kia ev6 Full OverviewHey," we said to the MotorTrend test team as it pulled its instruments off the 2022 Kia EV6. "You guys all have something on your face. Something really odd-looking. Goodness gracious, are those … smiles?"Sure enough, the EV6 had elicited that rare sign of positive emotion among our jaded testers, and for much the same reason its platform mate, the Hyundai Ioniq 5, earned that same infrequent accolade. Given free rein from its electronic nannies, it turns out the Kia EV6 likes to go sideways—earlier and even more so than the Hyundai does.Unexpected Results at the Test Track"Wow, I was not expecting this," road test editor Chris Walton said. "Well, I was halfway expecting it because we noticed the rear weight bias [49/51 front/rear]. But I wasn't expecting entry and midcorner oversteer." While the Ioniq 5 showed signs of a willingness to rotate as it careened around the skidpad, the EV6, with its 4-inch-shorter wheelbase, proved to be even friskier than the Hyundai. Walton was so intrigued that he attempted to drift the all-wheel-drive EV6 all the way around the circle, but its front motor kept straightening the car out. "I tried to do the entire skidpad sideways, but I only got about a third of the way around." (The Hyundai, which began to straighten later, drifted through two-thirds.)We noticed the same tail-happy behavior = on our public-road test loop: Push the EV6 hard into a corner, and it leads from the back. Which is not to imply you should avoid following Kia EV6s for fear that one will suddenly spin out in front of you—the EV6 has decent grip, generating 0.89 g on the skidpad before Walton decided to do his pro drifter impersonation. Its stability control system will prevent tail-wagging when fully on and curtail it before it gets out of hand in partial-off mode. Nothing dangerous here—just good old-fashioned unleash-the-teenager-within fun."It's a back-to-basics car, surprisingly," Walton said. "You have to get all the braking done before starting the turn-in. It hates trail-braking. The steering is a little lifeless, but it's very precise and intuitive. It doesn't feel like the heavy car [4,693 pounds on our scales] that it is." The EV6's figure-eight time of 25.9 seconds at 0.71 g further highlighted its dynamic bona fides, a number just 0.2 second behind that of the Hyundai.How Quick Is the 2022 Kia EV6?For our acceleration test, we were curious to see how the EV6 stacks up against both the Ioniq 5 and the Tesla Model Y, the current benchmark by which dual-motor E-crossovers are measured. With 320 hp and 446 lb-ft of torque to motivate itself, the EV6 sprinted to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds, a tenth slower than the slightly lighter Hyundai but with similar acceleration characteristics. Even with traction control off, the test team reported that the EV6's launch was drama-free with no wheelspin. While its acceleration didn't feel quite as dramatic as the 2020 Model Y Dual Motor Long Range we tested at 4.1 seconds to 60, unlike many other EVs, the EV6's power doesn't feel as though it trails off at higher speeds. That said, the quarter-mile came up in 13.3 seconds at 101.2 mph, again a tenth of a second (and 1.5 mph) slower than the Ioniq 5 and almost a second behind the Model Y.Braking performance was a mixed bag. The EV6's best 60-0-mph stop of 117 feet was fine—better than the Hyundai and the Model Y. But our first hard stop elicited a worrying bang accompanied by a very long stopping distance. The second run gave us the 117-foot figure, but on subsequent stops the performance notably deteriorated. Although the Kia felt more stable under panic braking overall than the Hyundai, we felt the pedal should offer more feedback, and we wish the brakes were more robust in general."The brakes definitely won't last long when driving it like a hot hatch," road test analyst Alan Lau said. "Powerful powertrain but not enough stopping power."A Sporty SUV in a Strangely Shaped PackageWhile the EV6's driving characteristics elicited grins, other aspects of this vehicle seemed to elicit an itching in our scalps—yes, this Kia had us scratching our heads. For starters, there's the price. The as-tested MSRP for our top-of-the-range AWD GT-Line model just crested $58K, a long way from the base model's $42,115 starting price. Even after incentives, that seems like a lot of money given the EV6's price and packaging.The packaging itself was another puzzler. Kia advertises the EV6 as an all-electric SUV, yet its limited headroom—thanks to a rakishly low roof combined with a high floor under which the battery pack resides—make it feel like more of a hot station wagon. Even our shorter staffers noted with some alarm how close their noggins were to the EV6's headliner. That, and the EV6's half-pane sunroof effectively turns the back seat into a cave.Some of the ergonomic choices are really baffling, as well, such as the combination stereo and climate controls. We don't mean that they're combined on one panel; rather, a capacitive-touch LCD screen and a pair of dials switch between these two functions—the left-hand dial, for example, serves as either power/volume or driver-side temperature control, depending on which mode the panel is in. Therein lies the trouble: If, when reaching for said dial with the intention of changing the volume, your finger happens to come close to the auto climate touch-pane next to it, the volume stays the same but the temperature changes. Hopefully you weren't planning to turn the volume down in a hurry, because you're now unable to change it (or press it to turn the stereo off) until you press another section of the screen to change the panel back to the stereo controls. This didn't happen to us just once or twice—it happened repeatedly, even after we knew to look out for it. It's hard to imagine Kia coming up with a worse idea short of mounting the horn inside the cabin.Speaking of inappropriate noises, while all EVs are required to have an external noisemaker at low speeds (to warn the sight-impaired of their otherwise-silent approach), the Kia pipes in a droning faux engine note at all speeds, not unlike what Audi does in the E-Tron GT. Except in the E-Tron GT it sounds cool. In the EV6, it just grated on our nerves.Kia EV6 May Not Be a Great SUV, but It's Pretty GreatSo yes, the EV6 has some challenges. Perhaps if Kia marketed the EV6 as a hot hatchback rather than an SUV, we might be a little less baffled. As a sporty electric car, though, we're as pleased as can be with the Kia EV6's test-track results and their real-world implications. We've known for a while now that the speed and smooth power of electric cars can make them a lot of fun to drive, but the Kia's tail-first antics were not the sort of fun we were expecting from an EV—and we call that a very pleasant surprise, indeed. Hey, Kia, how long before we can get a rear-drive version of the EV6 in for testing? Walton's eager to drift it all the way around the skidpad.Looks good! More details?2022 Kia EV6 AWD GT-Line Specifications BASE PRICE $57,115 PRICE AS TESTED $58,105 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front- and rear-motor, AWD, 5-pass, 4-door SUV MOTOR TYPE Permanent-magnet electric POWER (SAE NET) 320 hp TORQUE (SAE NET) 446 lb-ft TRANSMISSION 1-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 4,693 lb (49/51%) WHEELBASE 114.2 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 184.8 x 74.4 x 60.8 in 0-60 MPH 4.5 sec QUARTER MILE 13.3 sec @ 101.2 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 117 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.89 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 25.9 sec @ 0.71 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 116/94/105 mpg-e EPA RANGE, COMB 274 mi ON SALE Now Show All
This is The American Dream, the world's longest limo, at least according to the Guinness World Records organization. At 100 feet and 1.5 inches, we can't imagine it has too many challengers to its throne. But as impressive as this 25,000-odd pound, helipad-equipped, massive Cadillac is, what's even more impressive is that its restoration was completed at all. This limo was in terrible shape, a rotted hulk that would take a gargantuan effort to bring back to life.Abandoned in New York, it was first hauled to the Autoseum for an ill-fated restoration attempt. Then, with some difficulty (and a hood that flew off en route, never to be seen again), it was trucked down to the Dezerland Park car museum for another go—in several pieces—for another effort at revival. Here's what it looked like in 2013:Well, that effort has succeeded, as you can see. Michael Dezer—a prominent real estate developer in New York and Florida—and Michael Manning of Autoseum worked together to make it happen. Along the way, three Cadillacs were cannibalized, and untold amount of rust was removed, yards of leather and vinyl and carpet were employed, and the engine(s) were replaced. The subframe looks more like a bridge truss than anything you'd find in a vehicle, and in fact Manning admits rebuilding it was more of a civil engineering project than an automotive restoration.No fewer than six Eldorados were conjoined during the original construction of this 24-wheeled monster, conceived by Jay Ohrberg of Burbank, Calif.—the guy behind a few cars you may have heard of, like KITT from Knight Rider and the DeLorean time machine from Back to the Future. Originally, the vehicle had a swivel function, in order to attempt to navigate corners with more grace. It's not clear if that feature was retained in the restoration. Its tail housed a helipad, whose surface could be used as a putting green whenever the chopper wasn't around. In its original iteration, it also had two engines, dozens of windows, TVs, telephones, a lounge, a waterbed, a jacuzzi, and a swimming pool with a diving board. The American Dream is now functional, to the extent that it can be. With this length and an attendant cruise-ship-like turning radius, you can't simply drive this thing around. You need to carefully plan a route to make sure it has room to maneuver. Get it stuck and it'll take some creative towing to remove it. That said, whether stationary or on the go, Manning says there's room inside for 75, plus there's a pool on the back. The interior is mostly bare at the moment—in the video, Manning hints it could be built out to fit a customer—and it's so long the other end is barely visible from inside.There's no getting around it: The American Dream is excessive to the point of impracticality. But it's still the world record holder, taking the crown from itself with a 1.5-inch stretch. It's hilarious that a distance that small has any significance for a vehicle this large, but there it is. What happens to it next is anybody's guess, but we salute you, Floridians, for reviving The American Dream in all its excess.
Volvo has updated its T8 AWD plug-in hybrid version of its scalable vehicle architecture underpinning cars like the XC90 and XC60 Recharge, adding more performance and a larger battery. The updates boost the all-electric range, and on top of that, now customers would also be able to redeem the federal government's full $7,500 electrified vehicle tax credit on any Recharge model. Previously, these models were eligible for smaller credits.The update will roll out to every vehicle on the T8 AWD plug-in platform, including the S60 Recharge, V60 Polestar Engineered, XC60 Recharge, XC60 Polestar Engineered, S90 Recharge, and XC90 Recharge currently on sale. Volvo says the extensive upgrades Driving the plug-in hybrid in EV mode—where the gas engine is shut off and you're running on battery and motors only for a limited range, like a BEV—will get you further now. The S60 Recharge and V60 Polestar Engineered gain the most, at 41 miles total, the S90 Recharge jumps up to 38 miles total, and The XC60, S90, and XC90 Recharge models all get 35 miles of total EV range.Volvo claims this is enough for most of its customers to get to work on electric power alone, without having to burn any fuel. If they can charge at work, then they can operate the car in EV mode on daily commutes. Volvo says its customer research reflects its plug-in hybrids mentioned above are already driven "around half the time" in pure electric mode, so the boosted range will likely only increase that estimate. Volvo calls them "part-time electric cars," which is cute.The engine and motor improvements have also slightly boosted low-speed traction and towing capabilities. Volvo says the Other updates include newly introduced, optional one-pedal driving in EV mode for XC60 and S90 models, and a new remote cabin pre-heat or pre-cool feature is now available through the Volvo Cars phone app. Show AllTable information provided by Volvo. Volvo isn't talking about pricing yet for these updated T8 models, but we have to imagine MSRPs will increase somewhat given the additional performance and capabilities. We'll update you when we get that information.
Consumer marketing data from Experian shows Tesla's early 2022 production is off to a strong start, with new vehicle registrations outpacing German luxury titan BMW, the segment leader last year. It's a big achievement for Tesla, having its small all-electric lineup outpace the entire German stable of combustion, hybrid and electric vehicles combined.So far, Experian's data only reflects January vehicle registrations in the U.S. According to the data, via Automotive News, Tesla registrations rose 49 percent year-over-year in January, up to 37,162 vehicles. BMW also saw registrations rise, but only to a reported total of 30,563 new vehicles. Mercedes-Benz, which once also gave BMW a run for it's money, isn't doing as hot these days, with just 22,022 registrations, which is even fewer than Lexus for the month.Registrations in January do not directly reflect sales in January, since some vehicles are registered before delivery, when the sale is complete, leaving a gap in the two sets of data. Companies won't release more specific breakdowns until the end of the quarter.The Tesla Model Y, Model 3, and Model S took the top three spots for EV vehicle registrations in January, as well, with the Y and 3 accounting for 60 percent of new EVs sold that month, according to Experian's data. The Model X ranked ninth.The American luxury leader has been skipping around a bit lately, shifting from Mercedes-Benz a few years ago to a recent dominating run by BMW that was almost overturned by Tesla just last year, though BMW ultimately still won out.But that's why Tesla's strong January seems like a big deal—BMW is already slipping for 2022, and the outlook is only getting worse. The ongoing parts shortages, which are plaguing most of the auto market right now, paired with pandemic surges and rising gas prices will make it tough for BMW to keep its crown, if Tesla keeps its pace.It would appear Tesla, funnily enough, has fewer roadblocks to selling its cars at the moment, despite a rocky past. Or, at least not the same problems. With registrations up almost by half so far this year, it doesn't seem like industry supply shortages are taking their toll. January has traditionally been a low-output month for Tesla, with the bulk of its registrations typically coming later in an operating year, so this is a particularly promising start for 2022 for the automaker.
With SUVs increasingly becoming the default choice for single-car families across the U.S., automakers are working hard to make them more fuel efficient. Last year's 20 most fuel-efficient SUVs averaged an impressive 55.5 mpg combined; this year, the 20 most fuel-efficient SUVs bump up their combined average to 60.9 mpg. And that figure doesn't include the increasing availability of electric SUVs. Last year there were about nine SUV EVs on sale. This year? Seventeen and counting. Provided you're not ready to make the leap to an electric SUV (all of which would make this list), what follows are the 20 SUVs that achieve the best gas mileage on the market in 2022.But before we dig in, some quick housekeeping. Our list of the most fuel-efficient SUVs for the 2022 model year was gleaned using EPA test data, and all vehicles are ranked in order from 20 to 1 using their combined mpg/mpg-e figure. When we had a tie, we then factored in electric-only range (if applicable) and highway fuel economy to break it.Plug-in hybrid, hybrid, gas, and diesel SUVs were all eligible to make this list, but as you'll soon see, plug-in hybrid and hybrid SUVs dominate. As previously mentioned, the 17 electric SUVs on sale in the U.S as of this writing weren't included. In case you're curious, they are:Tesla Model Y (up to 129 mpg-e)Hyundai Kona Electric (120 mpg-e)Kia EV6 (up to 117 mpg-e)Chevrolet Bolt EUV (115 mpg-e)Hyundai Ioniq 5 (up to 114 mpg-e)Kia Niro EV (112 mpg-e)Tesla Model X (up to 105 mpg-e)Ford Mustang Mach-E (up to 101 mpg-e)Volkswagen ID4 (up to 99 mpg-e)Audi Q4 E-Tron (up to 95 mpg-e)Mazda MX-30 (92 mpg-e)Volvo C40 Recharge (87 mpg-e)Volvo XC40 Recharge (85 mpg-e)Audi E-Tron (up to 78 mpg-e)Jaguar I-Pace (76 mpg-e)Porsche Taycan Cross Turismo (up to 76 mpg-e)Rivian R1S (69 mpg-e)Without further ado, here are the 20 most fuel-efficient SUVs you can buy today, in order from worst to first.
hyundai sonata Full OverviewWhen we first took stock of our 2020 Hyundai Sonata Limited, we were impressed by its slick screens, comfortable leather seats, and stylish exterior. A year later, does the Sonata continue to charm, or has it lost its luster?The midsize sedan rolled into our garage wearing a striking sapphire blue paint color and all the trimmings of the top-tier Limited model. At $34,630, our test car looks almost like a luxury sedan. Its plush caramel leather seats held up well over a year of passengers shuffling into seats, loading and unloading tons of baby gear, car seats installations, and baby spit-ups. The leather didn't pucker over time like it did on one of my previous long-term vehicles, which happened to be a luxury vehicle.The Sonata's interior earned high praise for its uncluttered, elegant design. I enjoyed the easy-to-use 10.3-inch touchscreen, though I didn't fully appreciate how crisp it was until I downgraded to a duller 8.0-inch screen in my latest test car. The Sonata's infotainment screen complements the 12.3-inch digital instrument cluster, and a sharp Bose sound system sweetens the deal.Passengers enjoyed the panoramic sunroof, but my favorite feature is Highway Driving Assist. A semi-autonomous system that combines adaptive cruise control and lane centering tech, this feature makes highway commuting less stressful. Although it has a tendency to steer the Sonata to the left side of the lane within the lane markings, it works better than some other systems we've tested. The 360-degree camera system is another winner, providing a clear view on all sides of the car and making it easy to park this long sedan. The only real tech hiccup we encountered was with the keyless entry system. It often wouldn't register when I touched the door and had the key in my pocket, forcing me to dig out the key and press the unlock button.I had no illusions about the Sonata's performance going into the year. Our car features the Sonata's upgraded engine option: a 1.6-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that makes 180 hp and 195 lb-ft of torque. As I quickly found out, it has just enough power for merging and passing other cars on the highway. Given how well it handles, I didn't mind its lack of power. What became more and more bothersome over time was how the power is delivered. There's a noticeable lag off the line when you jam the accelerator, so making quick maneuvers in traffic can get a little tricky.No maintenance problems plagued our Sonata through the year, but the car visited the dealership twice for routine servicing. Our first service trip was free, but Hyundai charged $92.01 for our second visit. These costs will look quite different for typical retail customers of newer Sonatas, however. For retail vehicles sold on or after February 1, 2020, Hyundai offers complimentary maintenance for three years or 36,000 miles, whichever comes first.Subaru also offers free maintenance, which is why our long-term 2017 Subaru Legacy cost $0 over three service visits and 20,460 miles. Free maintenance hasn't been the norm among the Sonata's competitors we've tested for a year, though. We spent $178.96 for two service visits on our long-term 2014 Mazda 6, which logged 24,316 miles, and $204.92 on two services for our 2013 Nissan Altima, which finished its run at 21,774 miles. Surprisingly, our long-term 2013 Honda Accord cost more than all of these sedans, racking up a bill of $209.42 for two service visits over a course of 22,856 miles.Driving the Sonata for a year revealed more about the sedan's quality and maintenance costs, but what will the ownership experience look like over the course of five years? Our colleagues at IntelliChoice have some insights. Although we enjoy all the fancy features that come with the top Limited trim, it might not be the choice if you're looking to maximize value. The lower SE trim gets a Good value rating, but the other trims earn Mediocre or Average scores. The 2020 Sonata Limited has been deemed an Average value when taking into account depreciation, insurance, fuel costs, state fees, financing, maintenance, and repairs.The Honda Accord remains our top pick for a midsize sedan because of its superior driving dynamics and its spacious, well-packaged interior. That said, our yearlong test confirms the Sonata is a solid pick. Among its rather conservative, plain-looking competitors, the Sonata stands out with its sharp design. More important, its tech-forward cabin continues to delight over time, speaking to its strong feature-per-dollar value. Its playful handling never gets old on a twisty road. For the practical-minded, free maintenance and a generous warranty make a strong case for the Sonata.Looks good! More details?POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2020 Hyundai Sonata Limited 1.6T DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, FWD ENGINE TYPE Turbocharged I-4, alum block/head VALVETRAIN DOHC, 4 valves/cyl DISPLACEMENT 97.5 cu in/1,598 cc COMPRESSION RATIO 10.5:1 POWER (SAE NET) 180 hp @ 5,500 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 195 lb-ft @ 1,500 rpm REDLINE 6,500 rpm WEIGHT TO POWER 18.4 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 3.37:1/2.14:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 13.3:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.6 BRAKES, F; R 12.8-in vented disc; 11.8-in disc, ABS WHEELS 7.5 x 18-in cast aluminum TIRES 235/45R18 94V Michelin Primacy Tour A/S (M+S) DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 111.8 in TRACK, F/R 63.1/63.3 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 192.9 x 73.2 x 56.9 in TURNING CIRCLE 35.9 ft CURB WEIGHT 3,316 lb WEIGHT DIST, F/R 60/40% SEATING CAPACITY 5 HEADROOM, F/R 38.4/37.4 in LEGROOM, F/R 46.1/34.8 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 57.9/56.1 in CARGO VOLUME 16.0 cu ft TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 2.7 sec 0-40 3.8 0-50 5.5 0-60 7.4 0-70 9.5 0-80 12.3 0-90 15.6 0-100 — PASSING, 45-65 MPH 3.8 QUARTER MILE 15.7 sec @ 90.1 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 115 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.89 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 26.6 sec @ 0.66 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,800 rpm CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $34,475 PRICE AS TESTED $34,630 STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL Yes/Yes AIRBAGS 9: Dual front, f/r side, f/r curtain, driver knee BASIC WARRANTY 5 yrs/60,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 10 yrs/100,000 miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 5 yrs/Unlimited miles FUEL CAPACITY 15.9 gal EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 27/37/30 mpg RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded regular Our Car SERVICE LIFE 12 mo / 11,734 mi BASE PRICE $34,475 OPTIONS Carpeted floor mats ($155) PRICE AS TESTED $34,630 AVG ECON 24.4 mpg PROBLEM AREAS None MAINTENANCE COST $0 (oil change, inspection) NORMAL-WEAR COST $0 3-YEAR RESIDUAL VALUE* $27,700 (80%) RECALLS None *IntelliChoice data; assumes 42,000 miles at the end of 3-years Show All
Genesis is no amateur at creating vehicles as tailored for being driven as being chauffeured in. The Genesis G90 is as comfortable as flagship sedans get, but the automaker is expanding its first-class rear-seat horizons—this time with its flagship SUV. Enter the 2022 Genesis GV80 Prestige Signature, a four-passenger, two-row-only version of the luxury crossover that will serve as the pinnacle of the GV80 lineup.The GV80 Prestige Signature builds on the 3.5T Prestige trim, adding a wireless charger and captain's chairs in the second row and five-spoke dark finish wheels. Customers will only be able to pick between two exterior matte colors (Melbourne Gray and Matterhorn White), and two interior choices (Black with Olive Ash and Ultra Marine Blue/Dune with Olive Ash). Genesis also added a matte chrome trim to distinguish the fancy models from other GV80s.While Genesis hasn't revealed any pictures of this specific model's rear seats, we presume that area will look very similar to the Prestige Signature model sold overseas and pictured above. (The global version has a third row.) A center console between the two seats will allow backseat passengers to control the infotainment, and they'll have their own climate-control system. Although the model sold elsewhere has a rear-seat entertainment package, it doesn't look like we'll get that here. Besides enjoying a more comfortable seating position, those traveling in the rear will have access to Relax Mode, which reclines the seat to your preferred position.Under the hood, the Prestige Signature will be powered by the 3.5-liter twin-turbocharged V-6 engine found across the lineup and which makes 375 horsepower and 391 lb-ft of torque. An eight-speed automatic transmission sends power to all four wheels via standard all-wheel drive.A total of just 600 GV80 Prestige Signature models will be sold in the U.S., each one carrying a $78,295 price tag. That's a $4,500 increase from the Prestige model. The 2022 Genesis GV80 Prestige Signature is starting to arrive to dealerships now, and we hope to drive it—or be chauffeured in it—in the coming weeks.
aston-martin dbx Full Overview"Watch this." Aston Martin boss Tobias Moers keeps his foot hard on the brake, selects launch control, and pushes the gas pedal to the floor. The revs build with a guttural snarl, then he sidesteps the brake pedal. The Aston Martin DBX707 super-SUV lunges with a roar like a hungry lion, the nine-speed transmission snapping through the upshifts as the twin-turbo V-8 kisses the 7,000-rpm redline. Moers laughs out loud. "It's ridiculous fast," he says.A tight left-hander. Moers pitches the Aston into the turn and punches the throttle. The tail swings wide, and he catches the motion with an armful of opposite lock. He keeps his foot down, and the Aston exits the turn in a graceful drift, as comfortable and composed as a sports car. Moers grins. "You shouldn't be able to do this in an SUV," he says, shaking his head.It's good to see the boss enjoying his new toy.And the Aston Martin DBX707 is very much Moers' toy. His fingerprints are all over Aston's new super-SUV, from the tweaked, AMG-sourced 4.0-liter twin-turbo under the hood, to the AMG Speedshift MCT wet-clutch nine-speed automatic with its Sport+ mode and launch control function, to the chassis that's been tuned to deliver precision and support without compromising ride comfort.The DBX707's mission statement is simple: to be faster than a Lamborghini Urus and to handle better than a Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe. And after a brief drive of a production-ready prototype at Aston's compact Stowe Complex test track at Silverstone, England, we're tempted to say, "Mission accomplished."The DBX707's raw thrust is a given: With 697 hp and 664 lb-ft of torque under the hood, even a 5,000-plus-pound SUV is going to feel quick. This Aston builds speed with relentless intensity, the power delivery so smooth and linear, you must carefully watch you don't hit the rev limiter if you're shifting manually. Moers claims a 0-60-mph acceleration time of less than 3.5 seconds and a top speed of 193 mph, and the DBX707 feels every bit that quick.But what's much more impressive than how the DBX707 goes is how it handles. It feels agile and responsive, not twitchy or straining at its tethers, especially when changing direction rapidly. It has, quite simply, the best, most authoritative front end of any super-SUV in the business, precise in its response and concise in its feedback. Turn in, and the Aston goes exactly where you point it. More important, there's plenty of support from the rear axle, right through from corner entry to exit.Much of that, Moers says, is the result of a major rework of the front suspension, particularly in terms of its supporting structures. A cross-brace means the front shock top mounts are 55 percent stiffer than those of the standard DBX. A 0.16-inch-thick underbody panel has raised torsional stiffness by 1.3 percent to improve steering response and impact control. Compression and rebound damping have been increased by 20 and 10 percent.Modifications at the rear include a new e-diff with a higher locking rate, and spring and damper rates that are softer than those at the front. Overall, the electronic active roll system has been recalibrated to deliver 50 percent more torque on low body motions, and the roll control is now more rear-biased at higher cornering speeds to reduce understeer.As a result, the DBX707 feels remarkably light on its feet, with none of the slightly leaden, nose-heavy feel you get when pushing a Lamborghini Urus or a non-GT Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe—the car Moers' team initially used as a dynamic benchmark—and little of the exaggerated roll and head toss you normally feel in vehicles with a high center of gravity. And although it's tighter and tauter than a regular DBX, the ride is still impressively refined, with no harshness or jitters over small, sharp lumps and bumps.It still feels more like a grand tourer than a track rat.The Aston Martin DBX707 is hella fast in a straight line and jaw-droppingly good through the twisty bits. We'll reserve final judgment until we get to spend more time with it on real-world roads a few weeks from now, as well as until such time we can pitch it against its rivals in a proper comparison test. On first impression, though, the DBX707 just might be the new benchmark super-SUV.Looks good! More details?
In what may come as a shock to many of us, Subaru has announced that the new WRX it just launched will not be getting a higher-performance WRX STI model, at least not one based on the 2022 Subaru WRX. Instead, Subaru is looking into electrification for its future performance applications, and we may not see another STI until the next generation of the WRX, which might be awhile.In its announcement, Subaru cited "the regulations and requirements for greenhouse gasses (GHG), zero emissions vehicles (ZEV), and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ)" as the impotence for holding off on a developing a new STI right away. It appears an internal-combustion-powered STI would struggle to pass increasingly stringent regulations for sale, without first going hybrid or fully-electric. "A next generation internal combustion engine WRX STI will not be produced based upon the new WRX platform," the statement declares.The move is surprising, considering the company gave no hint that it was potentially facing delays with a next-gen STI at the reveal of the new WRX sedan last year. The STI is a popular model among enthusiasts, and sales for the outgoing WRX and STI models remained consistent for almost the last decade. It's possible this announcement is intentionally vague, and Subaru may intend to co-develop separate WRX and STI models on separate platforms to still get a new model out within a few years—technically releasing a WRX STI in the same life cycle as today's WRX, albeit with a different underlying platform and powertrain altogether.It's not clear how far along, if at all, Subaru's team has been looking into "opportunities for the next generation Subaru WRX STI, including electrification," as the announcement says. Subaru also promised to incorporate "the essence of STI" into the next-gen vehicles it actually is going to produce.If we're not getting a new STI soon, if at all, then what can we expect? The automaker just announced its new E-RA, a carbon-neutral, all-electric, all-wheel drive race car intended for production and customer racing in the upcoming FIA E-GT racing league. The company could potentially use this as a starting point for its next-gen STI, if Subaru really is starting from scratch and is free to use other platforms than the WRX's.
We like our comparison tests to come to definitive conclusions, but that didn't happen with this one. Instead, in pitting the all-new 2022 Toyota Tundra against the bestselling Ford F-150, it came down to weighing the details. For example: One of these pickup trucks has a better engine, the other a better transmission. One has a better-looking interior; the other offers better functionality. Even the back seat factors into the equation: One has a better seat, the other smarter floor storage. We did manage to pick a winner, but only by the slimmest of margins. If you were to purchase the truck we deemed the lesser of the two, we certainly wouldn't say you bought the wrong one.But enough preamble, let's meet our players. For this particular test, we decided to sample workaday, lower-trim versions of these full-size trucks. Both featured crew cabs, short boxes, and four-wheel drive. Toyota sent along a 2022 Tundra Limited equipped with the TRD Off-Road package and a handful of other useful stand-alone options that added up to a $60,188 sticker. Ford supplied an F-150 XLT, the truck's one-up-from-the-bottom trim, which was priced at $58,575 and fitted with two key options—Ford's Max Trailer Tow package and the 3.5-liter EcoBoost twin-turbo V-6. (The truck Ford sent was a 2021, but the 2022 F-150 is functionally identical.)Tundra vs. F-150: A Closer Look, Outside and InAt first glance, the Ford F-150 is the slightly better-looking truck in our eyes. It appears relaxed and sure of itself, whereas the Tundra is styled like it has something to prove. Although we appreciate the creases in its sheetmetal, we can't avert our gaze from the Tundra's giant, gaping grille, which reminds us of a jet plane missing its nose cone. Out back, the Tundra's vertical taillights don't seem to be as integrated into the truck's overall design. That said, when it comes to the details, the Toyota appears more modern, with sequential LED turn signals where the lower-spec Ford makes do with incandescent bulbs. It's controversial to be sure, but the Tundra is definitely a product of the new decade, while the new-for-2021 F-150 could be 10 years old.It's a similar story inside. The Tundra's interior is more modern in execution, with its massive 14.0-inch infotainment screen (optional), handsomely sculpted vents, and wide piano-key switches (a good idea lifted from General Motors). The F-150's stereo, A/C, and steering wheel controls, with their dials and plastic buttons, look old-fashioned by comparison, but they're arguably easier to use. The F-150's interior has its share of cheap plastics, though the bulk of its dashboard appears to be built of higher-quality materials than the Tundra employs. Even the upholstery is a draw: Some of our testers thought the F-150's two-tone cloth was way more attractive and comfortable than the Tundra's faux leather. Others said Toyota's Sof-Tex is more upscale and wondered what possessed Ford to put cloth seats in a $58,575 truck.Both trucks feature giant center touchscreen infotainment interfaces, but the Toyota's is gianter—and although that's great for Apple CarPlay, we were surprised the Tundra only lets you display one system (audio, phone, navigation, settings) at a time, whereas the Ford will show, say, your tunes and a map simultaneously.We found the back seats to be roomy in both the F-150 and the Tundra, with lots of legroom and easy access through big doors, and both offer two types of USB ports (A and C) and a 120-volt outlet. The Tundra has the (marginally) more comfortable seat, with a longer bottom cushion that provides better thigh support and a more relaxed backrest angle. But with the seat bottoms folded up, the F-150's flat floor and fold-away storage bins (a $215 option) made it far more useful and flexible than the Tundra, which has a sizable transmission hump and hard, fixed plastic binnacles.Tundra vs. F-150: The DriveBoth of our test trucks were powered by twin-turbo V-6 engines—a 3.5-liter unit for the F-150 and a 3.4 for the Tundra (though Toyota's sales literature says otherwise). Note, however, that the EcoBoost engine is a $2,595 option in the Ford; standard power is a 3.3-liter non-turbo V-6 with half as much torque. The Toyota, meanwhile, gets twin-turbo power as standard. (Both the Tundra and F-150 are available with an optional hybrid powertrain, but only Ford offers a V-8.)The F-150 provides a lot of go for the extra dough. Although its 400 hp and 500 lb-ft of torque bests the Toyota by only 11 hp and 21 lb-ft, the aluminum-bodied F-150 weighs a quarter-ton less than the Tundra. In addition, both come standard with a 3.31:1 rear axle, but our Ford test truck came with no-cost optional 3.55:1 gearing, which the Tundra doesn't offer. All of the above gave the F-150 a serious speed advantage: We clocked the Ford from 0 to 60 mph in 5.3 seconds, which is almost a full second quicker than the Tundra. And Ford's EPA fuel economy numbers measure 1 mpg better in city, highway, and combined measurements. Out on the open road, the Ford felt like the more powerful truck, and it delivered slightly better fuel economy during our testing.But that doesn't necessarily mean the Ford's powertrain is a far superior choice. The 2022 Tundra's 10-speed automatic transmission proved to be the better actor, shifting up and down promptly and smoothly. On one narrow, hilly section of our test route, the Tundra knew intuitively which gear to pick; prodding the F-150's accelerator on the same stretch resulted in a delay and a lurch while it tried to find the right ratio.Tundra vs. F-150: Ride and HandlingThe suspension is one area where Ford pulled definitively ahead. Neither of these pickup trucks will ever be mistaken for an old-school Lincoln Town Car, but the F-150 provided a smoother ride, while the Tundra felt jittery even over moderate bumps. When the pavement got slightly worse, the Tundra's ride got a lot worse, deteriorating much more quickly than the F-150's ride quality. This was somewhat surprising, given the Toyota's rear coil springs and lower payload rating relative to the leaf-sprung Ford.The Ford's steering felt light and a bit numb, making the truck easy, if not exactly enjoyable, to maneuver. But it steered better than the Tundra, which felt less precise and wandered more on the highway. Both trucks have adaptive cruise control with lane centering, and although the Ford guided itself accurately, the Tundra had a harder time staying centered, an experience shared by its human drivers. Keep in mind that our test Tundra came with the $3,085 TRD Off-Road package featuring stiffer shocks and softer all-terrain tires. Without this package, the Toyota might well have had better ride and steering qualities.Tundra vs. F-150: Getting Into BedUnlike the F-150, the Tundra doesn't have a spray-in bedliner, but it doesn't need one: The Tundra's bed is a plastic composite, which is virtually indestructible. There's nothing wrong with a metal bed like the Ford's, but it's eventually going to show the dents and scars of hard use. That won't be the case with the Tundra. Both trucks have tie-downs in the bed walls; the Ford's are fixed, while the Tundra offers both fixed and movable points.Our Tundra test truck had a $385 power package that included 400-watt outlets in the bed and a Qi wireless phone charger in the cab, which our F-150 lacked. Ford offers 400-watt plugs for $290, but our truck came instead with the $995 ProPower Onboard package capable of 2,000 watts. The Toyota also had a retractable tailgate step, but evetesn with it deployed, our shorter testers faced a steep climb into the bed. Speaking of steep, that little step costs a whopping $399. Unlike the Toyota, our F-150 didn't come with any tailgate assistance features as equipped. Ford does offer a quality tailgate step of its own for the F-150, but it's only included as part of the $695 power tailgate package, which was missing from our truck. (Perhaps it was a good thing given what we discovered in our last full-size pickup comparison.)Tundra vs. F-150: Towing and HaulingIn terms of truck capabilities, Ford is the clear winner. Our Tundra, as equipped, had a maximum payload of 1,740 pounds and a towing capacity of 11,120 pounds. The Ford, meanwhile, offered a 2,100-pound payload capacity and, with its Max Trailering package, a towing capacity of 13,900 pounds. But even with a lesser trailering package, the F-150 would still out-tow the Tundra by 180 pounds. Capacity and skill are separate things, though. We've always found the F-150 to be a stable towing platform, and the Tundra proved just as competent at hauling our high-profile two-horse trailer.We're big fans of Ford's optional Pro Trailer Backup Assist system, and we were eager to try Toyota's version, called Straight Path Assist. The key difference between the two is that the F-150 allows the driver to steer the trailer in reverse with a dial on the dashboard, but the Tundra only keeps the trailer going straight. With Straight Path Assist, once you get the trailer pointed where you want it, you can let go of the wheel and the Tundra will steer itself in an attempt to keep the trailer going in the same direction. The Tundra did a pretty good job of keeping the trailer going straight, but really, that's only half the battle—getting the trailer pointed in the right direction is the real struggle for novice trailer-backers. Ford's system (as well as Ram's Trailer Reverse Steering) alleviates 95 percent of the anxiety of backing up a trailer; the Toyota, maybe 50 percent. We're baffled as to why Toyota didn't build a complete trailer-backing solution.Let's Pick a Winner Already!We suspected from our first test loop that this was going to be a close competition, and we weren't disappointed. Toyota clearly benchmarked the bestselling F-150 when developing its new Tundra, and it followed very closely in the Ford's tire tracks.But in the end, the Ford managed to stay out front, if only by a bumper length or two. The F-150 is the better and more comfortable truck to drive (though a Tundra with the non-TRD suspension might be able to close that gap). The Ford's interior is marginally nicer and easier to use, and the F-150's back seat, though not quite as comfortable as the Toyota's, offers more flexibility for carrying other-than-human cargo. We like the Tundra's tough composite bed, but the Ford carries a lot more cargo. Both trucks are competent tow vehicles, but the Ford has more capacity and a better trailer-backing system. And although the Tundra has more modern styling details, the F-150 has a look we think will age better—indeed, it already seems to be doing so.Toyota fans might be disappointed to learn that the new Tundra generation is short of class-leading; in our estimation, that title still belongs to the Ram 1500. But in the full-size pickup field, where breaking into the Chevy-Ford-Ram triumvirate is a near-impossible task, playing follow the leader is perhaps the smartest move—and the 2022 Toyota Tundra is definitely following the Ford F-150 very, very closely.Second Place: 2022 Toyota Tundra LimitedPros:Powerful twin-turbo engine comes standardDurable composite bedComfortable back seatCons:Bumpy ride with TRD packageHalf-baked trailer-backing systemGiant center screen not used to its best advantageFirst Place: 2021 Ford F-150 XLTPros:Comfortable, if not exactly thrilling, to driveBroad choice of powertrains and axle ratiosHigh payload and towing capacity when properly equippedCons:Uncomfortable back seatRough-shifting transmissionCloth seats and incandescent bulbs? In a $60K truck?POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS 2021 Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Specifications 2022 Toyota Tundra Limited TRD Offroad 4x4 Specifications DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, 4WD Front-engine, 4WD ENGINE TYPE Twin-turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 24-valve 60-degree V-6, alum block/heads Twin-turbo port- and direct-injected DOHC 24-valve 60-degree V-6, alum block/heads DISPLACEMENT 3,497 cc/213.4 cu in 3,445 cc/210.2 cu in COMPRESSION RATIO 10.5:1 10.4:1 POWER (SAE NET) 400 hp @ 6,000 rpm 389 hp @ 5,200 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 500 lb-ft @ 3,100 rpm 479 lb-ft @ 2,400 rpm REDLINE 6,250 rpm 5,800 rpm WEIGHT TO POWER 13.4 lb/hp 15.0 lb/hp TRANSMISSION 10-speed automatic 10-speed automatic AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE/LOW RATIO 3.55:1/2.26:1/2.64:1 3.31:1/2.02:1/2.64:1 SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar; live axle, leaf springs Control arms, coil springs, anti-roll bar; live axle, coil springs, anti-roll bar STEERING RATIO 17.4:1 16.9:1 TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 3.2 3.3 BRAKES, F; R 13.8-in vented disc; 13.8-in vented disc 13.9-in vented disc; 13.6-in vented disc WHEELS 8.5 x 20-in cast aluminum 8.5 x 20-in cast aluminum TIRES 275/60R20 115T Pirelli Scorpion ATR (M+S) 265/60R20 112H Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3WA (M+S) DIMENSIONS WHEELBASE 145.1 in 145.7 in TRACK, F/R 67.9/68.3 in 68.4/68.4 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 231.7 x 79.9 x 77.2 in 233.6 x 80.2 x 78.0 in GROUND CLEARANCE 9.4 in 9.4 in APPRCH/DEPART ANGLE 24.6/25.4 deg 21.0/24.0 deg TURNING CIRCLE 47.8 ft 48.6 ft CURB WEIGHT (DIST F/R) 5,345 lb (58/42%) 5,820 lb (57/43%) SEATING CAPACITY 5 5 HEADROOM, F/R 40.8/40.4 in 41.0/38.5 in LEGROOM, F/R 43.9/43.6 in 41.2/41.6 in SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 66.7/66.0 in 65.0/62.4 in PICKUP BOX L x W x H 78.9 x 65.2 x 21.4 in 65.6 x 58.7 x 20.9 in CARGO BOX VOLUME 62.3 cu ft 48.8 cu ft WIDTH BET WHEELHOUSES 50.6 in 48.7 in CARGO LIFT-OVER HEIGHT 35.0 in 34.6 in PAYLOAD CAPACITY 2,100 lb 1,740 lb TOWING CAPACITY 13,900 lb 11,120 lb TEST DATA ACCELERATION TO MPH 0-30 1.8 sec 2.0 sec 0-40 2.9 3.3 0-50 4.0 4.6 0-60 5.3 6.2 0-70 6.9 8.1 0-80 8.9 10.3 0-90 11.2 13.1 0-100 13.9 16.2 PASSING, 45-65 MPH 2.6 3.2 QUARTER MILE 13.9 sec @ 99.9 mph 14.7 sec @ 95.3 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 126 ft 135 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.76 g (avg) 0.72 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 28.0 sec @ 0.62 g (avg) 28.5 sec @ 0.59 g (avg) TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,450 rpm* 1,700 rpm CONSUMER INFO BASE PRICE $45,850 $56,680 PRICE AS TESTED $59,520 $60,188 AIRBAGS 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee 8: Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee BASIC WARRANTY 3 yrs/36,000 miles 3 yrs/36,000 miles POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 5 yrs/60,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 5 yrs/60,000 miles 2 yrs/25,000 miles FUEL CAPACITY 36.0 gal 32.2 gal EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 18/23/20 mpg 17/22/19 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 720 mi 612 mi RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded regular Unleaded regular ON SALE Now Now *Truck will not select 10th gear at 60; 1,800 in eighth is the natural powertrain condition at this speed. Show All
volkswagen jetta Full OverviewIt might be hard to believe today, but the Volkswagen Jetta used to be the aspirational choice in the compact sedan segment. Travel back in time to the first decade of the 2000s, and amid the Civics, Corollas, Imprezas, Lancers, and Sentras of the world, the Jetta stood out for both its European styling and driving dynamics, as well as its premium, almost Audi-like cabin. Volkswagen of the era was focused on the "democratization of luxury," and the Jetta was at the forefront. Perhaps that's why the updated-for-2022 Volkswagen Jetta SEL is so disappointing.What's New With the 2022 Jetta?To be fair, maybe whatever the millennial equivalent of rose-colored glasses is (atomic purple Gameboys?) may have colored our expectations some. The 2022 Volkswagen Jetta is at its heart a midcycle update of a car one anonymous VW engineer called "boring" after we first drove the prototype back in 2017. When we tested the production model at the 2019 Car of the Year program, we thought the engineer undersold it some. "Cynical," and "forgettable," we called it.The changes to the 2022 Jetta are minor, but VW hopes they're enough to right the ship. The biggest change is under the hood. Gone is the 147-hp, 184-lb-ft 1.4-liter turbocharged I-4, and in its place is a new 1.5-liter turbocharged I-4 borrowed from the Volkswagen Taos crossover. The new four-pot makes 157 hp and the same 184 lb-ft of torque, albeit with that torque available at lower revs than in the outgoing engine. The Jetta's two transmissions, a six-speed manual and optional eight-speed automatic (tested here) carry over unchanged.You'll need to look closely for the 2022 Jetta's other changes. The sedan's nose and tail are subtly revised, and inside there is a digital instrument cluster, contrast stitching, and padded leatherette door armrests. Jetta prices start at $21,190, but our loaded Jetta SEL test car stickers for $29,185.How Quick Is the 2022 Jetta?With 10 new ponies under the hood, the 2022 Jetta is unsurprisingly quicker than pre-refresh models at the test track, accelerating from 0 to 60 mph in 7.6 seconds and through the quarter mile in 15.9 seconds at 88.2 mph. That's about mid-pack among compact sedans, and it's two-tenths quicker to 60 mph and one-tenth quicker at the dragstrip than the last automatic Jetta we tested, a 2019 model.Although the new Jetta is quicker in a straight line than the pre-refresh model, the picture is murkier once we start looking at braking, handling, and fuel efficiency. The updated car needed 127 feet to complete our 60-0-mph panic stop test, 6 feet more than the 2019 Jetta; on the figure eight, it brought in a 27.7-second lap where it averaged 0.61 g, a tenth of a second slower and 0.01 g less than the previous model. The 2022 Jetta is less efficient, too. It's EPA-rated at 29/40/33 mpg city/highway/combined, whereas the old model scored 30/40/34 mpg.Is It Any Better on the Road?The new engine is the best thing about the Jetta on the road. It'll never be mistaken for muscular, but the small 1.5-liter engine has a broad torque curve, and the eight-speed auto never feels shy about keeping the four-pot in its powerband with your foot down. Its only demerit? Some editors complained of inconsistent power delivery, especially at city speeds where the Jetta is prone to both lag and surge—a trait this powertrain also exhibits in the Taos.The Jetta drives a bit like the Taos, too, which makes sense considering it shares its MQB A1 platform with the SUV (the Golf, which was traditionally the hatchback version of the Jetta, rides on the MQB Evo platform). The VW's steering is joyless and vague, which is just as well because the softly sprung ride quickly gets out of sorts when the Jetta is driven with any urgency. Those looking for a more engaging compact sedan could buy a Jetta GLI, but they'll likely be better served by a Golf GTI or one of the Jetta's Japanese or South Korean rivals.A Weak Inside GameWhereas the hot-selling fourth- and fifth-gen Jettas (1999-2005 and 2006-10, respectively) featured cabins that "were rich in materials and textures but also darned well conceived," the interior of today's Jetta SEL is fairly basic, especially compared to its rivals. Once the initial distraction of the Audi-esque digital instrument cluster and front and rear heated seats fades, disappointment is sure to follow. Poking around the interior reveals flimsy, sweaty plastics, "wood grain" trim designed by someone who might never have seen wood before, and button delete panels (on a loaded car, mind you) that hint at features the Jetta could have included but didn't. What are they? Who knows—this Jetta SEL allegedly packs all the goodies.The cost-cutting in the back seat is the biggest letdown. Hop into the spacious rear seat, and the materials go from bad to worse. The few touches of attention to detail from the front of the cabin—chiefly the contrast stitching on the door panels and "wood" trim—are gone. In its place are yet more hard, cut-rate, black plastics. To be fair, some competitors turn down the wick somewhat on their rear-seat materials at lower price points, but here the priciest Jetta's front seat represents a pretty bargain basement starting point.The VerdictIn a crowded field of compact sedans, the Jetta is no longer an aspirational choice. For an expertly balanced mix of a high-quality premium-feeling cabin with satisfying driving dynamics at an affordable price, visit a Honda, Mazda, or Hyundai store. In the shrinking yet ever improving compact sedan segment, the Jetta stands out for, well, not standing out. Sure, the Jetta is fairly big and spacious for its class, but whether you're shopping for a feature-rich commuting appliance or something to spark a little joy, your money goes further elsewhere.Looks good! More details?2022 Volkswagen Jetta SEL (Premium) Specifications BASE PRICE $28,790 PRICE AS TESTED $29,185 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, FWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan ENGINE 1.5L Turbo direct-injected DOHC 16-valve I-4 POWER (SAE NET) 158 hp @ 5,500 rpm TORQUE (SAE NET) 184 lb-ft @ 1,750 rpm TRANSMISSION 8-speed automatic CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,121 lb (59/41%) WHEELBASE 105.7 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 186.5 x 70.8 x 57.7 in 0-60 MPH 7.6 sec QUARTER MILE 15.9 sec @ 88.2 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 127 ft LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.82 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 27.7 sec @ 0.61 g (avg) EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 29/40/33 mpg EPA RANGE, COMB 435 miles ON SALE Now Show All