2022 Mazda Cars: What’s New With the 3 and MX-5 Miata

A Definitive End to the Malaise Era Inside the 1986 Acura Integra: Like, Totally Tubular! The Engine of Tomorrow, TodayBack in the '80s, the Integra's 16-valve 1.6-liter engine really turned our heads. It's easy to chuckle at the oversized DOHC PROGRAMMED FUEL INJECTION decal on the Integra's flanks, but in 1986 this was exotic stuff. Detroit's four-cylinder engines were awful eight-valve lumps that were only just beginning to be tamed with throttle-body fuel injection, a cheap single-injector assembly bolted into the same spot as a carburetor. Even Honda, already known for the best four-bangers in the biz, still offered only single-cam 12-valve engines, all with carburetors (with fuel injection as a new-for-1986 option).Of course, MotorTrend was no stranger to two-cam multi-valve heads; we tested plenty of European supercars, but to see such exotica on a reasonably priced car was a novelty. Same for multi-port fuel injection, which in 1986 was only just making its first appearance on Chevrolet's Corvette and IROC-Z. To see such hardware put together with Japanese precision and refinement, though, was something new, even for us."The Integra's four-valve-per-cylinder 1.6-liter engine proved much more than anticipated," we wrote, "with a blend of flat-torque-curve power-on-demand, quick throttle response, and effective NVH (noise, vibration and harshness) damping unsurpassed in engines of its kind on the market today."In the muscle-car '60s—not too distant in 1985's rearview mirror—1-horsepower per cubic inch was the Holy Grail. The Integra drew a righteous 113 horsepower from a mere 97 cubic inches, this at a time when GM's 231-cid (3.8-liter) V-6 only delivered 110. We clocked the then-new 1986 Acura Integra to 60 in 8.9 seconds, just 1.8 seconds behind a 1985 Ford Mustang GT.The Engine of Yesterday, TodayToday we're driving this classic Integra amid fast-moving Los Angeles traffic, and it's a struggle. We're trying to keep up with KJ Jones from MT's Truck and Off-Road Group in his Banks-enhanced Chevy Colorado, and we need every last bit of the Integra's 99 lb-ft of torque. This example has 168,000 miles on the clock and feels appropriate for her age. But Jones knows where we're going and we don't, so museum piece or not, we've no choice but to flirt with the Integra's near-7,000-rpm redline. At least that's our excuse because we like pushing the Integra—and the Integra likes being pushed.With any luck, you are too young and/or fortunate to have driven a four-cylinder car in the early '80s. Trust us, they weren't great, with low and feeble torque peaks concentrated at low or mid revs. Few Americans had experienced anything like the Integra's engine, it's thin low-end torque gradually building and building before surging at 4,000 rpm into a crescendo of power delivered all the way to its exotically-high 6,700-rpm redline—and all the while accompanied by a wonderful sonorous snarl. Today's drivers might say, "So what? That's how every engine drives!" Sure, today they do—and we have the Integra's influence to thank for it.The Correct Tire Transforms the 1986 Acura IntegraBelieve it or not, in our original 1986 test report we complained about the Acura Integra's handling, fixing blame on its Michelin MXV tires which put low limits on the Integra's grip for both turning and braking. (Back in those days we had to modulate brake lock-up in panic stops; there was no ABS to do it for us.) "It was as if the chassis dynamics were tuned to a much more high-performance set of tires," we wrote, "only to be replaced at the last minute." We surmised that better rubber would make the Integra a handling gem.Thirty-five years later, our supposition is confirmed. Our classic Integra's 14-inch aluminum wheels are fitted with a modern set of Falken Azenis RT660s, and the car is masterful. Out on one of our favorite curvy roads, it simply refuses to relinquish its grip on the pavement. The suspension—struts and torsion bars up front, twist-beam in the back—keeps body motions under control, and despite a complete lack of electronic stability control, the Integra never does anything sudden or scary. The steering reminds us why people miss hydraulic assist; it feels alive and chatty with feedback. The effort to turn the tiller is light, and yet the power assist is dialed back enough that you almost forget it's there at all. If a brand-new car drove like this 35-year-old Acura, we'd have nothing to complain about.Lost in TimeAnd that, right there, is the conundrum we face in writing about this classic 1986 Acura Integra in modern times. Not long ago we drove another classic Honda, the foundational first-generation Accord, and there was no mistaking it was a disco-era relic. The timeline is a mind-bender: Only eight years separate that Accord from this Integra. Meanwhile, the time gap between the Integra and modern cars is more than four times as long. And yet it feels like 35 years separate the original Accord and this original Integra, which surely can't be more than a decade older than modern day cars, tape deck and gnarly upholstery notwithstanding.We understand why. In the wake of the Acura Integra's introduction, the 16-valve, dual-overhead-camshaft, multi-port-injected engine would become the industry standard, reigning right up until the recent adaptation of turbochargers, direct injection, and electrification. Detroit would give up its ribbon-style speedometers and one-finger-light power steering to better emulate the Integra. Thanks to Acura, upscale cars would soon be judged not by their size but by their performance, agility, and build quality.Indeed, Honda, Toyota, and the other Japanese automakers fundamentally changed what American automobile buyers wanted, and the 1986 Acura Integra was the car that pointed the way. And so, we can forgive this three-and-a-half-decade-old classic for feeling ordinary. After all, it defined what ordinary would become.

Lately, we've been crystal-balling a bit on what Honda has cooking up next, spurred on by the excellent new Civic and it's elegant, restrained, and yet dynamically excellent new iteration. We've speculated about the 2023 Accord, which we think will get a heavy redesign that take some notes out of Honda's Civic playbook. We've seen how Honda will play the split, stylistically and physically, between the U.S.-market HR-V and the Euro-only Vezel. And, most importantly, we have already seen what to expect from the 2023 CR-V thanks to a very convincing patent image leak.New DudsThe biggest changes, we expect, will grace the outside of the new 2023 CR-V—a styling overhaul similar to the one Honda applied to the compact Civic, which is mechanically quite similar to its predecessor but couldn't look more different outside and in. Based on our thoughts, the leaked patent application image (the grayscale photo below), spy photos of prototypes we've seen, and clues from existing products, we commissioned these illustrations to show you how we think Honda will redraft the CR-V.Whereas the smaller new HR-V looks a little puckish, we think the CR-V will forgo that SUV's active-lifestyle leanings for a more sophisticated look. That means slimmer headlights, an elegant grille, and lines that accentuate the extra length that spy shots hint is coming. While the current CR-V his handsome, it looks stubby and a little pinched up front when compared to our notion of where it's headed—in particular, the slim headlights and more conventional grille seem more contemporary than the current CR-V's "end of life facelift" visage.Out back, the look is a little more evolutionary, but the extra length makes the rear look a little smaller, a little more tucked in, and a little more contoured. A shapely D-pillar and a heavily sloped rear glass give it a bit of a fastback vibe, capturing some of the crossover coupe mojo that's so in vogue these days. A metallic finishing plate under the dark rear bumper adds a bit of zest.Inside, we imagine the new Civic's focus on simple, horizontal elements and interesting full-width dashboard mesh hiding the air vents will appear here. Expect an infotainment system just like the one found in the Civic, perched on top of the dash, a welcome addition as the current CR-V's screen is too small to be competitive. With that added length, an occasional-use third row may sprout in the back, giving it more ammunition to compete with the Volkswagen Tiguan and Kia Sorento. Under the HoodExpect more of the same here, with the 2023 CR-V adopting the previous models' powertrains, with the sort of moderate tweaks and enhancements the latest Civic received. That means the 1.5-liter turbocharged I-4 will return for study in most versions, and a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated I-4 should make a return in the hybrid version. It's possible a PHEV version will debut in the U.S.; a current-gen CR-V PHEV is already sold in China by Dongfeng Honda. If a PHEV version appears in our market with the new generation, expect something quite similar to the Chinese-market version's 2.0-liter powertrain and something in the neighborhood of 40-50 miles of EV-only range.Taking StockThe CR-V is near the top of a segment that is white hot right now, and has been hot for a long time. It's easy to assume that a longer, more versatile, and more handsome replacement vehicle will maintain Honda's position at the top of the heap. But the competition, particularly new models from Hyundai and Kia with bold styling and a broad range of powertrain options, makes the calculus a little harder.But let's put it another way: the CR-V has built up so much good will that it'd take a real stinker to put a dent in this SUV's appeal. We think, in this environment, the CR-V's biggest challenge will be whether there are going to be enough on dealers' lots to satisfy customer demand. It remains to be seen, though, if the additional length, potential third row, and extra heaping of content we assume will be slathered on drive the price up enough to hurt once the production shortages recede.

The Tesla Model S was a two-year-old car when Chinese auto execs Heng Xia and Tao He got together with tech billionaire Xiaopeng He in 2014 to found the electric vehicle manufacturer XPeng. Five years later, at the 2019 Shanghai Show, Guangzhou-based XPeng unveiled its homegrown Model S rival, the P7 EV sedan.The latest XPeng P7 is one of three EVs the automaker now has on sale in China, all built on the company's own platforms and featuring its own end-to-end software architecture. The P7 is already being marketed in Norway, and XPeng plans to launch the sedan in Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands in the second quarter of 2023.A fourth XPeng model, a midsize SUV called the G9 that will feature a fast-charging 800-volt electrical architecture and a Lidar-supported autonomous drive system, is due to go on sale in China this fall. The G9 is widely believed to be under consideration for launch in the U.S.Xpeng X7 Power, Range, and a Porsche Co-Developed Platform Move fast and break things—Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's motto is one Silicon Valley's tech bros love to invoke to explain why Tesla deserves to be worth more than any run-of-the-mill automaker like Volkswagen or Toyota or Hyundai. But Tesla needed 17 years to get four models into production and into showrooms. Eight-year-old XPeng is moving so fast it makes Tesla look like General Motors.The XPeng P7 is built on a bespoke EV platform, known internally as "Edward," that was co-developed with Porsche. It's a conventional skateboard design, with multi-link suspension front and rear and an 80 kWh battery pack between the axles. Behind the standard 19-inch alloy wheels, which are shod with 245/45 Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires, are Brembo brakes.The entry-level P7 RWD Long Range is powered by a single rear-mounted e-motor that develops 263 horsepower and 288 lb-ft of torque. Our tester, the P7 4WD High Performance, packs a total system output of 424 hp and 483 lb-ft, thanks to the addition of a 161-hp e-motor that drives the front wheels.The P7 is 5.6 inches shorter overall than the Model S but rolls on a wheelbase that's 1.6 inches longer. The XPeng is also slightly narrower and taller than the Tesla, and, unlike the Tesla, it's relatively light for an EV of its class—XPeng claims the single motor RWD Long Range weighs 4,380 pounds, while the dual motor 4WD High Performance is claimed to tip the scales at 4,623 pounds. That's almost 200 pounds less than a dual motor Model S.XPeng claims a range of up to 329 miles on the WLTP test cycle for the RWD Long Range, and a 0-60 mph acceleration time of less than 6.9 seconds. Claimed WLTP range for the 4WD High Performance is up to 292 miles, with a claimed 0-60 mph acceleration time of less than 4.5 seconds. (Note: EPA range is usually 20-30 percent lower on average than the WLTP quoted figure.) The P7's 80 kWh battery pack will accept up to 90 kilowatts on a DC fast charge, which allows it to go from five- to 80-percent charge in about 51 minutes, according to Xpeng.The P7's Overall Refinement ImpressesNeither version of the P7 threatens the Tesla Model S in terms of outright range or performance. But to airily dismiss this Chinese EV because of that is to miss the point. Entirely.It may not be a world-beater, but the XPeng P7 is one of the most impressive new cars we've driven this year. It has, of course, the punchy, silent acceleration you expect from a contemporary electric car, but what makes it stand out is how refined everything else about it feels, both at low speeds around town, and when cruising on the highway.Noise levels—wind, tire, and mechanical—are impressively low. The ride is good, though in truth the well-maintained roads of our test drive hardly exercised the suspension, other than over the occasional speed hump in the suburbs near XPeng's Dutch headquarters, which elicited some mild secondary body motions. Choppy surfaces induced occasional pattering from the tires, but impact harshness was well-suppressed.The steering is reasonably accurate and well-weighted, and the transitions between regenerative and mechanical braking are smooth. The P7 has just two regen modes —high and low. High regen delivers near-one-pedal driving capability, while low regen gives the car a slowing effect similar to lifting off the gas in a conventional internal combustion engine vehicle with an automatic transmission.P7 Price, Equipment, and Fit and FinishIn Norway, the XPeng P7 4WD High Performance costs less than two-thirds the price of a dual-motor Tesla Model S Long Range. In U.S. dollars, using the conversion rate current at the time of writing, that would make it a $53,000 car.You get a lot of EV for that money. Standard equipment includes a panoramic roof, heated front and rear seats, and the choice of black, beige, or red Nappa leather trim. The digital dash is a 10.25-inch screen, and the central touchscreen is a 15-inch unit. Standard driver assistance systems include adaptive cruise control, lane keep assist, forward collision warning, and autonomous emergency braking.It's easy to see the influence of the Model S in the XPeng P7's design. One area where the Chinese automaker has followed Tesla's lead a little too closely is the HVAC system, where all the functions—right down to setting the direction of the air vents— are controlled via the central touchscreen. As in Teslas, this requires taking your eyes off the road to go through a menu to do something that's easily done without looking or thinking in a HVAC system with physical buttons.The fit and finish throughout is superior to the Model S, though. Exterior panel gaps are more consistent and trim pieces better aligned, and the interior looks and feels plusher. But what makes the XPeng P7 perhaps more of a threat to the Tesla is not the hardware, but its software.It's All About the Software-Defined Vehicle"This is a software-defined car," says Piotr Chmielewski, XPeng's head of EV Charging in Europe, who points out that company co-founder Xiaopeng He—XPeng is a contraction of his name—made his fortune in software before deciding to get into the auto industry. Sound familiar, Elon?A Polish software engineer, Chmielewski says XPeng is the only automaker other than Tesla to use an end-to-end software architecture. The architecture is used on all XPeng models, and Chmielewski believes this software stack will give the company's products a competitive advantage over the long term.As on its other models, XPeng's XSmart operating system (initially Android-based but now highly evolved and unique) controls the P7's driver assistance systems, dubbed XPilot. The XSmart OS also controls the car's connectivity functions, infotainment systems, and its nascent AI capabilities, including a "Hey XPeng" voice activation function and smart navigation setup. It also allows for a wide range of over-the-air updates and remote vehicle diagnostics.It's Tesla-level stuff, though some of the P7's standard XPilot functions, most notably the lane keep assist, don't feel quite as well-resolved in terms of their operation. It's all in the software tuning, said Chmielewski, who noted our test car was running Chinese-spec software. He added that a team is already at work on tweaks to suit European operating conditions. XPeng Represents a New Age of AutomakingThe XPeng P7 is a graphic example of the new reality of the auto business in the EV age. In the past, the cost and complexities of developing and optimising internal combustion engines and suitable transmissions meant newcomers faced huge challenges in terms of delivering vehicles that performed as well as those from companies with long experience building automobiles—look how many years it took Toyota and Honda and Hyundai and Kia to become established in the U.S. as legitimate alternatives to GM, Ford, and Chrysler.However, EV powertrains are inherently smooth and quiet, and deliver plenty of easy driving torque. There are no pesky calibration issues in terms of driveability or to meet emissions and fuel economy targets. Making a car that's instantly competitive with mainstream rivals from established automakers has never been easier.The XPeng P7 proves the point. The way it looks and feels and drives means it would be right at home on any driveway in America right now, with no excuses needed. Were the P7 to be launched here, with software updated to suit the U.S. operating environment and American consumer tastes, and priced as competitively as it is in Norway, it would shock the automotive establishment. Tesla included.