a shudder through the steering and chassis. These mud tires don't grip paved corners like the stock tires, but then the stockers can't claw through mud bogs.Off-Roading the Prospector XLHaving mostly wheeled crossovers and stock Jeeps at our local ORV park, we're used to the toughest obstacles being off limits. Not for this rig! Climb any rock or plunge through any bog by simply relying on the tire-tread lugs and the Cummins torque and inertia to power through. Tough dusty ruts, sandy moguls—it doesn't matter. The Prospector XL tackled every path or obstacle with ease, or at least every path physically wide enough to accommodate it. And with the long wheelbase and gigantic turning circle, you must be cognizant of your escape route should a path prove too narrow. We were also impressed by how sturdy everything felt. The AEV Prospector XL took the harshest impacts in stride, and with no expensive sounding noises.How Do I Get an AEV Prospector XL?If you have a low-mileage current-generation Ram (or Jeep) that's never been wrecked, AEV can upfit it for you, but most builds are ordered new through AEV's online configurator and delivered through one of its 100 dealers. The dealer facilitates getting the stock truck built, shipped to AEV for the upfit, then shipped to the dealer. Upfitting typically takes about a week barring supply issues, and tires have lately been in particularly short supply. Buyers can specify unique paint—like the zinc-chromate green on AEVs four 2019 SEMA builds—but this stretches the build to 30 days and adds $13,687.Is the AEV Prospector XL Worth It?That $119,000 price includes a lot of showy bits we could do without. But the engineering is so stout we felt compelled to gin up an ideal build, starting with a strategically optioned 2500 Tradesman Cummins with Auto Level Rear Air Suspension, the Convenience Group, Uconnect 5 nav, Bed Utility Group, and the aux switches for $64,745. Then we spec'd a Prospector with 37s, the Mopar retractable steps ($2,420—they were included in our Laramie, and you need 'em!), AEV's leather and Cordura seat upgrade ($2,205), the smaller light bar ($1,024) plus the winch, intercooler skidplate, diff covers, and a few doodads for a total upfit cost of $29,196. We'd be out the door for $93,941 with the same suspension in a slightly more livable, goes nearly anywhere package with a bit more payload capacity, a quieter ride, and a slightly lower climb.Looks good! More details?2022 AEV Prospector XL Ram 2500 Laramie Cummins Turbodiesel Specifications BASE PRICE $91,679 LAYOUT Front-engine, 4WD, 5-pass, 4-door truck ENGINE 6.7L/370-hp/850-lb-ft turbo-diesel direct-injected OHV 24-valve I-6 TRANSMISSION 6-speed auto CURB WEIGHT 9,000 lb (mfr) WHEELBASE 150.6 in L x W x H 238.8 x 89.5 x 83.7 in 0-60 MPH 8.0 sec (MT est) EPA FUEL ECON Not rated ON SALE Now Show All

You laughed at us when we first imagined the Apple Car in 2016. "It's too podlike and not exciting enough to wear the Apple moniker," you complained.Look who's laughing now. The pod, for better or worse, is the future of automotive design. Just peek at the likes of the Canoo Lifestyle Vehicle or the Cruise Origin or the Amazon-backed Zoox, each of which essentially is a stylized passenger cell.The reasoning is simple: simplification. With compact electric motors instead of bulky internal combustion engines and no need for steering columns or gas and brake pedals, our projected autonomous future strips down the automobile to its most basic elements, a concept Apple has for decades applied to everything from cell phones to wristwatches.That said, pods need not look boring, which is why we went back to the drawing board and reimagined the Apple Car. Or should we say, cars.The Apple TouchIt may pain Apple fans to read this, but the company rarely creates truly original pieces of hardware. Its products instead tend to improve on existing concepts. For instance, Apple's earliest personal computers—the more rudimentary Apple I of 1976 and the more familiar-looking Apple II of 1977—were beaten to market by the likes of the Altair 8800 in 1975. Likewise, the first MP3 players and smartphones, the MPman F10 of 1998 and the IBM Simon Personal Communicator of 1994, went on sale years before Apple revealed the iPod (2001) and iPhone (2007).This is no knock against Apple's hardware, which with exceptions such as the Apple III is generally competent in its own right, but rather a commendation on the software environment the company created over the years. Credit the late Steve Jobs' decision to forgo licensing Apple's operating system to other hardware manufacturers, a strategy the company tried briefly in the mid-1990s during the reign of then-CEO Michael Spindler. (Jobs ended this process upon his return to Apple.)By maintaining integration between Apple's software and hardware, the company could "take responsibility for the user experience from end to end," as Walter Isaacson wrote in his 2011 book, Steve Jobs. Following Jobs' death in October 2011, Apple's current CEO, Tim Cook, regularly espouses the same beliefs."We love to integrate hardware, software, and services and find the intersection points of those because we think that's where the magic occurs … and we love to own the primary technology that's around that," Cook told Kara Swisher of The New York Times in response to a question regarding Apple's automotive ambitions.Recent Apple hires provide evidence the company continues to toy with the idea of fully developing its own car. The man said to be heading the program? Kevin Lynch, the executive responsible for turning the Apple Watch into one of the Cupertino, California, tech giant's core products. Lynch is much more a software developer than an automotive or autonomy engineer, but worry not.Over the past few years, Apple successfully recruited automotive industry talent such as Ulrich Kranz, former CEO of Canoo and former head of BMW's i division; Michael Schwekutsch, who previously served as Tesla's vice president of engineering; and Anton Uselmann, an engineer whose résumé includes stints at Mercedes-AMG and Porsche.Given Apple's nearly $2.9 trillion market cap (as of this writing), the company certainly has the means to develop and produce its own car. Nevertheless, developing and building an automobile is not the same as developing and building personal electronic devices such as computers, tablets, and smartphones. Or vacuums, as Dyson discovered when it attempted to mass produce its own electric vehicle.As company founder James Dyson revealed in his 2021 memoir, Invention: A Life, the company invested $700 million into its stillborn EV project, which it ultimately abandoned. Blame the various costs associated with the production and storage of a "relatively low-volume" vehicle Dyson intended to sell directly to consumers."[W]e would have [had] to sell the car at $210,000," Dyson wrote. "There are not many people who will buy a car at [that] price."The Apple Car(share) ProgramRumors persist that Apple plans to partner with an established automobile manufacturer to build its vehicle. Such a move may help Apple keep the per-unit costs reasonably low. How such a business relationship may affect Apple Car consumers is a different story.Although it's possible Apple decides to sell vehicles directly to the public, we hear it may ultimately pursue a car- or ride-share model, wherein Apple owns the vehicles and consumers pay to use them, à la Zipcar, with an autonomous twist. In this sense, then, Apple's model for its car program may more closely mirror Cruise's or Waymo's, wherein a user schedules one of Apple's autonomous electric vehicles to take them from Point A to Point B.We foresee riders being able to schedule recurring rides, too; just imagine an Apple Car showing up outside your door Monday-Friday to waft you off to work or shuttle the kids to school. If Apple goes this route, the company will likely—initially, at least—limit its vehicles' use to metropolitan areas where lower speeds and streets laid out in predictable grid patterns are the norms.Admittedly, we're working here with an assortment of crumbs we've gathered from sources and publicized leaks to come to this conclusion. Apple's car plans could take an entirely different route from what we're hypothesizing, or perhaps Cook and company will scrap the program altogether.Nonetheless, an autonomous car-sharing service seems the most sensible way for Apple to enter the automotive space. After all, there's a reason Alphabet created Waymo and why General Motors and Honda, not to mention others, invested in Cruise.Much like Apple's electronic devices, the company's potential crop of autonomous vehicles will likely rely on clean design, user-friendly ergonomics, and easy integration with Apple's various products to create a user experience distinct from those of competitors—and we think the company's CarPlay interface may play a key role.The Apple CarPlay PushToday, CarPlay largely serves to display and control Apple devices running certain iterations of the brand's mobile operating system, but tomorrow, CarPlay could effectively replace the native infotainment systems now used by automakers.Per a Bloomberg report, Apple is looking to take CarPlay to the next level as part of a project the company's working on, dubbed "IronHeart." If successful, IronHeart will reportedly give CarPlay access to control various vehicle settings, including the host car's climate, seat, and audio selections.Apple will likely struggle to convince automakers to let CarPlay control such features, but consumer demand for a more fluid experience between their personal vehicles and mobile devices could ultimately force carmakers to play ball. Little is known about the IronHeart project to those outside of Apple (and likely to many of those within Apple, as well). There's even a chance Apple has already scrapped IronHeart—assuming the project ever truly existed at all.Yet it makes sense for Apple to invest in a project such as IronHeart, if only to give drivers a more standardized user experience between the mobile devices they use and the cars they pilot. Cynics are sure to view IronHeart in a darker light as a way for Apple to collect pertinent information to use in the development of its own vehicle.This may be the case. Still, if our hunch is correct and Apple's car program takes on the form of a car-share service, then we think the company's intentions are far less nefarious. Rather, we wager Apple's goal for IronHeart is to turn CarPlay into a portable profile, allowing its autonomous cars to preemptively adjust comfort and convenience features to the individual preferences of a given passenger.The Apple Car ExperienceImagine the entirely possible future where, with few exceptions, private vehicles are banned from major metro areas such as San Francisco, New York City, and Chicago. Sure, you can take public transportation into the city, but you better hope your destination is located close to a train or bus stop.Alternatively, you can drive your personal car to an Apple Car pickup point located just outside the city. Once parked, the Apple Car you scheduled via your smartphone's app will whisk you away to your specific metropolitan destination with no driving required.An array of vehicle-mounted cameras and lidar sensors work with Apple's Maps app, which includes high-precision mapping of specific metropolitan areas, to help Apple's fleet of cars safely react to unforeseen obstacles, such as pedestrians and road debris. Additional peace of mind comes courtesy of the Apple Cars' vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication systems, which allow the autonomous cars to wirelessly "communicate" with one another and the surrounding infrastructure. Energy-dense battery packs afford many hours of continuous operation.Although some users will lease a private Apple Car, most will subscribe to the service that allows them to use the company's fleet of shared autonomous vehicles. Apple Car lessees and subscribers will largely consist of individuals who frequently enter city centers that ban private vehicles.Those unable to or uninterested in justifying the cost of an Apple Car lease or subscription, however, will be able to pay to ride in one of these self-driving EVs on a single-use basis, provided there's a fleet car available for such use. If none is, then single-use customers may decide to forgo the familiar interface of the Apple Car for a readily available autonomous vehicle from a competitor such as Cruise, Waymo, or Zoox.In this hypothetical future, we foresee Apple introducing its automotive worldview with two models of autonomous vehicles for its users to catch a ride in: a larger, boxy multipurpose vehicle, dubbed the ePod, capable of carrying multiple passengers and their associated goods, and a smaller, single-seat option, better known as the ePod Solo. Down the line, there would be a whole fleet of offerings, ranging from eight-passenger vans to open-top sports cars.No matter the model, Apple Car users will need only pair their CarPlay profile to the vehicle, which then automatically adjusts the likes of the display interface, climate control, seat settings, and more to the individual rider's personal preferences. To increase profits, Apple will offer the option to unlock certain features for a small fee. This includes access to the Apple Arcade collection of mobile games, exclusive programming from Apple TV+, and even in-car workouts and meditations through Apple Fitness+.Is the Apple Car Really Coming Soon?Apple's automotive doings remain a moving target, and much about what the company intends to produce in this space has changed since we first imagined the tech giant's four-wheeled machine more than a half-decade ago. That said, the rumor mill indicates the company continues to tinker away at developing a vehicle—there's even chatter Apple targets a launch as early as 2025. In other words, it's only a matter of time until Apple vindicates or disproves everything we think we know about its car program, from the vehicle's (or vehicles') potential design to the whole operation's potential business model.

Going on its fourth year of this third generation, the 2023 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter will lose its available V-6 diesel engine while gaining full-time all-wheel drive and retaining the versatility it's long been known for. While the U.S. won't see the updated van until "early next year (2023)," all of them, regardless of which engine is specified, will use a new 9G-Tronic nine-speed automatic transmission.No More Turbodiesel V-6Prior to its 2023 version, the Sprinter could be had with a 2.0-liter turbocharged I-4 gasoline engine, a 3.0-liter turbodiesel V-6, and a 2.0-liter turbodiesel I-4. The diesel V-6 has been dropped and a new turbodiesel I-4 is getting installed known as the OM654. This new I-4 turbodiesel will come in two power output ratings—168 hp and 208 hp—while providing "smoother acceleration, high torque values, decreased emissions and lower noise and vibration levels." The gasoline-burning 2.0-liter turbocharged I-4 remains the same as 2022.Two More GearsMultiplying those torque levels behind both gas and diesel engines is the 9G-Tronic nine-speed automatic transmission. When Mercedes compares it to the outgoing seven-speed 7G-Tronic, it claims the 9G offers quicker take-off and improved performance thanks to its shorter first-gear ratio and two more additional gears for a much greater gear ratio spread. The latter point seems rather obvious to point out but the former is important when you consider that the 2023 Sprinter now only offers four cylinder engines.AWD for 4WDThe final big change for 2023 is the move away from a selectable 4WD system to an automatic, full-time all-wheel drive setup, bringing the versatile van into the modern age of electronically controlled wheel torque distribution. Rather than having to select four-wheel drive (as before) via a part-time system like in rugged SUVs, the 2023 Sprinter equipped with four driven wheels will automatically detect wheel slip and apply up to a 50 percent torque split between the front and rear axles, like in most crossovers and cars. The selectable four-wheel-drive system of yore only allowed for up to a 35/65 split when it was in 4WD mode. While it loses a selectable 4WD, the AWD Sprinter will still retain the off-road prowess the 2022 model had in terms of its ground clearance (8.0 inches) in addition to its approach (26 degrees), breakover (23 degrees), and departure (25 degrees) angles.Same VersatilityThe other important factor of the Sprinter is its ease of being as capable inside as it is outside. This is especially true for its commercial users thanks to the Sprinter's streamlined packaging structure. With enough ingenuity and imagination, you can make the Mercedes van into anything from a perfect parcel delivery machine to a shuttle to ferry people across town to a rugged "van life"-styled overlander and everything in between. While no pricing has been announced yet, Mercedes does promise that the 2023 Sprinter will drop some time early in 2023.